Ben Simmons wants out of Philadelphia

Status
Not open for further replies.

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,949
Agree that Fox got much better from years 1 to 3. Not much fun year 3 to 4, but I don't disagree with most of your points about his offense.

Is he getting better at defense, though? This is rookie year through current l/r.

Drtg 113/111/112/118
DBPM -1.5/0.2/-0.5/-1.5
DWS 1.1/2.5/1.4/0.8
DRaptor -4.1/1.3/-2.1/-3.3

I tried to pull D-DARKO but failed lol.
Couple other small things about the offense - his ftr went down from y3 to y4. His efg did improve slightly, but the main reason was the bump from 29% 3s to 32% 3s.

& those on/off #s I've cited before are kinda damming. If the Kings are better without you 3 of 4 years, you might not be the solution.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,308
Santa Monica
If I'm an NBA GM, I'm trading for Ben Simmons under the following circumstances:
1. I need a roster shakeup badly,
2. I have such a god-awful defense that he's a huge plus even as a nonscorer, or
3. I need butts in seats. I'm not trading high-ceiling guys for him.
Those 3 describe Sacramento to a T and is why I put them as my odds on favorite to land the Coward of Oz
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,656
Fox has improved his eFG% every year in the league, while also getting to the line more frequently, cutting down on turnovers, and is a better defender than he was as a rookie, even if he is still a liability on that end. Also, scoring points does actually matter. The ability to reliably create your own shot and score 25 ppg is the most in-demand skill in the NBA and Fox is adept at that, even if he could stand to be more efficient on that end.

I want to point out that Fox is basically the greatest finisher at the rim out of any small guard in NBA history. He shot 76% at the rim last season, and is at 69% for his career. For comparison, Kyrie, who is widely regarded as the league's preeminent below-the-rim finisher shot 62% last season at the rim. Chris Paul is a career 61% shooter at the rim. Simmons, who is 6'10", shot 68% last season at the rim. Giannis is a career 73% shooter at the rim. If Fox becomes a decent three point shooter, he becomes an even more dangerous offensive player.
I mean he's 4 years in and he's not a very good FT shooter. Projecting "if he becomes a decent 3pt shooter" isn't any more likely in some ways than Simmons.

At the most basic level though.... Simmons is better at almost everything on a basketball court than Fox, except shooting (and Fox isn't good enough at shooting for it to matter) and he's got the better physical profile. While I agree that volume scoring is underrated sometimes, Fox is scoring because he's getting up a ton of shots on a terrible team. Simmons could score like that too if he used that many possessions.

I would trade Fox+ for Simmons in an instant. I don't think he's broken, I think he was in a garbage situation and got in his head. ANd honestly... he doesn;t need to get better for a Fox deal to be worth it... Simmons if he doesn't grow at all and is a 16/8/8 guy who doesn't shoot jumpers and is a DPOY candidate is a better player than Fox likely ever will be. He's a better Draymond Green, except young.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,271
Washington
I think Simmons will improve a fair amount with a better team fit and different atmosphere. I love Philly, most of my family is from the area, but many of the fans there are assholes. Unfortunately, Ben is sensitive. I think he'll have better success (almost) wherever he goes and when he does, there are going to be a few teams kicking themselves that they could have gotten a player of that caliber at something below market rate.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,656
He's just like Draymond, except for the part where he pulls his arms, head, and legs into his shell in the 4th quarter of playoff games.
Draymond's offense is basically the same, he hasn't taken a 4th quarter shot in like 6 years
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,805
At this point, if SAC is going to be a contender, it's going to have to figure out its core of players to whom they are giving max contracts. Bagley isn't even a consideration - even if he does pop this year, Bagley isn't the kind of guy most of us would give a max contract. I think he's gone after this year. So then you have to wonder if Fox, Halliburton, and Mitchell can be that core.

Without knowing much about Hallburton and Mitchell because I just don't have the time to watch, I would guess the answer to that is no.

