Brayan Bello signed to a 6 year, $55 million extension

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
18,103
100%...

This is what they should have done with Betts, Bogaerts, and Devers.

Idiots.
Was there ever an indication that Betts or Bogaerts would’ve taken this kind of deal? And does it really matter at this point, anyway? What’s done is done and I think Xander in particular is a non-pay that’s likely to look like a better and better call as time moves on.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,744
Not much to add other than saying I think this is excellent news.

A win for both the player (whom has set himself, his children and generations of his family up for life). A win for the team that desperately needed one.

Great news.
 

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
1,554
Here's the thing- Strider got 6 years plus a team option, which means one or two additional years of club control. And he's a better pitcher than Bello at the point of signing the contract extension. So it seems likely that the Sox could offer 6 years, club option for a 7th, at a lower value than Strider's contract, with the numbers landing somewhere between Strider and Hunter Greene. (Bello's numbers from last year look a lot closer to Greene's than Strider's stats in 2022.)

Let's go with 6 years, $62 million, with a club option for a 7th year at $21.5 million.
I used to keep track of some of the Rays trades to see how long they yielded players.
2011: Matt Garza traded for players that included Chris Archer (among others)
2018: Chris Archer was traded for Tyler Glasnow, Austin Meadows and Shane Baz.
2022: Austin Meadows is traded for Isaac Paredes.
2023: Isaac Parades hits 31 Homers, and has an OPS of 131. He yielded 4.2 War. Rafael Devers is 2 years older, and posted 3.5 War. Rafael Devers will make $30 million this year. Paredes will make $3.4 million and is not eligible for free agency until 2028.
2023 Tyler Glasnow, after posting a WHIP of 1.08 in 2023, is traded to the Dodgers. The Rays receive RHP Ryan Pepiot, OF Jonny Deluca. Pepiot has had injury troubles, but in 78 innings he's amassed a 2.76 ERA and a 2.50 strikeout-to-walk ratio
2017 Matt Garza retires.
This series of trades is absolutely incredible. None of it happens without the 2014 extension of Archer, which is why the Pirates gave up what they did.
 
Last edited:

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
1,554
Was there ever an indication that Betts or Bogaerts would’ve taken this kind of deal? And does it really matter at this point, anyway? What’s done is done and I think Xander in particular is a non-pay that’s likely to look like a better and better call as time moves on.
Granting extensions after a players first year is pretty new, but is certainly a trend. The Braves have done this, the Rays did this with Franco and Lowe, and the Padres did it with Tatis. It's why I think high level prospects are even more valuable than they once were.
In Mookie's case I think the Red Sox would have tried to lock him up after his second year - but outside of the Rays (who did that with Chris Archer) no one was that aggressive at the time.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
The Padres outdrew and outwon the Red Sox last year.

X's 4.4 WAR last year would have comfortably led the Sox in that category as well.
All very low bars...
And I guess I should type out "JK" or something. Not being entirely serious. I'm sure the Padres have fans, though I don't know if I have ever met one, even living on the west coast the last 20 years.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
38,060
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Apparently SJH just wants to be contrarian and pick fights today....
EDIT: addressed below.

I'll post about Bello: extending him like this is a very good sign and I am well pleased by it. The Sox gain an extra year of his services, he gets generational wealth now with the opportunity to let Lex Luthor-style wealth later in his career. This is a Very Good Thing.
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
So it looks as though part of the Sox strategy is to try to use up some of the money that they have under their budget/tax this year to save in future years. I think if you're not going to compete, that's actually kind of clever.

MLB is not like the NFL, obviously. You don't carry over extra cap room from year to year. It's effectively use or lose. Given the way baseball contracts work, there is not much you can do to shift. But the Red Sox are actually finding little ways to do it.

You look at this deal and you sort of think that all they really did is give a guy injury protection for several years in exchange to lock up arbitration values against inflation and get one reasonable FA year plus one reasonable option. That's a fair thing to do, and doesn't move the needle much. But the sneaky part is that they've also moved future years payments into this year and next year. Not huge, again, but clever.

Edit -- and by the way if they really did just add $9 million to this year's tax computation I think those who may continue to have been pining for Monty (raises hand) can kind of put their hands down now.
Sadly, with Giolito out I see very little incentive for Montgomery to consider Boston.
 

