2024-2025 MiLB Offseason

Mantush

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 30, 2014
777
MLB.com is predicting Arias is the number one prospect in the system a year from now. How do you feel about that?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
MLB.com is predicting Arias is the number one prospect in the system a year from now. How do you feel about that?
I don't think it's a bad prediction...but I don't think it's very likely to happen, though, just based on sheer prospect volatility.

It is the very obvious prediction based on their current rankings, though.

1) Roman - Graduate
2) Mayer - Graduate
3) KCamp - Graduate
4) Arias
5) Yoely
6) Bleis
7) Perales

With Perales hurt, it's likely that it will be one of those 4 through 6 guys.

But would I be shocked if someone like Mikey rakes all year & jumps up from #12? Or some pitcher from the most recent draft class like Tolle or Cason does something ridiculous? Naw.

So Arias may be the favorite... but I would probably put the odds at like 1 in 5?

Maybe...

Arias 20%
Bleis 19%
Yoely 18%
One of the big 3 15%
A pitcher 13%
A different hitter 10%
Mikey 5%

https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/redsox
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
22,725
Rogers Park
I don't think it's a bad prediction...but I don't think it's very likely to happen, though, just based on sheer prospect volatility.

It is the very obvious prediction based on their current rankings, though.

1) Roman - Graduate
2) Mayer - Graduate
3) KCamp - Graduate
4) Arias
5) Yoely
6) Bleis
7) Perales

With Perales hurt, it's likely that it will be one of those 4 through 6 guys.

But would I be shocked if someone like Mikey rakes all year & jumps up from #12? Or some pitcher from the most recent draft class like Tolle or Cason does something ridiculous? Naw.

So Arias may be the favorite... but I would probably put the odds at like 1 in 5?

Maybe...

Arias 20%
Bleis 19%
Yoely 18%
One of the big 3 15%
A pitcher 13%
A different hitter 10%
Mikey 5%

https://www.mlb.com/milb/prospects/redsox
I think your reasoning is sound. I think Mayer is the most likely to still have prospect status of the big three, so I’d nudge him up. But really, if Bleis has a start that suggests he is back on his pre-injury trajectory, he’ll rocket up the lists.
 

LoLsapien

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 5, 2022
456
Fwiw, I think my ranking is:

Yoellin
Jhostynxon
Johanfran
Jedixson
Yordanny
Jojo
Yhoiker

In no particular order.
 

Tuor

New Member
Mar 20, 2024
38
Fwiw, I think my ranking is:

Yoellin
Jhostynxon
Johanfran
Jedixson
Yordanny
Jojo
Yhoiker

In no particular order.
I count myself fortunate to have lived to see that list of names. My only regret is that Remy didn’t live for me to hear him pronounce them.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
^^^ I posted that before I watched it, but it was a pretty good summation of some of the current wisdom on pitcher injuries, including the theory that many injuries are caused, counterintuitively perhaps, by not enough work in the off season.

I was just looking at the SoxProspects MLFA page. Seems like we've gotten exactly one guy who turned out to be a guy in Minor League Free Agency each off season since after the 2020 season:

'20 - Refsnyder
'21 - Kelly
'22 - Booser
'23 - Fulmer?

Jury is still out on '23. If no one pops I guess you could argue Jamie Bats, but hopefully Fulmer has a good year this year & can fill that role. PENROD was an in-season MLFA but could also count.

Seby Zavala & Nate Eaton are the only 2 guys in that category so far for this off season, so would expect a fair # more fringy guys added in the coming months, especially hitters as the Worcester pitching staff seems pretty set for now.

Before that, the last one of note was Ryan Brasier after the '17 season.

Red Sox Minor League Free Agent & Independent League Signing History | SoxProspects.com
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
The next league to talk about is the Venezuelan Professional Baseball League (LVBP). The regular season ends in 2 days.

We boast 2 players in that league who need a bit less introduction:

Bryan Mata (25 from Maracay, VZ) plays for Navegantes del Magallanes. The Magallanes Navigators are 27-25. I don't believe Magallanes was named after Magellan, even though it is near the Strait of Magellan as "magalla" is the word for a sea or small harbor.

Anyway, sorry for the detour. After circumnavigating that roadblock, back to Mata's season:

14 games, 14.1 IP, 3.14 ERA, 1.74 WHIP, 3.8 bb/9, 5.7 k/9.

