Alex Bregman and Adding a Bat

Do you want the Red Sox to Sign Alex Bregman

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,575
If we need to pay someone far more than he believes he’s worth, let’s do it for Profar. He reportedly wants three years, not seven or eight, won’t cost us a pick, and will likely give us 75 percent of the production Bergman will.
 

kazuneko

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
3,116
Honolulu HI
I believe I’ve made my stance on this clear, but for the record, I voted yes, though it doesn’t “have” to be Bregman. I want a core bat added, and ideally one that can play an above average 3b or 1b defensively.
Mark Canha is above average at 1b and hits LHP better than Bregman. He also plays the OF and isn’t terrible. He’d probably be available on a cheap one year, and that would make subsidizing Yoshida so that he can play elsewhere far more palatable.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
14,965
I’m really worried that taking Devers off the field will result in a drop of focus on the game, thus his hitting might suffer.
Is this is a thing? Do you mean for some strange Devers specific reason? Or because this has been proven to happen with lots of poor defensive players that shift to DH?

I would assume any Devers shift to primary DH would result in unchanged to improved offensive production. He seems to get plenty of nagging injuries over the course of the season, and that can only be improved if he's on the field less.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
14,965
If we need to pay someone far more than he believes he’s worth, let’s do it for Profar. He reportedly wants three years, not seven or eight, won’t cost us a pick, and will likely give us 75 percent of the production Bergman will.
Way out on Profar. Egh.

He's coming off a career year, older than Bregman, and can't play in the infield.

He's definitely a guy you pass on, let the kids play, and see where things stand. No reason to think he's much of an upgrade on what we have, while Bregman should be a pretty clear upgrade.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,888
Since when does Bregman play the outfield? I don't see how potential Abreu and Anthony at bats are in any way relevant to to his fit on the team.
Relevant in terms of saying that signing Bregman (or similar) would some how necessitate blocking the kids. If Abreu continues to only play 125 games (his 3 year average) then you’re probably looking at those at bats going to Rafaela long term (Duran, Rafaela, Anthony configuration).

Also of course it’s very possible those games need to look like Campbell, Duran, Anthony (L to R), with Rafaela at SS and Grissom at 2b (or Hamilton).


If a “core” bat is acquired the Sox would need to hit on a ton of things going right for at bats to be tough to come by, and of course, this would assume the Red Sox either hit on the majority of their pitching prospects, because otherwise you’re going to need to trade some of these guys for pitching.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
10,156
Mark Canha is above average at 1b and hits LHP better than Bregman. He also plays the OF and isn’t terrible. He’d probably be available on a cheap one year, and that would make subsidizing Yoshida so that he can play elsewhere far more palatable.
And Solano hit them even better than that and can back up the corners adequately. There are good insurance guys out there that can do the job and be easily dumped if/when the kids force the issue.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,718
I’ve come to the conclusion that many people’s feelings on the current roster construction and possible positional addition hinge on their views of Rafaela.

I think it would be complete malpractice to pencil him in center for 650 at bats. He had the worst BB% in the majors. The 4th worst wRC+. He had some clutch hits that are masking people’s view of just how horrible of an offensive year he had. His major league track record suggest his lack of discipline is no fluke and could be a fatal flaw.

His value is as up the middle super sub with great defense and base running.

Bregman would be an enormous upgrade over Ceddane offensively. Which is why I’d be very excited about him starting at second, Campbell in left, with Duran in center.
 

marcoscutaro

New Member
Jun 15, 2024
186
I believe I’ve made my stance on this clear, but for the record, I voted yes, though it doesn’t “have” to be Bregman. I want a core bat added, and ideally one that can play an above average 3b or 1b defensively.

Cross posting from the other thread:

Now let’s even assume that for some reason Casas 2023, and that is on the low end, becomes the norm and his 2024, 2022 and 2021 are outliers, and there are STILL about 1050 PAs left to split.
You seem to have ignored the point I made about your deliberately misleading use of stats so I’ll link it again.
http://sonsofsamhorn.net/index.php?threads/much-like-newman-the-sox-are-not-ready-to-deliver-the-2025-offseason-news-rumors-thread.44280/post-6491613

I would very much like to understand how moving Casas helps this already underpowered lineup, especially when he’s prearb and costs almost nothing. Maybe someone could walk me through that one.
 

