He's more likely to get cut before the seasonWhat kind of odds can I get on Cam throwing more TDs than Brady?
It's not about tanking. It's that I don't see Newton as having any real chance at being a top 15-20 QB. Stidham might not either. But I couldn't disagree more with the 'high upside' here - Cam's been a good QB once in the last 5 years. I'm extremely skeptical that there is any upside here. At what level of play is him taking snaps away from Stidham worthwhile, when he's not going to be on the team next year anyway?It’s crazy to hear people talking about tanking like it was a real option for this year’s Pats. BB didn’t spend 20 years building this culture to piss it away for a high draft pick. Besides, the Pats wouldn’t be in the running for a top-5 pick in any circumstances — there’s too much talent on D.
If you accept that BB’s goal is to make this year’s team the best it can be, there’s nothing not to like about this signing.
If Cam plays out of his mind maybe the defense is good enough that they make some noise in the playoffs and teams have to contend with Bill in the post season.absolutely hate this move.
If Stidham is bad, they can just draft a replacement. There's no point to a stop gap on this team (and if there were, the stop gap should have just continued to be Brady). Unless Cam is very okay being a bench player, this might be the move of the BB era I dislike most. There's almost no upside here. If Cam plays out of his mind, he leaves in a year. If he sucks, it's at Stidham's loss.
Only way I can get behind this is if it is as a backup.
I think we’ll know pretty soon once they get into camp. Stidham is clear leader and Cam will really have to play well to take the job, IMO.Kinda both?
The real test here is if Cam is anywhere near healthy and if he can be coached by Bill and Josh.
You also have to assume Cam and Jared fit a new playbook that includes a lot more motion from the QB position.
This is my fear as well.Worst case is that he beats out Stidham and the Pats win 7-9 games, so we never get to see Stidham play but we don't draft high enough in the first round to get one of the better QBs.
The attraction of Stidham is that if he's good you've got a potential long term solution at QB and if not good you're well positioned to address QB going forward in a different way.
I’m actually wondering if we’ll see some Taysom Hill stuff inside the 10 with Cam.One other positive, I won't care/worry if the Pats QB gets hurt on a QB sneak or any run for that matter, anymore.
Josh drafted Tebow, I don't think he's limited to pocket passing statues.Curious. Is Cam a fit for how Josh schemes things? Should they have gone after Dalton when he was available instead? I like the fact that we get him cheap. Would have rather we had just gone with who we had and ripped the band-aid off.
What spygate2 story that just broke?Cam is terrible now, but it costs nothing so who cares. And it helps cover the stupid “Spygate 2” story that just broke.
You're right. It is low risk / high reward, and I trust Belichick unconditionally.I think it means he signed a guy who was a very good starting qb 2 years ago for the league minimum
Pats lost a 3rd round pick and got a big fine for the Bengals videotaping garbage.What spygate2 story that just broke?
There's a case to be made for wanting a long term solution, and that gets dicey if Cam wins the job and leaves for big $$, but with the money so low I think that's a worthy risk to be maybe in the thick of it this year. And as far as Stidham, if he's better he'll start.I find the anti-Cam stuff just bizarre. There is no rational reason not to want Cam Newton on this team. He was a legit NFL starting QB when healthy, with an upside of MVP candidate, they are paying essentially nothing for him. This is an objectively terrific signing.
Cam was the MVP in one of those 5 years, and a top 15-20 in 2 others, he had 1 terrible year and one year completely lost to injury. The "Cam Newton hasn't been good" narrative is nonsense, he's been a top half QB for his career with some terrible supporting casts.It's not about tanking. It's that I don't see Newton as having any real chance at being a top 15-20 QB. Stidham might not either. But I couldn't disagree more with the 'high upside' here - Cam's been a good QB once in the last 5 years. I'm extremely skeptical that there is any upside here. At what level of play is him taking snaps away from Stidham worthwhile, when he's not going to be on the team next year anyway?
Exactly. No downsideI mean it’s still the Patriots. It’s not as if he’s going to be there long if he sucks. If he is pretty good, well then...
If Cam is that good in 2020, the Pats will take it. They can always franchise him, or if not, take the 3rd round pick. Stidham would get his chance as a backup or in 2021. If he can’t play he gets cut. There is no downsideThere's a case to be made for wanting a long term solution, and that gets dicey if Cam wins the job and leaves for big $$, but with the money so low I think that's a worthy risk to be maybe in the thick of it this year. And as far as Stidham, if he's better he'll start.