His team has a 4.84 ERA overall, & the pitching staff includes old friend Eduard Bazardo & 43 y/o Alfredo Simón & 39 y/o Junior Guerra, who is dominating with a 2.13 ERA & 8-1 record in 11 starts.
Our other player in the LVBP is the newest (I think?) addition to our 40-man roster, Carlos Narváez. Narváez, a 26 y/o C/1B, like Mata is originally from Maracay.

Carlos has crushed this season:

.377/.456/.662, 1.118 OPS. He has 5 homers & 5 steals (0 cs) in 90 PAs. This is his 2nd season playing for Cardenales de Lara (Lara Cardinals).

He has been instrumental in his team's 30-21 record. Luisangel Acuña (.914 OPS) is also on this team, as well as old friend Gorkys Hernández (.829 OPS).

View: https://twitter.com/AlfonsoSaerG/status/1862724675538653221
Both Mata's team and Narváez's team qualified for the playoffs, but apparently Mata's team is trying to extend his Visa and there's no guarantee he'll be able to play in the playoffs, & Narváez hasn't played since he was traded to the Red Sox.

SoxProspects News: Fall/Winter Roundup: Playoffs begin in Venezuela
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Fun facts about the Alex Verdugo trade:

By either bWar (Verdugo 0.8, Fitts 0.6, Weissert 0.6), or fWar (Verdugo 0.6, Fitts 0.5, Weissert 0.5), the Red Sox received 0.4 more WAR from their return on the trade than they gave up.

The Yankees have 0 more years of control of Verdugo. The Red Sox have 6 more years of Fitts, 5 more years of Weissert, and the lottery ticket that is Nicholas Judice, who pitched 8.2 innings between the FCL & A-Ball this year.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,640
Fun facts about the Alex Verdugo trade:

By either bWar (Verdugo 0.8, Fitts 0.6, Weissert 0.6), or fWar (Verdugo 0.6, Fitts 0.5, Weissert 0.5), the Red Sox received 0.4 more WAR from their return on the trade than they gave up.

The Yankees have 0 more years of control of Verdugo. The Red Sox have 6 more years of Fitts, 5 more years of Weissert, and the lottery ticket that is Nicholas Judice, who pitched 8.2 innings between the FCL & A-Ball this year.
So what you're saying is that we're winning the Mookie trade by even more now?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Not so fun facts about the Angels trade...

Luis Garcia was worth -0.6 bWAR (-0.1 fWAR) out of the Red Sox bullpen, while Ryan Zeferjahn was worth 0.5 bWAR (0.4 fWAR) out of the Angels bullpen. Niko Kavadas was worth -0.2 bWAR & fWAR, but that seems more like an lol Angels thing.

The Red Sox have 0 more years of control of Garcia. The Angels have 6 more years of control of Zef, 6 years of Niko, 6+ years of Matthew Lugo who they recently added to the 40-man roster, & the lottery ticket that is Yeferson Vargas, who had a 2.35 ERA for the Angels' A-Ball team in 30.2 IP after the trade, & is only 20.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,640
If we still had the Garcia trade guys but they hadn't debuted, would you have protected them?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
So what you're saying is that we're winning the Mookie trade by even more now?
No...I absolutely did not mean to ever broach that subject again lol...but while we're here...

Sure, let's relitigate this one last time...

I'm going to preface this by saying Mookie is my all time favorite Red Sox player & the whole thing made me sad, buuuuuut...

All we actually lost in the Mookie trade was 246 plate appearances (2.8 fWAR) in 2020 in what would have been a horrendous Red Sox season regardless.

Price sat out 2020, so the Dodgers only had to eat $32m of his contract. They also paid Mookie the prorated portion of his $27m arb salary, which is $10m.

So the Dodgers paid $42m for 246 Mookie plate appearances & 114 David Price innings (at 0.8 fWAR). The return for paying $42m for 3.6 fWAR should be...negative...as each WAR should cost less than $11.7m on the open market.

Yes, it hurts because the Dodgers were able to resign Mookie at a reasonable rate...but the trade technically makes sense even if they did it for nothing because their books were so screwed up by DD's all-in approach.

So they took the best offer on the table which was apparently the Dodgers offer. In the past 3 seasons they have received a total of 5.1 fWAR from Verdugo at a total cost of $4.8m, pure unadulterated crap from Jeter Downs (-0.3 fWAR last season & he's gone from a consensus top 100 prospect to being a terrible baseball player), & not much from Colton Wong (0.1 fWAR last season).