Sox Pride

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
260
The Triangle
I’ve come to the conclusion that many people’s feelings on the current roster construction and possible positional addition hinge on their views of Rafaela.

I think it would be complete malpractice to pencil him in center for 650 at bats. He had the worst BB% in the majors. The 4th worst wRC+. He had some clutch hits that are masking people’s view of just how horrible of an offensive year he had. His major league track record suggest his lack of discipline is no fluke and could be a fatal flaw.

His value is as up the middle super sub with great defense and base running.

Bregman would be an enormous upgrade over Ceddane offensively. Which is why I’d be very excited about him starting at second, Campbell in left, with Duran in center.
Where’s Anthony playing?
 

marcoscutaro

New Member
Jun 15, 2024
186
Mark Canha is above average at 1b and hits LHP better than Bregman. He also plays the OF and isn’t terrible. He’d probably be available on a cheap one year, and that would make subsidizing Yoshida so that he can play elsewhere far more palatable.
36 years old on opening day with a career .763 OPS/OPS+ of 113 btw.
 

PedroisGod

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2002
1,638
Relevant in terms of saying that signing Bregman (or similar) would some how necessitate blocking the kids. If Abreu continues to only play 125 games (his 3 year average) then you’re probably looking at those at bats going to Rafaela long term (Duran, Rafaela, Anthony configuration).

Also of course it’s very possible those games need to look like Campbell, Duran, Anthony (L to R), with Rafaela at SS and Grissom at 2b (or Hamilton).


If a “core” bat is acquired the Sox would need to hit on a ton of things going right for at bats to be tough to come by, and of course, this would assume the Red Sox either hit on the majority of their pitching prospects, because otherwise you’re going to need to trade some of these guys for pitching.
Yeah, this is where I am too. I’d be happy with Breg, but it creates a ton of problems without moving Yoshida, and that’s going to be a big problem. I think the easiest solution is Grichuk as a RH platoon with Yoshida at DH, but I would like a trade for Taylor Ward. He can play LF vs RHP, moving Rafaela to a utility type role, and could be the RH half of an OF platoon with Abreu. This would push Refsnyder to the short side of the DH platoon with Yoshida.

I also wonder if there’s some blockbuster type move out there that we have yet to consider. Correa’s name has been mentioned - I like his fit more than Bregman because I believe in the bat more and he’s great defensively, but he has some injury concerns. He has 4 years left on his deal, with an option that vests in 2029, but that’s easy enough to avoid given that it vests with 575 PA in 2028. Mike Trout could work if there was some sort of deal where the Angels would take on Yoshida.
 

marcoscutaro

New Member
Jun 15, 2024
186
Correa is probably gettable & I personally would love him but given the Story situation, I can’t see them doing it.

Paying the ghost of Trout over $222m through the next six years holds absolutely no appeal, sorry.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
17,012
Seems pretty likely to me they are going to be a bat short. If all the prospects hit big then sure they likely won't need more offense, but that's unlikely.

None of the guys on your list has to play 3B. Devers sucks at it and everyone else can play other positions.

Generally speaking free agency is expensive and not very efficient, if it turns out Bregman is the last man standing and can be had on the relative cheap (as it seems he might be...) he is going to be a big help. The potential fit issues are far overblown.

Next offseason when some people "want to go for it", most likely we would be thrilled to find some 4 WAR offensive player who will take a contract offer of 25M AAV.
Well, your point is fair - the glut is really 2B/SS (and I have the odds pretty good that we are looking at Mayer/SS-Campbell-2B sooner rather than later) - but then to me it only makes sense to sign Bregman if you are going to play him at third base. Then you are bumping Devers to DH, presumably. Signing Bregman to a long-term contract to play 2B doesn't compute to me.
 

PedroisGod

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2002
1,638
Correa is probably gettable & I personally would love him but given the Story situation, I can’t see them doing it.

Paying the ghost of Trout over $222m through the next six years holds absolutely no appeal, sorry.
I think Trout can still hit when healthy, but of course that hasn’t been the case. I also don’t like Trout at 222m but if they took on Yoshida’s entire deal that would be 54 coming off. It would make Trout’s deal a bit more palatable.