Nor Colin Kaepernick. Chad Finn will be heartbrokenUpside: no chance they sign Andy Dalton now.
I agree fwiw.If Cam is that good in 2020, the Pats will take it. They can always franchise him, or if not, take the 3rd round pick. Stidham would get his chance as a backup or in 2021. If he can’t play he gets cut. There is no downside
I think the obvious answer is that if he's healthy and anywhere near his peak, the Patriots are the clear best team in the AFC East, and you take your shots at a couple playoff games to the title any time you can get it. There was no reason to give this season away as a rebuild, too much returning talent. Next year is the obvious re-set year given the cap.I suppose I don’t understand the logic. Cam isn’t a long term solution. Stidham probably isn’t, but now you’re likely relegating him to QB2, and you won’t find out if he’s any good or not.
And they likely are going to play themselves well out of range of Trevor Lawrence and probably Justin Fields.
As a long time fan of a team with mediocre QBs, this exactly where you don’t want to be.
And yet you’ve been justifying the Dolphins’ shitty moves in this board for the last decade.I suppose I don’t understand the logic. Cam isn’t a long term solution. Stidham probably isn’t, but now you’re likely relegating him to QB2, and you won’t find out if he’s any good or not.
And they likely are going to play themselves well out of range of Trevor Lawrence and probably Justin Fields.
As a long time fan of a team with mediocre QBs, this exactly where you don’t want to be.
Pats heard the AFC East was wide open, so...I suppose I don’t understand the logic. Cam isn’t a long term solution. Stidham probably isn’t, but now you’re likely relegating him to QB2, and you won’t find out if he’s any good or not.
And they likely are going to play themselves well out of range of Trevor Lawrence and probably Justin Fields.
As a long time fan of a team with mediocre QBs, this exactly where you don’t want to be.
If all of those shitty moves add up to Tua being left handed Drew Brees in the NFL, I would do it 100x over.And yet you’ve been justifying the Dolphins’ shitty moves in this board for the last decade.
This.I suppose I don’t understand the logic. Cam isn’t a long term solution. Stidham probably isn’t, but now you’re likely relegating him to QB2, and you won’t find out if he’s any good or not.
And they likely are going to play themselves well out of range of Trevor Lawrence and probably Justin Fields.
As a long time fan of a team with mediocre QBs, this exactly where you don’t want to be.
So employing Joe Philbin and Adam Gase was just playing the long game to land Tua? Ok.If all of those shitty moves add up to Tua being left handed Drew Brees in the NFL, I would do it 100x over.
You sure it’s not because he’s 43 and his play declined?There’s a reason Belichick was offering one year to Brady rather than two. Stidham isn’t ready.
Also, they are clearing the cap for next season and Brady is 43 and nowhere near the player he was.There’s a reason Belichick was offering one year to Brady rather than two. Stidham isn’t ready.
I would just like to be clear that I think there’s a decent possibility that Newton is good enough to get them to the playoffs. Then what?BB was NEVER tanking so there was never going to be chance for Trevor. Cam is probably more likely to be a long term solution than Stidham, which is to say, unlikely.
The fact that the #1 dolphins fan is against this probably says a bunch.
If Stidham can’t beat out a physically diminished Cam Newton, he’s not the long-term answer anyway.I suppose I don’t understand the logic. Cam isn’t a long term solution. Stidham probably isn’t, but now you’re likely relegating him to QB2, and you won’t find out if he’s any good or not.
And they likely are going to play themselves well out of range of Trevor Lawrence and probably Justin Fields.
As a long time fan of a team with mediocre QBs, this exactly where you don’t want to be.
If Stidham is as good as many here and the staff think, this move won’t impact him.I liked the idea of stidham. The long shot rookie, massive underdog.
I’m bleh on this.
Lawrence is a pipe dream but drafting at the #8 or #18 makes a big difference if you're hoping for the second or third best QB in the draft.BB was NEVER tanking so there was never going to be chance for Trevor. Cam is probably more likely to be a long term solution than Stidham, which is to say, unlikely.
The fact that the #1 dolphins fan is against this probably says a bunch.