It’s EEI. We should wait for legitimate confirmation from a reputable source.EEI reporting Monty fired. Sacco replacing him.
Please let this be true!!
It’s EEI. We should wait for legitimate confirmation from a reputable source.EEI reporting Monty fired. Sacco replacing him.
Please let this be true!!
Hence my qualifying second statement. I agree that we need a reputable source to confirmIt’s EEI. We should wait for legitimate confirmation from a reputable source.
No forward line with 3 players that do regular damage is problematic.Sacco's first practice. Mostly sticking with the same forwards, little shakeup on D.
Geekie - Zacha - Pastrnak
Marchand - Lindholm - Brazeau
Merkulov - Coyle - Frederic
Beecher - Kastelic - Koepke
Viel, Johnson
Lohrei - McAvoy
Wotherspoon - Carlo
Zadorov - Peeke
Oesterle
Zadorov on the 3rd pairing where he should be is nice. Him and Peeke are a good match pairing wise (Monty did try it a couple times too)Sacco's first practice. Mostly sticking with the same forwards, little shakeup on D.
Geekie - Zacha - Pastrnak
Marchand - Lindholm - Brazeau
Merkulov - Coyle - Frederic
Beecher - Kastelic - Koepke
Viel, Johnson
Lohrei - McAvoy
Wotherspoon - Carlo
Zadorov - Peeke
Oesterle
Whhhhhhhhy. I was all excited to see he was put on PP1 thinking maybe Sacco will actually try young guys a give them some rope, and it’s not even like Merk played bad. WTFJesus H Christ. McLaughlin up; Merkulov down,
View: https://twitter.com/NHLBruins/status/1859998017249849438
God DAMNIT!!!! Why? Let's see some of the younger players get some time and develop.Jesus H Christ. McLaughlin up; Merkulov down,
View: https://twitter.com/NHLBruins/status/1859998017249849438
McLaughlin is 1 year older than Merkulov.God DAMNIT!!!! Why? Let's see some of the younger players get some time and develop.
And of the two, Merkulov has a much higher upside. I like McLaughlin, but Merkulov is the better to keep. Also, right now, it looks like McLaughlin isn't even going to be in the lineup.McLaughlin is 1 year older than Merkulov.
Valuing bottom 6 grinders over guys with actual skill as usual. It’s this front office’s MO. They’re definitely not going to deviate now that jobs are on the line.Merkulov played 8 minutes at 5x5 and had a 64% xGF%. He was fine. Not much happened one way or the other. This is what they did to him last year. Called him up for 4 games, didn't really play him and when they did it was with the 4th line. Unsurprisingly he didn't produce so they sent him back down.
He's been basically a point per game guy in the AHL for 2+ years now. The team is starved for offense. Why not give him a real opportunity? Based on practice today, he's being replaced in the lineup by Tyler Fucking Johnson who has played 5 games, has not registered a point and is running a 33% xGF% which is lowest on the team.
What are we doing?
I guess I don’t understand xG% enough. I looked at the Corsi/Fenwick vs offensive zone starts. He seemed underwater on both while sheltered. Koepke for reference was 93% xG.Merkulov had 64% xG last night, and his linemates were significantly worse when he was on the bench. He's at 64.2% over the three games he played. Best on the team (SSS) by a wide margin. 3rd is Poitras, by the way, also in Providence.
He has 58G, 75A for 134 points in 146 games in Rhode Island over the last 2 plus seasons and they've given him a grand total of 7 NHL games. They just sent him down to get a look at Marc Mclaughlin.
What’s a good minimum sample size on these? 200-300 minutes? Or are we talking closer to half a season or more?The sample size is far too small, it's only 8 minutes. xG takes into account shot quality and basically the probability of a shot going in. Utah had more shots and attempts than Boston when Merkulov was on the ice but the Bruins had the only high danger chance so his xG was positive. But it's really miniscule. 0.33-0.22. Koepke played even less than Merkulov and the Bruins had the only scoring chance and high danger chance when he was on the ice too but the actual xG was 0.16-0.01 so while the 93% looks awesome it's really a nothing burger.
There are huge variances in xG until you get like 500+ minutes honestly. But they are good for when you want to be mad about something lolWhat’s a good minimum sample size on these? 200-300 minutes? Or are we talking closer to half a season or more?
