I think the difference is that you aren't starting with a blank slate. You're starting with a player who has already won multiple times on tour and then added considerable distance to his game. It's one tool that he didn't have, but can now add to an already impressive skill set.Oh, I understood and wasn't trying to be critical of your post. I just find it interesting how much everyone is focusing in on his distance and just assuming it's what's putting him over the edge (for obvious reasons) but it just doesn't make much sense to me. If it was that much of an advantage then the longest guys on tour would always win and that's just not the case. It's an advantage for sure, but not as much as it's being made out to be I think.