Simmons can be a core guy. Like him or hate him, if KL's shot bounced out, PHI probably would have a title win. So yes, Simmons can probably be part of a core that wins a championship, even with non-existent 3P shooting.
People seem to remember this shot as taking place in The Finals. It was in the second round. It's an enormous leap of faith to assume that if Kawhi missed that shot, the Sixers would have just rolled Milwaukee and Golden State in the Finals and have a title right now. What makes people think that if they advanced further, the same issues that have caused Philly to crash out of the playoffs in other years wouldn't have persisted? Why do people think they would just breeze past the Bucks; when Giannis owns Philly? In three games against Philly during that very season, Giannis averaged a 43-16-8.

He's just like Draymond, except for the part where he pulls his arms, head, and legs into his shell in the 4th quarter of playoff games.
The Draymond comparisons come across as really lazy. Simmons is actually a more skilled player, but they are very, very different. Draymond is a competitive, alpha MF'r, almost to his own detriment. Simmons is passive and hasn't shown nearly the amount of fight and doggedness that Green has shown throughout his career. Green is also probably one of the top 2-3 screeners in the NBA, a huge asset for a player that has limited scoring ability. Simmons is not much a screener at all, although part of that is that Philly has rarely used him as a screener.

More importantly like...even people that love Draymond acknowledge that he is in a very beneficial situation for his talents and that if here to assume a bigger role on a different team, that team would probably not be very good (as we've seen with the Warriors when Steph/Klay were injured). Saying that Simmons is like Draymond and then remarking that he needs his own team to shine doesn't make any sense.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,181
Imaginationland
NBA player rankings for the upcoming season:

ESPN: Fox (34), Simmons (28)
The Athletic: Fox (37-56 tier) Simmons (31-36 tier)
SI: Fox (32), Simmons (31)
NBA.com: Fox (unraked, somewhere lower than 37), Simmons (30)

Everyone has Simmons ahead of Fox, but it's not as ridiculous as I thought it'd be.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,181
Imaginationland
People seem to remember this shot as taking place in The Finals. It was in the second round. It's an enormous leap of faith to assume that if Kawhi missed that shot, the Sixers would have just rolled Milwaukee and Golden State in the Finals and have a title right now. What makes people think that if they advanced further, the same issues that have caused Philly to crash out of the playoffs in other years wouldn't have persisted? Why do people think they would just breeze past the Bucks; when Giannis owns Philly? In three games against Philly during that very season, Giannis averaged a 43-16-8.
No kidding, this always bugs me. Forget getting past GS and Milwaukee, if that shot misses they still have to get by Toronto in OT. The Celtics have been far closer to a title multiple times over the last 5 years than Philly was in 2019.

-edit: It does represent the peak of the process era, so that's something I guess.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,656
People seem to remember this shot as taking place in The Finals. It was in the second round. It's an enormous leap of faith to assume that if Kawhi missed that shot, the Sixers would have just rolled Milwaukee and Golden State in the Finals and have a title right now. What makes people think that if they advanced further, the same issues that have caused Philly to crash out of the playoffs in other years wouldn't have persisted? Why do people think they would just breeze past the Bucks; when Giannis owns Philly? In three games against Philly during that very season, Giannis averaged a 43-16-8.



The Draymond comparisons come across as really lazy. Simmons is actually a more skilled player, but they are very, very different. Draymond is a competitive, alpha MF'r, almost to his own detriment. Simmons is passive and hasn't shown nearly the amount of fight and doggedness that Green has shown throughout his career. Green is also probably one of the top 2-3 screeners in the NBA, a huge asset for a player that has limited scoring ability. Simmons is not much a screener at all, although part of that is that Philly has rarely used him as a screener.

