2019 Game Ball Thread: Wk. 11 at Eagles

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,776
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
IMO its 90% line and 10% everything else. i think he's had worse weapons units but a good enough line to give them time to find an open spot.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,297
AZ
Hopefully that’s the last we see of Newhouse at left tackle. We ought to have a thank you Newhouse thread.

He didn’t have a job after the first game of the season and is playing on a vet minimum deal or close to it. Yet here he is, out of position, playing every single snap on the hardest line position in football against the position that sees some of the most athletic and powerful athletes in the world. Two penalties in something like 700 snaps, both declined.

He’s not very good. He’s not supposed to be good. But he’s not even supposed to be there. There is no such thing as a replacement level blind side tackle, but he has been serviceable. It could have been a lot worse, and we may just be pleasantly surprised when he goes to the right side.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,387
Why do you think they added Antonio Brown then Sanu after that? After Edelman, there isn't another WR that scares you. Dorsett is a nice 3rd or 4th option, but if he's the #2 then there's an issue. It's clear that Meyers hasn't entered the Circle of Trust yet. Harry just got back. The TE position has been a black hole so far due to injury and just plain not even implementing them into the game plan because they're not very good. That being said, they have enough to work with if the offensive line can play better.
They added Brown because he's better than what they had. He's like the best receiver in the game and they had cap space and a free and easy way to add him. Why wouldn't they look to get better?

I mean they're in good shape at DT too but if they could add Aaron Donald for 10 million (without trading for him) and they had the cap space, wouldn't they do it?
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
53,850
Why do you think they added Antonio Brown then Sanu after that? After Edelman, there isn't another WR that scares you. Dorsett is a nice 3rd or 4th option, but if he's the #2 then there's an issue.
Yes, they had fewer weapons earlier. But Dorsett isn't the #2 now. He's the #3 or #4. That's the point. He does not, at this moment, have inadequate weapons.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,300
deep inside Guido territory
Yes, they had fewer weapons earlier. But Dorsett isn't the #2 now. He's the #3 or #4. That's the point. He does not, at this moment, have inadequate weapons.
You are certainly entitled to this opinion. If Meyers and Harry improve enough to contribute at a higher level consistently then the depth looks better. Not having a TE threat hurts especially in the red zone. Sanu had no impact on the game pre-injury. 2 catches for 4 yards can’t happen.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,897
Los Angeles, CA
After a brutal start, defense was immense. Maybe the best overall effort of the year.

Bailey- what a weapon, great job all day pinning them in.

Offense is just brutal right now, but winning a rock fight like this is probably a good thing in the long run.
It feels really strange as a modern Patriots fan to see our offense as a weakness and our defense carrying games. But that's a good problem to have, I suppose. Because we still have Brady, a healing Edelman, a returning Wynn,, and a Belichick-led team which usually figures this shit out over time.
 

Gambler7

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2003
3,752
Regarding Brady I wonder if the mood is more about his own performance than anything. If he is feeling it and making more mistakes than usual and has not been able to correct them that may be weighing on him more than anything. He is not used to not playing very well for a good period of time.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
2,371
Tom was really upset after Meyers ran the wrong route that one time. Tough to practice so much and have that happen.

Edelmen with the nice toss but two drops.

Nick folk sure is making me feel a lot better though so the ball to him.

Also props to the eagles fans for continuously booing their home team down less than a score to an 8-1 team on national TV basically. Really. .. what the fuck?
 

MyDaughterLovesTomGordon

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 26, 2006
14,205
Some of Brady's mood has got to be his own performance. He was sailing the ball over heads, rushing screens, etc. Just looked like an old guy out there today. Most of it was a lack of time, I think, but he still can't feel good about it.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,249
from the wilds of western ma
It feels really strange as a modern Patriots fan to see our offense as a weakness and our defense carrying games. But that's a good problem to have, I suppose. Because we still have Brady, a healing Edelman, a returning Wynn,, and a Belichick-led team which usually figures this shit out over time.
So next week I guess we get a look at the full version of the offense they’re going with down stretch ( assuming Dorsett and Sanu are both OK), with Wynn eligible and presumably playing. Hopefully he has as big of an impact as we think , and they can settle in and start building confidence and better production heading into December and beyond.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,088
Shelton and Van Noy were both very good today. Watson had a few big catches and Sony had a couple of nice runs. Bailey would get a game ball from me if he had held onto the fumble recovery.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,100
Brady had to throw it 47 times, and the result was a 67.3 rating. Lot of times he was hurried. And he made some bad decisions. But there were also times where no-one was open.

8 drives ended in punts, and the number of plays in those 8 drives was 4, 5, 3, 3, 4, 7, 6, and 3*. On the drive that the D gave him a short field, the offense gained 1 yard before settling for 3.

Yeah, I can understand why Brady was upset.

*: They were playing for the punt on that final drive so probably doesn't count. And Michel almost broke through the box on the final rush.
 

