If Kyrie or Harden are healthy, with Durant playing at his current level, the Nets probably roll everyone in the NBA Playoffs. Giannis is not a perfect player, in fact out of all the elite-NBA players he probably has the most glaring an obvious flaw that makes him an easy target for reactionary posts, which unfortunately have been very prevalent throughout the playoffs as people overreact to a few moments in every game.
I pointed out his stat line to bring up the broader point that people might look at a few moments in crunch time (in games the Bucks lost, but conveniently not in games the Bucks won) and make judgments about Giannis that to me, seem kind of insane. Despite the fact that the main talking point in this series was that Giannis is a broken player unworthy of being labeled as one of the best players in the league, he actually played extremely well throughout the series and carried his team to victory. That might be hard for some people to admit, especially if they overreacted to his past failures, like a poor stretch in Game 5, to make inaccurate rushed judgments and summations of a player, but hey, that is the environment we live in when it comes to NBA discussion.
Giannis' lack of shooting does make him worse than say, Luka Doncic or Dame Lillard, in the final few offensive possessions of a basketball game. I don't think that disqualifies him from being considered one of the best players of the NBA. He brings so much to the table on both ends of the court besides shooting that we can't just look at his one flaw and exaggerate its impact because it can be more noticeable in end-of-game scenarios. Most of the time he dominates the game to such a degree that crunch time never exists, like he did in Game 6.
