Brayan Bello signed to a 6 year, $55 million extension

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,157
The Bello and Rafaela contracts are commitments but by no means are they detrimental if they don't work out. They combine for a total hit of $15M on the luxury tax payroll each season, compared to $18M for Yoshida and $29M for Devers. That's a minor inconvenience if they flame out entirely and a bargain and a half if they come close to their ceilings.
Yeah that’s fair. I just view it as a judgment call by the FO and you want to see more hits than misses in that category. I mean, even if it’s not a huge risk, those deals you make bc you expect those guys to develop - I just hope their judgment is sound more often than not on such decisions.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,314
Yeah that’s fair. I just view it as a judgment call by the FO and you want to see more hits than misses in that category. I mean, even if it’s not a huge risk, those deals you make bc you expect those guys to develop - I just hope their judgment is sound more often than not on such decisions.
No doubt it's a little awkward when your two of your prearb extensions im the last year are two of the guys who've underperformed relative to expectations, while the young guys who are outstanding are still making 700k. But it's far too early to evaluate these deals, of course.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,868
Maine
Yeah that’s fair. I just view it as a judgment call by the FO and you want to see more hits than misses in that category.
100%. It's just way too early to know whether they're hits or misses.

It's interesting that the first of the early extensions the recent FOs gave out was to Whitlock. Based on how it's worked out so far, it's arguably a miss but it hasn't warranted mentioning because it's not prohibitive in the least.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
82,039
Whitlock and Bello were fine extensions. This isn't Rusney or Hanley money/percentage of LT cap, and isn't in the same stratosphere as the Panda contract.

And yeah, it's waaaaaaaaay too early to criticize for Bello.
 

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,846
Chicago, IL
Whitlock and Bello were fine extensions. This isn't Rusney or Hanley money/percentage of LT cap, and isn't in the same stratosphere as the Panda contract.

And yeah, it's waaaaaaaaay too early to criticize for Bello.
Although they controlled Bello for a quite while yet ...there was time to test his performance a bit longer before extending. It did seem a little rushed IMO.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,436
If this turns out to be true, it’s concerning as it relates to the FO (I know we have had two baseball heads during this time but there is some continuity in the FO). Our big contracts:

- devers (great hitter but not a 3b imo)
- Rafaela (certainly a gamble)
- Yoshi (an objectively bad contract to a DH on a team with too many DHs that sorely needs better D)
- Bello

no wonder Henry is skiddish about big deals
Yoshida wasn't signed by the existing front office. Technically neither was Devers, but I'm not sure the current Red Sox front office would have made a different call there.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,157
Yoshida wasn't signed by the existing front office. Technically neither was Devers, but I'm not sure the current Red Sox front office would have made a different call there.
i get that but there are plenty of guys in the FO who have spanned the bloom and Breslow eras
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,740
Rogers Park
Although they controlled Bello for a quite while yet ...there was time to test his performance a bit longer before extending. It did seem a little rushed IMO.
Once he’s proven himself and is closer to FA, there’s no way he signs a deal in that price range. That seems like it warrants mention in these discussions.

IMO, we shouldn’t extend every young player, but all of our extensions should be “too early.” Will there be some implosions? Yes. But those implosions will be at low AAVs that will be much less debilitating than FA misses.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,740
Rogers Park
Also, it’s notable that this discussion leaves out Story, who has the worst contract on the team by a mile.

Yoshida’s contract is a bit underwater performance-wise, but that’s only a problem because he fits the roster so poorly. I expect we’ll find a taker for him, maybe picking up $10 or 15m in the process. Story’s deal is miles underwater, but a better fit: if healthy and performing, he’d be exactly what we need.
 

billy ashley

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,264
Washington DC
Bello has a 3.76 xFIP, better than Crawford. If he was rocking a 3.5 ERA right now, no one would be complaining about the extension. Bello has been fine, if a little unlucky. The HR rate is a tick high but overall this has been a step forward for him.
 