VORP Speed

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,796
Ground Zero
I used to keep track of some of the Rays trades to see how long they yielded players.
2011: Matt Garza traded for players that included Chris Archer (among others)
2018: Chris Archer was traded for Tyler Glasnow, Austin Meadows and Shane Baz.
2022: Austin Meadows is traded for Isaac Paredes.
2023: Isaac Parades hits 31 Homers, and has an OPS of 131. He yielded 4.2 War. Rafael Devers is 2 years older, and posted 3.5 War. Rafael Devers will make $30 million this year. Paredes will make $3.4 million and is not eligible for free agency until 2028.
2023 Tyler Glasnow, after posting a WHIP of 1.08 in 2023, is traded to the Dodgers. The Rays receive RHP Ryan Pepiot, OF Jonny Deluca. Pepiot has had injury troubles, but in 78 innings he's amassed a 2.76 ERA and a 2.50 strikeout-to-walk ratio
2017 Matt Garza retires.
This series of trades is absolutely incredible. None of it happens without the 2014 extension of Archer, which is why the Pirates gave up what they did.
https://delmonyoungtradetree.com/
 

In my lifetime

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 18, 2003
967
Connecticut
This adds just over 9 MM to RS salary for LT purposes. It could be a signal that the RS are passing on Montgomery/Snell and will spend money in other ways. If so, it would make sense to try to get Casas done as well. They might as well spend up to the LT this year and next with the hope of saving money in 4-6 years when they might be closer or over the LT threshold.
 

RS2004foreever

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 15, 2022
1,554
Going back to Delmong Young makes my head hurt. Young Begat Garza AND Jason Bartlett (who was a ALL-STAR SHORTSTOP).
The whole thing is like a paragraph from Genesis. And the Garza trade - which happened over 13 YEARS AGO - keeps getting worse.

The key is the Rays kept trading players with a couple of years of experience and got back prospects who were better than they guys they traded. They missed on most of the guys they got back.
But the whole line of trades is amazing.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
44,181
AZ
This adds just over 9 MM to RS salary for LT purposes. It could be a signal that the RS are passing on Montgomery/Snell and will spend money in other ways. If so, it would make sense to try to get Casas done as well. They might as well spend up to the LT this year and next with the hope of saving money in 4-6 years when they might be closer or over the LT threshold.
I think in a few ways they have signaled they are punting. They are definitely time shifting some expenditures by taking on salary this year that will save them in future years. It’s a forward thinking approach. Once they decided to punt they could have held steady at $190 or $200m and just said fuck it. But spending more of 2024’s cap space for future years is a minor encouraging sign about their inclination to spend to compete in future years. Sucks for 2024 though.
 

HfxBob

goes on and on...
Nov 13, 2005
940
Sadly, with Giolito out I see very little incentive for Montgomery to consider Boston.
Just have to Show Him the Money.

But I'm guessing that wasn't one of John Henry's favorite movies.
 

effectivelywild

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
477
I assume that the extension was long in the works, but when I saw that the news of the Bello extension relatively closely followed news about Giolito's injury, I thought that at the minimum seeing a fellow pitcher (with no real history of injury) go down with an elbow problem had to at least mildly prod Bello to take the guaranteed money, because nothing is ever certain for a pitcher.


And then I thought "Wouldn't it be such a 5-D interdimensional chess move if the Sox when evaluating Giolito saw something that hinted his elbow could break and to sign him anyways knowing that if it happened then it could motivate Bello to sign an extension, which was their REAL goal." You know, crippling the team this season to get some cost savings down the line.

Brilliant.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,691
Isle of Plum
I assume that the extension was long in the works, but when I saw that the news of the Bello extension relatively closely followed news about Giolito's injury, I thought that at the minimum seeing a fellow pitcher (with no real history of injury) go down with an elbow problem had to at least mildly prod Bello to take the guaranteed money, because nothing is ever certain for a pitcher.


And then I thought "Wouldn't it be such a 5-D interdimensional chess move if the Sox when evaluating Giolito saw something that hinted his elbow could break and to sign him anyways knowing that if it happened then it could motivate Bello to sign an extension, which was their REAL goal." You know, crippling the team this season to get some cost savings down the line.

Brilliant.
It may have opened Bello to the idea as well as creating just a bit more incentive for the FO to have something to change the narrative. I think it was happening anyway (I think you do too?) just saying it may have impacted timing.
 

effectivelywild

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
477
It may have opened Bello to the idea as well as creating just a bit more incentive for the FO to have something to change the narrative. I think it was happening anyway (I think you do too?) just saying it may have impacted timing.
Absolutely. Deals like this are (IMO) almost always the result of a lot of discussion and negotiation and I suspect something would have happened regardless. But both sides were likely motivated to find common ground (Boston for the PR, Bello for the security after being reminded of the injury rate of pitchers). Nothing like seeing an unexpected injury to make you think that mayyyyyybe you would feel better if you accepted a reasonable offer. Certainly at least one less thing to worry about now for Bello.
 

Sox Puppet

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2016
791
After a pretty mediocre start against the MFY, Bello now has a 5.00 ERA with a 4.72 FIP, and is averaging just barely over 5 IP per start. BABIP against him hasn't been particularly high, either, at .290.