I think Correa could probably play a pretty good 3B if he’d be willing to make the switch. He definitely has the arm for it.
 

Whoop-La White

used to be zougwa
SoSH Member
The RH power bat has been supplied by Hunter Renfroe in 2021 ($3.1M), Adam Duvall/Justin Turner in 2023 ($7M & $8.3M), and O’Neill in 2024 ($5.85M). I have a hard time seeing them break from that trend to spend significant dollars trying to shoehorn in a bat that could require moving up to 3 players from their positions in order to get the playing time or value that would justify the deal.
 

6-5 Sadler

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
287
Is this is a thing? Do you mean for some strange Devers specific reason? Or because this has been proven to happen with lots of poor defensive players that shift to DH?
No…see here. Although positional players that DH do see a penalty, players that DH 75% of the time don’t see to see this effect.

Having said that, this is an easy no for me. We already have a third baseman and I have no interest in giving significant dollars to Bregman to play him out of position at 2b. Whoever compared it to the Hanley experiment years ago nailed it. If he was willing to sign a one year deal then sure but that’s extremely unlikely. Even if his market collapses someone will give him a multiyear deal with an opt out.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,740
I think Rafaela should be in AAA playing every day, or traded- the team simply does not need a defensive replacement at any of the positions he plays, and there’s nobody you’d really want him to PH for. I don’t think he’s a great fit for this team, currently, and he’s the easiest bat to upgrade.

Now, the argument may be that he proved all he could at AAA and just needs at bats. But I don’t see him as a very good fit in a part time role; either for his career or the team.

If Yoshida can play the field, it could change things a bit, but if he can’t he’s also a really tough player to use optimally too.
 

marcoscutaro

New Member
Jun 15, 2024
186
I think Trout can still hit when healthy, but of course that hasn’t been the case. I also don’t like Trout at 222m but if they took on Yoshida’s entire deal that would be 54 coming off. It would make Trout’s deal a bit more palatable.

I think Correa could probably play a pretty good 3B if he’d be willing to make the switch. He definitely has the arm for it.
The flip side of this would be exchanging a guy on 54/3 for 222/6 and who may very well be (literally) unplayable for the back half of that deal while taking up a 40 man spot and being immovable. I’d be inclined to leave him in Anaheim personally.

Correa said during his free agency that he’d only switch to 3B to accommodate Lindor in NY.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
21,103
Somewhere
I said yes, contingent on price. Bregman isn’t a need, but he’s a good enough player that you make space for him. I still think that some needy team is going to splash for him though.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
14,965
Well, your point is fair - the glut is really 2B/SS (and I have the odds pretty good that we are looking at Mayer/SS-Campbell-2B sooner rather than later) - but then to me it only makes sense to sign Bregman if you are going to play him at third base. Then you are bumping Devers to DH, presumably. Signing Bregman to a long-term contract to play 2B doesn't compute to me.
Agree 100% if you’re committed to Devers at 3B and are signing Bregman for 2B long term. That makes no sense with Campbell et al.

Personally I’ve seen enough of Devers at 3B and am more than happy to let him be the DH of the future (or maybe play 1B if we trade Casas).
 

PedroisGod

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2002
1,638
The flip side of this would be exchanging a guy on 54/3 for 222/6 and who may very well be (literally) unplayable for the back half of that deal while taking up a 40 man spot and being immovable. I’d be inclined to leave him in Anaheim personally.

Correa said during his free agency that he’d only switch to 3B to accommodate Lindor in NY.
That’s fair, but I have a hard time imagining Trout being unplayable for any reason other than health. Even last year, his batted ball metrics were very good. I can understand the injury risk being too big of a risk to take though.
 

flredsoxfan

New Member
May 29, 2012
28
Boca Raton, FL
I voted yes - because Devers' problems are mostly throwing and there hasn't been a lot of improvement. The other caveat is that I would not offer Bregman 6 or 7 years - maybe 4 or 5 with a higher AAV and maybe some out options. Devers was always destined for DH toward the end of his contract anyway I believe. The argument to move Devers to 1B and trade Casas is intriguing but only if there is a real "get" from whatever team will give up real value - Kirby???
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
10,156
I’ve come to the conclusion that many people’s feelings on the current roster construction and possible positional addition hinge on their views of Rafaela.