More importantly like...even people that love Draymond acknowledge that he is in a very beneficial situation for his talents and that if here to assume a bigger role on a different team, that team would probably not be very good (as we've seen with the Warriors when Steph/Klay were injured). Saying that Simmons is like Draymond and then remarking that he needs his own team to shine doesn't make any sense.
If this is directed at me, I'm talking about type of player if he didn't improve at all, and literally just gave you what PHI got out of him. Player type he is similar to Draymond in that he's a versatile defender with no outside shot. Stylistically they are somewhat different on offense (Simmons is better, he can score off the dribble) but from a lineup construction point of view they do play a lot of the same roles in terms of being versatile defense first players whose offensive contributions are not going to be shooting or the go to crunch time scorer.

My case there was... Simmons right now, can be a key piece in a title team, like Draymond was, if you put him with shooters, 1 of whom is also your go to ISO guy, and that's valuable even if you get no other benefit from him in terms of growth.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,308
Santa Monica
If this is directed at me, I'm talking about type of player if he didn't improve at all, and literally just gave you what PHI got out of him. Player type he is similar to Draymond in that he's a versatile defender with no outside shot. Stylistically they are somewhat different on offense (Simmons is better, he can score off the dribble) but from a lineup construction point of view they do play a lot of the same roles in terms of being versatile defense first players whose offensive contributions are not going to be shooting or the go to crunch time scorer.

My case there was... Simmons right now, can be a key piece in a title team, like Draymond was, if you put him with shooters, 1 of whom is also your go to ISO guy, and that's valuable even if you get no other benefit from him in terms of growth.
Comparing Ben to Dray isn't really going out on a limb. The GSW owner just was fined $50,000 for exactly doing that

"In some ways, it doesn't really fit what we're doing," Lacob told the Chronicle. "He makes a lot of money. And, can he finish games? I don't know. He's very talented. The problem is: We have Draymond. Draymond and him are very similar in the sense that neither one really shoots and they do a lot of the playmaking. That's one issue. The salary structure is another."
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,742
People seem to remember this shot as taking place in The Finals. It was in the second round. It's an enormous leap of faith to assume that if Kawhi missed that shot, the Sixers would have just rolled Milwaukee and Golden State in the Finals and have a title right now. What makes people think that if they advanced further, the same issues that have caused Philly to crash out of the playoffs in other years wouldn't have persisted? Why do people think they would just breeze past the Bucks; when Giannis owns Philly? In three games against Philly during that very season, Giannis averaged a 43-16-8.
OK, I'll admit to forgetting about MIL (and assuming PHI would win in OT that's given) but there's a reason that people forget MIL between PHI and and GSW.

But to put a finer point on it, after looking it up, PHI beat MIL the only time Butler played (even though Giannis shot 19-21 from the FT line) and I think PHI would have been the odds on favourite to win that series. PHI was much more talented than MIL that year, at least in my estimation.

And people assume PHI would have rolled over GSW due to the injuries, nothing more.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
All the rankings have Simmons 25-35 for good reason. He is not a big prize at that contract, even if you ignore all of the off the court stuff.

Teams can dream on him reaching the level we all thought he was likely to get to, but it's a pretty big risk at this point.

There is a non-zero chance he has another mediocre season in Philly (or elsewhere) and he's a net negative contract a year from now. Forget about a "haul", teams might be stapling picks to get rid of him.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Also Draymond has 700 career 3 pointers made (including postseason), Simmons has 5. 5!!
Yeah they're the same in that they're both not really scorers, but are excellent defenders, good passers, and the size of a 4.

They're different in that one won't shoot the ball and one does, albeit sparingly because his team has great shooters. Also one has the eye of the tiger, while the other has the constitution of a lactose-intolerant tourist in Green Bay for a football game. Oh and one was a second round pick who added to his game for years until he got old, while the other is the same exact kid he was when he put on the #1 pick hat 5 years ago. Other than that, same dude.
 
