Bruins to acquire Lindholm

Jordu

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2003
9,031
Brookline
Friedman and Lebrun have both reported they are working on an extension. I'd guess 8X$7, which is not without risk.
If that happens then the Bruins will have three big mobile defensemen locked up through 2027. That would be huge.

Now Sweeney needs to move DeBrusk and a prospect or two for a top six forward.
 

The Mort Report

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 5, 2007
7,097
Concord
It also looks like the Bruins are getting D Kodie Curran. 32, apparently was really good over seas, named the top player in Sweden in 2020 with over a point per game. In the AHL, hasn't been able to make it all the way up. Wonder how he made it into the deal
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,873
It also looks like the Bruins are getting D Kodie Curran. 32, apparently was really good over seas, named the top player in Sweden in 2020 with over a point per game. In the AHL, hasn't been able to make it all the way up. Wonder how he made it into the deal
LOL, I saw that earlier, but wasn't sure it was worth mentioning. Maybe the Providence Zamboni is broken and he knows how to fix it?
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,761
It also looks like the Bruins are getting D Kodie Curran. 32, apparently was really good over seas, named the top player in Sweden in 2020 with over a point per game. In the AHL, hasn't been able to make it all the way up. Wonder how he made it into the deal
That sounds like PJ saying "hey ask for Curran as a throw in."
 

The Mort Report

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 5, 2007
7,097
Concord
Oh I don't think he matters at all, but its just kinda weird since he's not on the NHL roster so its not like he counts on the cap to offset salary. The B's must have wanted him
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,246
306, row 14
Oh I don't think he matters at all, but its just kinda weird since he's not on the NHL roster so its not like he counts on the cap to offset salary. The B's must have wanted him
It’s to balance contracts. Anaheim probably didn’t want to go +2 in contracts on the trade.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,799
Alamogordo
Oh my. A top four of Chuck, Lindholm, Carlo and Grz for the foreseeable future (at least the next two seasons) makes me really happy.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,246
306, row 14
It’s a pretty big bet that his recent statistical decline is more related to his situation and bad team than anything else. The analytic types are cautious but point to solid micro stats as a reason for optimism.

I’m pretty happy here. I think they sold high on Vaak. Clearing Moore out is obviously good. The picks are steep but that’s the going rate. They’ve been looking for a top 4 defenseman for years and finally took the plunge. They weren’t going to get one for a 4th and Senyshyn, they were gonna have to pay big.
 

Dummy Hoy

Angry Pissbum
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2006
8,249
Falmouth
It’s a pretty big bet that his recent statistical decline is more related to his situation and bad team than anything else. The analytic types are cautious but point to solid micro stats as a reason for optimism.

I’m pretty happy here. I think they sold high on Vaak. Clearing Moore out is obviously good. The picks are steep but that’s the going rate. They’ve been looking for a top 4 defenseman for years and finally took the plunge. They weren’t going to get one for a 4th and Senyshyn, they were gonna have to pay big.
this is my concern, especially locking up a guy roaring into his 30s. Definitely helps the team right now tho
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,538
Our last two major European mid-season LHD acquisitions got their name on the Cup. It’s go time.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,233
CA
To be able to get a top pairing D at age 27 for 8 years at $6.5m for a 1st and two 2nds when rentals are going for a 1st and 3rd is a pretty fucking great deal. For all the shit that Sweeney gets in here, this is an outstanding move.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,161
Tuukka's refugee camp
I like the trade but don’t love the extension. 8 years is a lot of years and there are only 52 35+ players and 33 36+ players. Only 5 of the 36+ ones are defensemen. The last couple years could look very bad.
 

bibajesus

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
968
I like the trade but don’t love the extension. 8 years is a lot of years and there are only 52 35+ players and 33 36+ players. Only 5 of the 36+ ones are defensemen. The last couple years could look very bad.
Donny can just trade him back to Anaheim when he gets old.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,761
Before Lindholm broke his wrist and came back to play with a 19 year old who has never passed his own blueline, he was regarded as one of the most underrated D in the league. He was Jaccob Slavin before Jaccob Slavin. Up until 2019, he was a legit #1D. You have to hope that the good entry and exit numbers are a good picture of his true talent level. His numbers will improve with either Chuck or Carlo and I suspect that $6.5 will look like a steal for a while. He basically needs to recover to 1.5 WAR type play for it to be right. I think he will, but the end of that deal might suck. hopefully the cap rises enough that it doesnt matter.


50282
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,233
CA
Before Lindholm broke his wrist and came back to play with a 19 year old who has never passed his own blueline, he was regarded as one of the most underrated D in the league. He was Jaccob Slavin before Jaccob Slavin. Up until 2019, he was a legit #1D. You have to hope that the good entry and exit numbers are a good picture of his true talent level. His numbers will improve with either Chuck or Carlo and I suspect that $6.5 will look like a steal for a while. He basically needs to recover to 1.5 WAR type play for it to be right. I think he will, but the end of that deal might suck. hopefully the cap rises enough that it doesnt matter.


View attachment 50282
Even if the lat 2-3 years fell off a cliff, with some expectation in an increased salary cap 6 years from now, how much impact would $6.5 aav really have? Worst case, it doesn’t feel like it would be that much of an issue. I would get it if it was an 8-10m aav deal, but this feels well worth the risk with minimal downside.
 

burstnbloom

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 12, 2005
2,761
Even if the lat 2-3 years fell off a cliff, with some expectation in an increased salary cap 6 years from now, how much impact would $6.5 aav really have? Worst case, it doesn’t feel like it would be that much of an issue. I would get it if it was an 8-10m aav deal, but this feels well worth the risk with minimal downside.
ya I would agree. Also in 8 years it’s likely this team is largely unrecognizable to today’s anyway.If it’s an issue, it should be a minor issue.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,786
Melrose, MA
Isn't the (theoretical) point of the 8 year deal is that ~$50M is the going rate regardless of years, so in some sense it is better for Boston to go 8 years than 6 years to keep AAV down. The cap will be higher in 7-8 years so even if the contract doesn't look as good in thise years it will be easier to manage. Finally, good defensemen tend to maintain a value pretty well even after their peak.

