Guess Bloom knew what he was doing and didn't totally waste a pick like some people here thought last year.Fabian still on the board. He may have gotten some bad advice last year.
Guess Bloom knew what he was doing and didn't totally waste a pick like some people here thought last year.Fabian still on the board. He may have gotten some bad advice last year.
I think it’s really just the first part. NBA/NFL draftees can play their whole rookie contract in the time it takes a baseball draftee to debut.
Plus there is just not the same culture of interest in the college game. The first time the average fan hears about these players is on draft night if they are paying attention, if/when they are traded, or their MLB debut. There’s only so much the league could to do manufacture interest.
Is he REALLY committed to school?Roman Anthony, committed to Ole Miss
https://www.mlb.com/video/2022-draft-roman-anthony-of?t=mlb-draft
no one ever is really committed, although some should beIs he REALLY committed to school?
And even for first rounders, though most will make the majors at some point the odds of them being relevant are pretty slim. The average career WAR for 1st rounders is under 10, and even for top 5 guys it isn't that much higher. Hard to get excited about the fact that your team drafted a guy who in 3-4 years might be a 2 WAR player for a few seasons.It is hard to turn it into a really exciting event when most of these guys are never even gonna hit the majors. Players in the second round rarely ever pan out. I find it kind of strange that they are even trying to turn this into a big media event. The MLB Draft is nothing like the NBA or NFL drafts.
Since 2010, the only real impact players to come from the second rounds are
2016: Bo Bichette, Pete Alonso, Bryan Reynolds
2014: Alex Verdugo, Spencer Turnbull
2012: Alex Wood
2011: Josh Bell, Nick Ahmed
2010: Andrelton Simmons, Drew Smyly
Already has “Red Sox” on his instagramIs he REALLY committed to school?
Was wondering if it was *that* Marjory Stoneman Douglas or if Florida has a number of high schools named for her (which would be unsurprising)I’m gonna cheer extra hard for Roman Anthony out of Marjory Stoneman Douglas in Florida.
I believe he is from MSD HS which is where the mass shooting happened in February 2018.Was wondering if it was *that* Marjory Stoneman Douglas or if Florida has a number of high schools named for her (which would be unsurprising)
following up.Is he REALLY committed to school?
There was a basketball player at Algonquin Regional (alma mater of Mark Fidrych, who finished up at Worcester Academy) and now his daughter plays for them. First part is like sherpa, but with a long E. yerp-E.Is it pronounced like sherpa?
Given both the draft slot and the associated bonus money rolled forward, I'll never understand the arguments that claimed that Bloom botched the pick.Guess Bloom knew what he was doing and didn't totally waste a pick like some people here thought last year.
Go Tomahawks!There was a basketball player at Algonquin Regional (alma mater of Mark Fidrych, who finished up at Worcester Academy) and now his daughter plays for them. First part is like sherpa, but with a long E. yerp-E.
Thank you for thisI hope they put his locker next to Tyler Danish if they are both on the big club together.
He celebrated by dumping a bag of Pop Rocks into a PepsiNot a single: “Mikey! I like it!” post?
Another Draft thread turns Len BiasHe celebrated by dumping a bag of Pop Rocks into a Pepsi
Solid work right here, well done.I hope they put his locker next to Tyler Danish if they are both on the big club together.
I’m not sure that explains why no one would try to manufacture drama. The nba has made a big event from its draft and doesn’t exactly produces runaway success from its second round.And even for first rounders, though most will make the majors at some point the odds of them being relevant are pretty slim. The average career WAR for 1st rounders is under 10, and even for top 5 guys it isn't that much higher. Hard to get excited about the fact that your team drafted a guy who in 3-4 years might be a 2 WAR player for a few seasons.
Not positive, but I think Anthony Rizzo went to that HS. Of course, Anthony was there when the shooting happened.I believe he is from MSD HS which is where the mass shooting happened in February 2018.
Not positive, but I think Anthony Rizzo went to that HS. Of course, Anthony was there when the shooting happened.
He went to Marjorie Stoneman Douglas in Parkland, Florida, but was not yet in high school when the school shooting occurred there.
Like 9 posts above you is a tweet that says Roman is a huge value there. And if Cutter is considered an above slot pick at 41, then there's likely a pretty good reason.Whats the overall verdict so far. Underslot Mikey not wowing anyone. Any verdict on Cutter or Roman? I am not that knowledgeable on these prospects. Seems to be a bit underwhelming what I am reading on them
Along with what DJ said, the idea of coming up with a "verdict" on draft classes in baseball is, to be nice, premature at best. Because of the development period, it makes even less sense to evaluate it now than drafts in other pro sports.Whats the overall verdict so far. Underslot Mikey not wowing anyone. Any verdict on Cutter or Roman? I am not that knowledgeable on these prospects. Seems to be a bit underwhelming what I am reading on them
It ties into what DJ and E5 are saying in that there are no guarantees... especially for High School players as their time from Draft to the majors is understandably longer.The median time for a college player taken in the top 20 picks from 2000 to 2018 to reach the majors was 810 days; for high school players, it was 1,458 days, so about two years difference. For college players, however, it’s on the rise — the median time for college players drafted in the top 20 from 2000 to 2009 was 786 days, but for players drafted from 2010 to 2020 the median is at 1,037 days, and if we roll back to skip the last few drafts and avoid the impact of the pandemic, it goes up even more, to 1,058 days if we cut off at 2010 to 2017.