They have 2 years of control on Verdugo left & like 5 more years of control on Wong. So bottom line:

Red Sox give up 3.6 fWAR and save $42m
Red Sox receive 4.9 fWAR, 2 more years of Verdugo, 5 more years of Wong, & pay about $6m

On the other hand...in 1990 Larry Andersen pitched a very good 22 innings for the Red Sox, earning like 0.8 fWAR...and Jeff Bagwell went on to earn 22.1 fWAR during his 4 arb years at a total cost of $3.5m before signing a giant 4/$27.5m contract. So the 2 trades really aren't comparable.

Also, Babe Ruth was purchased by the Yankees for $125k & then went on to put up 150.1 fWAR for the Yankees over the next 15 seasons...
After 2 more seasons (this was from December '22), they have now received:

Wong: 1.3 fWAR (0.2 in '23, 1.1 in '24), cost $1.5m
Verdugo: 1.4 fWAR ('23), cost $6.3m
Fitts: 0.5 fWAR, cost $84k
Weissert: 0.5 fWAR, cost, $644k


Red Sox give up 3.6 fWAR and save $42m
Red Sox receive 8.6 fWAR, spend like $15m, & have more years...Wong (3), Weissert (5), Fitts (6), Judice (6)
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
If we still had the Garcia trade guys but they hadn't debuted, would you have protected them?
I would have traded them to the Angels. It's curious that they seem to have missed on Ryan Fernandez & now Zeferjahn while trying to bring in other team's guys midseason. It probably has to do with Ryan Theory...

Ryans out, Dick's in

In one day, we unloaded 80% of our Ryans, losing Fernandez to the R5, Fitzgerald & Miller to the AAA R5, & trading Ammons.

Zeferjahn better watch his back. Breslow clearly has some sort of past trauma involving someone named Ryan. Won't speculate further.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
9,640
I liked the Garcia trade (much more than the Sims one), it didn't work out but that's baseball.

I forgot all about Fitzy. Looks like he put up a .755 OPS for KC AAA this year.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
I liked the Garcia trade (much more than the Sims one), it didn't work out but that's baseball.

I forgot all about Fitzy. Looks like he put up a .755 OPS for KC AAA this year.
I liked the concept of the trade in terms of giving up "name" guys who didn't seem to have much actual substance & would require 40-man spots if they were going to stick around. The Angels are weird.

This was my end of season update on all the Rule 5 guys. The way I did the post makes it impossible to quote effectively so will just link:

Sox Rule 5 thread | Sons of Sam Horn
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
SoxProspects is looking for a staff writer & social media person if anyone is about that life.

We are opening two new positions at SoxProspects.com! For both of these positions, we're seeking a commitment through the end of 2025, but ideally, we’re looking for someone who will want to stick around with us long term if there’s a mutual fit. Here are the details of the positions:

Staff Writer: The Staff Writer will write our daily Cup of Coffee column once or twice per week, author our Weekly Notes column at least once per month, and otherwise chip in to help on SoxProspects News as needed. We usually ask for some extra help during draft week, which is happening in the July 13-15 time range in 2025. The time commitment for this position will be roughly 2 hours per week during the season, with significantly less in the off-season.

Social Media Specialist: The SMS will join our existing social media team helping to assist with our Twitter, Bluesky, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok feeds, both during the day and in the evening during games. The overall time commitment will vary. The primary task for this position will be to help post to our social media accounts in real-time during Red Sox affiliate games in the evenings, so an ideal candidate will be someone who can regularly–but not necessarily every single day–follow games and post noteworthy content. We also are all ears on ideas for new and interesting content to add to our social media accounts!

Requirements

  • Familiarity with SoxProspects.com and the Red Sox minor league system
  • Availability and interest as noted in the above descriptions
  • Perfunctory understanding of baseball stats (understanding of advanced stats would be a big plus)
  • Some experience directly or analogously related to the position (writing experience for the Staff Writer position; editing, content, and/or graphics experience for the SMS position)
  • Strong attention to detail
  • Professional attitude and approach
  • Someone who can work on their own without much hand-holding or oversight. To be upfront, we all work remotely, there’s almost no face-to-face interaction, and the site is not anyone’s primary job. After the first couple months, successful staff members take the bull by the horns and are able to make the position their own.

These openings are great opportunities to gain experience in the sports field! Members of the SoxProspects staff have gone on to write for ESPN.com, MLB.com, MiLB.com, the Baltimore Sun, Newsday, and Baseball Prospectus, among other outlets!