Last edited:

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
I think part of the disconnect here is that some people are looking at Ben's accolades, but those are actually part of the problem. Those All-NBA and All Defense awards produced a 30% max deal for Simmons, and his actual contributions on the court just don't merit that kind of money. Simmons is getting paid at a rate he could never have achieved in an open market.

Think back to last year when so many of you were desperate for Boston to trade Marcus Smart because you were convinced that someone was going to pay him 4/100 to "change the culture". I laughed at the notion because guys like Marcus, despite their value to the culture, just don't get paid that kind of money. Simmons is actually a very similar player to Marcus. Like Marcus he's a defensive oriented Swiss Army Knife type of player. He's the billionaire's version due to the height/length/athleticism differences.

Of course the other difference is mentality. Simmons is willing to give everything but points/shooting. Marcus is willing to step up and shoot aggressively when the team needs it (sometimes too aggressively). While being content to shoot like Ben (i.e. rarely) when Boston has sufficient offense. Ben just plain doesn't shoot the ball. He's taken fewer shots every year that he's been in the league and a greater percentage of those few shots come in the paint. He's at the point where he's taking one shot outside 10' per game. If he were finishing at 68% on 14-16 FGA in the paint per game, you'd live with it. But he's taking a mere nine shots per game there now.

I keep coming back to this, the ginormous problem with Simmons is that he's a sidekick level talent, but his game is such that you have to build your entire offense around him. And there just aren't that many teams that he fits on. After Minnesota and Indiana I'm just not seeing a lot of fits for his skillset that aren't wishcasting.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,277
De'Aaron Fox is better than Ben Simmons.
I like Fox……and I disagree with this. Simmons perceived ability is being skewed by a couple bad weeks in the playoffs. It’s difficult to compare since they are such polar opposites but at any point pre-playoffs last year I’d believe most knowledgeable fans would feel this way too.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,656
One thing about a Simmons trade... PHI REALLY needs to get back someone who can pass in that deal.

They have ZERO players other than Simmons on the roster with a career AST% of 20 or better. Not only that, they have a combined 4 player seasons with an AST% of 20+ (3 by George Hill).
As a comparison Al Horford has 4 all by himself.

That's a team that really relied on Simmons when it came to getting guys shots, Hill helps some, but not if he's outright replacing Simmons.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,308
Santa Monica
One thing about a Simmons trade... PHI REALLY needs to get back someone who can pass in that deal.

They have ZERO players other than Simmons on the roster with a career AST% of 20 or better. Not only that, they have a combined 4 player seasons with an AST% of 20+ (3 by George Hill).
As a comparison Al Horford has 4 all by himself.

That's a team that really relied on Simmons when it came to getting guys shots, Hill helps some, but not if he's outright replacing Simmons.
George Hill went back to Milwaukee, right?
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,457
I don't think that Fox is better than Simmons. But I'd rather have Fox than Simmons. Simmons is broken. He might get fixed somewhere else, but he's broken now. And this isn't just "optics" of the Atlanta series. The guy is scared to shoot the fucking basketball. The guy is THE SAME guy that he was in school. He adds nothing to his game ever.

If I'm an NBA GM, I'm trading for Ben Simmons under the following circumstances: 1. I need a roster shakeup badly, 2. I have such a god-awful defense that he's a huge plus even as a nonscorer, or 3. I need butts in seats. I'm not trading high-ceiling guys for him.

And this means basically that only non-contenders are trading for him, which Paul will fight. Fucking mess. Sacramento seems to be the only landing spot that meets the CA request and sucks enough that this dice roll is worth it to them.
Bingo.

Im honestly amazed that people here are arguing that they would trade Fox for Simmons. At full value I think they are similar players…except Simmons is nowhere near full value now. The last time we saw him he was afraid to shoot a lay up and has since said he would not play another game with the 76ers….
Why in the fuck would anyone offer close to full value for him and bail Morey out?

Im going to parrot the trade offer that I’ve seen floating around multiple places. D’Angelo Russell, Malik Beasley, and a protected 1st or two.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,949
I was thinking DLo + Beasley is way too much $, but if you throw in Maxey it technically works.

