Alex Cora fired

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,847
There are already rumblings that the Dodger and Yankees among others did the same thing, hope MLB is prepared to give those mangers career killing suspensions too. Because of course every team is doing something similar to what the Sox did (unless there's more than just using the replay room)
The way the MLB has set things up, future investigations will only come if the violation was post 2018. That's why Cora/Red Sox are being investigated after The Athletic article and not the Yankees who were also using the replay room before but supposedly not after 2018.
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,104
UWS, NYC
Two thoughts on the release:
1.) It was very generous of Red Sox ownership to characterize the dismissal as a "collective decision" and to allow Cora a quote.
2.) Cora's quote was also well done. This isn't the place he needs to put on the hair shirt and issue mea culpas for the Houston behavior, because he hasn't been formally disciplined by MLB. But at the same time, Cora didn't go with the bullshit "to be clear, I never intentionally cheated" bullshit that Luhnow put in his farewell statement. I hope and expect when Cora is disciplined, he can just say "I used bad judgment" and stop right there.

Also, exactly what is a "hair shirt"?
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
There are already rumblings that the Dodger and Yankees among others did the same thing, hope MLB is prepared to give those mangers career killing suspensions too. Because of course every team is doing something similar to what the Sox did (unless there's more than just using the replay room)
The same thing as who and are we clear yet on what the Red Sox did?
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,476
I liked Cora but find most coaches to generally be replaceable. Managing a locker room is not some unicorn superpower. This is a strong ownership group and they will come out of this fine. It’s a shame but I am sweating potential serious draft pick loss more than I am about replacing a manager.
 

P'tucket rhymes with...

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2006
11,633
The Coney Island of my mind
Two thoughts on the release:
1.) It was very generous of Red Sox ownership to characterize the dismissal as a "collective decision" and to allow Cora a quote.
2.) Cora's quote was also well done. This isn't the place he needs to put on the hair shirt and issue mea culpas for the Houston behavior, because he hasn't been formally disciplined by MLB. But at the same time, Cora didn't go with the bullshit "to be clear, I never intentionally cheated" bullshit that Luhnow put in his farewell statement. I hope and expect when Cora is disciplined, he can just say "I used bad judgment" and stop right there.

Also, exactly what is a "hair shirt"?
Religion is weird.
 

FredCDobbs

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 5, 2004
563
Austin
I guess I'm a hypocrite because I can't help but still like Cora while I was mad at the Stros for the garbage can. So I'm just another full of shit American.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,332
The same thing as who and are we clear yet on what the Red Sox did?
It sounds like lots (if not almost all) teams were using the replay room to steal signs which is what they Sox are getting hit for, obviously if the Sox did something like the Astros did it's a whole different ball game, but there hasn't been anything to indicate they did.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,732
AZ
The way the MLB has set things up, future investigations will only come if the violation was post 2018. That's why Cora/Red Sox are being investigated after The Athletic article and not the Yankees who were also using the replay room before but supposedly not after 2018.
After the 9/15/17 memo. That was what really set Manfred off. He sent a memo and the Astros ignored it, presumably starting the very next day and then into the postseason.

If credible allegations come forward of other teams doing this stuff after 9/15/17, then I think it's going to be hard to walk it all back.
 

21st Century Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2006
766
The way the MLB has set things up, future investigations will only come if the violation was post 2018. That's why Cora/Red Sox are being investigated after The Athletic article and not the Yankees who were also using the replay room before but supposedly not after 2018.
I believe this is correct. Both Sox and NYY were disciplined (lightly) for the apple watch/video rooms, and the league was notified that going forward, hammer comes down. Cora kept rolling the dice, perhaps the Yankees too, but perhaps they took the 2018 warning, and just went back to plain old sign stealing....

https://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2017/9/6/16262734/mlb-punishment-red-sox-sign-stealing-yankees-fines-hurricane-relief-apple-watch
 

YTF

Member
SoSH Member
It sounds like lots (if not almost all) teams were using the replay room to steal signs which is what they Sox are getting hit for, obviously if the Sox did something like the Astros did it's a whole different ball game, but there hasn't been anything to indicate they did.
The reason I asked is that it seems many here are blurring lines here between the two things Cora has been associated with.
 