Pretty much. Every now and then you'll get a CF. At least at the top of the draft. This is why the Nick Yorke pick was panned. Once you move down a few rounds, there are more Blaze Jordan types. Usually the most athletic kid ends up playing SS whether he's good at it or not. Many are drafted at SS and are moved off the position immediately or soon there after. Michael Chavis and Mookie Betts come to minors. Others are allowed to stay at the position even if that's not where they project long term. Ex: Matthew Lugo, though he may move to 2b/OF if he shares a field with Mayer. Lumbering 1b only have one path to the majors. They have to rake. Toolsy shortstops have multiple paths to the majors.Isn't just about every good high school hitting prospect a shortstop? I wouldn't really pay attention to the position, a lot of them probably move off to something else.
Answering my own question, the Sox were the only organization taking 3 HS players on Day 1 of the draft. A couple of teams with 4 selections split their choices between HS and C. No other team came close with college players predominating. Am I right that HS players who can hit were a less in demand category of prospects that other teams inefficiently avoided?It seems to me with 3 fairly equal talents in the top 80 picks, Romero, Coffey and Anthony (RCA), might come close to being signed to comparable contracts. Romero comes in under slot, Coffey close to slot (maybe a little under) and Anthony above slot. Does this make sense? I haven't done the count but, to the extent that there is a Moneyball aspect to the draft, how many other organizations picked 3 HS players in their top 80 selections. Safer college players seemed to predominate. What was the HS, JC and college breakdown of those top draftees? HS pitchers are the riskiest picks with college pitchers being the safest picks in the context of all drafted pitchers are high risk. College hitters are safe but ceiling limited picks. HS hitters have the most upside.
To those who do not appreciate this line:There's not a nobler Roman than Anthony.
It could just be that the Red Sox went into this draft with the intention of continuing to spread the talent through their system. The better low-minors players are advancing, meaning they need a talent influx at that level. That's a guess on my part, but under Bloom the focus has been to rebuild the farm system to the point where it becomes a conveyor belt rather than a vending machine. Building the low minors also produces a wider range of talent to use eventually in deals.Answering my own question, the Sox were the only organization taking 3 HS players on Day 1 of the draft. A couple of teams with 4 selections split their choices between HS and C. No other team came close with college players predominating. Am I right that HS players who can hit were a less in demand category of prospects that other teams inefficiently avoided?
I'm not really a HS/College guy but I am a sox farm junkie. I like the profile of all 3 players. Mikey comes across as it's his birth right to play in the majors and that's the perfect attitude to have. Cutter has the potential to be an above average hitter and Roman has power you can dream on. He has some legit power at his age.Whats the overall verdict so far. Underslot Mikey not wowing anyone. Any verdict on Cutter or Roman? I am not that knowledgeable on these prospects. Seems to be a bit underwhelming what I am reading on them
From what I have read, Romero is under slot, Coffey is OVER slot. Haven't heard anything on Anthony but given he appears eager to sign here, it may be around slot.It seems to me with 3 fairly equal talents in the top 80 picks, Romero, Coffey and Anthony (RCA), might come close to being signed to comparable contracts. Romero comes in under slot, Coffey close to slot (maybe a little under) and Anthony above slot. Does this make sense? I haven't done the count but, to the extent that there is a Moneyball aspect to the draft, how many other organizations picked 3 HS players in their top 80 selections. Safer college players seemed to predominate. What was the HS, JC and college breakdown of those top draftees? HS pitchers are the riskiest picks with college pitchers being the safest picks in the context of all drafted pitchers are high risk. College hitters are safe but ceiling limited picks. HS hitters have the most upside.
There is hope for the board yet.I hope they put his locker next to Tyler Danish if they are both on the big club together.
Was Eric Van still working for the team when they drafted those two?Pretty much. Every now and then you'll get a CF. At least at the top of the draft. This is why the Nick Yorke pick was panned. Once you move down a few rounds, there are more Blaze Jordan types. Usually the most athletic kid ends up playing SS whether he's good at it or not. Many are drafted at SS and are moved off the position immediately or soon there after. Michael Chavis and Mookie Betts come to minors. Others are allowed to stay at the position even if that's not where they project long term. Ex: Matthew Lugo, though he may move to 2b/OF if he shares a field with Mayer. Lumbering 1b only have one path to the majors. They have to rake. Toolsy shortstops have multiple paths to the majors.
---
On another note, I hope we see more 2 way players in the minors. I don't know why the are already committed to Cutter Coffey at SS. Do the minor leagues have the same DH rules? They could always use him as an opener.
Also don't think the Sox really need pitching, so don't get the call for drafting pitchers even if one did draft for need. Bello, Walter, Winckowski, Seabold, Mata, Ward, Murphy. I guess there isn't much at the lower levels. Wikelman has a very live arm. Hunter Dobbins is turning some heads. Scouting reports are trailing behind on him. 4 pitch mix, currently sitting in the mid 90s and topping out at 98.
Of course, if the best available prospect is a pitcher, take him.
I think it was after, but I thought EV was done with the Sox prior to 2010. I'm not entirely sure.Was Eric Van still working for the team when they drafted those two?
This makes me wonder about trade value. My gut tells me top prospect lists are more likely to be dominated by high school draftees or IFAs who are younger and have more projectibility/perceived upside whereas college players tend to be higher floor/lower ceiling in addition to being significantly older.It could just be that the Red Sox went into this draft with the intention of continuing to spread the talent through their system. The better low-minors players are advancing, meaning they need a talent influx at that level. That's a guess on my part, but under Bloom the focus has been to rebuild the farm system to the point where it becomes a conveyor belt rather than a vending machine. Building the low minors also produces a wider range of talent to use eventually in deals.
Right? Impossible not to root for him.I’m gonna cheer extra hard for Roman Anthony out of Marjory Stoneman Douglas in Florida.
This is sublime.Was Eric Van still working for the team when they drafted those two?
This guy is not a fan: https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/p/pompeda01.shtmlRight? Impossible not to root for him.