donutogre

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,484
Philadelphia
Bello has a 3.76 xFIP, better than Crawford. If he was rocking a 3.5 ERA right now, no one would be complaining about the extension. Bello has been fine, if a little unlucky. The HR rate is a tick high but overall this has been a step forward for him.
Non-snarky question: by what measure has this been a step forward for him? I don't see anything that shows an improvement over last season. And yes the xFIP is what it is, but the stats that measure what actually has happened are not looking great. He's giving up more HRs and walking more people, and has a negative WAR and an ERA+ well under 100 at this point.
 

billy ashley

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,264
Washington DC
Non-snarky question: by what measure has this been a step forward for him? I don't see anything that shows an improvement over last season. And yes the xFIP is what it is, but the stats that measure what actually has happened are not looking great. He's giving up more HRs and walking more people, and has a negative WAR and an ERA+ well under 100 at this point.

He's continuing to post groundball rates, while seeing his K rate tick up. I think you can rightly point out the BB rate has also increased but that was always going to happen (I never thought he was a 2.5 BB per 9 guy). I think the HR issue is probably both bad execution and bad some bad luck but he looks like a solid 3/4 starting pitcher with some upside for more.

It would probably have been more accurate to say, he's more or less the same pitcher as he was last year, which is already a good SP. If he can drop that HR rate to 1.3, he should be a 3.50 xfip guy
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
21,823
Row 14
Non-snarky question: by what measure has this been a step forward for him? I don't see anything that shows an improvement over last season. And yes the xFIP is what it is, but the stats that measure what actually has happened are not looking great. He's giving up more HRs and walking more people, and has a negative WAR and an ERA+ well under 100 at this point.
His pitches have regressed a bit. Bello is still young but this is probably what we are looking at, a solid middle of the rotation SP which is contract is really good for. Bello is not Kutter or Houck which is fine. Moving into a three year window with those three makes them somewhat viable as a playoff team going forward if the Red Sox actually try to invest in the team a bit.
 

donutogre

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,484
Philadelphia
That's all fair on all fronts... I still hope for a bit more from him, and think it's possible. He isn't Kutter yet — but through his age 26 season, Kutter had only thrown 79 unimpressive MLB innings. Despite the fact that this season hasn't been the step forward I think everyone was hoping for (yet), I also feel like there's still time for that step forward to happen. Fingers crossed!
 

TomRicardo

rusty cohlebone
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 6, 2006
21,823
Row 14
That's all fair on all fronts... I still hope for a bit more from him, and think it's possible. He isn't Kutter yet — but through his age 26 season, Kutter had only thrown 79 unimpressive MLB innings. Despite the fact that this season hasn't been the step forward I think everyone was hoping for (yet), I also feel like there's still time for that step forward to happen. Fingers crossed!
Of course it is possible. That said the contract has a ton of value for what he is if he doesn't as well as that does not preclude the Sox from competing. I don't get why people try to drag Kutter down to build Bello up. Kutter has become a top of the rotation starter though he has dragged a bit lately. Bello really doesn't have the pitches yet to take that next step.

While I think it is highly possible Houck could take a step back next year, if you start your rotation with Houck, Crawford, Bello you are in a solid spot. You still need another power bat preferably RHH and to find more pitching depth.
 

donutogre

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,484
Philadelphia
Oh, to be clear, I love what Kutter has become in the last two seasons! I have been surprised and delighted, and would be thrilled if Bello gets there... but even if he doesn't, a mid-rotation guy who can give innings at his cost is great. If those three guys you mention can continue doing what they're doing or improve a little, it's a great rotation.
 

cantor44

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 23, 2020
1,846
Chicago, IL
Once he’s proven himself and is closer to FA, there’s no way he signs a deal in that price range. That seems like it warrants mention in these discussions.

IMO, we shouldn’t extend every young player, but all of our extensions should be “too early.” Will there be some implosions? Yes. But those implosions will be at low AAVs that will be much less debilitating than FA misses.
I wonder if there's a middle ground. The Sox extended him without much MLB data at all ..what if they waited until the off season? It would still be well before he's reached FA. Sure if they wait until October and he has a good season and the price goes up. But it still wouldn't be gotten-to-FA range. He has a bad season, and maybe they're happy they didn't extend quite yet.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,740
Rogers Park
I wonder if there's a middle ground. The Sox extended him without much MLB data at all ..what if they waited until the off season? It would still be well before he's reached FA. Sure if they wait until October and he has a good season and the price goes up. But it still wouldn't be gotten-to-FA range. He has a bad season, and maybe they're happy they didn't extend quite yet.
Or, in other words, how they played it with Mookie.