I haven't followed the Bruins as closely as I used to, and I have no idea who Lindholm is. But the Bruins gave up a king's ransom for him.

Is he a legit #2, or at least someone who can play as a #2 on this Bruin team? If so then with the extension I can see the logic of the deal.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,873
Isn't the (theoretical) point of the 8 year deal is that ~$50M is the going rate regardless of years, so in some sense it is better for Boston to go 8 years than 6 years to keep AAV down. The cap will be higher in 7-8 years so even if the contract doesn't look as good in thise years it will be easier to manage. Finally, good defensemen tend to maintain a value pretty well even after their peak.

I haven't followed the Bruins as closely as I used to, and I have no idea who Lindholm is. But the Bruins gave up a king's ransom for him.

Is he a legit #2, or at least someone who can play as a #2 on this Bruin team? If so then with the extension I can see the logic of the deal.
I don't get this. They gave up a dead-weight player (Moore), a defenseman in Vaak whose ceiling is second pair, but is more likely to be a bottom pair or #7, so not much on the player front. As for picks, they gave up a low first, a low second, and what's likely to be a mid-to-low second. Those are all crap-shoot picks (especially with the way the Bruins draft). They're not nothing, but they're largely lottery tickets.

EDIT: And to answer your question, we'll see how he fits in with the B's, but I think he's a legit #2 to pair with McAvoy.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,786
Melrose, MA
I don't get this. They gave up a dead-weight player (Moore), a defenseman in Vaak whose ceiling is second pair, but is more likely to be a bottom pair or #7, so not much on the player front. As for picks, they gave up a low first, a low second, and what's likely to be a mid-to-low second. Those are all crap-shoot picks (especially with the way the Bruins draft). They're not nothing, but they're largely lottery tickets.

EDIT: And to answer your question, we'll see how he fits in with the B's, but I think he's a legit #2 to pair with McAvoy.
Moore was addition by subtraction. Vaakanainen, a first, and 2 seconds is a LOT to give up. But if you are right about Lindholm and the extension happens, then it may be a very good deal.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,538
The Bruins are just the right mix of great at hockey, good at trading and extending, and bad at drafting and/or developing such that their picks are inherently devalued leading to this constant cycle of trading them and being fine with it.

They make it work for them, mostly because they tend not to splurge on rentals, but I do hope the next regime has a better eye for the draft, acknowledging of course that it’s generally a crapshoot anyway.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,873
The bad at drafting perception is a hill I will have to die on.
"Bad" isn't a word I'd use. "Hit or miss" is better, but that's true of most organizations and doesn't change my point, which is that the picks that they gave up are more likely to be misses than hits.
 

veritas

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2009
3,151
Somerville, MA
I’m not gonna get into the Bruins draft history, but these picks are all much more likely to be hits than misses no matter who is making them.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,479
Even if the lat 2-3 years fell off a cliff, with some expectation in an increased salary cap 6 years from now, how much impact would $6.5 aav really have? Worst case, it doesn’t feel like it would be that much of an issue. I would get it if it was an 8-10m aav deal, but this feels well worth the risk with minimal downside.
I've been a Linholm stan for a few years. I'm comfortable saying that he'll earn his contract.
I’m not gonna get into the Bruins draft history, but these picks are all much more likely to be hits than misses no matter who is making them.
Meh. They got a 1B/2A defenseman for a late first, an average prospect, and some flyer draft picks. If people are up in arms about this, there isn't a trade to be had they'd like.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,207
Missoula, MT
Yep and with ANA retaining 50% of salary, this is a cap neutral trade that keeps the Bs in the market for a 2C/ top 6 forward. I also think this trade is what extends Bergy.

This trade is perfect.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,233
CA
I've been a Linholm stan for a few years. I'm comfortable saying that he'll earn his contract.


Meh. They got a 1B/2A defenseman for a late first, an average prospect, and some flyer draft picks. If people are up in arms about this, there isn't a trade to be had they'd like.
Yeah, and it feels like throwing in Moore and getting Anaheim to take the 50% is what cost the extra 2nd round pick — which is basically the Bruins paying for the chance to add another player (2C) by Monday — so it is really getting a 1B/2A for the next 8 years for a late 1st, 2nd, and an average prospect. Based on the market, this feels like an A+ to me.
 

Maximus

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
5,774
Great job by Donny getting a 1A/2B LHD and extending him to make him part of the core going forward, very happy with the addition. Interested to see if he can can find an impact forward, ideally a 2C, prior to the deadline with $5M of cap to work with.
 

veritas

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2009
3,151
Somerville, MA
I meant to say whoever makes these picks, they are much more likely to be misses than hits. They’re lottery tickets and I love this trade
 

4 6 3 DP

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 24, 2001
2,378
Using picks to increase the chances of another title with this group is entirely the right thing to do. Locking down the top 4 defense for a while, even better.
 

TheRealness

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2006
11,698
The Dirty Shire
I’ve always been a believer that you win from the defense out. This guy is really good at defense. The Bruins needed a shutdown guy on the left side, and they got one of the best in the league at it. They are a better team today. He should make a big difference against the top 3 in the east (Carolina, Tampa and Florida ).