From a long term guarantee standpoint it is not as good as what was projected. Good yearly numbers though.This is more AAV (and front loaded) and he has opt outs and still in his 20’s
Cratered?
From a long term guarantee standpoint it is not as good as what was projected. Good yearly numbers though.This is more AAV (and front loaded) and he has opt outs and still in his 20’s
Cratered?
I'm not in favor of trading Yoshida ... BUT ... signing Chapman and moving Devers to DH would improve our defense and lineup pretty quickly. Yoshi would need to be moved, I would think.Yeah, something like 3/65 seems in play for Chapman all of a sudden
Yeah the AAV and Opt outs are good for him, but at the same time he was the top position player on the market and he made less guaranteed than Josh Hader (through a QO even).This is more AAV (and front loaded) and he has opt outs and still in his 20’s
Cratered?
I’m curious what more typical long term contract structure Bellinger chose this over. I’m sure someone was willing to offer something with more than 80M guaranteed, perhaps just not what they were looking for.Yeah the AAV and Opt outs are good for him, but at the same time he was the top position player on the market and he made less guaranteed than Josh Hader (through a QO even).
Last year's crazy market looking more like temporary insanity every day.
They were probably the only ones offering anything at all to a guy who had a .587 OPS last year.Brandon Crawford to the Cardinals. A bit of a bummer. He was a lifelong Giants fan and then had spent his whole excellent career with them. I'm curious what the Cardinals were willing to offer that the Giants were not.
A contract?Brandon Crawford to the Cardinals. A bit of a bummer. He was a lifelong Giants fan and then had spent his whole excellent career with them. I'm curious what the Cardinals were willing to offer that the Giants were not.
Ugh, this probably means they plan to send Masyn Winn back down to AAA to start the season. That makes me sad, even though he sucked during his MLB time last year.Brandon Crawford to the Cardinals. A bit of a bummer. He was a lifelong Giants fan and then had spent his whole excellent career with them. I'm curious what the Cardinals were willing to offer that the Giants were not.
They traded Margot to MIN (a few posts up) so that they had a spot for Keekay.Do the dodgers have a sixty man roster? Feel like they’ve been adding guys non stop.
The Cardinals are opening an old folks home and he can hangout with some of his friends there.Brandon Crawford to the Cardinals. A bit of a bummer. He was a lifelong Giants fan and then had spent his whole excellent career with them. I'm curious what the Cardinals were willing to offer that the Giants were not.
Not to start the season. Winn will play and Crawford will back him up unless Wynn falls apart in spring training.Ugh, this probably means they plan to send Masyn Winn back down to AAA to start the season. That makes me sad, even though he sucked during his MLB time last year.
I completely missed Margot even being part of the Glasnow deal.They traded Margot to MIN (a few posts up) so that they had a spot for Keekay.
The fact that this is tongue in cheek makes me feel really old.Youth movement in STL this offseason:
Matt Carpenter, 38
Brandon Crawford, 37
Lance Lynn, 36
Kyle Gibson, 36
Sonny Gray, 34
Andrew Kittredge, 33
In the scheme of things, a single 2nd round pick is nice but not super valuable. If the Giants traded an equivalent prospect for Chapman in May, that would just seem like the cost of doing business. And if not for the QO, the price would have been higher — perhaps it would have been the 30 mil Bellinger is getting?Chapman has a QO so the Giants lose their 2nd round pick for potentially one year of $20M Chapman, or he is not very good and stays. I would not be thrilled about that as a Giants fan.
They also lose $500k international bonus money, & the slot value of the 2nd round pick they lose (around $1.7m). So it's really like 2 or more prospects being lost.In the scheme of things, a single 2nd round pick isn’t super valuable. If the Giants traded an equivalent prospect for Chapman in May, that would just seem like the cost of doing business.
Sure. It’s not nothing. But they also got a guy projected make 5/120 at a much smaller deal -- he's making less this year than he would have if he took the QO. Maybe Chapman helps them win a WC spot. If the Giants have any kind of a farm system the picks they lose won’t end up in their top 15 prospects (initially anyway). Those guys get moved in rental deals all the time and nobody bats an eyelash. Is what the Giants lose here more valuable than what the Sox got for Verdugo?They also lose $500k international bonus money, & the slot value of the 2nd round pick they lose (around $1.7m). So it's really like 2 or more prospects being lost.
View: https://twitter.com/MLBPipeline/status/1763793590680252754
I'm not really arguing whether it's a good move or bad, just stating the entire picture. Chapman also makes more money than Verdugo & they have to pay him the next 2 years only if he's worth less in the market than his contract.Sure. It’s not nothing. But they also got a guy projected make 5/120 at a much smaller deal. Maybe Chapman helps them win a WC spot. If the Giants have any kind of a farm system the picks they lose won’t end up in their top 15 prospects. Those guys get moved in rental deals all the time and nobody bats an eyelash. Is what the Giants lose here more valuable than what the Sox got for Verdugo?
Dombro will probably be fired by then.Phillies in 2027 will have $142 million (tax number) committed just 4 guys who will be 34, 34, 34, and 37. After that, the 37 year old (Wheeler) is off the books but they still have 13 more years collectively of the 34 year olds (Turner, Harper, Nola). If they win in the next few years, money well spent. But either way, they better nail the next few years of drafting/player development, because they are going to need a lot of cheap talent, even if the players age well.
Not that he wasn't before, Ken?Snell, 31, is believed to be seeking the same type of contract recently signed by two other Scott Boras clients, Cody Bellinger and Matt Chapman — a three-year deal with two opt outs.
Or, he goes to a place he gets to play everyday and build value for another contract.JD Davis takes the "I don't feel like moving again" deal.
ThisOr, he goes to a place he gets to play everyday and build value for another contract.
Plus, if you put up numbers on a bad team for a couple of months, maybe come trading season some good team decides they actually do have a use for you. Applies to Taylor as well.Or, he goes to a place he gets to play everyday and build value for another contract.
Agreed. I would not have minded the Sox signing him to that deal.View: https://twitter.com/JonHeyman/status/1770677420053717082?s=20
This feels like a great deal for the Rangers.
100% agree.Agreed. I would not have minded the Sox signing him to that deal.
We can only hope that will prove to be the case.100% agree.
OTOH, maybe I'm a dreamer at this point but this does seemingly eliminate one of the few logical competitors for Montgomery. I still don't think it's likely he comes here, but where else? Yankees looking at a 90% tax on his salary.