There’s risk there, too.
 
Last edited:

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,740
Rogers Park
Did they make an extension offer to Mookie after his first full season? I don't remember, tbh.
No, they did not.

The first offer (5/$100m) came *after* the 2016 season, his second full season, a 9.5 bWAR season in which he finished second in MVP voting. The move would have been to offer him something in that range *before* that season.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
27,385
He's got lots of talent. He is young and needs to harness it. He may never do it though. We will see. I'm not opposed to demoting him for a little bit but honestly, I think he just needs to be out there.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,634
Kind of disappointing that the pitching gurus can’t figure him out although may be more mental than mechanical. Looks like a lost year and I’m definitely discounting him more in future roster planning. Everything seemed to get worse after his injury so wondering if that messed with his mechanics.
 

Otis Foster

rex ryan's podiatrist
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,803
Kind of disappointing that the pitching gurus can’t figure him out although may be more mental than mechanical. Looks like a lost year and I’m definitely discounting him more in future roster planning. Everything seemed to get worse after his injury so wondering if that messed with his mechanics.
Do the Red Sox have any dedicated personnel to work with mental health issues? Bello is still very young and showing a tendency to allow his emotions to override the composure necessary to pitch in the big leagues.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
49,634
Do the Red Sox have any dedicated personnel to work with mental health issues? Bello is still very young and showing a tendency to allow his emotions to override the composure necessary to pitch in the big leagues.
That’s a good question. Feels like a combination of mechanics and mental makeup but hard not to notice that every start seems to have an inning that doesn’t go right where he starts to unravel a bit. He isn’t a very resilient player but hopefully better maturity will come.
 

Tony Pena's Gas Cloud

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 12, 2019
439
I would have demoted him after his on-field tantrum against the White Sox. This is eight straight awful outings (he got lucky his last start - there were a lot of loud outs). Give Wink or Criswell his spot in the rotation and send him down until he learns to control both his pitches and his emotions.
 

Mueller's Twin Grannies

critical thinker
SoSH Member
Dec 19, 2009
9,563
No idea what Pedro saw in this kid beyond a countryman with a good pitch repertoire. Maybe he'll figure it out, but he seems to have no idea what to do when it's not going his way. Thankfully they aren't paying him Sale money, otherwise that contract would be even more troubling. Not to commit blasphemy, but maybe Pedro isn't the best talent scout or mentor. Maybe he was fooled like the rest of us. I think he needs a break, but how do you give him the Mike Hampton treatment at this point? It's far too early to think about relocation, but taking the pressure off with a stint in Worcester might be the happy medium.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,157
Or, in other words, how they played it with Mookie.

There’s risk there, too.
On some level this is my concern, that they over-corrrected for the betts miss.

Overall this ownership group has been a huge blessing for us fans but they do seem to swing from one philosophy to another. Some examples:

- after cherington era wasn’t working, swung completely to a diff philosophy with DD…then back again to Bloom

- after missing on a Lester re-sign, signed price for a couple brinks trucks

- after Tito’s crew collapsed (perception: too much of a player’s coach), they brought on valentine to bring discipline (laughable)

- etc

Maybe the rafaela and Bello deals work out, but did they need to move that fast?
 

SoxFanInPdx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
3,358
Portland, OR
As much as some of us would like to see them send Bello down, I don’t think they’ll want to damage his confidence even more. Although, they should. Just no real starting depth to do it.

I’ve not been impressed at all to say the least. He may be young, but he’s either hiding an injury or he needs a serious overhaul in mechanics this offseason. No control or command, no out pitch. Absolutely not fooling anyone.

On top of all that, he just comes off the rails way too easy mentally. I’ve hated the extension from the onset: Rooting for him to turn it around at some point, but he can’t be trusted.
 

