There plenty of positives I thought, especially coming out on the losing end of a 3-0 score line. There was an obvious identity and style of play. You could easily see a path for the US to get a tie or even a win out of that game. That Djordje shot goes in or Lacazette’s doesn’t, and it’s a different game. The best scoring chance belonged to the US in Tolkin’s header. Lots of players had moments. I was impressed with Maguire’s nifty touches and I thought the fullbacks both brought more to the table than I expected. It certainly feels like they need Paxten to create scoring chances, and he looks able to do so. The CB pairing was unsurprisingly solid and showed why they were two of the overage players selected. Sure, Djordje had some unexpectedly poor touches and Schulte should’ve done better on that first goal, but it was encouraging.
That’s not to say France didn’t deserve to win. They did. If that xG figure TB posted above is correct, I’d say that points to the flaws in that particular xG model. One thing I do know, I don’t want Henry anywhere near the USMNT job.