Too early to say for sure, but watching both him and Keegan Murray makes you think there may a market inefficiency for nominally “old” “low ceiling” guys who kicked ass in the Big 10. (Murray was picked #4, but projected a lot lower than that, and Sac got heat in some parts for picking him that high — including by me, IIRC).What does GS have in TJD?
I wanted Brad to take him in the 1st. This kid never should have fallen to the 2nd nevermind almost going completely Undrafted.What does GS have in TJD?
wanted Brad to take him in the 2nd round
Absolutely. I don't qualify coaching and coaching staffs as mattering a whole lot but that is due to NBA-level coaching staffs having little separation. CJM and last years staff was an anomaly that I don't recall ever seeing in the NBA when the prior years second row staff is now leading the team....with all the assts being loyal to the prior coach. The only type of disarray in the same ballpark that I recall was when Scal was part of that fiasco in Golden State.I know it's a "players" league, but coaching does matter if it's in disarray. I expect MIL to have some HC growing pains, Budenholzer may have had his faults, but he did have a lot of NBA success with MIL/ATL.
Now take CJMs situation last year, with nobody on his staff having his back. It's kind of amazing that they made it to the 7th game in the ECF
Weakside shotblockers like Chet and Timelord rarely guard the other team's bruising big wings in any case. Chet will be just fine (if healthy): he's a talent, and there are plenty of ways to keep a shooting, skilled shotblocker on the floor against basically anyone.Watched a little of that. My big takeaway was that Chet needs to put on like 50 pounds. Giannis moved him like he wasn't there.
Also: Anyone else getting a little "Russ moves to Denver" vibes from Dame going to the Bucks? Maybe it's just wishful thinking.
Agreed and that game is a great example. I've heard some people downplay it as nothing which I don't think will be the case once the games begin. I expect this thing to get fairly big. To the naysayers....what is the downside that concerns you?That GSW-Sac preseason game is why I'm very high on the in-season tournament. If you tell NBA players "you don't have to get up every night, but get up for THIS game", they tend to do it. I think we're going to see some serious intensity and fun in Nov/Dec, which would be cool.
Do you think the league will eventually move the tournament final into the current dog days of the season, like March or so?Agreed and that game is a great example. I've heard some people downplay it as nothing which I don't think will be the case once the games begin. I expect this thing to get fairly big. To the naysayers....what is the downside that concerns you?
We likely won't get them but I want all of the Iguodala stories. A lot of NBA careers are fascinating but his is particularly interesting. Went from what seemed like a disappointment in Philly (unfair expectations imo) to a seasoned vet for Denver -until he shivved Karl - to effectively the first missing piece for the ascendant Dubs. He's seen a thing or two...
Did he sign an Exhibit 10 so that being waived is the procedure for him to be "stashed" on their G-League team? If the Warriors have too many guaranteed contracts maybe this was the plan all along until things shook out. Aside from that this would seem very strange.
I think you're thinking of 2 way deals, there is no limit on service time to just play in the G-League, Brandon Jennings for example had 8 or 9 years of service time when he went to China, then he came back and signed with a G-League team.Green is an exhibit 9. I don't think those can be converted. He's also got 4 years of service time, so I think he's ineligible for the G-League. (Presumably that's why he was on an exhibit 9 instead of an exhibit 10).
Yes. Of course that's right. Thanks.I think you're thinking of 2 way deals,
I'm sure he made up for it by playing his usual stellar defense.And after having a hell of a preseason, Jordan Poole tonight has:
7 points on 1/15 shooting, 0/6 from 3,, 2 rebounds, 4 assists, 1 steal., and a-18 rating, in 20 minutes..
I feel like I remember this guy roller coastering a lot, but this may be even more extreme.
He had one incredible game out of four.And after having a hell of a preseason, Jordan Poole tonight has:
7 points on 1/15 shooting, 0/6 from 3,, 2 rebounds, 4 assists, 1 steal., and a-18 rating, in 20 minutes..
I feel like I remember this guy roller coastering a lot, but this may be even more extreme.
"L'état--c'est moi."Based on this quote, I am now a Clippers fan.
Clippers/Denver west finals will be great
View: https://twitter.com/malika_andrews/status/1720202953326485866?s=20
Yes def break this out.Do we need/want a thread specifically for the in-season tournament?
Thats where I am at. until I see this with different intensity across the entire tourney then they are just in season gamnes to me.I see them as regular season games but I dunno...maybe there's a little juice in this?
You will see it right out of the gate so get ready. When basketball players have a reason to compete for something it is an easy flick of the switch. We saw this in the final preseason game between the Warriors and Kings game if anyone needs evidence of this to be true....and that was a preseason game.Thats where I am at. until I see this with different intensity across the entire tourney then they are just in season gamnes to me.
