I wonder about this -- is this a message from the team that Bruce needs to go?It might not be a coincidence that they play like shit as soon as Cassidy is back.
I wonder about this -- is this a message from the team that Bruce needs to go?It might not be a coincidence that they play like shit as soon as Cassidy is back.
Sad but true. And why all these duds on home ice?Completely uninspired performance. It's been a steady team since Cassidy came in, but they have never really fared that well when facing adversity, so this wasn't terribly unexpected.
Not a single one of the free agent signings from this offseason has been a positive this year.
Maybe jake has support in the room. We cant be this bad.I wonder about this -- is this a message from the team that Bruce needs to go?
Sure they can. For years, the team survived because they had two of the top 40 centres in the league in front of a consistently good goalie. They don’t anymore. Their prospect pool is puddle thin. They’ve failed to develop enough talent to offset guys leaving in free agency or trades. This likely gets worse before it gets better, especially if Bergeron goes into any kind of serious decline.Maybe jake has support in the room. We cant be this bad.
Personally, I would like to see if a different voice in the room would work before they go trading guys with 25-30 goal upside at his lowest point of value.It has nothing to do with Bruce or coaching. The players just suck. They can’t score to begin with and it becomes impossible when you take two of their best wingers away.
I agree with you, but thing is, they don’t even grind well. Other than Marchand and Bergeron, they’re not good on the wall. The roster is full of either small guys that get knocked off the puck, or bigger guys that play small.In my opinion they develop guys to grind instead of create.
Who has 25-30 goal upside?Personally, I would like to see if a different voice in the room would work before they go trading guys with 25-30 goal upside at his lowest point of value.
That being said, this is really on Sweeney for putting all of his off-season cap space into a bunch of stiffs. They would have been better off signing nobody and seeing what guys like Studnicka could do at this level.
And I agree with you. What’s the answer? Why hasn’t Frederick pummeled someone? Has he been neutered?I agree with you, but thing is, they don’t even grind well. Other than Marchand and Bergeron, they’re not good on the wall. The roster is full of either small guys that get knocked off the puck, or bigger guys that play small.
I feel like we're seeing the disastrous long-term effects of the Sweeney regime's management style. Years of risk-averse drafting, rental trades, and wildly undervaluing offensive skill have left them with UFAs as their only viable player acquisition option. And even there Sweeney is not great, exemplifying "the high price of mediocrity" all too well. I get the sinking feeling that this team completely wasted years of a Hall of Fame line.So, we’re back to that dead space we were in for the 2015-17 stretch, aren’t we?
That was 3.5 years ago and he shot 18% to get to 27 goals He has obviously butted heads with Bruce and maybe a new voice would be beneficial for him, he kind of is what he is.DeBrusk.
Let’s get him to 10 goal upside first maybe?DeBrusk.
How does he not have 25-30 goal upside? He scored 27 his second year and 19 in a shortened season after that. He’s had 1.5 bad seasons but I’m not ready to write a kid off that’s actually scored at this level when he’s 25.Let’s get him to 10 goal upside first maybe?
30 goal upside. Lol.
I’ll bet you the amount of your choice to the charity of your choice he doesn’t score 30 goals or more in either of the next…2 seasons? If he scores <25 I win, 25-29 it’s a wash, and if it’s 30 or more I lose. Deal?How does he not have 25-30 goal upside? He scored 27 his second year and 19 in a shortened season after that. He’s had 1.5 bad seasons but I’m not ready to write a kid off that’s actually scored at this level when he’s 25.
I guess we have different definitions of the upside. I never said it was probable, or even likely. No I wouldn’t bet on him scoring 25 next year, but he has done it before, and he’s still a young player, so it’s not out of the realm of possibility.I’ll bet you the amount of your choice to the charity of your choice he doesn’t score 30 goals or more in either of the next…2 seasons? If he scores <25 I win, 25-29 it’s a wash, and if it’s 30 or more I lose. Deal?
I never used the word likely. I said upside. Maybe I should have used the word ceiling instead.I’m not arguing for any of that. Just the idea that DeBrusk is likely to score 30 goals anytime soon is laughable.