Is Fox a significantly better player than Russell? Not statistically. DLo is kinda like a slower better shooting Fox...

DLo is almost 2 years older, but meh.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,656
Bingo.

Im honestly amazed that people here are arguing that they would trade Fox for Simmons. At full value I think they are similar players…except Simmons is nowhere near full value now. The last time we saw him he was afraid to shoot a lay up and has since said he would not play another game with the 76ers….
Why in the fuck would anyone offer close to full value for him and bail Morey out?

Im going to parrot the trade offer that I’ve seen floating around multiple places. D’Angelo Russell, Malik Beasley, and a protected 1st or two.
See, the thing is... Simmons' terrible playoffs and demand to be traded are the only reason you COULD possibly trade Fox for him, Simmons is universally considered the better player, arguably has the more attractive contract, and has more ceiling to grow. If SAC went to PHI at say last year's all-star break with a Fox/Simmons deal, the question would be..."how many 1sts are SAC adding, and will they eat a bad deal?"

Even after the bad playoffs basically everyone who covers the league seems to still consider Simmons more valuable. Fox for Simmons isn't bailing out Morey, it's getting a discount.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Simmons absolutely has more ceiling to grow.

Problem is that he has never grown, ever. Like not since LSU. Maybe 6-7 years since he has grown at all. At least 5.

Someone needs titanium nuts to bet on Simmons adding anything.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,730
Saint Paul, MN
Simmons doesn't need to grow to be a max player though. Sure, he tops out at top 20 if he doesn't improve, but that is still a very valuable player to have.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,277
Simmons absolutely has more ceiling to grow.

Problem is that he has never grown, ever. Like not since LSU. Maybe 6-7 years since he has grown at all. At least 5.

Someone needs titanium nuts to bet on Simmons adding anything.
Does he even need to grow though? People have spent the last 3 years criticizing Simmons for what he cannot do……as he’s been an auto-All Star selection each of the last three years. Yes, he was awful in the playoffs which is a concern moving forward but he’s been (unfairly, imo) heavily scrutinized while being among the most productive two-way players in the league since he’s entered it.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,656
Does he even need to grow though? People have spent the last 3 years criticizing Simmons for what he cannot do……as he’s been an auto-All Star selection each of the last three years. Yes, he was awful in the playoffs which is a concern moving forward but he’s been (unfairly, imo) heavily scrutinized while being among the most productive two-way players in the league since he’s entered it.
He definitely has grown defensively anyway. His offensive game needs to grow for him to be a superstar, but he's already a max player no matter what, just one you have to gameplan for in a playoff series to make sure you don't have to lean to heavily on his offense, but there are plenty of those.

Also, I think people will talk about his offensive growth if he gets traded, but in reality it will just be him doing what he always did well at higher volume and without an Embiid taking up the paint.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Does he even need to grow though? People have spent the last 3 years criticizing Simmons for what he cannot do……as he’s been an auto-All Star selection each of the last three years. Yes, he was awful in the playoffs which is a concern moving forward but he’s been (unfairly, imo) heavily scrutinized while being among the most productive two-way players in the league since he’s entered it.
I'm responding there to a post about his room for growth. There's just no reason to think that he will at this point, not materially. That doesn't mean that it's required, just unexpected.
 