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
14,095
Boulder, CO
I find it amusing that his 'apology' is not in any way an apology, it's basically just 'thanks to everyone, thanks to Boston, it was awesome winning a world series CORA OUT.'
 

The Big Red Kahuna

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 14, 2003
3,564
It sounds like lots (if not almost all) teams were using the replay room to steal signs which is what they Sox are getting hit for, obviously if the Sox did something like the Astros did it's a whole different ball game, but there hasn't been anything to indicate they did.
This needs some backup sourcing. I think this entire situation is way overblown personally, but where do you see that most (if not all) teams were using replay room to steal signs?
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,122
Concord, NH
DD & Cora are gone. who else needs to go?
It was a hot take. This whole thing has me all conflicted.

I can only speak as a fan. And an honest person. I can tolerate the outside hate for the Pats because I genuinely believe it's wrong. This one bothers me. Not as much for what he was caught doing with the Sox. It's that now I don't know what he did with the Sox.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
This needs some backup sourcing. I think this entire situation is way overblown personally, but where do you see that most (if not all) teams were using replay room to steal signs?
The Athletic article made clear that the Yankees definitely were, and then vaguely said that "other teams" were doing the same. Then there was an SI article (here) that said the following: "Two sources familiar with the investigation, which lasted three months and included more than 70,000 e-mails and 60 interviews, said various Astros personnel told MLB investigators about eight other teams who used technology to steal signs in 2017 or 2018–such was the culture of the time."

The question, as noted above, is how many teams were doing this after the Sept. 2017 memo - I think MLB has acknowledged that anything prior to that is basically out of bounds in terms of punishment because the rules were less clear.
 

staz

Intangible
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2004
20,756
The cradle of the game.
Hope Sox decision not to let Cora stick around and take the inevitable MLB bullet won't backfire with more $$/picks taken than if he was still around.

Maybe this issue mellows over time (after it's discovered how rampant these practices are) and, after an acceptable period of employment in the lower ranks, he gets a second chance.

But yeah, any way you slice it, it sucks right now.
 

donutogre

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
3,229
Philadelphia
It was a hot take. This whole thing has me all conflicted.

I can only speak as a fan. And an honest person. I can tolerate the outside hate for the Pats because I genuinely believe it's wrong. This one bothers me. Not as much for what he was caught doing with the Sox. It's that now I don't know what he did with the Sox.
I feel like we’ll eventually find out what he was up to when the full Red Sox report comes out. Even if what he did in Boston wasn’t as bad as what was going on in Houston, it really does make sense for the Sox and Cora to part ways now. But that doesn’t make it sting any less. A very disappointing to what seemed like a very promising managerial career here.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,732
AZ
It was a hot take. This whole thing has me all conflicted.

I can only speak as a fan. And an honest person. I can tolerate the outside hate for the Pats because I genuinely believe it's wrong. This one bothers me. Not as much for what he was caught doing with the Sox. It's that now I don't know what he did with the Sox.
I feel better about Manfred than Goodell. I think we're all a little bit shellshocked from the NFL's lack of good faith and transparency in these situations and are applying it to this situation.

I think we're going to get a fair report on the Red Sox alleged infractions in 2018 and I also have some comfort that Manfred and the league understand nuance and degree.

That really doesn't help us if the scheme was as bad as the Astros. But if it wasn't I don't think we should fear a Goodell like report written to appeal to Jerry Jones here.
 

Jim Ed Rice in HOF

Red-headed Skrub child
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,346
Seacoast NH
So if it was "mutual" do we still have to pay him?
Who cares? There’s no cap issues like AB with the Patriots and it won’t impact anything on or off the field.

I would imagine he will get paid and this may be a way for him to avoid losing a year of salary to MLB. It will be interesting to see what MLB does to him if he’s not in the employment of MLB.
 

drbretto

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 10, 2009
12,122
Concord, NH
I'm just glad there won't be anymore cheating in baseball.
Well, that's the thing, though, isn't it? I mean, of course there will always be cheating in baseball. By people with enough shame to actually try to hide it. And the game survives because people don't realize it's happening. But they had to go and bang on trash cans in an era where billions of people can watch all the video clips and share em on social media, shining a big bright spotlight on it.

