Would Rudy Gay be a realistic target?Good argument there for upgrading our depth at the wing?![]()
Would Rudy Gay be a realistic target?Good argument there for upgrading our depth at the wing?![]()
Grant's step-back 3 was impressive, his stroke is mustard. He's a tremendous role player. The last 2 games were the perfect time for him to cash in on RFA. BUT foul trouble and a disciplined Miami team made sure he couldn't put up his signature Corner3s in volume. He'll need a massive postseason to get an unmatchable RFA offer. Brad played it right.Grant had a key 3 that tied the game in the Celtics penultimate possession. A lot of was asked of the deep bench, and they did make a valiant effort on the road of a B2B.
Ha. I was hoping for more minutes from Luke last night. It's funny because the more he plays the less he embarrasses himself. You never know when we'll have to lean heavily on him if Tl or Al go down for an extended period.Good argument there for upgrading our depth at the wing?![]()
Gay is at the Blake Griffin stage of his career. The type of veteran who provide a presence off the court but not going to really help you on it except for emergencies.Would Rudy Gay be a realistic target?
This is where Stevens's excellence at his job should pay off. Someone will be this season's White.These last two weeks hammered home what this team needs to add in a trade or the buyout market IMO
Same, man. Every time his name pops up, I post "No Bamba".I know we’ve spoken about Bamba previously. Every time I see him I’m trying to consider options to beat the Joe Barry Carroll/JBC, Joe Barely Cares acronym. What can we create out of MFB?
They were missing two guys who can play 1-3, one guy who can play 2-4, and a 4-5.....so, no, not really.Good argument there for upgrading our depth at the wing?![]()
I thought that was "occupying space". At least according to someone's longtime signature lineBeing tall is the last skill to deteriorate
Man you aren't kidding. His scoring efficiency numbers have cratered this year, TS% of .439 (it was .539 last year). It's also somewhat remarkable that a guy in year 17 (1100 games played) has been in the playoffs just 3 times, never out of the first round.Gay is at the Blake Griffin stage of his career. The type of veteran who provide a presence off the court but not going to really help you on it except for emergencies.
He is also paid in millions upon millions of dollars. They bought the C's for 200 million 20 years ago. It is worth what? 5 billion now?"We're paid in enjoyment"
Love him.
Question: I'm sure the numbers are opaque, but how would the Celtics', or any other franchise's, value be reduced by renting and not owning? I know the TV deals are a huge piece of the pie, but does it not factor in when you're a marquee franchise? I'd assume there's a considerable hit to operating income, too.He is also paid in millions upon millions of dollars. They bought the C's for 200 million 20 years ago. It is worth what? 5 billion now?
Doesn’t make a huge difference. The Sixers are worth $3.15B per Forbes and they don’t own their arena although they’re looking into building a new one at the end of their Wells Fargo lease.Question: I'm sure the numbers are opaque, but how would the Celtics', or any other franchise's, value be reduced by renting and not owning? I know the TV deals are a huge piece of the pie, but does it not factor in when you're a marquee franchise? I'd assume there's a considerable hit to operating income, too.
Are you aware of any specifics on the leases? Do the landlords get rent and all/most/some concessions? Do renters end up relying solely on TV money?Doesn’t make a huge difference. The Sixers are worth $3.15B per Forbes and they don’t own their arena although they’re looking into building a new one at the end of their Wells Fargo lease.
Sarver purchased Phoenix in 2004 for a then record $401mm and they just sold for ~$4B. So, yeah, given the C's franchise profile in the NBA as well as their media market, that ~$360 Boston went for is probably somewhere in the neighborhood of $5B. We may be getting paid in enjoyment but Wyc is getting far, far more than that.He is also paid in millions upon millions of dollars. They bought the C's for 200 million 20 years ago. It is worth what? 5 billion now?
From my understsnding, Wyc doesn’t get any of the concession, parking or other ancillary revenue that game day events in the arena produce. Those aren’t peanuts (pun intended).Question: I'm sure the numbers are opaque, but how would the Celtics', or any other franchise's, value be reduced by renting and not owning? I know the TV deals are a huge piece of the pie, but does it not factor in when you're a marquee franchise? I'd assume there's a considerable hit to operating income, too.
A lot of times it’s an operating lease, like what the Devils have with the Newark Housing Authority. They pay annual rent but generally keep all of the revenue associated with the operations. I think they even got out of paying real estate taxes on the arena.Are you aware of any specifics on the leases? Do the landlords get rent and all/most/some concessions? Do renters end up relying solely on TV money?