Attachments

brendan f

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2019
272
Many people here are convinced of what Simmons is/and what his value SHOULD represent. But I think we need to account for the fact that he basically completely shit the bed in the playoffs last year, took no accountability for it, and now is seemingly demanding a trade. No matter how good you think he is, all of what he has presented matters a lot and decreases his trade value significantly in the eyes of potential trading partners. That's why I think a Hield/Bagley deal, plus pick(s) might be all Morey can land. When you have Rich Paul--arguably the most powerful agent in all of basketball--shitting on Philly and even telling Maxey to cancel his events for Philly charities, you have a very big problem that goes beyond the actual value of Simmons--whatever you think that is.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
Many people here are convinced of what Simmons is/and what his value SHOULD represent. But I think we need to account for the fact that he basically completely shit the bed in the playoffs last year, took no accountability for it, and now is seemingly demanding a trade. No matter how good you think he is, all of what he has presented matters a lot and decreases his trade value significantly in the eyes of potential trading partners. That's why I think a Hield/Bagley deal, plus pick(s) might be all Morey can land. When you have Rich Paul--arguably the most powerful agent in all of basketball--shitting on Philly and even telling Maxey to cancel his events for Philly charities, you have a very big problem that goes beyond the actual value of Simmons--whatever you think that is.
First, Morey isn't losing sleep over what Tyrese Fucking Maxey thinks. Second, Morey doesn't have to settle for anything he doesn't want. Now, he may be fine with that specific return, but he has more leverage than Rich Paul would want you to believe. If the illustrious Kings franchise is offering less than that, Simmons is going to have to settle with watching the NBA on TV.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,949
I think I would rather let BS sit out for multiple years than trade him for Hield/Bagley...
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,271
Washington
The only way Hield/Bagley works is if Embiid really wants to play with them. Which I doubt. As bad as the Simmons situation is, something that would make it worse is if Embiid gets pissed off and decides he wants out too.

Might playing hard ball with Simmons make some players avoid Philly? Sure. But I think Morey needs to worry more about the star he already has.

I get the impression that Morey, Embiid and ownership are all on board with playing hard ball for a while. I think "a while" in this case lasts well into the season, though probably not beyond it.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,277
Serious question. If you were the Celtics or the Sixers…….who would you trade from your roster in exchange for Hield’s contract and Bagley……..Schroder and Kanter? I don’t even do Smart and Grant Williams.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Serious question. If you were the Celtics or the Sixers…….who would you trade from your roster in exchange for Hield’s contract and Bagley……..Schroder and Kanter? I don’t even do Smart and Grant Williams.
Your question makes your point.

I don't think that we have any contracts that are bad enough that I'd want Hield and Bagley instead. Don't think that Philly does either.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,277
Your question makes your point.

I don't think that we have any contracts that are bad enough that I'd want Hield and Bagley instead. Don't think that Philly does either.
Forget contracts for purpose of this silly exercise……for talent matches who would you trade?

These convos we are having tonight are freakin stupid lol.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Forget contracts for purpose of this silly exercise……for talent matches who would you trade?

These convos we are having tonight are freakin stupid lol.
Tough to ignore the contracts. I mean, sure ignore for Trade Machine purposes. But Bagley and Hield are jokes in this deal because of what they make. If Hield was making Bagley money, and Bagley was making MLE money, this wouldn't be as funny.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,949
Forget contracts for purpose of this silly exercise……for talent matches who would you trade?

These convos we are having tonight are freakin stupid lol.
For 1 season, contracts don't matter?

Nesmith & Bruno
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,730
Saint Paul, MN
Many people here are convinced of what Simmons is/and what his value SHOULD represent. But I think we need to account for the fact that he basically completely shit the bed in the playoffs last year, took no accountability for it, and now is seemingly demanding a trade.
This really isn't a fair take.

In round 1, he nearly averaged a triple double (15/10/9). Round 2, in game 1, he went for 17/10/4 with 4 steals. Disappeared in game 2. Had a good game 3 with 18/4/7, a good game 4 with 11/12/9, and some unforgettable games 5,6,7.

I think the whole passing up the dunk is way overblown anyway. He made a bad read, but there were two guys right there and in that split second, he thought a pass to Thybule would be for an easy layup. Thybule made 1/2 free throws, and PHI was down just 1 point with 3.5 minutes to go. That loss of 1 point didn't cost them the series.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,949
Ben Simmons to the Knicks might be fun.