Which has historically been a successful strategy for them.Valuing bottom 6 grinders over guys with actual skill as usual. It’s this front office’s MO. They’re definitely not going to deviate now that jobs are on the line.
I'm not sure what the actual answer to that from a statisticians perspective but I don't think you can draw meaningful conclusions until probably 400-500 minutes range.What’s a good minimum sample size on these? 200-300 minutes? Or are we talking closer to half a season or more?
If you're right, then it makes some sense. And *then* if Swayman continues as he was, I hope Sacco gives a Korpisalo a few games in a row.My take is they had already mapped this out and Saturday was Swayman's game. They don't want to deviate on short notice given everything else but Sacco has also communicated to both that plans beyond Saturday might be changed based on results.
20
And I'm looking at something wrong? He has the second most giveaways on the team after Pasta according to hockey reference.He doesn't turn the puck over much either, there are 4 regular defenseman who turn it over more frequently (Wotherspoon, Peeke, Lindholm, Lohrei).
I think he's been as advertised.
That's in volume. His raw number of giveaways is 2nd on the team to Pastrnak. However, Zadorov has played the 3rd most minutes on the team. The actual rate in which he turns the puck over, 4.28 giveaways/60, is not bad. The 4 defenseman I listed give the puck away more frequently than Zadorov.And I'm looking at something wrong? He has the second most giveaways on the team after Pasta according to hockey reference.
Have we seen any updates on Lindholm? His return drops Zadkrov down and that should provide a lift to the team.That's in volume. His raw number of giveaways is 2nd on the team to Pastrnak. However, Zadorov has played the 3rd most minutes on the team. The actual rate in which he turns the puck over, 4.28 giveaways/60, is not bad. The 4 defenseman I listed give the puck away more frequently than Zadorov.
Sacco said that he was still “weeks away” yesterday.Have we seen any updates on Lindholm? His return drops Zadkrov down and that should provide a lift to the team.
The real question is would the NHL uniform guidelines allow it. Particularly since I assume the contract with the official jersey maker, fanatics, probably requires them to wear their stuff only.Weird question, but would the B's/Canadiens consider playing in Fleet/Victoire jerseys for a game as cross-promotion?
wants to see what? Pregame skate or support for the women’s game?Pregame skate maybe… but who really wants to see it?
You don't support propping up the new woman's hockey league??Pregame skate maybe… but who really wants to see it?
Ahhhh, thank you for the explanation. Much appreciated!That's in volume. His raw number of giveaways is 2nd on the team to Pastrnak. However, Zadorov has played the 3rd most minutes on the team. The actual rate in which he turns the puck over, 4.28 giveaways/60, is not bad. The 4 defenseman I listed give the puck away more frequently than Zadorov.
Need 2 tonight, yes. Toss up Sunday w/ Philly. Then the 5 game trip out west. If they get 6 point out of that I'd be ecstatic. 9 out of 14 points in the next 7 would be good, and probably asking a lot.nfidence and it's really hard for them to A) generage quality looks and B) bury them.
Kinda big stretch they're in the midst of. Back to back against the league worst Chicago tonight. Really need 2 points, then Saturday they get Philly who is in the mix for the wild card. B's are in the playoff structure by points but outside on points percentage because they've played the most games.
Before it was .884 and 3.57.Since Monty was fired Swayman has been much better...it may be a product of the opponents but he's sporting a .929 Sv% with a 1.78 GAA. Not sure what it was before that but it was significantly worse.
thanks. And yeah, I'd suggest that's more than just a 'little improvement,' but SSS applies of courseBefore it was .884 and 3.57.
Which is what Monty should have been doing instead of focusing solely on getting the offense going. When it was clear that the offense was going to continue to struggle, the only path forward here was to double down on defense. It should have a knock-on effect to both goaltending and even the offense. If the team is giving up less goals, that will release the pressure from the offense and we should start to see some improvement there.Part of it is they are playing shutdown defense at the moment. They are not giving anything up, they are allowing the 3rd fewest expected goals against in the league. They weren't horrible defensively under Monty but it's been clear that Sacco's directing a lot of attention on the defensive end.
SSS and all, but it's at least a start. Much needed improvement.thanks. And yeah, I'd suggest that's more than just a 'little improvement,' but SSS applies of course