Bills down 35-3It's the 4th biggest deficit overcome in NFL playoff history. So it's one of the worst losses in the history of the sport.
Patriots down 28-3
?
Chefs down 24-0
What's #3?
Bills down 35-3It's the 4th biggest deficit overcome in NFL playoff history. So it's one of the worst losses in the history of the sport.
I love your hate for NantzNantz is the worst announcer in the sport. Worse than Fous.
Chiefs-Colts with Luck?Bills down 35-3
Patriots down 28-3
?
Chefs down 24-0
What's #3?
Considering that tree includes Matt Patricia, Romeo Crennel (good coordinator, terrible HC), and Eric Mangini...BOB is actually in the upper tier, sadly. (And McD's HC tenure wasn't exactly sterling, either.)BOB is like the black sheep on the BB coaching tree
The guy in Detroit would kill for BOB's resultsBOB is like the black sheep on the BB coaching tree
Colts were down 38 to 10 to the Chiefs in 2013.Bills down 35-3
Patriots down 28-3
?
Chefs down 24-0
What's #3?
Yeah, it's so obvious every game. I don't think he is anti-Pats specifically, but I do think he goes into each game with a clear preferred winner based on who he thinks the more "exciting" team is and it consistently bleeds through his play-calling (in practice this often amounts to him being anti-Pats in specific games because he feels, perhaps not wrongly, that a Pats upset is more exciting than a Pats win in most cases).You can hear the disappointment in Nantz when something happens against his rooting interest.
Proves it’s all (or a great deal of) Belichick?Considering that tree includes Matt Patricia, Romeo Crennel (good coordinator, terrible HC), and Eric Mangini...BOB is actually in the upper tier, sadly. (And McD's HC tenure wasn't exactly sterling, either.)
The defense kinda needs to come up with a stop though. Hasn’t happened in forever.As crazy as it sounds, Texans have enough time left to come back and win this.
That and also it's just ridiculously hard to be a consistently good coach in the NFL. Don't have the info at my fingertips but I doubt any other coaching "tree" is any better than BB's.Proves it’s all (or a great deal of) Belichick?
I lol'ed.Texans say NOBODY scores 7 straight TDs against us.
Exactly. He picks a rooting interest and it is so clear by how he calls the game. He stopped trying to hide that years ago.Yeah, it's so obvious every game. I don't think he is anti-Pats specifically, but I do think he goes into each game with a clear preferred winner based on who he thinks the more "exciting" team is and it consistently bleeds through his play-calling (in practice this often amounts to him being anti-Pats in specific games because he feels, perhaps not wrongly, that a Pats upset is more exciting than a Pats win in most cases).
Bill Walsh?That and also it's just ridiculously hard to be a consistently good coach in the NFL. Don't have the info at my fingertips but I doubt any other coaching "tree" is any better than BB's.
Exactly. He picks a rooting interest and it is so clear by how he calls the game. He stopped trying to hide that years ago.
[/QUOTE
He seems to favor favorites, like most crypto-nazis
I'm probably in the minority, but I'll take Michaels over either.Take Nantz over Joe Buck every time.
Al is the best, easilyI'm probably in the minority, but I'll take Michaels over either.
I can't believe I'm saying this but for football at least I think I'd take Buck over Michaels or Nantz. Buck has his annoying quirks but he's the only one of the three that I feel like actually calls the game evenly no matter what teams or players are involved.I'm probably in the minority, but I'll take Michaels over either.
As a society, I thought we had defeated ring around the collar, just as we defeated waxy yellow buildup. Yay progress.Ring around the collar won't resonate these days...so let's try 'you won't get laid if your shirts are wrinkled'...I love progress.....
Romo with Al would be awesome. But you would need the NBC production team. What the hell had happened to CBS over the years?I'm probably in the minority, but I'll take Michaels over either.