Apparently what Kinsler and MLB have perpetrated against Angel Hernandez is nothing less than an abomination:
Am I wrong, or does MLB say that the strike zone technology isn't there to have computers call balls and strikes BUT they use strike zone technology to grade the umpires on the accuracy of their calling balls and strikes?Computers should call balls and strikes
No sense of humor have you?blah, blah, blah
I do agree that the wristbands is a joke, but beyond that I saw no evidence that the substance of your post was supposed to be humorous.No sense of humor have you?
Do you think that wearing wrist bands will spur the Commissioner's Office into action? Irrespective of your feelings on the issue, Rule 9.02, or umpires.
So how do they reconcile that rule with replay?As an aside, rule 9.02 is the dumbest rule in baseball. Of corse, the rulebook is irrelevant to this discussion, because what the umps are mad about are the comments that Kinsler made after the game.
I'm not sure, but it seems like something that shouldn't be done in public at the very least.Was there a way for Kinsler to express himself that didn't come across as sour grapes or offensive? Not a rhetorical question, I'm just not sure how players are supposed to raise sincere questions about umpire performance in a manner that gets it taken seriously. Perhaps through the MLBPA?
I dunno, his language is a little ambiguous in that regard. The word "blatant" used in this kind of context tends to have connotations of intent (i.e., "he's not even trying to hide it"). "He needs to stop ruining baseball games" also could be interpreted as meaning that Hernandez is acting with intent. Even the "what is he doing out there?" questions could be taken two ways ("why is he allowed out there?" or "what is he up to out there?"). You wouldn't have to be all that paranoid to interpret the remarks, taken together, as meaning that Hernandez is blowing calls on purpose. Kinsler may not have meant that, but he chose his words poorly if he didn't want to people to think so.That letter is such bullshit. Kinsler didn't attack Hernandez's character, he attacked his skill at his job.
In criticising his fine, it also says Kinsler himself said he expected to be suspended. Maybe I missed that, because I saw what was televised and all Kinsler said was that he expected to be fined and was ok with it:That letter is such bullshit. Kinsler didn't attack Hernandez's character, he attacked his skill at his job. He might be a great guy, he's just not good enough at the job he's paid to do.
"If I get fined for saying the truth, then so be it. He's messing with baseball games, blatantly."
He and joe west should have been forced into retirement years ago.I feel like he's just giving evidence to the defense at this point.
The main issue with that being that, in order for that to happen, the managers of the teams needed to challenge the play. If they didn't challenge it - or didn't have any challenges left - the call would have been incorrect.Per Jeff Passan here is MLB's statement:
“There were several very close calls at first base tonight, and we are glad that instant replay allowed the umpiring crew to achieve the proper result on all of them.”
I don't believe any of us wanted him behind the plate. This could get ugly, especially with Kinsler starting. Maybe it's Cora' s evil plan: get Kinsler to cause a stink on a close play, get ejected, and then he has to go to Holt!I guess Hernández got what we wanted.
A playoff officiating series.
Asked after Boston's win about Hernandez's strike zone -- and Sabathia's critique of it -- Porcello was pointed in his response.
"Throw the ball over the plate, CC," Porcello said. "I thought Angel Hernandez called a good game. You gotta get the ball over the white part of the plate and then you get the strikes called."
CB Bucknor is still employed, so I'd say "impossible"I have a question and could not find an answer on line. How often, or how many times, has a major league umpire been let go due to poor performance?
I dunno but the last time an umpire was fired for poor performance was 2012.I have a question and could not find an answer on line. How often, or how many times, has a major league umpire been let go due to poor performance?
Just going from memory, he is exceptionally bad at 1B and 2B calls.Rick was right. Angel was better than league average last night.
His missed call pct. at the dish was 6.7. MLB average is 8.1% (according tp MLB now).
Hernandez is clearly an awful ump. But reading between the lines, it seems these suits are as much related to the opacity of MLB’s umpiring system and dubious hiring practices as any overt effort to target him on the basis of his ethnicity. Which is to say that as bad as Hernandez is, when you have a black box of HR protocols and procedures in today’s day and age—that you don’t share because you want to be able to manipulate who gets what position when—this is precisely the kind of thing that can be exploited. The NBA should take note.Angel Hernandez alleged in a legal filing with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals that Major League Baseball manipulated its internal umpiring metrics to disadvantage minorities, thereby excluding them from becoming crew chiefs.
The filing is the latest salvo in Hernandez’s discrimination claim against MLB filed in 2017, which a lower court tossed in March 2021, though not without first acknowledging baseball had a “diversity issue.”