Archer1979

shazowies
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
9,034
Right Here
Give him some time. This is a pitcher who suffers from the OBIs (one bad inning). He's got the stuff to turn it around. Just needs time and maturity in order to do it.

The obvious cure-all to this is to work out of a jam and build on that. It seems like once the runners start getting on he starts to lose the focus on the batter... which leads to OBI.
 

LoLsapien

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 5, 2022
456
Bryan's xFIP is 3.83. His gb/fb ratio, velocity, average EV, max EV, and barrel% are basically the same as last year, hard hit percent is actually down a full 10% compared to last year. Slider usage is up quite a bit, fastball usage is... Gone? Is that right? Distribution of where the hits are going is quite a bit different than last year, with more hits going center and oppo, versus pull, but I have no idea if that's informative. He's 25.

I dunno, if someone wants to buy a put on this guy that expires in a year, I guess I'll take the other side of that trade.
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
22,662
Bryan's xFIP is 3.83. His gb/fb ratio, velocity, average EV, max EV, and barrel% are basically the same as last year, hard hit percent is actually down a full 10% compared to last year. Slider usage is up quite a bit, fastball usage is... Gone? Is that right? Distribution of where the hits are going is quite a bit different than last year, with more hits going center and oppo, versus pull, but I have no idea if that's informative. He's 25.

I dunno, if someone wants to buy a put on this guy that expires in a year, I guess I'll take the other side of that trade.
He’s not making real money. This is a very low risk gamble for a team with the resources that should be available to the Sox. Sign me up for your position. I’d rather gamble on a bunch of guys like this for relatively low money than lose a guy like you know who again by not taking the risk early.
 

Daniel_Son

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2021
2,068
San Diego
Some of us were ready to ship Houck and Duran a couple years ago, too. I don't really think there's anything to do but let him work through it. It's not like they have someone forcing the issue in the minors to replace him with. He's shown he can be a really good pitcher. It sucks to watch sometimes, but this is part of fielding a young, inexperienced team. I have faith that Breslow and Bailey have the coaching skills to help him through the growing pains.
 

johnnyfromspain

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
64
Given that I live in Europe, with the time difference, it is impossible for me to see night games live. However, this morning I have seen the condensed game summary MLB.com offers.
After having played the game since the mid 70's and being a coach for more than 25 years, I saw Bello go through something I have seen hundreds of times with young, inexperienced pitchers: he came unravelled.
Granted, he did not seem to be very sharp in the first couple of innings and was lucky enough to have some hard hit balls caught by his teammates (see the sharp line drive to 1B, which ended up being a double play!). He was obviously very well aware of the fact that he wasn't having a very good outing, although he had not given up a run in the first two innings. And this is something that lingers in the back of a pitcher's mind.
Unfortunately, he started off the third inning by giving up a double, then he had to endure two straight poor defensive plays which should have been outs (a solid 3B would not have fumbled the weak bunt, and a good defensive 2B should have fielded the ground ball, which in addition Abreu ended up airmailing to the dugout). These three consecutive plays obviously affected Bello's confidence. And here comes the moment of truth. Successful pitchers are capable of overcoming these adversities, but inexperienced ones end up suffering a long rally.
After those plays, the pitching coach should have gone to the mound to make sure his pitcher was focused on the next hitter. Again, since I did not see the game, I am not aware if this took place or not. If not, this is a mistake committed by the coaching staff.
Obviously, Bello was not focused at that moment and this caused him to walk the next two hitters. It was a snowball effect after that. And it cost the Sox a 7 run inning, and ultimately the game.
With experience, a pitcher is able to "flush" all negative thoughts from his mind after the hard hit double and two consecutive errors, although it is no easy task.
This is something Breslow and Bailey will have to work with Bello: mental fortitude.
Will they be able to help Bello overcome these mental lapses? I certainly hope so, and being the optimist that I am, I believe they will, but it will take time, effort, and renewed self-confidence.
 

