Agree with this take also.Feel like that's also a really good deal for TEN... a 9 pick drop in the 3rd and a future 3rd to move up 8 spots in the 2nd and get your potential starter?
If you're a Levis believer, absolutely.Feel like that's also a really good deal for TEN... a 9 pick drop in the 3rd and a future 3rd to move up 8 spots in the 2nd and get your potential starter?
meh, you get what you get. They got fair value, especially because it seems like they wanted to move down only to 16,17 (maybe 18?) and no further. I'm sure they could have gotten more value if they were willing to go to 25 or something, but they weren't.Feels more and more that Pats should have gotten more moving 14 to 17
I think the Pats knew they only wanted to trade as low as 17, no lower. When you have only one partner you're willing to trade with, you can't get max value.Feels more and more that Pats should have gotten more moving 14 to 17
sure but it seemed like he couldn’t throw in the prosdidn't they just take a QB last year?
They traded up from 90 to take Malik Willis at 86. He was awful last year, though.didn't they just take a QB last year?
Not sure a trade-up at start of second round, where picks are in demand, is the same type of market.Feels more and more that Pats should have gotten more moving 14 to 17
Also, QB trades are fundamentally different anyway, teams almost always overpay on QB trades because QB is so valuable.Not sure a trade-up at start of second round, where picks are in demand, is the same type of market.
I don't know--LaPorta was likely on their board somewhere, no?Seems like three guys so far that the Pats wouldn't be interested in at 46 -- so that's a good start.
Isn't the knock on him that he's not a good blocker at all?I don't know--LaPorta was likely on their board somewhere, no?
They're going to have to give up more than a second and a fourth to get up to Washington or Schoonmaker
What's wrong with it? Greenie?What’s the best place to watch on YouTube or something I can watch on my smart tv? The NFL feed on YouTube last night was fine, but this ESPN one today makes me want to punch people
Probably, but it's a position they were interested in, so a lot of times the first one to go starts a run, so it still has an effect. And now Mayer is gone..Isn't the knock on him that he's not a good blocker at all?
It's ESPN. It's just..."we don't know if this is for Levis" 5 minutes after we knew here.What's wrong with it? Greenie?
Rams take Avila, let’s see if we get one of the othersJohn Michael Schmitz is the bomb. Steve Avila is a great option. Luke Wypler. That Wisconsin center Tippman is a favorite of a lot of people but I just don't love him.
It’s not Greenie, it’s six other guys I don’t recognize and I’m finding it a bit hard to followWhat's wrong with it? Greenie?
I think zilch if they stay putWhat are the chances that Branch falls to the Pats?
also, the Steelers may have been the only viable trade partner if they didn’t want to go lower than 17.meh, you get what you get. They got fair value, especially because it seems like they wanted to move down only to 16,17 (maybe 18?) and no further. I'm sure they could have gotten more value if they were willing to go to 25 or something, but they weren't.