BB's next job (a.k.a. Steve Belichick's next next job)

Status
Not open for further replies.

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
20,748
He has one of the best track records of developing QBs, not sure why you would not want him working with a new QB.

Because of Mac? That should be a success story that he made it to the playoffs with him.
I wouldn’t have an issue with him developing a QB If he had McDaniels with him. I wouldn’t trust Bill to draft Drake Maye at 3 though last year, which is my issue.

Maybe he’s learned his lesson though that you need a real QB and not the “We can win the Super Bowl with any Top 15 QB” that apparently came from Judge.
 

Ralphwiggum

Well-Known Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
10,320
Needham, MA
He’s 72. Whoever hires him, pro or college, it’s a short-term fix. In the NFL if you have a roster that you think is close to championship level I could see it. I think he probably still has it as a coach, and could maximize results on a roster like that and maybe win you a Super Bowl. Not sure which franchise is that, Buffalo maybe, maybe Dallas. In college I would imagine it would be to bring enthusiasm to the program, get the boosters all fired up and bring in a bunch of transfers, and maybe get you into the playoffs.

There’s a reason why he didn’t get a job last year and now he seems on the verge of taking a 2nd tier college job. Regardless of whether you think he can still coach or not he’s 3 years older than the oldest guy ever to win a Super Bowl, and both the oldest (Ariens) and 2nd oldest (BB himself) did it with the GOAT QB. He’s 72.
 

rodderick

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2009
14,104
São Paulo - Brazil
He has one of the best track records of developing QBs, not sure why you would not want him working with a new QB.

Because of Mac? That should be a success story that he made it to the playoffs with him.
Because I don't think he'd gel with every personality at that spot and the things he values at the position aren't really what I'd prioritize when looking for my next guy. I would be concerned with the relationship he'd have with a Caleb Williams, for instance. And not just off the field. Would he try to rein in the attributes that could make him special? Also, isn't Bill's track record of developing QBs kind of just Tom Brady? Are Brissett and Garoppolo his success stories? Those guys barely played in NE and had their best years in completely different systems, is Bill really the one who should be credited for their solid careers?
 
Last edited:

Eric Fernsten's Disco Mustache

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
I don't think BB is coming back to coach in the NFL except under a very narrow set of circumstances that may or may not actually happen.

He's 73. When last we saw Bill in the NFL, he could not even competently fill out a coaching staff. All of that said, you need only look at the Pats over his last three years, comparing talent level to success, and see that he can still coach.

At this point, you don't hire him to rebuild an organization, because his years remaining in coaching are in the low singe digits. You hire him for an immediate and short term payoff. But that means having a lot of what is needed to win already in place. You can't count on him to bring in his own full and competent coaching staff, because he couldn't do that in his final years in NE. So he will need a willingness to let the front office help with that while he just brings in a few key people (Steve, Josh McD, etc.). I also don't think he can be trusts.

Put it all together and he would need a team he thinks is poised to make the jump to legit contender, with a front office run by someone he trusts enough to work for as opposed to being the guy in charge. But that team must also be seeking a coach.

I don't know who that would be.

Great summary of the situation

Would add the point that Belichick has a pretty strong reputation as someone who isn't easy to work with, if you're a peer or a supervisor. To the people he had control over (coaches, players) he was the gruff, demanding boss who didn't suffer fools. Everyone else he tried to to exclude or freeze out of things that mattered to him.

So if you're the owner of another team, and you're seeing things the way @Eddie Jurak just laid it out, then you run a meaningful risk bringing Belichick. For it to work, he'll need to collaborate with people he doesn't control, in particular in the front office. He'll need to accept people on his coaching staff that he didn't recruit and that aren't "his" people. But he doesn't have much of a track record of doing that in New England.

Which means Belichick may be unwilling or unable to do what an NFL team is going to need to be confident he can do, to believe that bringing him onboard as a HC will be a success.

It's a tough thing being a maniacal control freak who's hard to get along with. When things are working great, it works. But when it doesn't work, it can be hard to shift gears and show up differently. Maybe even more so in your 70s.
 