SinkingLowe

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 28, 2012
84
Maine
No idea what Pedro saw in this kid beyond a countryman with a good pitch repertoire. Maybe he'll figure it out, but he seems to have no idea what to do when it's not going his way. Thankfully they aren't paying him Sale money, otherwise that contract would be even more troubling. Not to commit blasphemy, but maybe Pedro isn't the best talent scout or mentor. Maybe he was fooled like the rest of us. I think he needs a break, but how do you give him the Mike Hampton treatment at this point? It's far too early to think about relocation, but taking the pressure off with a stint in Worcester might be the happy medium.
I love Pedro, but you may be right about his ability as a talent scout. IIRC, Pedro was also very high on Rubby De La Rosa and people were upset about trading him for Wade Miley.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,868
Maine
That's been the case since spring training began, no? Reduction or elimination of 4-seamers has been one of Bailey's more universal influences since arriving.

2023 usage vs 2024 usage of 4-seamer
Bello 20.6% - 0.0%
Houck 9.9% - 0.0%
Crawford 39.2% - 33.7%
Pivetta 50.6% - 48.8%
Winckowski 4.9% - 1.8%
Whitlock 0.4% - 0.0%
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,436
No idea what Pedro saw in this kid beyond a countryman with a good pitch repertoire. Maybe he'll figure it out, but he seems to have no idea what to do when it's not going his way. Thankfully they aren't paying him Sale money, otherwise that contract would be even more troubling. Not to commit blasphemy, but maybe Pedro isn't the best talent scout or mentor. Maybe he was fooled like the rest of us. I think he needs a break, but how do you give him the Mike Hampton treatment at this point? It's far too early to think about relocation, but taking the pressure off with a stint in Worcester might be the happy medium.
There was a lot more to the Sox signing Bello than having Pedro be a fan. He tore through multiple seasons in the minors and then showed an ability to get major league hitters out in 2022/23. That's not nothing, and a pitcher with his stuff can earn a handsome sum in the open market.

The Sox indeed took a risk signing him early. The advantage is that if the risk doesn't pan out, the financial consequences are nowhere that of signing a veteran free agent pitcher and having him not work out. There are worse pitchers in the majors making more than $19M (Bello's 2029 contract value). There's no reason to trade him at this point.

Bello clearly needs to work some things out. Whether the best way to do that is a temporary assignment to the minors, a move the bullpen, some time on the IL, or continuing to take the ball every 5 days is literally unknowable to anyone here.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
7,569
For the people who wanted to wait to sign him- there’s a quandary-
Imagine he has the season he’s having now but unsigned still (unextended)…. But he puts together a good few games in September and it looks like he’s “back”. I imagine those same people would be cautious extending him then- not trusting his late season improvements…. So want to see what he has in ‘25. Imagine he turns in the season long performance we hoped he would have this season then. Now after ‘25 he’s becoming arb eligible and getting closer to FA…. His extension is going to likely cost more or he may decide to just go with his arb raises and look for a big payday.
The time to ensure an extension was this past offseason IMO. If he just is average he is still a good value, if he poops out completely it’s not a terrible loss.
 