Important to note that these are unpaid, volunteer positions. If you are interested in applying, please email info@soxprospects.com, preferably including a resume and a basic overview of your skills and experience with respect to the Requirements outlined above. We look forward to hearing from you! We do not have a set timeline to fill these positions – we’re just waiting for the right candidates. Apologies in advance that we might not be able to personally respond to every applicant.
Help Wanted: Staff Writer & Social Media Specialist | SoxProspects.com Forum
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Semi-random thought based on the Gleyber Torres to Detroit on a one-year deal thing...do we really think MLB front offices aren't smart enough at this point to determine how good a hitter plays independent of the stadium they play in? There are all sorts of stats based on the actual contact made & the likelihood of different results based on the actual contact with the ball. These stats are widely used when coaching the Red Sox MiLB players among other places. There are not going to be many teams that are not smart enough to not factor in park effects & various luck factors when making free agency decisions.

If Gleyber puts up a nice xwOBA, smart teams are not going to care if he hit a few less homers because he played in a bigger ballpark.
 
Last edited:

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Noah Davis got a milb deal

Pitching+ numbers on his Slider and Curve jump out to me immediately.
I talked about it a bit in the Acquisitions thread. Probably got lost at the bottom of the page before the Yhoiker shuffle.

Sandoval was actually only 1 of 2 pitchers they acquired yesterday in a massive display of cheapness:

View: https://twitter.com/drivelinekyle/status/1870405397263102074

View: https://twitter.com/PatSullivan05/status/1870502312898068802
Here's a Fangraphs writeup on Davis from June '23 when they had him as the #30 Rockies prospect.



https://blogs.fangraphs.com/colorado-rockies-top-40-prospects-2023/

A 7-pitch mix is fun.



https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/noah-davis-663562?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
The Dodgers' signing bonus/deferred $ loophole will probably be closed soon. It allows them to lower the AAV while keeping the PV about the same.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Red Sox starting pitching depth for next year in approximate order...

Crochet
Houck
Bello
Buehler
Giolito
Crawford
(Sandoval)
Priester
Fitts
Fulmer
Winck
Dobbins
Whitlock
Penrod
Murphy
Drohan
(Perales)
Sandlin
Coffey
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Adding more detail (& Criswell):

1) Crochet
2) Houck
3) Bello
4) Buehler
5) Giolito
6) Crawford
7) (Sandoval)
8) Criswell
9) Priester
10) Fitts
11) Fulmer*
12) Winck
13) Dobbins
14) Whitlock
15) Penrod
16) Murphy
17) Drohan*
18) (Perales)
19) Sandlin*
20) Coffey*
21) Mata*
22) Early*
23) YORDANNY*

* = not on the 40
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
33,019
Alamogordo
Even better, the only people who fall off that list in 2026 are Giolito and Buehler. What Breslow has done with this organization's pitching in essentially 12 months is nothing short of astounding.
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
17,817
The bullpen should have WAY more optionable depth than in many years as well.
Sox Prospects 40-man shows these guys as having options:
Zach Kelly
Bernadino (this is a surprise to me, I wonder if this is accurate?)
Whitlock (same?)
Murphy
Crawford
Winck
Weissert
Slaten
Criswell
Priester
Guerrero
Fitts
Penrod
Dobbins
Shugart

And these guys not on the 40-man who are on non-roster invites and/or will probably start the year in AAA:
Austin Adams
Isiah Campbell
Michael Fulmer
Juan Mata
Wyatt Mills
Wyatt Olds
Jovani Moran
Noah Davis

The old Pawtucket Worcester Shuttle should be full of helpful arms this year.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Hobie Harris & Jack Anderson from the Minor League r5, too.

I thought you had missed Mata but there is Juan...
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Giving up a comp pick for 1 year of Bregman seems silly to me. & signing Bregman for lots of years seems silly to me.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
33,019
Alamogordo
Giving up a comp pick for 1 year of Bregman seems silly to me. & signing Bregman for lots of years seems silly to me.
I agree. It's weird because I would love him on the 2025 Red Sox, but I'm pretty sure I would hate him on any Red Sox team beyond that. Also, paying him to play second base would be stupid, so they need to have Devers on board with moving to DH, but I feel like the dude loves playing third base, so that would be kind of shitty (even if he isn't very good at it).
 