The Social Chair

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 17, 2010
6,674
Because I don't think he'd gel with every personality at that spot and the things he values at the position aren't really what I'd prioritize when looking for my next guy. I would be concerned with the relationship he'd have with a Caleb Williams, for instance. And not just off the field. Would he try to rein in the attributes that could make him special? Also, isn't Bill's track record of developing QBs kind of just Tom Brady? Are Brissett and Garoppolo his success stories? Those guys barely played in NE and had their best years in completely different systems, is Bill really the one who should be credited for their solid careers?
I'd like to also add that he hired Matt Patricia as his offensive coordinator. I wouldn't even let 2024 Belichick in the same room as my young QB.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
48,163
Melrose, MA
If BB returns to the NFL, I would almost expect it to be in more of an Ernie Adams role than as a coach or decision maker responsible for everything. Not sure he’d want that but that feels like a more likely scenario if he wanted it.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
29,229
Newton
At this point, you don't hire him to rebuild an organization, because his years remaining in coaching are in the low singe digits. You hire him for an immediate and short term payoff. But that means having a lot of what is needed to win already in place. You can't count on him to bring in his own full and competent coaching staff, because he couldn't do that in his final years in NE. So he will need a willingness to let the front office help with that while he just brings in a few key people (Steve, Josh McD, etc.). I also don't think he can be trusts.
One thing that struck me about that initial report with UNC is that he is apparently asking for Steve to be coach in waiting and for Patricia to come along. So I’m not sure this is quite the small window that people are saying it would be.

Even still, I agree that it’s less about a rebuild for Bill than helping a team get over the hump. To that end, I think Dallas would be a good, possibly ideal fit. Of course there’s a chance it blows up with Jerry but if you’re Jones and watched that debacle last night, you can reasonably conclude that what’s missing is less personnel and talent than discipline and execution. Even if the very end of the Pats dynasty saw that stuff fray a bit, Bill is a master of the latter. And this is not a team (like, say, the Eagles) that’s so close that you’d be hesitant to rock the boat – it’s a team in dire need of a shakeup and culture change.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
38,090
Deep inside Muppet Labs
One thing that struck me about that initial report with UNC is that he is apparently asking for Steve to be coach in waiting and for Patricia to come along. So I’m not sure this is quite the small window that people are saying it would be.

Even still, I agree that it’s less about a rebuild for Bill than helping a team get over the hump. To that end, I think Dallas would be a good, possibly ideal fit. Of course there’s a chance it blows up with Jerry but if you’re Jones and watched that debacle last night, you can reasonably conclude that what’s missing is less personnel and talent than discipline and execution. Even if the very end of the Pats dynasty saw that stuff fray a bit, Bill is a master of the latter. And this is not a team (like, say, the Eagles) that’s so close that you’d be hesitant to rock the boat – it’s a team in dire need of a shakeup and culture change.
At the beginning of the year I thought Dallas would be the perfect fit for him. Clearly talented team underperforming in many ways, Coach Beav seemingly on the hot seat. But Jerruh HATES sharing credit so I doubt anything will happen there.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
29,229
Newton
At the beginning of the year I thought Dallas would be the perfect fit for him. Clearly talented team underperforming in many ways, Coach Beav seemingly on the hot seat. But Jerruh HATES sharing credit so I doubt anything will happen there.
I agree but Jerruh is 82 -- does he value getting all the credit or winning one more time? Part of me wonders if the very public UNC push--which would inherently be a protracted multi-year thing--is actually about Bill letting the Joneses of the world know that the train is leaving the station.

Weirdly I am kind of rooting for it to happen.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
38,328
306, row 14
Jerry has the perception of being a George Steinbrenner type reactive owner but he's really not. At least not in the past like 30 years. He always whines that he has no money pay players, they aren't very active in free agency and with his own players he plays hard ball to the bitter end before paying top dollar. For coaches, he held on to Jason Garrett for almost a decade.

McCarthy is in the final year of his contract so Jerry doesn't have to actually fire him. I do think someone new will be coaching Dallas next year but I'm not sure winning is necessarily at the top of the job description for Jerry. I think the top of the job description is someone he's friendly with and someone who is OK being in Jerry's shadow and let Jerry make the decisions and do the media and ll the Jerry stuff.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
38,873
One thing that struck me about that initial report with UNC is that he is apparently asking for Steve to be coach in waiting and for Patricia to come along. So I’m not sure this is quite the small window that people are saying it would be.