I think it would be complete malpractice to pencil him in center for 650 at bats. He had the worst BB% in the majors. The 4th worst wRC+. He had some clutch hits that are masking people’s view of just how horrible of an offensive year he had. His major league track record suggest his lack of discipline is no fluke and could be a fatal flaw.

His value is as up the middle super sub with great defense and base running.

Bregman would be an enormous upgrade over Ceddane offensively. Which is why I’d be very excited about him starting at second, Campbell in left, with Duran in center.
I'm not willing to write off his bat entirely after his first year. It may be as you say that he'll never learn to take a walk, in which case I'm fine making him a super sub. But he also just had his first taste of failure in a full season; all through the minors he was able to just athlete his way to good batting lines, so I want to see what he does this winter and spring to address a newly undeniable problem. Cause the upside of him making even minor improvements is tremendous.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,258
I think Rafaela should be in AAA playing every day, or traded- the team simply does not need a defensive replacement at any of the positions he plays, and there’s nobody you’d really want him to PH for. I don’t think he’s a great fit for this team, currently, and he’s the easiest bat to upgrade.

Now, the argument may be that he proved all he could at AAA and just needs at bats. But I don’t see him as a very good fit in a part time role; either for his career or the team.

If Yoshida can play the field, it could change things a bit, but if he can’t he’s also a really tough player to use optimally too.
They didn’t sign him to an 8 year deal to play in AAA. That’s silly talk. He is 23, plate discipline can be improved. He is an elite OF and very good MI who hit 15 HR and stole 17 bases and had 75 RBI out of the 9 hole. As a rookie. I’m sure having the 2nd most games played to Duran out of necessity wore him down as well.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,718
I'm not willing to write off his bat entirely after his first year. It may be as you say that he'll never learn to take a walk, in which case I'm fine making him a super sub. But he also just had his first taste of failure in a full season; all through the minors he was able to just athlete his way to good batting lines, so I want to see what he does this winter and spring to address a newly undeniable problem. Cause the upside of him making even minor improvements is tremendous.
I’m not saying they should punt on him. I’m saying they need to construct a roster where he is competing for at bats that hedges against be possibly his bat will not allow him to be a major league regular.
 

PedroisGod

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2002
1,638
They didn’t sign him to an 8 year deal to play in AAA. That’s silly talk. He is 23, plate discipline can be improved. He is an elite OF and very good MI who hit 15 HR and stole 17 bases and had 75 RBI out of the 9 hole. As a rookie. I’m sure having the 2nd most games played to Duran out of necessity wore him down as well.
I don’t think they signed him to an 8 year deal to play in AAA, but I do think they signed him to an 8 year deal with the idea that his floor as an outstanding defensive super utility player makes the deal worth it. I do think some players can make modest improvements to their plate discipline, but Rafaela has a huge hill to climb to even become average in terms of chase rates and whiff rates.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
10,156
I’m not saying they should punt on him. I’m saying they need to construct a roster where he is competing for at bats that hedges against be possibly his bat will not allow him to be a major league regular.
I'm counting the existence of both Anthony and Campbell as pretty decent hedges.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,718
They didn’t sign him to an 8 year deal to play in AAA. That’s silly talk. He is 23, plate discipline can be improved. He is an elite OF and very good MI who hit 15 HR and stole 17 bases and had 75 RBI out of the 9 hole. As a rookie. I’m sure having the 2nd most games played to Duran out of necessity wore him down as well.
And despite the numbers you posted he managed to be the 4th worst offensive player in all of baseball. It’s hard to hit 15 bombs and be as bad as he was last year.

Replacing his bat with someone as good as Bregman would be a multiple win swing.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,258
I don’t think they signed him to an 8 year deal to play in AAA, but I do think they signed him to an 8 year deal with the idea that his floor as an outstanding defensive super utility player makes the deal worth it. I do think some players can make modest improvements to their plate discipline, but Rafaela has a huge hill to climb to even become average in terms of chase rates and whiff rates.
yes he does. Let’s see if he was able to unlock something over the winter and and ST. Because there are many other tools at play there.
 