The Gray Eagle

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
17,817
If you want to add a third baseman to try to improve the defense, I'd rather play Campbell there (and/or possibly Mayer later in the year) than give Bregman all that money for all those years (plus lose the draft pick and international money.)
Giving Bregman all that money and years to have him play second base would be completely nonsensical. A huge part of his value is his glove at third base.
He's a really good player but he doesn't really fit our roster right now.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
If you want to add a third baseman to try to improve the defense, I'd rather play Campbell there (and/or possibly Mayer later in the year) than give Bregman all that money for all those years (plus lose the draft pick and international money.)
Giving Bregman all that money and years to have him play second base would be completely nonsensical. A huge part of his value is his glove at third base.
He's a really good player but he doesn't really fit our roster right now.
I don't think KCamp would be a good 3B, but that's not really based on anything.

The Devers is a bad 3B & Bregman is a good 3B stuff is interesting. & while it's true... it's interesting trying to figure out how much it actually matters.

I like OAA better than DRS, so we'll use FRV for this, which is basically the translation of outs to runs.

Devers was a -5 last year & Bregman was +5 runs. So, if that's accurate, over the course of the season, having Bregman at 3B instead of Devers would have allowed the Red Sox to prevent 10 runs on the season.

The Red Sox allowed 747 runs last year, so with Bregman they allow 737. They scored 751 runs.

That would increase their pythag wins from 81.5 to 82.5. So that's not nothing, but it's also not like a big needle mover. Bregman is also 2.5 years older than Devers so one would generally expect his defense to fall off sooner, but there are of course arguments to the contrary.

The other piece is the offense. If we sign Bregman with the intention of replacing Yoshida by moving Devers to DH, the other piece is how many runs more do you score with Bregman over Yoshida?

Bregman had a .323 xwOBA & a 118 wRC+ last year, & Steamer projects him for 122 next year.

Yoshida, who is about 9 months older than Bregman, had a .324 xwOBA & a 115 wRC+, & Steamer projects him for a 117 next year.

Steamer projects Bregman to be worth 15.3 runs above average offensively in 664 PAs & Yoshida to be worth 8.4 in 520. While it is reasonable to project that Bregman may have more PAs in a full season than Yoshida, that's not particularly descriptive if Yoshida is complemented by a Refsnyder or someone. But rather than getting too into the weeds on that, let's just give Yoshida the same # of PAs as Bregman which would take him to 10.7 RAA.

So in the same # of PAs, Steamer projects Bregman to be worth 4.6 more runs. Let's round that to 5.

So in Bregman world, the Red Sox have now outscored their opponents 756 to 737, which is a pythag of 83.1.

So using this really rough mathmatical construct, Bregman at 3B & Devers at DH is worth about 1.6 wins more than Devers at 3B & Yoshida at DH.

Is a marginal increase of 1.6 wins worth $30m per year, their 2nd round pick & $500k of IFA $? I guess it's hard to say in a vacuum. Technically they could probably be able to save about $7m/year of that amount by subsidizing Yoshida.

I just realized if I use Steamer projections they only predict a 5.6 run difference on defense between Bregman & Devers for '25, so using that we are back to about 1 marginal win by adding Bregman, but either way.

Let's compare that to the catcher situation, though...Steamer projects Wong will be worth -4.4 runs on offense & -3.0 runs on defense in 369 PAs & Narváez for -4.2 & 3.7 in 194 PAs...

The oddest thing is if that's accurate, they could improve by 3 runs just by switching Narváez to Wong's PAs & Wong to Narváez's.

But for the sake of this exercise, let's just plan on replacing Wong & letting Narváez be the backup.

Yasmani Grandal has a Steamer projection of -1.8 offense & 5.3 defense in 240 PAs. If you give him Wong's 369 PAs, that would be a total of +5.4 runs, compared to Wong's -7.4 runs. That's a swing of 12.8 runs...rounding we will call it scoring 2 more runs & allowing 11 less.

So in Grandal over Wong world we're at 753 to 736, for a pythag of 82.8 wins.

So Bregman is worth 1.6 marginal wins & Grandal is worth 1.3 marginal wins.

Grandal is a free agent who signed a 1 year, $2.5m contract last off season. He would not require a long term commitment, or cause the Red Sox to lose a draft pick or IFA money.

I mean, of course they can do more than one thing... but I think the main thing this exercise illustrates is how much easier it is of a fit to upgrade at catcher than it is by adding Bregman.