It was actually the year before. And if DeBrusk was 30 years old, I would call him a veteran stiff as well if he was putting up 20 point seasons at age 30. At 30 Haula is not getting any better. At 25, DeBrusk may still get better. That’s why I used the phrase upside.Erik Haula has scored 29 goals almost* as recently as DeBrusk has scored 27. Why is he a veteran stiff and DeBrusk a potential 25-30 goal scorer?
25 and 30 are pretty similar in the NHL. DeBrusk is getting worse, not better.It was actually the year before. And if DeBrusk was 30 years old, I would call him a veteran stiff as well if he was putting up 20 point seasons at age 30. At 30 Haula is not getting any better. At 25, DeBrusk may still get better. That’s why I used the phrase upside.
Clearly.you're right. no sense trying anything different. won't work. everything's fine. stay the course.
I love you, but you're picking a fight where there isn't one to be picked. Nobody in this thread is saying what you're insinuating. DeBrusk isn't the savior, but he's clearly another talent that has been mishandled.Clearly.
I mean this team sucks. JDB is not their savior. I clearly would love to give Studnicka and some other guys some time but can’t really do that when they’re in the AHL. I’m directing my ire purely at the front office and the players, with a small amount (but not nothing) towards the coaching staff.
But I’m sure if we put DeBrusk with Coyle he’ll break out for those 25 goals.
This was me responding to a straw man with a straw man with a dabble of hyperbole for effect.I love you, but you're picking a fight where there isn't one to be picked. Nobody in this thread is saying what you're insinuating. DeBrusk isn't the savior, but he's clearly another talent that has been mishandled.
Time for an overhaul of the front office.
I think we can all agree on this.Time for an overhaul of the front office.
I don't know the right answer honestly. He was a young kid with lots of potential that fell off a cliff. There's a lot of blame to go around when that happens, including with him obviously.I would argue on the mishandled part given he’s been given every chance to not suck prior to this year on a previously good second line until they couldn’t handle the suck anymore and had to move him down because it gave them the best chance to win.
The sad part is that the unwatchable crew includes the only Hart Trophy winner on the roster, the guy they wish they drafted in 2010.Outside of the four superstars, this team is unwatchable.
I think it's pretty clear that what happened was Nazem Kadri. And I'm willing to give him a pass the year after because coming back from something like that sucks for a lot of players for a lot longer then people would think. All I'm saying is it seems like he's done what they wanted from him this year but he's in Bruce's doghouse that has no exits.I don't know the right answer honestly. He was a young kid with lots of potential that fell off a cliff. There's a lot of blame to go around when that happens, including with him obviously.
This is a sneaky part of the uncomfortable direction this team is taking and is getting obscured by the DeBrusk saga. If Hall just happily cashed in a couple months of inspired play at the end of last year and is retreating to his level of play in Buffalo, that's a dagger.The sad part is that the unwatchable crew includes the only Hart Trophy winner on the roster, the guy they wish they drafted in 2010.
Or maybe he just needs someone more skilled to play with than Charlie Coyle, for whom it could also be stated, happily cashed in a couple months of inspired play at the end of 2019, and has retreating to his level of play in Minnesota, which is a real dagger for a team desperate for a number 2 center.This is a sneaky part of the uncomfortable direction this team is taking and is getting obscured by the DeBrusk saga. If Hall just happily cashed in a couple months of inspired play at the end of last year and is retreating to his level of play in Buffalo, that's a dagger.
Well, I miss David Krejci so much it hurts. I can only imagine how Hall feels. He and Coyle are a pretty good pairing on paper, but not on the ice, so far.Or maybe he just needs someone more skilled to play with than Charlie Coyle, for whom it could also be stated, happily cashed in a couple months of inspired play at the end of 2019, and has retreating to his level of play in Minnesota, which is a real dagger for a team desperate for a number 2 center.
To me, Coyle is the most aggravating player on this roster because we’ve seen what he can be when he’s engaged and motivated. Last year’s excuse was the knee. What’s his excuse this year?