Even still, I agree that it’s less about a rebuild for Bill than helping a team get over the hump. To that end, I think Dallas would be a good, possibly ideal fit. Of course there’s a chance it blows up with Jerry but if you’re Jones and watched that debacle last night, you can reasonably conclude that what’s missing is less personnel and talent than discipline and execution. Even if the very end of the Pats dynasty saw that stuff fray a bit, Bill is a master of the latter. And this is not a team (like, say, the Eagles) that’s so close that you’d be hesitant to rock the boat – it’s a team in dire need of a shakeup and culture change.
Is there any backup on that? I do not see that in any of the reputable outlets, it appears to just be a random tweet from a part time freelancer at the Guardian with no ties to UNC or Belichick.
Sounds a whole lot like a guy just making some shit up based on BB's relationships so he can claim he was right if/when BB brings Stephen and Patricia with him (a logical guess he will).
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
38,328
306, row 14
I don't see any obvious plug and win landing spots for Bill in the NFL. New Orleans and the NYJ are messes that will take a few years to turn around. Some other teams that will likely be looking for a new coach next month are Jacksonville and the Raiders and neither of those seem like win-now places. Jacksonville I guess has the benefit of Lawrence if Bill has a high opinion of him. The Giants are going to be starting over with a rookie QB in all likelihood. Cleveland may move on from Stefanski but they have QB issues. The Bengals might be an interesting spot. Awesome offense, top 5 QB, Bill can come in and clean up the defense and they'd be Super Bowl contenders. The problem is they probably aren't firing Zac Taylor.

I don't see any playoff teams in the AFC that have coaches on the hot seat (Reid, McDermott, Harbaugh x2, Tomlin, Payton, Ryans maybe Steichen/McDaniel). I guess maybe McDermott if the Bills flame out in the WC round, but I think that's unlikely. Same kinda goes on the NFC side. Sirianni will probably perpetually be on the hot seat so if the Eagles crash and burn maybe they open up? But they crashed and burned last year, reportedly discussed replacing Sirianni with Bill and decided against it.

The only intriguing NFL opening at the moment may be the Bears, depending on the view of Caleb Williams.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,952
02130
I don't think BB is coming back to coach in the NFL except under a very narrow set of circumstances that may or may not actually happen.

He's 73. When last we saw Bill in the NFL, he could not even competently fill out a coaching staff. All of that said, you need only look at the Pats over his last three years, comparing talent level to success, and see that he can still coach.

At this point, you don't hire him to rebuild an organization, because his years remaining in coaching are in the low singe digits. You hire him for an immediate and short term payoff. But that means having a lot of what is needed to win already in place. You can't count on him to bring in his own full and competent coaching staff, because he couldn't do that in his final years in NE. So he will need a willingness to let the front office help with that while he just brings in a few key people (Steve, Josh McD, etc.). I also don't think he can be trusts.

Put it all together and he would need a team he thinks is poised to make the jump to legit contender, with a front office run by someone he trusts enough to work for as opposed to being the guy in charge. But that team must also be seeking a coach.

I don't know who that would be.
Yeah this is it for me. He obviously can help a team but seems to insist on only working with "his" guys and those guys are increasingly being shown to not be very great or have gone on to do other things.

Adding a humble BB to an existing staff as senior football advisor, or even hiring him as HC with a solid DC or OC and GM already there makes a ton of sense for a team with a good roster. Making BB the HC and firing your staff to bring on Matt Patricia and Joe Judge makes basically zero sense and I'd take my chances with someone else.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,447
Yeah this is it for me. He obviously can help a team but seems to insist on only working with "his" guys and those guys are increasingly being shown to not be very great or have gone on to do other things.

Adding a humble BB to an existing staff as senior football advisor, or even hiring him as HC with a solid DC or OC and GM already there makes a ton of sense for a team with a good roster. Making BB the HC and firing your staff to bring on Matt Patricia and Joe Judge makes basically zero sense and I'd take my chances with someone else.
Seems like a team could simply ask, as part of the interview process, "Bill, how do you plan to fill out the coaching staff? Who do you have in mind to bring over and in what roles? Are you OK with working with assistants that we want to keep?". Wouldn't take that long to ask those questions.

Teams are not interviewing coaches right now, and the last thing the Saints or Bears want to do right now is to undermine their in-season hires by openly reaching out to coaching candidates and take the risk of word leaking out.

Based on Bill's comments about a college coaching position, there is zero chance of him taking a "senior advisor" role for any organization. It seems like a lose-lose proposition all the way around. If Bill wants to coach in the NFL badly enough, he can agree to let the GM make the GM decisions and focus on coaching up the players he has. As a coach, he's definitely better than most of the drek around the league. But he needs to have good answers on questions about the rest of the staff.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
35,390
I don't see any obvious plug and win landing spots for Bill in the NFL. New Orleans and the NYJ are messes that will take a few years to turn around.
The Jets would be a great spot for BB to make the playoffs next year but he is never working for Woody. He could fix the D and he could get more out of the O with better coaching. Rodgers is putting up a huge year for a Jets QB which is funny in that it is a bad year for him. The Jets offensive talent is getting pretty good. The Oline where most teams have nothing. The Jets have guys.