Apologies for all the questions. I'm not sure how to research this stuff.
I know for certain that the Wizards do not keep operations revenues as I have a friend close with the organization (at least up to 6-7 years ago) and I know years ago the arena owners had a stranglehold on the teams…..but maybe that has changed as the NBA product has given owners more leverage in these negotiations.A lot of times it’s an operating lease, like what the Devils have with the Newark Housing Authority. They pay annual rent but generally keep all of the revenue associated with the operations. I think they even got out of paying real estate taxes on the arena.
Yeah, I suspect every arrangement is different. I know the Devils got a real sweetheart deal as part of a never ending effort to make Newark less of a shit hole. When it’s a private/private transaction, I would presume the terms are less favorable for the NBA teams.I know for certain that the Wizards do not keep operations revenues as I have a friend close with the organization (at least up to 6-7 years ago) and I know years ago the arena owners had a stranglehold on the teams…..but maybe that has changed as the NBA product has given owners more leverage in these negotiations.
Having been to Newark, I'd agree with the "never ending" part.Yeah, I suspect every arrangement is different. I know the Devils got a real sweetheart deal as part of a never ending effort to make Newark less of a shit hole. When it’s a private/private transaction, I would presume the terms are less favorable for the NBA teams.
Thanks for that. The writing is solid AF.
$200M purchase with a $180M loan from SocGen, secured by the Celtics assets. Those private equity guys.Not sure where to put this:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_mu8g_HhBE
Wyc interview on CNBC
"We're paid in enjoyment"
Love him.
Yeah normally I'd click out of that one verse and chorus in, after I got the idea... but the whole thing was strangely compelling. Even if the guy can't rap to save his life.
First time I flew through Newark for business was during the period when I still smoked but smoking was outlawed in the domestic terminals. I stepped outside to the smoking area and was hit with a wall of sewage smell. I said out loud to nobody in particular "What the fuck is that smell?", and another smoker just casually said "Newark" without looking away from his book.Yeah normally I'd click out of that one verse and chorus in, after I got the idea... but the whole thing was strangely compelling. Even if the guy can't rap to save his life.
Corey Booker has a lot to answer for. Could probably have our own V&N thread on Newark.
Red Auerbach used to get calls from the predecessor of Delaware North after Celtics games. The caller had no interest in the outcome of the game, only in the amount of beer sold.I recall the late 1970s when Delaware North had such onerous lease terms that the Celtics were looking to move to Rockingham Park in Salem. Then again, it really wasn't until Larry Bird arrived on the scene that the Celtics started regularly selling out the arena, so the team had much less leverage than they have now.
Growing up in Essex County in the 1970's as a Red Sox fan made fraternity hazing a picnicFirst time I flew through Newark for business was during the period when I still smoked but smoking was outlawed in the domestic terminals. I stepped outside to the smoking area and was hit with a wall of sewage smell. I said out loud to nobody in particular "What the fuck is that smell?", and another smoker just casually said "Newark" without looking away from his book.
That's not to say that the hookers and shit don't matter, but the smell is unique.
I always thought that was the smell from the Budweiser factory adjacent to the airport.First time I flew through Newark for business was during the period when I still smoked but smoking was outlawed in the domestic terminals. I stepped outside to the smoking area and was hit with a wall of sewage smell. I said out loud to nobody in particular "What the fuck is that smell?", and another smoker just casually said "Newark" without looking away from his book.
That's not to say that the hookers and shit don't matter, but the smell is unique.
Depends if it was an overcast or cloudy day. The chemical/petro factories worked overtime on those daysI always thought that was the smell from the Budweiser factory adjacent to the airport.
I had that same experience 44 years ago. Only I was still on the bloody plane and my brothers and I were wrinkling our noses and one of us asked aloud “Did someone shit their pants?” and a more experienced traveler told us “Nope, that’s just Newark. Hopefully your layover is short.”First time I flew through Newark for business was during the period when I still smoked but smoking was outlawed in the domestic terminals. I stepped outside to the smoking area and was hit with a wall of sewage smell. I said out loud to nobody in particular "What the fuck is that smell?", and another smoker just casually said "Newark" without looking away from his book.
That's not to say that the hookers and shit don't matter, but the smell is unique.
Grant should have been the high-energy guy off the bench to slow down Julius Randles rim runs...sadly notAnd in this corner, we have the Great Disappearing Grant Williams: 2 for 8 from the field, 2 rebounds (1 fewer than Pritchard despite playing 9 more minutes), 2 turnovers, 4 fouls, -18 +/-.