Cassvt2023

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 17, 2023
1,258
And despite the numbers you posted he managed to be the 4th worst offensive player in all of baseball. It’s hard to hit 15 bombs and be as bad as he was last year.

Replacing his bat with someone as good as Bregman would be a multiple win swing.
this is why numbers like that are complete bullshit. I bet if you asked Alex Cora, he would tell you that CR wasn’t even close to the 4th worst offensive player in all of baseball last year. He actually stabilized the team in many ways when Story went down and helped them from cratering in May. He helped them win baseball games. Do you know how I know this? Hint: it’s because I actually watch the games instead of reading spreadsheets.
 

SouthernBoSox

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2005
12,718
this is why numbers like that are complete bullshit. I bet if you asked Alex Cora, he would tell you that CR wasn’t even close to the 4th worst offensive player in all of baseball last year. He actually stabilized the team in many ways when Story went down and helped them from cratering in May. He helped them win baseball games. Do you know how I know this? Hint: it’s because I actually watch the games instead of reading spreadsheets.
93965
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,219
I voted yes based on the assumption it would be a short-ish deal and would move Devers off 3B.

if the Sox are serious about contending, improving 3b defense is the lowest of low hanging fruits.

I don’t care about devers’ war. I care about the team’s war.
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,651
Personally I’ve seen enough of Devers at 3B and am more than happy to let him be the DH of the future (or maybe play 1B if we trade Casas).
Are you willing to trade Casas as an ascending player with four years of rookie scale to accommodate six years of Bregman’s decline on a FA deal? How much of Yoshida’s 3/$54M are you willing to subsidize to add in Bregman’s contract?
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
14,965
Are you willing to trade Casas as an ascending player with four years of rookie scale to accommodate six years of Bregman’s decline on a FA deal? how much of Yoshida’s 3/$54M are you willing to subsidize to add in Bregman’s contract?
Sure, depending on the details.

Though I think you would only have to do one of those, not both. I definitely would not sell low on Casas, but he would be on the table in a trade in the right deal.

We don't need Devers, Casas, and Yoshida on the roster in 2025 or beyond.... it's too late do go back in time and not have those 3, but at this point subsidizing Yoshida or moving Casas should be on the table.

Bregman might annoy some... but he's actually a great fit for this roster as a good defensive 120 wRC+ RHB 3B. Moving Devers to DH or 1B is low hanging fruit (as twibnotes said), leaves room for the kids, and would help a lot.
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,651
Sure, depending on the details.

Though I think you would only have to do one of those, not both. I definitely would not sell low on Casas, but he would be on the table in a trade in the right deal.

We don't need Devers, Casas, and Yoshida on the roster in 2025 or beyond.... it's too late do go back in time and not have those 3, but at this point subsidizing Yoshida or moving Casas should be on the table.

Bregman might annoy some... but he's actually a great fit for this roster as a good defensive 120 wRC+ RHB 3B. Moving Devers to DH or 1B is low hanging fruit (as twibnotes said), leaves room for the kids, and would help a lot.
Would you trade Casas for Bregman (and their contracts) for the next six years?
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
If we need to pay someone far more than he believes he’s worth, let’s do it for Profar. He reportedly wants three years, not seven or eight, won’t cost us a pick, and will likely give us 75 percent of the production Bergman will.
Profar had an .839 OPS in 2024.

Rob Refsnyder had an .830 OPS in 2024.

I get that if you want an everyday player Profar is better, but if we are just filling a niche against lefties, I'm not sure what difference we are getting from some big, roster-complicating contract.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
14,965
Would you trade Casas for Bregman (and their contracts) for the next six years?
No of course not.

Casas is 30M or so in surplus value, Bregman you are paying pretty much market rate (by definition as a FA).

But that's not the relevant question for building a team.

It's Bregman + what you would get for Casas, the overall cost, and how those pieces fit with the rest of the roster.
 