So, they didn't solve cheating today. But they did make the right move.
 

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
How much will what hurt?
I can't see the Sox getting hit as hard as Houston. Sox didn't do anything in the 2018 post season because MLB was monitoring everything. I get the whole repeat offender thing but Houston did this for a few years.
 

Marbleheader

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2004
11,728
Next man up.

This was going to happen in one form or another, better to rip the band aid off now. I'm not too concerned about finding a replacement. I don't need a big name.

I remember expecting wall to wall coverage of the Cardinals hacking scandal and it was met with a collective yawn. Funny what league leaders and media decide to overreact and underreact to.

I think MLB drops this here and doesn't investigate any other teams. They should, but they won't.
 

canderson

Mr. Brightside
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
39,558
Harrisburg, Pa.
Had to be done.

I can‘t recall the last time a pro sports coach/manager disappointed me as much as Alex Cora. I thought he was here for the long haul, turns out he‘s a cheater. Very sad.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,499
I can't see the Sox getting hit as hard as Houston. Sox didn't do anything in the 2018 post season because MLB was monitoring everything. I get the whole repeat offender thing but Houston did this for a few years.
didn't one of the Red Sox players who came forward to Rosenthal say we had the monitors in our pockets?

EDIT: Excerpt from Athletic:

Where things stood in the 2019 season
MLB revised its rules again in 2019, with Torre’s three-page memo from the previous year expanding into a six-page memo with much tighter restrictions. Among them: the continued monitoring of replay rooms, extending the practice that began in the 2018 postseason.

The in-person monitors made cheating more difficult. But most alarming to MLB might be an assertion that at least one team, again the Red Sox, found ways to occasionally skirt the system.

“We had (the monitors) in our back pocket,” one Red Sox person said. “If we wanted to whisper something or they walked out, then we could do something if we needed to.”

Another Red Sox source confirmed this dynamic.

A video scout with another club who saw the monitors in action said that their efficacy varied widely depending on the city and the monitor on duty. Some would stay in the video replay room the entire game, while others would disappear for periods of time.

“Some acted like they were your best friend, root you on. Others would tell on you for the littlest things that weren’t even real,” the scout said. “It was very inconsistent how each person took their job and what they were actually doing. … You knew this guy was a stickler, and with this guy you could get away with some stuff.
I'm sure a good chunk of the investigation would be seeing if this occurred in 2018 postseason.
 

dhellers

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2005
4,218
Silver Spring, Maryland
I'm just glad there won't be anymore cheating in baseball.
For me, the bottom line is that baseball has a more sane attitude about minor acts of cheating (than football).
If you get away with it, congrats.
But if you get caught, you pay a price.
Cora got caught. He pays the price. So be it.

There is a legitimate real issue -- trying to prevent a technological arms race in "cheating". So while the punishment's being meted out are bigger than the crimes,
the goal of deterring this arms race is valid.

Though perhaps MLB should just join the 21st century, and enable secure electronic communication between pitcher and catcher?

Nah-- I like that one of the perks of getting to 2nd base is having a chance to steal signals the Old Fashioned Way!
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,847
I think we're going to get a fair report on the Red Sox alleged infractions in 2018 and I also have some comfort that Manfred and the league understand nuance and degree.
Honestly it doesn't seem all that nuanced that using your eyeballs (video) and brain (computer) is 100% completely legitimate but using a video feed gets people shot into the sun. How much more effective is one method than the other really?

Personally, I hate the "it's been that way forever" fallacy. Pitching is hard enough as it is and the pitchers should be allowed to do their jobs without people stealing their signs. If using video is illegal then, at the very least, Manfred should be working his ass off to implement a pitcher to catcher comms system that eliminates this crap from the game if they aren't willing to explicitly ban human sign stealing(which could never be enforced anyway).

