Baylor Scheierman - 30th pick, RD1

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
66,359
Rotten Apple
Old. Lefty. Can shoot and pass.
View: https://youtu.be/tYIyDlo1ynU?si=xELzW4I0qPp767tg

View: https://youtu.be/GVlIIQPWkXc?si=HIFsB98hWrnJGtD5


View: https://youtu.be/iVrrNFfZvbU?si=IXpgu1N4LVf0rtLF


View: https://twitter.com/Shot_Quality/status/1613652210230992906

Baylor Scheierman is one of the best shooters in the country. He ranks in the 99th %ILE with 1.21 SQ PPP on high volume (71 attempts in 17 games). His lethal shooting was on display against Xavier, draining four second-half 3s.

View: https://twitter.com/Marc_DAmico/status/1806165611921207801
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
66,359
Rotten Apple

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
11,017
San Francisco
Old. Lefty. Can shoot and pass.
View: https://youtu.be/tYIyDlo1ynU?si=xELzW4I0qPp767tg

View: https://youtu.be/GVlIIQPWkXc?si=HIFsB98hWrnJGtD5


View: https://youtu.be/iVrrNFfZvbU?si=IXpgu1N4LVf0rtLF


View: https://twitter.com/Shot_Quality/status/1613652210230992906

Baylor Scheierman is one of the best shooters in the country. He ranks in the 99th %ILE with 1.21 SQ PPP on high volume (71 attempts in 17 games). His lethal shooting was on display against Xavier, draining four second-half 3s.

View: https://twitter.com/Marc_DAmico/status/1806165611921207801
Anyone care to explain what ILE or PQ PPP are?
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,804
Old. Lefty. Can shoot and pass.
View: https://youtu.be/tYIyDlo1ynU?si=xELzW4I0qPp767tg

View: https://youtu.be/GVlIIQPWkXc?si=HIFsB98hWrnJGtD5


View: https://youtu.be/iVrrNFfZvbU?si=IXpgu1N4LVf0rtLF


View: https://twitter.com/Shot_Quality/status/1613652210230992906

Baylor Scheierman is one of the best shooters in the country. He ranks in the 99th %ILE with 1.21 SQ PPP on high volume (71 attempts in 17 games). His lethal shooting was on display against Xavier, draining four second-half 3s.

View: https://twitter.com/Marc_DAmico/status/1806165611921207801
36.4% and 38.1% his last two years don’t smack of someone who “can really shoot it”. They’re not terrible numbers but nothing to go crazy over.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
80,692
36.4% and 38.1% his last two years don’t smack of someone who “can really shoot it”. They’re not terrible numbers but nothing to go crazy over.
His range is amazing.

They can go "real 4 corners" now with PP lol and Jrue and Al in the front
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
33,175
Super interesting article on BS: https://www.noceilingsnba.com/p/baylor-scheierman-shooting-for-the. One part with stats:

The big lefty can hit without setting his feet. Whether he’s coming left or right off a screen, he can send the ball home. When he does set his feet, though, he does a great job of getting his gather together in a hurry. His high release point and ability to hit from the logo stretches out a defense to the furthest degree, and even a hard closeout doesn’t guarantee a miss. This knack for hitting tough ones gives him tremendous versatility as a shooter.
So far this season, he’s hit 48% of his transition threes (25 attempts), 40.6% of his threes off screens (32 attempts), 53.8% of his threes as a pick-and-roll ball handler (13 attempts), and 41.2% of his threes in handoff settings (17 attempts). While Scheierman can knock down the easy ones (49.3% on uncontested catch-and-shoot threes), it’s his proclivity for knocking down difficult threes while coming off of different actions that makes him special. If a team wants shooting for their stars, Baylor Scheierman is one of the safest bets to bring that to the table.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,860
I think he might struggle a bit more than Hauser on D, but... he has more off the dribble scoring ability passing and rebounding... question in part will be how close is the shooting. Scheierman was very good in college on high volume.... Hauser was ABSURD in college as a shooter
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
80,692
Super interesting article on BS: https://www.noceilingsnba.com/p/baylor-scheierman-shooting-for-the. One part with stats:

The big lefty can hit without setting his feet. Whether he’s coming left or right off a screen, he can send the ball home. When he does set his feet, though, he does a great job of getting his gather together in a hurry. His high release point and ability to hit from the logo stretches out a defense to the furthest degree, and even a hard closeout doesn’t guarantee a miss. This knack for hitting tough ones gives him tremendous versatility as a shooter.
So far this season, he’s hit 48% of his transition threes (25 attempts), 40.6% of his threes off screens (32 attempts), 53.8% of his threes as a pick-and-roll ball handler (13 attempts), and 41.2% of his threes in handoff settings (17 attempts). While Scheierman can knock down the easy ones (49.3% on uncontested catch-and-shoot threes), it’s his proclivity for knocking down difficult threes while coming off of different actions that makes him special. If a team wants shooting for their stars, Baylor Scheierman is one of the safest bets to bring that to the table.
SSS but I'm in love.
 

SteveF

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,338
ShotQuality Points Per Possession (SQPPP) Long Definition:
ShotQuality Points:
  • ShotQuality estimates the probability that any shot is made more missed, and credits the shooter with the expected points (ShotQuality Points) on that shot
  • A 90 percent free throw shooter may shoot 8 for 10 in a game, but based on his 90 percent average, we credit him with 9 ShotQuality points, since we would expect a 9 for 10 performance if he took the same shots again.
  • A 30 percent three-point shooter takes 10 threes in a game, and she makes 5. If she were to take the same shots again, we would expect her to make 3. So while she scored 15 points, we only credit her with 9 ShotQuality points.
  • The underlying model considers complex basketball factors, like defensive impact, shooter ability, time and score, playtype factors, and more.
ShotQuality points per possession measures a player's expected scoring efficiency based on their ability and the quality of scoring opportunities. If we replayed every shot taken by a player, how many points do we expect them to score per opportunity?
Additionally, this metric helps eliminate the randomness in basketball, like hot and cold streaks, and better measure player ability and how well or poorly we can expect them to play in the future.
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
11,017
San Francisco
Are these shot quality models more predictive of anything? Its a nice idea but I am curious what their evaluation metrics look like. And what they even choose for those.
 

SteveF

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,338
Are these shot quality models more predictive of anything? Its a nice idea but I am curious what their evaluation metrics look like. And what they even choose for those.
Pretty dicey for prospects right? There's a little bit of question begging insofar as you are using what you are trying to measure as an element of the measurement. How can I use the quality of the shooter if the quality of the shooter is what I'm purporting to measure.
I would say it makes sense to adjust for shot location and shot difficulty (e.g. pullup vs catch and shoot, off screen, off DHO, nearest defender, quality of defender and so on).
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
11,848
I think he might struggle a bit more than Hauser on D, but... he has more off the dribble scoring ability passing and rebounding... question in part will be how close is the shooting. Scheierman was very good in college on high volume.... Hauser was ABSURD in college as a shooter
If you mean Hauser coming out of the draft, yeah. If you mean Hauser of today, Scheierman is much, much worse on defense.
I would guess he spends next year in Maine because his defense just isn’t good enough for Boston
 

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
11,017
San Francisco
There's a little bit of question begging insofar as you are using what you are trying to measure as an element of the measurement. How can I use the quality of the shooter if the quality of the shooter is what I'm purporting to measure.
This was my most immediate concern when looking at their little blurb. I am also not sure what it is supposed to be telling you. How good their shot selection is? How lucky/unlucky they were? Quality of the offense they were in? What do I do with a "92nd percentile in SQ PPP"?
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
33,175
View: https://twitter.com/RealBobManning/status/1806175872593899995

Scheierman combine measurements: 6-6 1/4 height (should get to 6-7 with shoes) 6-8 3/4 wingspan 8-6 1/2 standing reach 9.25 hand length 9.75 hand width 201.6 pounds (will need some muscle) Shot 88% at combine on left corner 3s T-highest 27.5 standing vertical
He apparently was the best player on the floor in the combine scrimmages, including playing credible defense. Givony discussing on IG at this link: https://www.instagram.com/draftexpress/reel/C6-CvY0NEtL/
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
25,909
where I was last at
Its always nice to have a 2nd Hauser. A get away, just in case.

