I feel like I remember an article highlighting some of the all time highest QBR performances when the rolled the statistic out and they were comically bad games. Then ESPN just disappeared those games from the QBR data.
That quote from BB was taken out of context. He actually said the following:Not going to quote the article because it's all relevant, but Belichick reinforces that Cam gives them the best chance to win and he hints at playcalling may be to blame for some of the disfunction.
https://www.boston.com/sports/new-england-patriots/2020/12/11/bill-belichick-cam-newton-jarrett-stidham-cam-newton-patriots-quarterback
Worth a read. Talks positively about Stidham, but with reservation.
We’ve got 19 problems but the Pats ain’t one.On the plus side, we get to have a stress free holiday!
I think Myers and Byrd could contribute to a good NFL offense.We’ve got 19 problems but the Pats ain’t one.
When the Pats don’t execute perfectly they generate nothing. Kind of amazing they are 6-7 with Izzo, Meyers, Harry, and Byrd as your main receivers. That’s like cooking with stale ingredients...
Sure all those guys I mentioned could contribute to an NFL offense. It is a matter of where they are on the Roth chart. Byrd and Meyers strike me as WR3s. Byrd can play all 3 roles but with his speed can work as an X. Meyers is an inside guy. Harry can play all 3 positions but imo is best suited as an inside guy. Izzo is a decent depth inline guy who is better at blocking. They could all be useful pieces to some degree. You wouldn’t want them as the main course though - they are contributors not stars.I think Myers and Byrd could contribute to a good NFL offense.
You certainly know this stuff better than me - but I look at Harry and in particular Izzo and see two guys who should not be anywhere on an NFL depth chart. If Izzo can block, I'm missing it on the regular TV broadcast.Sure all those guys I mentioned could contribute to an NFL offense. It is a matter of where they are on the Roth chart. Byrd and Meyers strike me as WR3s. Byrd can play all 3 roles but with his speed can work as an X. Meyers is an inside guy. Harry can play all 3 positions but imo is best suited as an inside guy. Izzo is a decent depth inline guy who is better at blocking. They could all be useful pieces to some degree. You wouldn’t want them as the main course though - they are contributors not stars.
Cam can't fucking throw the ball quickly and with accuracy, tho.A legit WR1 would push Byrd and Meyers down to their appropriate spots as WR2 and WR3. Would help everyone out immensely.
Harry should not be on an NFL roster? That's hyperbole, right? Cut him and see how fast he ends up on an NFL roster.You certainly know this stuff better than me - but I look at Harry and in particular Izzo and see two guys who should not be anywhere on an NFL depth chart. If Izzo can block, I'm missing it on the regular TV broadcast.
Agree on the other two, but Byrd looks like a damn good #3 and maybe even decent #2.
Agreed. Even when he has flashes where he can ... those seem to come like a surprise.Cam can't fucking throw the ball quickly and with accuracy, tho.
All they need is a QB1, TE1, WR1 and then everyone slides down a peg into a more appropriate role.Cam can't fucking throw the ball quickly and with accuracy, tho.
That seems like a problem.
Seriously, put Aaron Rodgers, Allen Robinson, and TJ Hockenson in the lineup and this team would be really good.All they need is a QB1, TE1, WR1 and then everyone slides down a peg into a more appropriate role.
Thanks. I agree on the development, but also think they need a vet to push whomever it is we're trying to develop. They can learn how to prepare, etc, and the vet is there to hopefully avoid an apocalypse if the prospect flames out. If the prospect can't beat out a journeyman vet, well, that says it all.Let/hip was the speculation. I remember someone like Bedard implying that the Pats were annoyed that Stidham had put himself in that position in the first place, but it quickly became clear that Cam was better. I’m starting to wonder if it was more of a “presence” thing with Cam winning the media narrative, but whatever.
I’d rather go the development route rather than a stopgap solution, but we may be looking at another mediocre vet as GM Belichick drafts another project. I think the wildcard is Bill’s view of the defense, though. I could seem them stretching with a retread if he feels it’s closer to being a top tier unit.
I'd say it's questionable whether he should even be on a roster. But unquestionably he should not be on the field.Harry should not be on an NFL roster? That's hyperbole, right? Cut him and see how fast he ends up on an NFL roster.
Tom Jackson likes this post.The WR certainly aren't great, but even having prime Randy Moss wouldn't fix this. Cam cannot throw, has no pocket awareness, takes forever to windup. His mechanics are shot. Ive never seen an NFL QB throw the ball while standing with feet parallel to the LoS instead of one foot forward and stepping into the throw. Cam looks like he is putting all his effort into these 20 yard throws that end up at the WR feet.
BB has forgotten more about football than I will ever know, but I just don't understand the downside of rolling Stid the remaining games. And those intimating he 'may lose the locker room' are silly. The greatest coach in NFL history is going to lose the locker room?
He is an average blocker. I think he is an average TE3/4 so he might be able to find the bottom of someone else's roster. I'm not lighting a candle at night pining for Izzo as a starter next year. I believe a loaded team like the Titans would scoop Harry up. The Ravens might want him too - they ask their receivers to block more than the average bear. Cleveland and 49ers might have fun with him too. He's not too far removed for someone who would want to give him another chance.You certainly know this stuff better than me - but I look at Harry and in particular Izzo and see two guys who should not be anywhere on an NFL depth chart. If Izzo can block, I'm missing it on the regular TV broadcast.
Agree on the other two, but Byrd looks like a damn good #3 and maybe even decent #2.
