Why did this devolve so quickly?
Nothing controversial in thinking Williams will never be a top 10 QB. But in taking that position, you should expect some pushback.
There are a ton of reasons Williams makes some bad plays. One, he is a rookie. Not any different than some mistakes Maye is making. Except, Williams is not turning the ball over like Maye is and just broke the rookie record for number of passes without an INT. That's not nothing.
Two, Chicago is on their 10th or 11th OL combo this season, similar to the Patriots. They have a massive amount of injuries there. As mentioned, the Pats game should be an indicator of how bad their line has been. 9 sacks in that game for the Pats. He simply doesn't have the time to make better plays, in or out of structure.
Three, there is coaching and that's been covered extensively.
As terrible as the Bears offense was in the first half, they played very well in the second half. Why discount their opponent? The Lions are the best team in the league and they were in the game with a chance to tie and then Eberflus decided to get himself fired.
Making that Williams declaration after watching one Bear's game is silly. When discounting their OL, his lack of turnovers, making plays all rookie QBs make, and the coaching disaster in the process of making that declaration, well...you see where I'm going.
You may end up being correct and he will never be good. I expect, however, his reads, progressions, and setting the protection will get better with better OL play. At times, he looks lost (you might say he looks like a rookie) out there. Also, at times, he looks like he will be good (like the 2nd half against the Lions). I'm not sold on him yet either, but there are a number of non-Williams factors to consider.
As far as the conversation here, do better than your devolution.
The issue I have is that this forum has become very comfortable using media talking points or hearing something and simply latching onto it as fact. I think your post is a pretty good example of that, frankly.
There are a ton of reasons Williams makes some bad plays. One, he is a rookie. Not any different than some mistakes Maye is making. Except, Williams is not turning the ball over like Maye is and just broke the rookie record for number of passes without an INT. That's not nothing.
I've heard plenty in the media about him setting that record, so it must correlate to some pretty good rookie QBs! Let's see...CJ Stroud? Sure, OK. Kyler Murray? Ehh....maybe. Derek Carr? Oh...no thank you. When presented with context, its a list of some good and some bad rookie QBs. So...it kind of is nothing. At least compared to the list of rookie QBs with the most TDs without an interception. Jake Locker, Kyle Allen, and Desmond Ridder are powerhouses.
Or maybe it just means he's overly cautious. Which would be fair, because of your second point:
Two, Chicago is on their 10th or 11th OL combo this season, similar to the Patriots. They have a massive amount of injuries there. As mentioned, the Pats game should be an indicator of how bad their line has been. 9 sacks in that game for the Pats. He simply doesn't have the time to make better plays, in or out of structure.
That damn offensive line. They aren't giving him the time he needs! Only 3.01 seconds per throw! That's *checks ranking* only the 4th most time in the league! Surrounded by other atrocious lines like Baltimore, Washington, Denver, Minnesota, Arizona, and Kansas City. All of whom have great sack numbers...except Chicago, of course. Its also worth noting that PFF - whether you like them or not - rank Chicagos offensive line as 6th best in pass blocking, with all of those same teams previously listed.
Either the Chicago line is the outlier of all outliers, or maybe the QB needs to make better throws and quicker reads. It probably wouldn't be so bad if he could actually make a quick read and throw. When having to throw with less than 2.5 seconds, good old Caleb has the 4th worst completion percentage and the 2nd lowest yards per attempt in the NFL. Under pressure, he's throwing it shorter than everyone else and somehow doing so less accurately than almost everyone else. Impressive.
But it really isn't Calebs fault because of your third point:
Making that Williams declaration after watching one Bear's game is silly. When discounting their OL, his lack of turnovers, making plays all rookie QBs make, and the coaching disaster in the process of making that declaration, well...you see where I'm going.
Its absolutely the coaches fault. They just can't put together an offense that can score. When the team needs solid play designs in the red zone, the coaching just keeps letting Caleb down. Thats why their redzone percentage is only *checks rankings again* 67%. Third best in the league! The damn coaches just have no idea how to design an offense for Williams!
When the field gets short and teams need well designed plays, Chicago has performed extremely well. The top 6 teams in points per game rank 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th in redzone percentage. Chicago is 3rd in redzone %...23rd in PPG.
You could also say that having high-end skill players in tight corners like the redzone are helpful, too. It just so happens that Williams has one of - if not the - best skill rooms in football. But I don't hear people talking about that, I suppose because it doesn't fit in with the other talking points.
You may end up being correct and he will never be good. I expect, however, his reads, progressions, and setting the protection will get better with better OL play. At times, he looks lost (you might say he looks like a rookie) out there. Also, at times, he looks like he will be good (like the 2nd half against the Lions). I'm not sold on him yet either, but there are a number of non-Williams factors to consider.
I've considered them. And I replied to them above.
I had no idea what to expect when looking up Chicagos offensive line performance. I know what my eyes told me in the two games I saw him in (yes, I also watched the Pats game, just wasn't as tuned into Caleb as I was last week), and frankly it lines up almost exactly with what the advanced stats say:
Caleb can't perform under pressure, so teams blitz the shit out of him.
Fin.
Lazy analyst's will say "the line sucks, they give up a ton of sacks!!", but ignore the fact that teams have blitzed Williams the second most of any NFL QB because he sucks when getting blitzed. The Bears have some of the best WR's in the NFL that can win their quick 1on1 battles. They also supposedly have a horrendous offensive line that should be losing their individual matchups without defenses blitzing. Despite this, teams are blitzing the shit out of Williams because he often times freezes - the Brissett special, as I like to call it - or rushes into short, inaccurate throws. The line gives him time (4th most in the league), but when he's under pressure, his accuracy sucks despite throwing to his outlets or quick reads.
It surprises me that on a board full of Patriot fans who previously watched Mac Jones do the same fucking thing - and are currently watching fellow rookie Drake Maye make a crappy offensive line and a shit WR room look cromulent - that people are going out of their way to blame anyone but the guy throwing the ball.
So...rant over. Maybe everyone will be right and Williams will be a top 5 QB someday (which was the goalpost I set). But you'd expect with those kind of expectations people wouldn't be so quick to blame everyone else on the team while shrugging away Williams results thus far as, "rookie learning curve".