Hard to find the right package, though, & it would probably have to wait until December 14th.

Fournier ($17m), Quickley ($2.2m), Toppin ($5.1m), Burks ($9.5m), plus picks?
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,181
Imaginationland
This really isn't a fair take.

In round 1, he nearly averaged a triple double (15/10/9). Round 2, in game 1, he went for 17/10/4 with 4 steals. Disappeared in game 2. Had a good game 3 with 18/4/7, a good game 4 with 11/12/9, and some unforgettable games 5,6,7.

I think the whole passing up the dunk is way overblown anyway. He made a bad read, but there were two guys right there and in that split second, he thought a pass to Thybule would be for an easy layup. Thybule made 1/2 free throws, and PHI was down just 1 point with 3.5 minutes to go. That loss of 1 point didn't cost them the series.
He had exactly 1 FG attempt total in the 4th quarter of the last 6 playoff games. Maybe instead of "shit the bed" we should be using terms like "disappeared into thin air." Passing up the dunk was emblematic of his complete and total vanishing act late in games when it mattered most. The reason it gets all the headlines is because it's just about the only time he had the ball for more than a second or two late in these games without immediately getting rid of it. It wasn't a bad read, he was afraid he'd get fouled and have to shoot free throws. Sometimes things are exactly as they seem.

*edit - Philly was up 2-1, and Atlanta won 3 of the last 4 by a total of 13 points. Here are Simmons stats in the 4th quarter of those 4 games (essentially the equivalent of one full game):

34 minutes
6 points (0 FG attempts)
4 rebounds
3 assists
1 block
1 steal

Beyond the stats, just watching him it was clear that he was terrified of being involved, at all, on offense.
 
Last edited:

Swedgin

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2013
702
He had exactly 1 FG attempt total in the 4th quarter of the last 6 playoff games. Maybe instead of "shit the bed" we should be using terms like "disappeared into thin air." Passing up the dunk was emblematic of his complete and total vanishing act late in games when it mattered most. The reason it gets all the headlines is because it's just about the only time he had the ball for more than a second or two late in these games without immediately getting rid of it. It wasn't a bad read, he was afraid he'd get fouled and have to shoot free throws. Sometimes things are exactly as they seem.

*edit - Philly was up 2-1, and Atlanta won 3 of the last 4 by a total of 13 points. Here are Simmons stats in the 4th quarter of those 4 games (essentially the equivalent of one full game):

34 minutes
6 points (0 FG attempts)
4 rebounds
3 assists
1 block
1 steal

Beyond the stats, just watching him it was clear that he was terrified of being involved, at all, on offense.
This is where I am at as well. If Simmons had just a poor series or playoffs shooting the ball, I would not be so down on him.

His FT% in the playoffs was alarming, but his refusal to participate in the offense during the fourth quarter was terrifying. He had 3 FGA over the course of seven fourth quarters in round two, and those were all in the first three games. It is not as if Atlanta had some elite wing defenders like Kahwi, locked in Lebron, Tatum who shut him down. Simmons shut himself down.

I cannot think of a similar disappearing act. Plenty of guys have come up small in big moments, some went on to redeem themselves others did. not. But what other superstar/max guy just completely vanished from the offense? That's an honest question. Is there anyone?

If I was running a team with championship aspirations, I cannot see trading for Simmons unless either 1) my sports psychologist is a miracle worker or 2) I have so much offensive talent Simmons that can be the fifth option in my closing line up. Short of that, the market for Simmons would be teams on the playoff bubble who can look at him as a regular season player/floor raiser. They will be thrilled to see Simmons disappear in the second round because that means they made the second round.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
I feel like this pushes him past Harden on the “guys willing to commit the most fully to forcing their way out” scale. I don’t think it will get fully forgotten and do wonder if it makes it harder for other teams. Probably not—someone will still take the shot on his talent—but it’s awfully messy for perceptions of him
 
Status
Not open for further replies.