Another guy who has been thrown out there is Sean Murphy, who Steamer projects at +1.5 & +10.6 in 420 PAs. If we give him all of Wong's PAs, & 51 of Narváez's it's a 19.7 run swing (83.8 pythag).

Murphy would obviously require some sort of trade compensation, but he has 4/$60m renaining on his contract with a team option for '29, & his AAV is only $12.2m. Not sure if that bumps up to $15m if he's traded. They keep changing the rules on that stuff, but either way.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
That got a bit out of hand on my phone, but I think it's a much better framework than whatever that fWAR conversation was because fWAR is pretty imaginary as it relates to team-building.
 

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
33,019
Alamogordo
Holy shit, Devers being on that list is astounding, but then I think about the season he had and what I saw of it, and I really don't feel like I should be THAT surprised.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Was just playing around with some Fangraphs stuff...mostly to see if there is any value in it...so I'll post it...

Here's the Primer on what the stats mean:

Stuff+, Location+, and Pitching+ Primer | Sabermetrics Library

Relievers:

Stuff+
Chapman 134
Hendriks 134**
Guerrero 119
Kelly 111
Slaten 109
Campbell 106*
Fulmer 105*
Whitlock 104
Wilson 104
Penrod 103
Winck 101
Weissert 100
Shugart 99
Murphy 95*
Bernardino 92

Location+
Shugart 105
Guerrero 104
Wilson 104
Weissert 103
Slaten 102
Winck 102
Whitlock 101
Kelly 100
Campbell 99
Hendriks 98**
Bernardino 97
Fulmer 97*
Chapman 96
Murphy 95*
Penrod 90

Pitching+
Hendriks 108**
Chapman 106
Guerrero 105
Weissert 105
Shugart 105
Wilson 104
Kelly 104
Slaten 103
Whitlock 102
Campbell 102
Winck 100
Fulmer 100*
Murphy 96*
Bernardino 93
Penrod 91

Starters:

Stuff+
Fitts 112
Houck 108
Crawford 108
Crochet 102
Bello 101
Criswell 100
Sandoval 98
Buehler 94
Giolito 94*
Priester 94

Location+
Crawford 105
Fitts 104
Crochet 103
Criswell 102
Buehler 101
Giolito 101*
Houck 100
Priester 100
Bello 99
Sandoval 98

Pitching+
Crawford 107
Fitts 106
Houck 104
Crochet 103
Bello 102
Giolito 101*
Buehler 100
Criswell 99
Sandoval 99
Priester 98

** = from 2022
* = from 2023

In 2024, Isaiah Campbell had a 145/97/112...in 6 2/3 bad innings, so went with the larger '23 sample size.
In 2020, Walker Buehler had a 138/105/112.

Of the outgoing guys...

Pivetta 133/104/108
Jansen 121/105/110
Martin 98/112/107
Booser 94/100/99

What did I learn from this? Almost nothing...
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Answering the question about why Casas struck out 6.6% more often in '24 than in '23... it's because he swung at 3.6% more balls out of the strike zone & hit the ball 5.8% less of the time when he swung. On the season, he had 2.8% more swinging strikes & 2.2% more called strikes than the previous year. So worse swing decisions & less contact overall.

In 90 PAs before the injury, he struck out 28.9% of the time & had a 132 wRC+.
In 150 PAs after returning from the injury, he struck out 32.7% of the time & had a 112 wRC+.

A 132 wRC+ for a full season would be 23rd in MLB among qualifying hitters last year. His .513 SLG would have been 14th (.439 after he returned).

But yeah, prior to injury he was on basically the same path has '23 (130 wRC+ to 132 & 25.1% k to 28.9%). To put an even finer point on it...Casas was 2-12 with 5 k's in the 3 games before being shut down. Prior to that, he had a 139 wRC+ & a very in line 26.3% k-rate.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
That 139 wRC+ would be the same as Jurickson Profar over a whole season.

The problem is that 2025 is an odd year:
From 2016 to 2024...

Profar even year wRC+ avg: 109
Profar odd year wRC+ avg: 73
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Nolan Arenado:

Through June 8th: 260 PAs, 91 wRC+, EV 85.9
From June 9th on: 375 PAs, 110 wRC+, EV 86.6

Meh.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
19,524
Here's is KCamp's games by position since joining the org...

2B - 51
SS - 36
CF - 25
DH - 18
LF - 8
3B - 5
RF - 2