Completely agree.A legit WR1 would push Byrd and Meyers down to their appropriate spots as WR2 and WR3. Would help everyone out immensely.
Ok but that's the situation they are in. It isn't pretty to need 1-2 top end receiving weapons when you have none. It sucks that they currently don't have an inline TE who can catch worth a damn but, again, that's reality. Cam has some warts and personally I want them to draft a top 4 QB in this years draft but have you looked at the FA QBs? I'd rather roll the dice again with Cam who would get an actual off-season and hopefully better skilled position guys vs Fitz. YMMV there. If not Cam, who do you like? I know I just joked about Fitz but I wouldn't hate him as a bridge QB IF they draft someone like Trey Lance.Seriously, put Aaron Rodgers, Allen Robinson, and TJ Hockenson in the lineup and this team would be really good.
I also think this idea is hilarious because BB has made a career out of making unpopular moves and telling everyone to fucking deal with it.BB has forgotten more about football than I will ever know, but I just don't understand the downside of rolling Stid the remaining games. And those intimating he 'may lose the locker room' are silly. The greatest coach in NFL history is going to lose the locker room?
Since Jackson is usually anti Pats. Care to expand?Tom Jackson likes this post.
Clearly cutting leadership vets like Milloy cost BB all credibilty. Pats got smoked by Buff the next week. That 2003 season really turned out terribly.I also think this idea is hilarious because BB has made a career out of making unpopular moves and telling everyone to fucking deal with it.
Tom Jackson was maybe the first to utter the preposterous idea that BB had lost a locker room. I believe the quote was “everyone hated him.” That was after the 31-0 loss that started the 2003 season.Since Jackson is usually anti Pats. Care to expand?
“They hate their coach”Tom Jackson was maybe the first to utter the preposterous idea that BB had lost a locker room. I believe the quote was “everyone hated him.” That was after the 31-0 loss that started the 2003 season.
I was being sarcastic.
Thanks! Tom Jackson sure knows his stuff...Tom Jackson was maybe the first to utter the preposterous idea that BB had lost a locker room. I believe the quote was “everyone hated him.” That was after the 31-0 loss that started the 2003 season.
I was being sarcastic.
Yeah, Harry looked awesome last year with Brady throwing, so this all makes tons of sense.As if N'Keal Harry didn't have enough to think about, his trainer apparently decided to open his mouth
“We’ve got a new quarterback. We’ve got to put some of that (expletive) on Cam. Cam hasn’t been the most accurate this year. Like if (N’Keal) had Tom Brady, Tom Brady would’ve fed him. But we’re back there with Cam and Cam’s getting acclimated to the offense, too. …
“It’s a big deal coming from Tom Brady to Cam Newton. … That’s one of Cam Newton’s biggest issues is mechanics.”
Whitfield says he was misquoted.
https://nesn.com/2020/12/nkeal-harry-responds-to-trainers-comments-about-patriots-qb-cam-newton/
While that sucks, it's a big relief over some of the alternatives. It did look like he wasn't exactly grabbing his knee, so this makes a lot of sense.Gilmore has a torn quad per Ian Rapoport, should be fine for next season.
"Dear Patriot Nation, I will be the first to tell you that this year has been unacceptable in more ways than one!!" Newton wrote. "And the standard has been and always have been set; and unfortunately we (I) did not live up to what that standard was at all times or consistently enough!! With that being said the answer(s) is (are) in the locker room and one thing I do know about this bunch is that this locker room is filled with guys who want to be a part of the solution including me!!
but will his trade value be fine this offseason? oofGilmore has a torn quad per Ian Rapoport, should be fine for next season.
Very rare to need surgery for a quad muscle tear. Maybe a hematoma evacuation if anything.I assumed ‘torn quadriceps’ meant the muscle, not a tendon. Is that wrong?
Joe Flacco threw more TDs than Cam Newton this season.
Akili Smith and Jimmy Clausen. Now THAT's great company...yikesThis is pretty amazing...playing around on Stathead football just now...there are all of four quarterbacks since 1990 who have started at least 10 games in a season and thrown fewer touchdown passes than Cam Newton has this year.
Out of EIGHT HUNDRED AND TWENTY-TWO 10+ start seasons since 1990...FOUR have thrown fewer touchdown passes than 2020 Cam Newton.
(BTW: 1993 Mark Rypien; 1995 Trent Dilfer; 2000 Akili Smith; 2010 Jimmy Clausen)
Sure. But as far as throwing the ball - kind of a big thing for a QB - it's not like we could just assume if he didnt run it for a TD, that he would have thrown it. Theres a strong possibility that he wouldnt even convert 50% of those rushing TDs into passing TDs. It's a lot harder to throw in the redzone than the rest of the field. If anything, his rushing TDs emphasis his failure as a passer even more.Not including his rushing TDs is being misleading. Not that he was good but it's a major component of his game and helped made him somewhat passable sometimes (how's that for a qualifier?) even as his passing deteriorated.
Also, teams have running backs that could probably run it in on many of those plays. I'd prefer a quarterback who can actually throw the ball.Sure. But as far as throwing the ball - kind of a big thing for a QB - it's not like we could just assume if he didnt run it for a TD, that he would have thrown it. Theres a strong possibility that he wouldnt even convert 50% of those rushing TDs into passing TDs. It's a lot harder to throw in the redzone than the rest of the field. If anything, his rushing TDs emphasis his failure as a passer even more.