Absolutely, yes. Then I can talk about my scheme to include international teams in future years, if and when we make this single-elimination.Do we need/want a thread specifically for the in-season tournament?
Scale of 1-10, how interested are people in this? I see them as regular season games but I dunno...maybe there's a little juice in this?
Agree. Coaches are going to coach these games to win, and players will respond accordingly. I don't necessarily expect that starters will all play 40+ minutes in the round-robin games; bench players will have a bigger role than they normally would in the playoffs. But it does seem like everyone is bought in to try to make it work.You will see it right out of the gate so get ready. When basketball players have a reason to compete for something it is an easy flick of the switch. We saw this in the final preseason game between the Warriors and Kings game if anyone needs evidence of this to be true....and that was a preseason game.
Was Eric Snow not their starting PG? Iverson was SG.I stopped reading here:
"Other than that, these scoring-sensation point guards who can't guard a lick do not win or even play for titles. Go look. You won't find a single one, not even prime James Harden, that made it to an NBA Finals this century, and before that they didn't really exist. "
Allen Iverson and the 2001 NBA Finals say hello, admittedly it was on a team surrounded by defense-first players but still. You can make your same case without twisting history a bit and hoping people won't check.
I guess, although it's rare to have a SG three inches shorter than a PG, so I'm sure Iverson guarded PGs at least as much as he did SGs.Was Eric Snow not their starting PG? Iverson was SG.
When the one guy that you can think of played 14 years in the league, winning an MVP, and had all-NBA votes 12 times and only went to one finals 22 years ago, I'm not sure that you're making the point that you think that you're making.I stopped reading here:
"Other than that, these scoring-sensation point guards who can't guard a lick do not win or even play for titles. Go look. You won't find a single one, not even prime James Harden, that made it to an NBA Finals this century, and before that they didn't really exist. "
Allen Iverson and the 2001 NBA Finals say hello, admittedly it was on a team surrounded by defense-first players but still. You can make your same case without twisting history a bit and hoping people won't check.
I am merely rebutting the quoted point, the one that says "Go look. You won't find a single one" when there's no reason for the writer to say that. That kind of sentence triggers my brain to try to do just that, it's just how I'm wired, for better and worse.When the one guy that you can think of played 14 years in the league, winning an MVP, and had all-NBA votes 12 times and only went to one finals 22 years ago, I'm not sure that you're making the point that you think that you're making.
Sure, it's possible for a diminutive defense-impaired guard to lead a team to the finals. It just doesn't really happen.
Those videos are pretty badThis is an unusually scathing take on a superstar's play by a national media outlet.
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/damian-lillard-is-playing-the-worst-defense-of-his-career-and-it-might-cost-more-than-just-the-bucks/
That's incredible. Those clips are absolutely damning, thankfully for them he's got the entire year to turn it around. All the time in the world won't make him faster or stronger, but those clips show a stupid, lazy, unengaged defender. Those are fixable for a HOF level player.This is an unusually scathing take on a superstar's play by a national media outlet.
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/damian-lillard-is-playing-the-worst-defense-of-his-career-and-it-might-cost-more-than-just-the-bucks/
Snow guarded whichever depended was going to force a Sixer guard to expend the most energy from my recollection.I guess, although it's rare to have a SG three inches shorter than a PG, so I'm sure Iverson guarded PGs at least as much as he did SGs.
Agreed. A defense is only as good as its weakest linkSure, it's possible for a diminutive defense-impaired guard to lead a team to the finals. It just doesn't really happen.
Pre-Celtics Nate Archibald existed. Didn't play much defense. Led the league in scoring and assists. Even Pete Maravich was getting 5-6APG (top 10 or 20) while shooting out the lights. The overall point about titles may be right. But the final clause is not."Other than that, these scoring-sensation point guards who can't guard a lick do not win or even play for titles. Go look. You won't find a single one, not even prime James Harden, that made it to an NBA Finals this century, and before that they didn't really exist. "
Well, he has two theses.I am merely rebutting the quoted point, the one that says "Go look. You won't find a single one" when there's no reason for the writer to say that. That kind of sentence triggers my brain to try to do just that, it's just how I'm wired, for better and worse.
I always regret posting on the hoops threads here, I need to do it even less.
In the playoffs probably, but it's certainly possible to put together a good to great defense even with having a small, terrible defender at the point. Beyond Kemba, the Celtics had small point guards whose defense ranged from bad to worst in the league, from 2016-2020 (IT-->Kyrie-->Kemba) and still put up good defensive numbers. Here's where the Celtics finished in defensive rating over those 5 years: 4th, 13th, 1st, 7th, 4th. And that was without having an individual defender like Giannis on the roster.Agreed. A defense is only as good as its weakest link
Diminutive PGs that float can be troublesome. We all suffer from PKS
Post-Kemba Syndrome
Not terribly rare these daysI guess, although it's rare to have a SG three inches shorter than a PG,