However, the double-overtime game also made a profound case for an increasingly popular, if nerdy, way to solve the outcome of games: the Elam Ending. Fans are probably most familiar with it from the last three All-Star Games, but the G League has been using it in overtimes this season, while a summer event called The Basketball Tournament has played with it as a regular feature. The Elam Ending uses a target score rather than time: In the G League, the first team to score seven points in OT wins.
From a sports science perspective, you can almost immediately see the advantage; it removes the near unlimited minutes cap that teams can face in multi-overtime situations, presenting a vexing decision of whether to press on and push player loads into the stratosphere or punt on a winnable game that’s sitting right there for the taking. Boston didn’t just lose on Sunday; the Celtics now will have a harder time summoning their legs for a back-to-back in Cleveland on Monday night, not to mention any cumulative fatigue heading into next week’s six-game road trip. New York at least left with a W, but the Knicks als0 have a four-games-in-six-days West Coast trip soon.
Nick Elam, the Ball State professor
who came up with the concept, spoke about it in one of the Sloan Conference’s highlights and noted some easy tweaks to address situational tactics that might spring from an Elam Ending. (The most common: Teams intentionally fouling when opponents are three points from the target score; an elegant solution for this is a one-shot-plus-ball penalty for Elam Ending fouls in the bonus.)
Adopting the Elam Ending for overtime seems like the next obvious move for the league to kill multiple birds (game length, player health and safety, excitement) with one stone. In the end, it was perhaps the biggest way the Knicks-Celtics thriller reflected back on all the weekend’s events.