Hernandez claimed MLB has a history of discriminating against minority umpires, pointing out that as of the filing of his lawsuit, there had only been one minority crew chief in the league’s 150 years (Richie Garcia) — though that number has grown in the years since. There are 19 umpiring crews, each with four umpires, one of whom is a crew chief. In the appeal brief filed this week, seeking an overrule of the lower court judge’s dismissal, he also raised the argument that MLB not only looked the other way on its lack of diversity, but it altered the season-ending umpiring reports to justify this behavior.
“The District Court also failed to give appropriate weight to evidence of MLB’s disparate treatment of Mr. Hernandez, including evidence that MLB was manipulating the performance of Mr. Hernandez and other minority umpires to make their performances look worse,” the umpire argued in the court filing.
MLB during the time period covered in the complaint, 2011-16, performed midseason reviews of umpires called umpire evaluation reports (UER), and followed with year-end reviews. Hernandez said his UERs were glowing, but when it came time for his year-end review, the results did not reflect the previous positive assessments.
“[A] review of Mr. Hernandez’s Year-End Evaluations and his UERs for the years 2011-2016 reveals that MLB manipulated Mr. Hernandez’s year-end evaluations in order to make his job performance appear worse than it actually was,” he argued. “Mr. Hernandez’s Year-End Evaluations for the 2011-2016 seasons do not even come close to accurately summarizing Mr. Hernandez’s actual performance in those seasons.”
He's the worst but that was actually pretty close.Another blown call at first by HOF umpire Angel Hernandez
View: https://streamable.com/z63baz
he blew another obvious call in TB
https://mlb-cuts-diamond.mlb.com/FORGE/2022/2022-06/25/af6c39c4-81bebc11-6a50d591-csvm-diamondx64-asset_1280x720_59_4000K.mp4
Honestly I don’t think we can kill him over this. This call gets missed by a lot of umpires. That said, yes he definitely sucks, but not in this caseAnother blown call at first by HOF umpire Angel Hernandez
View: https://streamable.com/z63baz
he blew another obvious call in TB
https://mlb-cuts-diamond.mlb.com/FORGE/2022/2022-06/25/af6c39c4-81bebc11-6a50d591-csvm-diamondx64-asset_1280x720_59_4000K.mp4
I think the issue is that they don't have much in the way of reinforcements, at least that are "ready." If they force him out before he's ready to retire, they have to promote someone to take his place. That person may not be much better.Reading that article - how strong is the Umpire Union that Hernandez hasn’t been outright canned by now? Just example after example of a man who is not just bad at his job, but is hostile to the suggestion that he isn’t infallible.
I'll take someone who misses a call due to inexperience over repeated missed calls due to incompetence.I think the issue is that they don't have much in the way of reinforcements, at least that are "ready." If they force him out before he's ready to retire, they have to promote someone to take his place. That person may not be much better.
Plus, if they're going to let him go for poor performance and shitty attitude, there's CB Bucknor, Laz Díaz, etc. Where do you stop?
Right, and I agree, but if they promote a AAA umpire, they would then need to promote a AA umpire to take that spot, and so on and so forth. I'm not sure how many minor league umpires there are that are worth moving up. One is probably manageable, maybe even two or three, but the feeding pools are only so stocked. At last check, it wasn't a career choice (or side hustle) that was attracting a lot of applicants, at least not a number that would sustain a graduation rate commensurate with the league's needs.I'll take someone who misses a call due to inexperience over repeated missed calls due to incompetence.
I don't want to trivialize how hard umpiring is, but I can't imagine that the leap from umping in AAA to umping in MLB is that big.
That might explain keeping him on an extra year or so, but it's been over a decade since he should've been fired.Right, and I agree, but if they promote a AAA umpire, they would then need to promote a AA umpire to take that spot, and so on and so forth. I'm not sure how many minor league umpires there are that are worth moving up. One is probably manageable, maybe even two or three, but the feeding pools are only so stocked. At last check, it wasn't a career choice (or side hustle) that was attracting a lot of applicants, at least not a number that would sustain a graduation rate commensurate with the league's needs.
considering how many minor leagues they shut down, there might be some experienced umps available.Right, and I agree, but if they promote a AAA umpire, they would then need to promote a AA umpire to take that spot, and so on and so forth
That didn't stop them from promoting everyone they needed to after the umpires walked out in 1999. Diaz was one of those brought up.I think the issue is that they don't have much in the way of reinforcements, at least that are "ready." If they force him out before he's ready to retire, they have to promote someone to take his place. That person may not be much better.
Plus, if they're going to let him go for poor performance and shitty attitude, there's CB Bucknor, Laz Díaz, etc. Where do you stop?
Here is the link to the game log… if what Jomboy says is correct, those 19 missed calls represent 15% of the non-contact pitches (I counted 129) that Hernandez had to call for the game. That’s bad.Speaking of which, if people haven't seen it...the Jomboy breakdown of Kyle Schwarber losing it at Angel Hernandez is worth seeing:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPFERnpO-QQ