Harden was called for one when Claxton was at the line two nights ago. I don’t think it’s not a thing, I think with so much tape on players they are now better than ever in timing their footwork so their foot is either behind the line or in the air on release.Are lane violations on free throws just not a thing anymore?
Can watch the replay of the 2 FT's on nba.com.Harden was called for one when Claxton was at the line two nights ago. I don’t think it’s not a thing, I think with so much tape on players they are now better than ever in timing their footwork so their foot is either behind the line or in the air on release.
Should take a look at the 2-minute report to see if that's legit (or just an NBA PR smokescreen) since that is a clear violation of the rulesCan watch the replay of the 2 FT's on nba.com.
On the first one, Randle almost steps into the lane just as the ball is leaving Brown's hand, but catches himself while looking off balance. Something that is always let go, as it should be.
On the second FT, Randle and Sims are both well over the inside line by the time the Brown shoots. Not sure why the officials would or should let that go, because it's a clear violation as per the rules.
View attachment 60505
I'll never understand constantly using Tatum & Brown to initiate the offense with Smart, White, or Brogdon on the floor. Brown/Tatum slowly get the offense into action, while letting the defense dig in showing help in the lane.When we got Brogdon, I was hoping the combination of him+Jaylen would be able to handle the non Tatum minutes better than in the past. It just hasn’t been the case though, the image below is their net rating with JB/MB on, and Tatum off.
Just from watching the games, it seems that too much of the time, we use Jaylen to initiate the offense while camping Brogdon off ball. It’s 50 games in, so I’m not sure if that’s going to change now.
View attachment 60521
The team with Tatum/Brogdon on and Jaylen off have dominated, FWIW. Whatever the staff has going on with them seems to be working. I’d rather use Tatum off ball more to help with the wear and tear, but at least he has the skill set. Using Jaylen on ball with Brogdon as a C&S guy makes zero sense to me, it’s too predictable.I'll never understand constantly using Tatum & Brown to initiate the offense with Smart, White, or Brogdon on the floor. Brown/Tatum slowly get the offense into action, while letting the defense dig in showing help in the lane.
Agreed, 50 games in and that appears to be their approach to half-court offense. Worked the first couple of months, but that offensive efficiency was probably due to unsustainable 3pt shooting across the board.
The fact that they call it occasionally is not evidence that they still call it consistently and correctly. I do agree that players are probably good at timing it, but blatant violations are very common and almost never get called.Harden was called for one when Claxton was at the line two nights ago. I don’t think it’s not a thing, I think with so much tape on players they are now better than ever in timing their footwork so their foot is either behind the line or in the air on release.
Edit: Wow that still shot shows a blatant violation by two players.
You'd look at that and immediately say Tatum is a lot better than Brown.I just wasted a ton of time going through a bunch of lineup data on cleaning the glass, which filters out garbage time. This roster is too talented for the following numbers to be so extreme. Obviously the Rob pairings are small sample size, same with Hauser to a lesser extent.
Jaylen/White on, Tatum off: +7.4, 91st percentile. Pretty much any combination with those two out there have been pretty good, they are a really good fit together.
Jaylen/Hauser on, Tatum off: +15.4, 99th percentile. This was +30 in mid December, but as we all know, Hauser fell off a cliff, so not much to take from this.
Tatum on: +8.8, 94th percentile.
Tatum off: -0.4, 47th percentile.
Jaylen on, Tatum off: +1.9, 63th percentile.
Tatum on, Jaylen off: +15.5, 99th percentile.
Jaylen/Tatum both on: +4.9, 82nd percentile.
Jaylen/Brogdon on, Tatum off: -3.7, 29th percentile.
Tatum/Brogdon on, Jaylen off: +16.6, 99th percentile.
Smart/Jaylen/Al on, Tatum off: -2.7, 33rd percentile.
Smart/Tatum/Al on, Jaylen off: +21.9, 99th percentile
Smart/Jaylen on, Tatum off: -2.6, 34th percentile.
Smart/Tatum on, Jaylen off: +25.0, 100th percentile.
Al/Jaylen on, Tatum off: +1.3, 58th percentile.
Al/Tatum on, Jaylen off: +16.0, 99th percentile.
Rob/Jaylen on, Tatum off: +1.9, 63rd percentile.
Rob/Tatum on, Jaylen off: +14.1, 99th percentile.
LeBron has been listed as Questionable on the initial injury report for the past month. He just played the back end of a B2B, I’m sure he’ll be playing tomorrow night.LeBron listed as questionable and A.D. as probable for tomorrow nite in Boston. Can't see LeBron missing this one unless he's on crutches.