But BB will not take this job, it’s probably going to be a reboot without Rodgers and who knows what the hell will happen at QB with him gone.
 

Gash Prex

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 18, 2002
7,322
I'm a little confused but it sounds like the ball is in UNC's court? BB agreed ... but UNC has not?



Also, sounds like if the NFL wasn't willing to give him full control...then he would take his absolute full control to the college game?
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
50,215
Hartford, CT
Odd wording. But the reporting below that lede makes it seem like Bill wants the job…but only if certain demands are met. So, he really hasn’t ‘agreed’ to anything.
 

NDBoston

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 22, 2003
903
It's a huge investment. It's a state school and there's plenty of politics (and funding) required to make this happen.
 

NDBoston

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 22, 2003
903
I'm not quite as confident but hope you're right. There's nothing about UNC's historical view on football that indicates they will do it.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
26,186
where I was last at
How much is schmoozing a 17 YO kid and his parents still a thing in college recruiting?

Maybe BB's recent private life is prepping him for sweet talking 17-20 somethings.

I don't see the fit.
 

yeahlunchbox

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 21, 2008
951
How much is schmoozing a 17 YO kid and his parents still a thing in college recruiting?

Maybe BB's recent private life is prepping him for sweet talking 17-20 somethings.

I don't see the fit.
My guess is the position coaches and NIL group would be doing the sweet talking and then you'd be bringing the recruit in to meet with Bill the closer.
 

steveluck7

Member
SoSH Member
May 10, 2007
4,130
Burrillville, RI
How much is schmoozing a 17 YO kid and his parents still a thing in college recruiting?

Maybe BB's recent private life is prepping him for sweet talking 17-20 somethings.

I don't see the fit.
In the context of BB to UNC, Bert Breer (as well as someone else that can’t recall) have said that Deion has done precisely zero visits to recruits so it would seem that the rest of the staff manages that for some programs
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
55,964
UNC hosts the FCS Richmond Spiders next season. That's awesome. Possibly Bill's first game...

EDIT: Not his first game
 
Last edited:

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
32,350
I'm not quite as confident but hope you're right. There's nothing about UNC's historical view on football that indicates they will do it.
I have no confidence in anything except the group my info came from.
How much is schmoozing a 17 YO kid and his parents still a thing in college recruiting?

Maybe BB's recent private life is prepping him for sweet talking 17-20 somethings.

I don't see the fit.
As others have said, Steve will be running the defense and other recruiting coordinators will be in place along with the Steve transition plan to sell.
 

PayrodsFirstClutchHit

Bob Kraft's Season Ticket Robin Hoodie
SoSH Member
Jun 29, 2006
8,436
Winterport, ME
BB must believe his chances for a job in the NFL are near zero to seriously pursue this college gig. While I didn't believe NFL teams would be racing to fire their current coach just to have a chance to hire BB, I certainly thought he would have a number of serious opportunities to consider after sitting out a year.
 

Stevie1der

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 6, 2009
1,101
Morrisville, NC
This seems like such a bad fit for all parties. But having gone to UNC for grad school and still living in the area, I can kinda see it. If you’re UNC, you probably feel like the ACC is still ripe for the taking with a splashy hire and the right investment. And if you’re Belichick, this is probably one of the top college programs prestige wise that would actually agree to all these crazy demands. It’s hard to imagine an actual elite NCAA program saying yes to a 72 year old who has never coached in college and promising him that you will replace him with his son with absolutely zero head coaching experience.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
9,607
Are college HC gigs considered as cushy (compared to being an NFL HC) as they used to be? I remember part of the reason it was believed Steve Spurrier failed in Washington was that he was shocked at the time commitment expected of him as a pro coach as compared to college. And Urban Meyer also seemed to expect to have a lot more free time as an NFL HC than he actually did. Maybe Bill's year off and new GF have opened his eyes to the benefits of not grinding quite so hard.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,967
Because I don't think he'd gel with every personality at that spot and the things he values at the position aren't really what I'd prioritize when looking for my next guy. I would be concerned with the relationship he'd have with a Caleb Williams, for instance. And not just off the field. Would he try to rein in the attributes that could make him special? Also, isn't Bill's track record of developing QBs kind of just Tom Brady? Are Brissett and Garoppolo his success stories? Those guys barely played in NE and had their best years in completely different systems, is Bill really the one who should be credited for their solid careers?
Personally, I don't think Bill's credit is for "developing QB's" in the traditional sense.