Sin Duda

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,174
(B)Austin Texas
Given that I live in Europe, with the time difference, it is impossible for me to see night games live. However, this morning I have seen the condensed game summary MLB.com offers.
After having played the game since the mid 70's and being a coach for more than 25 years, I saw Bello go through something I have seen hundreds of times with young, inexperienced pitchers: he came unravelled.
Granted, he did not seem to be very sharp in the first couple of innings and was lucky enough to have some hard hit balls caught by his teammates (see the sharp line drive to 1B, which ended up being a double play!). He was obviously very well aware of the fact that he wasn't having a very good outing, although he had not given up a run in the first two innings. And this is something that lingers in the back of a pitcher's mind.
Unfortunately, he started off the third inning by giving up a double, then he had to endure two straight poor defensive plays which should have been outs (a solid 3B would not have fumbled the weak bunt, and a good defensive 2B should have fielded the ground ball, which in addition Abreu ended up airmailing to the dugout). These three consecutive plays obviously affected Bello's confidence. And here comes the moment of truth. Successful pitchers are capable of overcoming these adversities, but inexperienced ones end up suffering a long rally.
After those plays, the pitching coach should have gone to the mound to make sure his pitcher was focused on the next hitter. Again, since I did not see the game, I am not aware if this took place or not. If not, this is a mistake committed by the coaching staff.
Obviously, Bello was not focused at that moment and this caused him to walk the next two hitters. It was a snowball effect after that. And it cost the Sox a 7 run inning, and ultimately the game.
With experience, a pitcher is able to "flush" all negative thoughts from his mind after the hard hit double and two consecutive errors, although it is no easy task.
This is something Breslow and Bailey will have to work with Bello: mental fortitude.
Will they be able to help Bello overcome these mental lapses? I certainly hope so, and being the optimist that I am, I believe they will, but it will take time, effort, and renewed self-confidence.
Really appreciate this perspective, JFS. Are you originally from the Boston area? What started your Sox fandom? And can we put Bello on the IL for "unraveling syndrome"? ;-)
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
7,569
Is it time to think a little more critically of Bailey?
He’s clearly helped Houck but Bello not so much.
Pivetta is about what anyone should have expected knowing his history. Crawford too. Maybe Criswell he was great for?
 

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
1,567
xFIP corrects the HR/FB% to 10.5%, which is one of the reasons it is so much lower than his ERA. Among pitchers who have pitched more than 70 innings, Bello's HR/FB rate is the highest in the major leagues. In 2023 Bello had the 11th highest HR/FB% in the majors among pitchers who pitched more than 100 innings. It's a major reason why I think his xFIP looks better than his FIP.

Based on just watching it looks like he is struggling with control - and I wonder if abandoning the 4 seamer also meant abandoning his go-to pitch when he needed a strike.
FWIW.


84724
 

SirPsychoSquints

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 13, 2005
6,445
Pittsburgh, PA
Is it time to think a little more critically of Bailey?
He’s clearly helped Houck but Bello not so much.
Pivetta is about what anyone should have expected knowing his history. Crawford too. Maybe Criswell he was great for?
Top 7 in IP, actual FIP vs. ZIPS FIP

  • Houck 2.20 v 4.34
  • Crawford 3.99 v 4.20
  • Bello 4.83 v 4.03
  • Pivetta 4.42 v 4.45
  • Criswell 3.69 v 4.60
  • Anderson 5.61 v 5.67
  • Slaten 2.32 v 4.59
A straight average of each of these is 3.87 actual FIP vs. 4.55 ZIPS FIP, but obviously that's drive by Houck & Slaten. WIthout those two, it's 4.51 v 4.59.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,868
Maine
Is it time to think a little more critically of Bailey?
He’s clearly helped Houck but Bello not so much.
Pivetta is about what anyone should have expected knowing his history. Crawford too. Maybe Criswell he was great for?
Perhaps. Some players just don't click with certain coaches and vice versa. That said, even just 2.5 months into a season isn't a huge sample size to determine anything conclusively. Bello's issues now aren't that dissimilar to what was happening last year, and other than an adjustment to his pitch mix (dumping the 4-seamer), we really don't know exactly what or how much Bailey has done or tried to do with him.

There's another way to look at it though, and others have alluded to it already. It could just be normal growing pains. Houck had his own set of issues (third time through the order, stamina, etc) and perhaps his current success is as much a result of his own growth as "Bailey magic." Could also be that Bailey made some adjustment (like eliminating the 4-seamer) that enabled everything to click into place for Houck. Could be he just happened to arrive when Houck was putting it all together anyway. Meanwhile Bello's at a different stage than Houck and it could take more work to find the right formula. Maybe it doesn't happen this year. Maybe 12 months from now we're marveling at the change and improvement Bello has made to become a top of the rotation star. Or maybe he's just what he is...an average, middle of the rotation starter with bouts of inconsistency.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
48,419
Is it time to think a little more critically of Bailey?
He’s clearly helped Houck but Bello not so much.
Pivetta is about what anyone should have expected knowing his history. Crawford too. Maybe Criswell he was great for?
it seems its a mental thing with Bello... That's not something a Pitching coach can fix on their own