Yuck The FankeesThanks YTF. Can you tell me what YTF stands for?
Yuck The FankeesThanks YTF. Can you tell me what YTF stands for?
Got me to chuckle at the breakfast table! Thanks!!Yuck The Fankees
No problemo, hope you're doing well.Got me to chuckle at the breakfast table! Thanks!!
No problem! Statcast has these all for free. You just need to search the pitcher, click game logs, and then if you hover over the game, a little diagram appears. Click through that and you can see the game summary.Thanks, Fishy. I was hoping someone would provide some analysis of Bello's game last night, and you did it.
Looks like around $14M, as he makes $12M each of this year and next.Taylor Rogers was put on waivers today by the Giants. I believe he is due to make $11-$12 mill through the end of next year. He has been pretty solid and has worked with Bailey in the past.
It isn't your money????I don't mind paying 12 mil on a one year deal for a very good 8th inning reliever, given the Sox' payroll capacity. The bullpen cost them a ton of games this year and they are losing their top 2 guys.
Why? The team needs pitching. The team has money to spend. Spend it on fucking pitching.Isn’t Hendriks at closer the plan (or hope)? I wouldn’t go adding another high priced reliever at this point.
The Sox have kinda flopped there... was really expecting Mata to fill in a good bullpen role. Maybe Wikelman Gonzalez or any other number of types like Fitts or Drohan?I'm fine adding another high priced reliever (after we secure a high priced starter), I just want them to be worth it and not an expensive 6th-7th inning guy.
His peripherals are great this year. Great for his career, too. We need guys like this.I'm fine adding another high priced reliever (after we secure a high priced starter), I just want them to be worth it and not an expensive 6th-7th inning guy.
If he's so great, why have the Giants protected him almost entirely from hi-lev situations and are now trying to give away his contract? It's not an Angels situation where they can duck under the tax here.His peripherals are great this year. Great for his career, too. We need guys like this.
First of all, I love that the Giants have a Taylor Rogers AND a Tyler Rogers. They're both 33 too.If he's so great, (1) why have the Giants protected him almost entirely from hi-lev situations and (2) are now trying to give away his contract? It's not an Angels situation where they can duck under the tax here.
I would hope they're the same age. They were born on the same day. To the same mother.First of all, I love that the Giants have a Taylor Rogers AND a Tyler Rogers. They're both 33 too.
Different dads, though. Makes it awkward on Father's DayI would hope they're the same age. They were born on the same day. To the same mother.
WHAT ARE THE ODDS?!I would hope they're the same age. They were born on the same day. To the same mother.
Get in line for Fishy1 humiliation hour, folksDifferent dads, though. Makes it awkward on Father's Day
Close. The judges were looking for "Thank you, sir. May I have another?"Get in line for Fishy1 humiliation hour, folks
I recently read a thing about a ship that was near the international dateline on Dec 31, 1899 (I think) and the captain altered the path of the ship so a mom delivering twins would have them not just on different days, but in different years.I would hope they're the same age. They were born on the same day. To the same mother.
I'd think that somewhere there's a set of twins born in different years without such manipulation?I recently read a thing about a ship that was near the international dateline on Dec 31, 1899 (I think) and the captain altered the path of the ship so a mom delivering twins would have them not just on different days, but in different years.
I don't know if it's actually true or not, but I want to think it is.
Sure. Don't even have to go back that far to find them. Too bad for the parents they only get to claim one of the kids as a dependent for 2023.I'd think that somewhere there's a set of twins born in different years without such manipulation?
Probably the hope more than the plan. I wouldn't expect him to be the Hendricks of old as the season finishes up and they're going to have to figure out what issues (if any) are due to rust and reacclimation and try to assess as best as they can before the FA period.Isn’t Hendriks at closer the plan (or hope)? I wouldn’t go adding another high priced reliever at this point.
I wouldn’t add another high priced reliever at this point- meaning this point in the season. If they want to spend $12M+ on a reliever next season, why lock themselves in to a guy now, when other more appealing options may be available?Why? The team needs pitching. The team has money to spend. Spend it on fucking pitching.
I don't know if Rogers is the answer but the money shouldn't be the deterrent.
And how did he get so many pop-ups?Crawford looked good last night.
Who the hell is Francis? Last 4 starts 29 IP 5 hits 2 runs allowed?
Out of nowhere the guy suddenly became Maddux.
Probably downloaded a computer virus.And how did he get so many pop-ups?
It'll be interesting to see if Zack Kelly moves to the starting rotation next year. He has the stuff and the pitch mix to do it.Martin and Jansen are coming off the books. The team is saving tons of money on young cost controlled guys. We need relief depth right now, and next year. Booser is still out. No brainer IMO.