I think what Bill brings to the table for QB's is the best defensive mind in football history. He has the ability to sit a QB down and tell them what the defense is going to do. He's basically a human cheat sheet for a QB when it comes to executing on the field. I believe that's why it's impossible for people to separate credit between Bill and Tom. Neither are as successful without the other.

But, to me, developing a QB is more than that, and that's the job of the QB's coach and the OC. Bill isn't sitting with Tom or anyone else and talking about footwork, arm angles, strength/flexibility or even pocket mobility. He's there to explain to them "when you see this look, this is what's going to develop and this is what your x does, this is where your Y is, and this is where you're going to find an opening." That's his bread and butter. That's how you take a Matt Cassel and plug him and come out 11-5. It's the same way he coaches his defensive players, he dumbs it down and gives them a few things to focus on at a time or even for an entire game.

I mean, nobody has take my word for it, this is Brady himself:

Cowherd was clearly trying to stir the pot on a question where he asked Brady if, under Belichick, the club might have been ever been too tight at times ahead of a big game, asking the former quarterback if he ever felt like he needed to step in as a leader and “lighten this room up.”

Brady actually admitted it was in fact, just the opposite. He said the preparation was generally so good that it gave players confidence heading into the game.

“I think the answer would be no, and I think that’s where Bill was actually so great,” said Brady. “And no one saw him in those moments like we did. And Saturday night, we were so prepared and so focused, we were the opposite of tight. We were always relaxed because we had the answers to the test. I knew that … I went through the call sheet. Let’s say we had 150 calls on the call sheet. There was a squad meeting at 8:00. I would meet with the quarterbacks starting at 6:30 and the offensive coordinator. We’d go through every single play on the call sheet, and we’d do exactly what we do. We do exactly what we did. ‘Okay, this is the play, this is the run. What’s the one thing that could mess this run up? Oh, a safety blitz off the right side. Okay, great. What do you want to do if that happens?’”

“So, I’d walk to the line of scrimmage. That call was made. I’d break the huddle. I’d look to the line of scrimmage. I’d say, ‘Okay, the only problem I have on this play is if the safety is blitzing off the right side.’ Then I would just look for it and he only did it, let’s say, 5% of the time. So, most coaches would just say, ‘Ah, just run the play, whatever. If they get lucky and call at the same time, one for them.’ That’s not how I played because that one play could mean everything. I would say, ‘No, if it’s a 5% chance, it could happen. What should I do if it happens?’ So, we’re all on the same page.”

“I would tell the line, ‘Okay, if this guy’s blitzing, this is what I’m doing, I’m going to check to this play. We’ll call Wolf, or call Beatle, or call Python,’ whatever we wanted to call it. This is what I’m going to do. Or I’m going to check to a screen, Liz, Rip. I’m going to change to protection and go to Greta or Grape. So, there was all these different code words that we had that we can get to them so quickly because it’s hard to do when there’s 70,000 fans. It’s hard to do it to communicate to everybody in 10 seconds to go from one play to another play. But that’s what the continuity allowed us to do over a long period of time. That’s what the same coordinator, the similar core group of players could do, the same offensive line coach.



“‘Oh, yeah, we did that two years ago. Yeah, I like that solution. That worked great.’ That allowed us win the game. Great. We gained confidence in it. That continuity that we had with all of us allowed us to succeed in those little small percentage chances that they did something or made a call that could beat what we were doing. And I think so much of that is what the beautiful part about the sport is. That’s the chess game in football. It’s not checkers. It’s not soccer where everything’s reaction. It’s not hockey. It’s not basketball. They’re all set pieces. There’s a play.”

“When I looked at the real field generals when I played growing up, that was John Elway, Dan Marino. Then you got to the Peyton Mannings and Drew Brees and Philip Rivers. That’s all we tried to do. We tried to say, ‘What’s the defense doing and how can we beat the defense on every single play?’ Then we’d come out of the game. That’s how we would judge ourselves. Did I make the right call there? Not always did I make the right throw. Did I snap the ball into a defense that that play would actually work?”
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
9,158
If Deion Sanders can be a successful college HC in the NIL era, I have zero doubt that Bill Belichick can do it.
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
45,963
Mtigawi
BB must believe his chances for a job in the NFL are near zero to seriously pursue this college gig. While I didn't believe NFL teams would be racing to fire their current coach just to have a chance to hire BB, I certainly thought he would have a number of serious opportunities to consider after sitting out a year.
I think that it speaks to his priority giving his son a leg up and spending two or three years on a swan song coaching gig. I’d be on the beach if I were him, but I can see doing this as a happy middle ground versus a 18 hour day for the next five years NFL coaching gig.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,796
Unreal America
At a macro level, it's never made sense that UNC has been such a mediocrity in football. It's a huge, state school with a tremendous brand, tons of rich boosters, and located in incredibly fertile recruiting grounds.

