Just an offhand line in a tweet, I think.Would he be calling more games if he had worn a higher number while with the Yankees? There may be a logical connection between the two numbers, but I'm surely not seeing it. Who thinks up this stuff?
Just an offhand line in a tweet, I think.Would he be calling more games if he had worn a higher number while with the Yankees? There may be a logical connection between the two numbers, but I'm surely not seeing it. Who thinks up this stuff?
Also all Boras clients, we really should probably never quote Heyman on this site.View: https://twitter.com/jonheyman/status/1501601444310433794?s=21
I like them sniffing around Rodon.
It won’t be banned this year. It can be banned by the owners next year with 45 days notice to the players.Were the shift bans included in the cba? If so, then I think I prefer Rizzo.
Interesting. Well, then, I prefer Olson then Freeman then Rizzo.It won’t be banned this year. It can be banned by the owners next year with 45 days notice to the players.
Who are you offering for Olson? If the deal can be Gleyber and/or Voit plus some secondary prospects, ok, but NY moved a lot of prospects in deals last year (Taillon, Rizzo, Gallo) and don’t have the excess they did then. Peraza is the best defensive SS on the 40 man currently, seems dumb to me to send him away for two years of Olson.Interesting. Well, then, I prefer Olson then Freeman then Rizzo.
I was just teasing JAWe don't know how the top tier prospects will turn out, but if one or more of them hit, those contracts will allow the Yankees to spend big of top-tier free agents as needed. I'd rather the Yankees roll with that.
Definitely agree with the final phrase there, but when did NY try to move Voit and Gleyber to OAK for Olson last year? I don't think Olson or maybe Gleyber were actually on the market then, and Voit had health question marks around the deadline. I do agree that if OAK doesn't want Gleyber as the primary piece in return, that it's not a match.If a deal couldn't be built around Voit and Gleyber last season, I doubt it is going to happen now. I don't think the Yankees match up with what Oakland really wants and I'd rather they move on than give up top prospects.
Yeah, you're probably right. Just an assumption on my part that they would have been looking at it and done it if they could before they traded for Rizzo.Definitely agree with the final phrase there, but when did NY try to move Voit and Gleyber to OAK for Olson last year?
Nah. You told Cashman to move him for Marte, so I'm sure he was at least considering it.It all seems like a lifetime ago, but looking it up, they did not even move Gleyber off SS until Sept 13, so no way he was available at that point, I think.
Cot's has them just under $223M currently with Gleyber and Voit each at $5M exactly, so not possible.The one domino from the negotiations is that prior to the new CBA, the Yankees had no real choice but to go over the luxury tax threshold if they wanted to improve. Now they are safely under it and Hal could try and get cute by staying under once again. I would not be shocked to see it, but when we talk about Voit and Gleyber, that’s around $10-15m off the books if we were to trade them. Suppose you do that plus Freeman and you have a chance to be under $230?
He is supposedly OK and reporting to camp in Tampa tomorrow, but I agree that there is no future for him in NY and it's even pretty surprising to me that he is still on the 40 man.Hope he's alright. Always bothers me when a player who bursts onto the scene fades into nothingness and he's on the verge of doing that unless he gets traded or released.
Volpe and Arias are probably untouchable but Peraza and/or Sweeney/Vargas are possible. NY has a lot of tempting young pitching too.I guess if they're really going to sign Correa, might as well trade all the SS prospects