This whole thing looks crazier by the minute.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,172
It's a shame because I really like Cora. He was good for the team, and was capable of being in Boston. And I do like the way he went out as well. I'm going to hate the faux outrage and moralizing from the media on this, but that's a bed Cora made for himself.

I do hope that if a different team is caught having done what the Sox were alleged to have done, their manager gets a similarly harsh penalty.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,292
Santa Monica
why does MLB seem like its getting less fun every year?

young multi-millionaires pounding garbage cans in the dugout, Earl Weaver kicking dirt on the Ump and Gaylord Perry doctoring baseballs - all part of the game

and don't @ me about the journeyman RP or 25th man, jeez we were stealing signs in Little League
 

section15

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 23, 2007
227
Bradford, MA and section 15
I rarely listen to get-a-life sports radio but because I had to work in Boston, I listened to WEEI-FM on the way home. A guy who calls himself "Mut" was hosting - and no announcement had been issued up to that point in time. Most callers agreed, fire him now. One caller said perhaps they're thinking of a scenario where he's suspended with pay until it's settled, then fire him, avoiding a potential legal stink. Mut said he had a point.

But the analysis -

1) pitchers and catchers report in four weeks, so you're going to have to have a manager who's not in limbo or sitting under the sword of Damocles.
2) the baseball writers dinner is Thursday - and it would be difficult to address this issue there if Cora was still aboard
3) Winter Weekend begins Friday night at MGM Grand. There's no way they'd escape scrutiny from the media over there. AND the fans.
4) There may have been some people who sent in their renewal checks, then called and said "don't cash it yet."
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,332
The Athletic article made clear that the Yankees definitely were, and then vaguely said that "other teams" were doing the same. Then there was an SI article (here) that said the following: "Two sources familiar with the investigation, which lasted three months and included more than 70,000 e-mails and 60 interviews, said various Astros personnel told MLB investigators about eight other teams who used technology to steal signs in 2017 or 2018–such was the culture of the time."

The question, as noted above, is how many teams were doing this after the Sept. 2017 memo - I think MLB has acknowledged that anything prior to that is basically out of bounds in terms of punishment because the rules were less clear.
In addition to this we had Logan Morrison, who has been with 7 organizations and probably knows someone on almost every team, saying today that many teams use the replay room, specifically naming the sox yankees astros and dodgers that he had first hand accounts from. Plus vague inferences to the Brewers as well I believe. Maybe almost every team was too strong, but there's no way it's just 2 teams
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,505
My guess is that the Sox/Cora didn't come to their "mutual decision" without consulting with the league and, as other posters noted upthread, this story wasn't out of the blue.

If that is the case, they also presumably have a short list of replacements. I strongly suspect instead of bringing in an old school guy, they will give someone their first shot. They can give that person a chance to grow with the inevitable changes Bloom is going to make to the roster.


In addition to this we had Logan Morrison, who has been with 7 organizations and probably knows someone on almost every team, saying today that many teams use the replay room, specifically naming the sox yankees astros and dodgers that he had first hand accounts from. Plus vague inferences to the Brewers as well I believe. Maybe almost every team was too strong, but there's no way it's just 2 teams
I agree with this and the Morrison Tweets/comments are pretty damning if true. That said, I have to think Manfred and company want this story to be done with ASAP. Not saying this happened because, as we have seen, professional organizations are constantly screwing up basic damage control situations but you would have to think that MLB ID'd the Astros and Red Sox as the worst offenders. As such, anything else that comes out is going to be more along the lines of Morrison anecdotes and not with definitive proof.

However, as others have also observed, the MLB looks like it is overreacting here so who knows how this all actually plays out...
 

greek_gawd_of_walks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 14, 2009
9,180
Wiscansin, by way of Attleboro
In addition to this we had Logan Morrison, who has been with 7 organizations and probably knows someone on almost every team, saying today that many teams use the replay room, specifically naming the sox yankees astros and dodgers that he had first hand accounts from. Plus vague inferences to the Brewers as well I believe. Maybe almost every team was too strong, but there's no way it's just 2 teams
Did he really implicate the Brewers? They just signed him to a non-roster invite deal. Even if incredibly implicit, that's awkward as hell.