6-5 Sadler

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
287
if the Sox are serious about contending, improving 3b defense is the lowest of low hanging fruits.
Isn’t this the opposite of low hanging fruit? In order to do this, you would need to convince Bregman to come here and give him a 9 figure contract. You would also have to move your franchise player to DH and if you believe Breslow/Cora this has never been discussed with him. I know he’s already gotten paid but who knows how he would react. You would also have to find a willing trade partner for Yoshida and eat a significant portion of his contact.
 

pjheff

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2003
1,651
No of course not.

Casas is 30M or so in surplus value, Bregman you are paying pretty much market rate (by definition as a FA).

But that's not the relevant question for building a team.

It's Bregman + what you would get for Casas, the overall cost, and how those pieces fit with the rest of the roster.
I’d very wary of trading youngsters with surplus value so as to sign free agents at full freight.

Thus, for me, the issue becomes Yoshida.

I don’t want to see the team trading assets to offload his contract (see Seattle).

I don’t want (or expect) to see the team eat a lot of his contract which would realistically cut into the operating budget, particularly when his value is diminished
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,541
Rafaela may improve his plate discipline, but there isn't a whole lot of precedent for players with his disastrous plate approach improving. Doesn't mean it won't, but yeah, I wouldn't bet on it.

Slotting him in as a fourth outfielder means you've got a solid backup in case of disaster with a solid floor.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
82,563
I voted yes based on the assumption it would be a short-ish deal and would move Devers off 3B.

if the Sox are serious about contending, improving 3b defense is the lowest of low hanging fruits.

I don’t care about devers’ war. I care about the team’s war.
Moving a superstar on the right side of 30 off their defensive position has definite risks
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,888
I believe I’ve made my stance on this clear, but for the record, I voted yes, though it doesn’t “have” to be Bregman. I want a core bat added, and ideally one that can play an above average 3b or 1b defensively.

I also understand this means selling Yoshida for cents on the dollar, but honestly I’d rather have $1m extra per year to spend and the open DH slot than Yoshida (and I do think the Sox could get someone to pay $15m total of his salary, meaning the Red Sox get nothing back and pay about $13m for him to be elsewhere).

Cross posting from the other thread:



Again, this is already penciling in 150 games started at 2b and LF for Campbell and Anthony. I find it highly likely these two are productive MLB players. It also already assumes Abreu playing about 125g in RF. Even if we assume Abreu gets to the point of playing 140g per year (ie missing only a few games off for the toughest LHP that the Sox face, you’re still looking around 1225PA.

Now let’s even assume that for some reason Casas 2023, and that is on the low end, becomes the norm and his 2024, 2022 and 2021 are outliers, and there are STILL about 1050 PAs left to split.

So people say “play the kids”, and I get that. I‘m assuming a) Campbell and Anthony are borderline All Stars beginning on opening day; b) Casas goes from averaging about 100 games to 145; c) that Abreu goes from his about 125g average to more like 145g. Even making all those assumptions, there are still over 1,000PAs to split among Mayer, Rafaela, Grissom and Hamilton.

If the Sox have acquired “Bregman” and each of those 4 things follow the best case, there is still plenty of playing time available. Not to mention that they’re also going to need some of these “panned out” players to move for controllable starting pitching as well, since I think we can all now accept they’re not going to sign top of the market FA starters (or shall we go through this again next year when they won’t sign Gallen or whatever).




Either way, I don’t think they’re actually going to acquire this hypothetical core bat, I just strongly think they should.
You seem to have ignored the point I made about your deliberately misleading use of stats so I’ll link it again.
http://sonsofsamhorn.net/index.php?threads/much-like-newman-the-sox-are-not-ready-to-deliver-the-2025-offseason-news-rumors-thread.44280/post-6491613

I would very much like to understand how moving Casas helps this already underpowered lineup, especially when he’s prearb and costs almost nothing. Maybe someone could walk me through that one.
Sorry if you didn’t see it, but I didn‘t ignore it. In the same post you quoted, I said the bolded above. Specifically saying, Casas goes on to begin averaging 145g.

I cannot believe I need to say this again, but I will. It’s Yoshida I want off the roster. I want Devers at DH, Casas at 1b, Campbell at 2b, Anthony in LF and someone else at 3b.