I know zip about the guy but watching some of his tapes he looks slow and not terribly athletic
 

brendan f

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2019
382
I think he might struggle a bit more than Hauser on D, but... he has more off the dribble scoring ability passing and rebounding... question in part will be how close is the shooting. Scheierman was very good in college on high volume.... Hauser was ABSURD in college as a shooter
I said something similar in the draft thread. He will almost certainly not shoot as well as Hauser. The question is whether his passing and rebounding translate well enough for him to make up for it.
 

ALiveH

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
1,206
Who's the type of player who at least has a shot at getting some run on these celtics? It would have to be one of these or a combo of these archetypes:

seasoned college player,
defensive specialist who isn't asked to do too much on offense except be a passable 3-point threat,
3-point specialist who doesn't kill you too badly with his defense, or
a big man who can give you at least half the versatility of a KP or big Al.
I like the pick.

He fits 2 / 4 of the archetype I expected. Seasoned college player / 3-point specialist. Remains to be seen if his defense could develop or be playable. At least he seems like he'd pass and rebound decently well. For a wing, average size. If he can get at least Jordan Walsh NBA minutes (about 100 total minutes across regular season + playoffs), plus a lot of G-league run that would just about fit expectations.

He reminds me a little bit of Nesmith if he develops - that would be a useful player. Scheierman is not as bad an athlete as people might think (folks tend to focus on his below-average vertical leap which is not a big part of positional defense) so the defensive potential is there. At the combine (77 prospects competed) he was: 81st percentile lane agility, 72nd percentile shuttle run, 80th percentile sprint so the defensive potential is there.

Speaking of Walsh, Scheierman is also complementary to Walsh's skillset - Walsh is basically the other extreme at the wing position - a defensive specialist who needs to be at least passable at shooting and not bog down the offense. They could actually develop in parallel at the wing position without being redundant.
 
Last edited:

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
53,676
The numbers posted in the Tweet above suggests he can board. As has been well documented, the Cs like the corner crash so his ability to shoot and grab rebounds definitely fits a type.
 

tbrown_01923

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2006
842
The slot is ~$2MM approximately the same as the vet minimum. I suspect he gets signed and we'll see if he develops. They have done a great job coaching up pritch and hauser on D, remains to be seen on Drew Peterson. Those down side comps are a bit ludicrous... max strus? Come on.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
33,175

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
14,280
SF
Not that he's going to be asked to do a lot of this at the beginning but he "ranked 99th percentile in points per possession scoring out of the pick-and-roll, per Synergy. Scheierman still ranked 98th percentile even when adding in his passes". If there are bets for making the GLeague all-star team, maybe place one on him now. :)

cite: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5595744/2024/06/27/celtics-nba-draft-creighton-baylor-scheierman/
The JT/JB Celtics thrive with guys who can play off advantages in space. He won't be running PnR for Boston, but that ability probably translates to attacking closeouts and making plays on the fly.

Hauser has worked on this, but he's not that good at it currently. It's basically floater/midrange jumper or nothing when he gets into space.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
22,210
Santa Monica
Not that he's going to be asked to do a lot of this at the beginning but he "ranked 99th percentile in points per possession scoring out of the pick-and-roll, per Synergy. Scheierman still ranked 98th percentile even when adding in his passes". If there are bets for making the GLeague all-star team, maybe place one on him now. :)

cite: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5595744/2024/06/27/celtics-nba-draft-creighton-baylor-scheierman/
Thx for posting.

If we're going to use a First I'm glad Brad used it on this type of player (experienced, full-grown, succeeded at the NCAA level) instead of paying a 19-year-old lottery ticket. They'll know quickly if he has the chops to understand Celtic concepts/add value against opposing bench players. Suspect this was their target for a while (had him in pre-draft)

Teams like Miami (Jaquez Jr) and GSW (TJD/Podz) were criticized for taking older draft picks last season & it worked out fine for them.

ALSO don't believe its the end of the Hauser Era, probably means they are leaning more into that archetype.

Hate to say it but love the Lakers pick. Dalton Knecht will be playable Day 1 in JJ's system.