Clearly the school has never put its full institutional weight behind football as it has for hoops (and non-revenue sports as well).

Most of the coaches who have done well building non-power programs in the past few years in this NIL/portal era either have untold amounts of connections throughout the college game (e.g. Cignetti at Indiana) or have an electric personality/recruiting swagger (e.g. Sanders, Kiffin). And of course they all have vast financial resources.

I suspect Bill's would require a LOT of organizational help and resources to be successful. College is much more about the Larrys and Moes than the Xs and Os than the NFL.
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
45,963
Mtigawi
At a macro level, it's never made sense that UNC has been such a mediocrity in football. It's a huge, state school with a tremendous brand, tons of rich boosters, and located in incredibly fertile recruiting grounds.

Clearly the school has never put its full institutional weight behind football as it has for hoops (and non-revenue sports as well).

Most of the coaches who have done well building non-power programs in the past few years in this NIL/portal era either have untold amounts of connections throughout the college game (e.g. Cignetti at Indiana) or have an electric personality/recruiting swagger (e.g. Sanders, Kiffin). And of course they all have vast financial resources.

I suspect Bill's would require a LOT of organizational help and resources to be successful. College is much more about the Larrys and Moes than the Xs and Os than the NFL.
Steve already has the haircut!
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
26,186
where I was last at
Being a place holder for his adult kid, in a relatively weak football school in a weaker football conference, in basketball country, as a 73 YO who has never coached college ball is an interesting career choice. It speaks of a level of desperation to remain relevant.

Now BB may become king of Tobacco Road, but he should look at his buddy at Bama, who had everything there, and wonder why he called it a day.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,569
One only needs to look at the assistants potentially following him to UNC - son Steve, other son Matt Patricia, Josh mcdaniels’ brother - to see why he doesn’t have opportunities available to him in the NFL. Whatever staffing magic he had 15-20 years ago has completely dried up.
 

JShams

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2001
1,136
As a Carolina football fan this 100% can’t be worse than what we got with Larry Fedora.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,967
One only needs to look at the assistants potentially following him to UNC - son Steve, other son Matt Patricia, Josh mcdaniels’ brother - to see why he doesn’t have opportunities available to him in the NFL. Whatever staffing magic he had 15-20 years ago has completely dried up.
I'm not sure that's fair.

I would imagine if Bill chose to take the Dallas Cowboys job as opposed to the UNC Tar Heels job, there'd be plenty of good assistants looking to go with him.

Nobody with any real ambition or resume is going to be an assistant for him at UNC. Talk about a thankless job. He'll get all the credit no matter what happens, and they'll share the blame if its a disaster.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
38,873
Being a place holder for his adult kid, in a relatively weak football school in a weaker football conference, in basketball country, as a 73 YO who has never coached college ball is an interesting career choice. It speaks of a level of desperation to remain relevant.

Now BB may become king of Tobacco Road, but he should look at his buddy at Bama, who had everything there, and wonder why he called it a day.
I would say... Saban had a lot higher expectations, pressure and had been doing the same thing for like 20 years, also had built the type of program/infrastructure Bill is talking about making. Saban's job when he left was just running out the same thing over and over, Bill is pretty clearly signing up to structurally rebuild UNC football as an operation probably more so than trying to win the National Championship.

One only needs to look at the assistants potentially following him to UNC - son Steve, other son Matt Patricia, Josh mcdaniels’ brother - to see why he doesn’t have opportunities available to him in the NFL. Whatever staffing magic he had 15-20 years ago has completely dried up.
Patricia I can see (though we underrate him, he's a perfectly fine coach by NCAA assistant standards, probably better) but McDaniels is a legit coach for HOU who has had a lot of success at his position (should get real credit for the Collins breakout and Dell surprise performance). Steve was a good defensive playcaller... I think everyone on this board would swap out Covington for him in a heartbeat and WAS is one of the better defenses in the country under him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.