Only chance I’d have moved Casas (past tense) was for someone like Logan Gilbert, Tanner Bibee or similar. I didn‘t even want the proposed (apparently) Casas for Woo trade (though I’d have understood it).

My assumptions are that Campbell and Anthony both play 150 MLB games and perform well, that Casas plays 145g at 1b for the Boston Red Sox and is a monster, and even that Abreu does well enough against LHP to get up to 140g or so. Even if those great outcomes happen, then with Devers at DH and ”someone else” at 3b there are still around 1,000 PAs to split among Rafaela, Grissom, Mayer and Hamilton.

In a hypothetical world where DDski calls and offers Breslow Bryce Harper for a Kelly’s roast beef sandwich on the one condition that Harper plays 1b, I’d only want Casas moved to DH and Yoshida gone. If Christian Walker had come to Boston and said “I want to play 1b here for a 3yr/$30m/$10m deal“, I’d have only wanted Casas moved to DH and again, Yoshida gone. If Bregman (or anyone) were to end up here, I’d want Devers at DH, Casas at 1b and Yoshida gone.

Sorry if I wasn’t clear on that. I like Casas a great deal.
 
Last edited:

marcoscutaro

New Member
Jun 15, 2024
186
Rafaela can improve his plate discipline substantially and meanwhile you’re throwing away one of maybe two players on the team with a good approach for what?

I’m going to ask again until I get an answer: how does trading Casas improve the lineup?

We don't need Devers, Casas, and Yoshida on the roster in 2025 or beyond.... it's too late do go back in time and not have those 3, but at this point subsidizing Yoshida or moving Casas should be on the table.
Absolutely bizarre take.
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
15,740
Rafaela may improve his plate discipline, but there isn't a whole lot of precedent for players with his disastrous plate approach improving. Doesn't mean it won't, but yeah, I wouldn't bet on it.

Slotting him in as a fourth outfielder means you've got a solid backup in case of disaster with a solid floor.
All the starters are good defenders, though, so you don’t need Rafaela to come in as a defensive replacement, and you wouldn’t want him to PH for anyone either. He’s been worse against LH than RH, so no real help there.

Feels like Rafaela is being treated as a guy who has to make the roster simply because of his contract, even though he’s probably not the best player for a backup role given the roster, and it’s hard to imagine him realizing his full potential with sporadic playing time.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
8,541
All the starters are good defenders, though, so you don’t need Rafaela to come in as a defensive replacement, and you wouldn’t want him to PH for anyone either. He’s been worse against LH than RH, so no real help there.

Feels like Rafaela is being treated as a guy who has to make the roster simply because of his contract, even though he’s probably not the best player for a backup role given the roster, and it’s hard to imagine him realizing his full potential with sporadic playing time.
I hear you dude, but also...like, I wouldn't be surprised at all if one of Anthony-Duran-Abreu-Story-Grissom-Campbell missed a substantial period of time. In fact I think it's oikely. In which case Rafaela really easily slots in. And will likely be able to start in someone's place once a week regardless.

I actually don't think he needs a full-time role to figure out his discipline issues. I even think the shock of finally being relegated to a backup role might force him to learn some new skills re: pitch identification. Who knows.
 

marcoscutaro

New Member
Jun 15, 2024
186
Rafaela is a really high floor guy who should ideally play 5-6 times a week in different positions and these things have a way of working themselves out with injuries/slumps.

I’m interested to see how he looks in spring training.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
14,965
Absolutely bizarre take.
LOL. Thanks for chiming in Chaim.

It's bizarre to think it's a poor use of resources to employ 3 left handed hitting DH's at the same time? Our pitching staff certainly doesn't appreciate it and there are rational ways for a big market team to get out of this quagmire. We are stuck in this position at the moment, but it doesn't mean we have to be for the next 3 years.

If Bregman's suitors are limited and we can get him on a less than expected deal while subsidizing Yoshida's ticket out of town, that's one way. If another team is super high on Casas and wants to give us a young starter, that might be another (agree on not wanting Castillo).

Certainly there are other non-Bregman ways to do it as well. But I don't accept the idea we have to start all 3 of Devers at 3B, Casas at 1B and Yoshida at DH just because that's the current situation we are in.