Obviously, growing pains and all the other caveats, but I was sort of expecting a bit more from our opening day starter.
 

iddoc

New Member
Nov 17, 2006
195
Mediocre is generous. He has been pretty bad recently. Hopefully just a rough patch, but a 4.72 FIP this far into the season speaks to how unimpressive he has been all year, with occasional exception. If we had anyone knocking on the door in Worcester…
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,821
Maine
Mediocre is generous. He has been pretty bad recently. Hopefully just a rough patch, but a 4.72 FIP this far into the season speaks to how unimpressive he has been all year, with occasional exception. If we had anyone knocking on the door in Worcester…
I won't argue that Bello hasn't been great this year but a 4.72 FIP is hardly the stuff of demotion even if there was someone "knocking on the door" in Worcester. This is a guy that, as the thread title says, they gave a long term extension to. His leash here should be quite long as he tries to figure it out and get back on track.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,492
He had a 4.54 FIP last year, his walk rate is higher this year (3.4 v 2.6) as is his K rate (8.0 v 7.6), but otherwise seems pretty similar.

He’s pretty mediocre pitcher when he’s giving up lots of homers. A .541 slg against his sinker is a problem.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
7,561
He had a 4.54 FIP last year, his walk rate is higher this year (3.4 v 2.6) as is his K rate (8.0 v 7.6), but otherwise seems pretty similar.

He’s pretty mediocre pitcher when he’s giving up lots of homers. A .541 slg against his sinker is a problem.
He’s got to be telegraphing his pitches somehow- especially when he’s throwing slider.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,917
Boston, MA
Not to be the turd in the punchbowl, but it could just be who Bello is. He wasn't seen as a great prospect coming up and most scouts thought he'd be a mid to back end of the rotation guy. That he's given back of the rotation performance so far isn't a shock. He's a young 25 since he lost a development season in 2020, so there's time to turn it around. He just may never do it. Good thing Houck turned into an ace.
 

Jason Bae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2021
731
NJ
He stopped throwing his 4 seam and cutter (not that he used that much last year). I do wonder if that's led to his sinker falling off this year. Even if they weren't effective pitches, at least they're something to differentiate from his sinker. He's only throwin the sinker/slider/changeup mix in 2024.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,821
Maine
Not to be the turd in the punchbowl, but it could just be who Bello is. He wasn't seen as a great prospect coming up and most scouts thought he'd be a mid to back end of the rotation guy. That he's given back of the rotation performance so far isn't a shock. He's a young 25 since he lost a development season in 2020, so there's time to turn it around. He just may never do it. Good thing Houck turned into an ace.
I don't think this is a turd in the punchbowl take at all. Bello was a mid-level prospect who made a huge leap during the 2021 season and rocketed up the rankings to thrust himself into the mix in 2022. It's not as though he was a can't miss prospect who's now flailing. He's about what you'd expect for a pitcher of his pedigree and age. He has roughly two years worth of big league experience (51 starts, 277 innings) and he's put up what you'd consider league average, mid-rotation numbers in that time: 4.51 ERA, 4.24 FIP. The reason for optimism with him is that he's just 25. There's over 100 years of big league history that shows that most pitchers typically come into their own in their late 20s.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,282
Yeah, Bello's offspeed stuff grades out well, but his sinker and four seamer have always been mediocre. 84212
When he's struggling to throw the slider and changeup for strikes, hitters are sitting on the sinker, in my opinion.

I don't think the solution is to throw more fastballs. The solution is locating the offspeed stuff.

Ill also add that it's interesting that he's just about the only guy on the staff who they didn't convert to throwing sweepers. Houck, Giolito, Whitlock, Pivetta and Criswell are all throwing versions of that pitch.
 
Last edited:

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,147
Not to be the turd in the punchbowl, but it could just be who Bello is. He wasn't seen as a great prospect coming up and most scouts thought he'd be a mid to back end of the rotation guy. That he's given back of the rotation performance so far isn't a shock. He's a young 25 since he lost a development season in 2020, so there's time to turn it around. He just may never do it. Good thing Houck turned into an ace.
If this turns out to be true, it’s concerning as it relates to the FO (I know we have had two baseball heads during this time but there is some continuity in the FO). Our big contracts:

- devers (great hitter but not a 3b imo)
- Rafaela (certainly a gamble)
- Yoshi (an objectively bad contract to a DH on a team with too many DHs that sorely needs better D)
- Bello

no wonder Henry is skiddish about big deals
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
22,821
Maine
If this turns out to be true, it’s concerning as it relates to the FO (I know we have had two baseball heads during this time but there is some continuity in the FO). Our big contracts:

- devers (great hitter but not a 3b imo)
- Rafaela (certainly a gamble)
- Yoshi (an objectively bad contract to a DH on a team with too many DHs that sorely needs better D)
- Bello

no wonder Henry is skiddish about big deals
The Bello and Rafaela contracts are commitments but by no means are they detrimental if they don't work out. They combine for a total hit of $15M on the luxury tax payroll each season, compared to $18M for Yoshida and $29M for Devers. That's a minor inconvenience if they flame out entirely and a bargain and a half if they come close to their ceilings.