RoDaddy

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 19, 2002
3,247
Albany area, NY
Honorable mention to Jules. Dropped a few today but still led the team in receptions. Plus the TD pass (move over Lamar Jackson for perfect QB rating).
For a struggling offense, these made a difference. And given the way he's played through injury, it's been basically another great year for him and hopefully, an All-pro one finally
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,878
Dallas
Bailey, Simon, Van Noy, DMC.

The front DL and LBs in this game vs last time these teams met is night and day (minus some of the first quarter).
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,069
UWS, NYC
Much as the offensive line is a profound worry, I noticed Thuney doing some real good work getting out on sweeps and screens...and Cannon did a great job on the big Michel run on the final drive.

That said: Bailey, Hightower, DMc
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,012
Mansfield MA
Honorable mention to Jules. Dropped a few today but still led the team in receptions. Plus the TD pass (move over Lamar Jackson for perfect QB rating).
For a struggling offense, these made a difference. And given the way he's played through injury, it's been basically another great year for him and hopefully, an All-pro one finally
LOL wut?
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
5,934
Cultural hub of the universe
Honorable mention to Jules. Dropped a few today but still led the team in receptions. Plus the TD pass (move over Lamar Jackson for perfect QB rating).
For a struggling offense, these made a difference. And given the way he's played through injury, it's been basically another great year for him and hopefully, an All-pro one finally
Dropping the TD pass was a tough one to get over, but I still love the guy.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
26,993
Newton
All this “Brady looked like a 42 year-old” stuff is stupid. The problems with the line lead to everything else. We talk about the 2014 KC game but does anyone actually remember the three games that preceded it? Brady’s timing was a mess. His footwork was bad, he missed guys left and right and his decision making was really poor. It was almost entirely because his OL play under Googs was a tire fire. Once they cleaned that up, it was off to the races. And with Wynn coming back they have a chance to clean things up.

That’s the good news. The bad news is that David Andrews isn’t coming back. And I think he’s the more important player because he is the guy who communicates everything. Mason has been a shell of himself this year without Andrews next to him. So I think the impact won’t be transformative just better. I also think Lacosse being back will be bigger than people think.

Brady is frustrated because he can’t do what he normally does. With Wynn back he should be able to do more of it.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,300
deep inside Guido territory
All this “Brady looked like a 42 year-old” stuff is stupid. The problems with the line lead to everything else. We talk about the 2014 KC game but does anyone actually remember the three games that preceded it? Brady’s timing was a mess. His footwork was bad, he missed guys left and right and his decision making was really poor. It was almost entirely because his OL play under Googs was a tire fire. Once they cleaned that up, it was off to the races. And with Wynn coming back they have a chance to clean things up.

That’s the good news. The bad news is that David Andrews isn’t coming back. And I think he’s the more important player because he is the guy who communicates everything. Mason has been a shell of himself this year without Andrews next to him. So I think the impact won’t be transformative just better. I also think Lacosse being back will be bigger than people think.

Brady is frustrated because he can’t do what he normally does. With Wynn back he should be able to do more of it.
It’s not just Wynn though. Karras is average at best, Mason is clearly banged up and not playing well(not because of no Andrews) and Cannon isn’t playing at the same level he did last year. Thuney is the only guy healthy and playing well. Wynn will help for sure but if the right side doesn’t get going there will still be issues.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,406
around the way
Lots of good on defense, and loved Edelman and Watson's game.

To pick 3, it's Shelton, Bailey, and Brooks.

HM to KVN, Folk.

Again, the secondary was silly good, and most of the defense impacted the game.

Thought that they went to zones too often, although I appreciate that they almost fooled Wentz a couple of times with guys dropping into coverage. Overall well-called game too.
 
Apr 24, 2019
1,278
The awful OL play, the inconsistent passing game, rookies making mistakes (from objectively bad like Meyers on that one long throw to the picky ones where some rook is one yard off so TB12 won’t trust him enough to even look at him, to the point of petulance), a tough and well-coached opponent on the road...ALL of these things are, I’m sure, frustrating to Brady, and most represent areas that will in all likelihood improve with time and hard work. Having said that...

Brady played poorly tonight. He was too often bad, physically and mentally. Another awful decision in the red zone, and more moments of seeming pissed off and rushed. Not the end of the world, he’ll work it out, but MAN do I hate it when he gets this way. And man do I love it when the team finds a way to win anyway.
 

azsoxpatsfan

Does not enjoy the go
SoSH Member
May 23, 2014
4,774
On pace for 1200 yards and 7 td. Third in receptions on pace for 112 it’s not out of the question.

Unrelated, but looking at stats for this post further illustrated how incredible Michael Thomas is. He’s on pace for 150 catches for 1826 yards and 8 tds. Already at 94 for 1141 and 5 which is a great season and he’s played 10 games. Absurd.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,260
the defense had a horrible 5 quarters but snapped out of it. I do wonder how much of it was their starting LT getting injured. Wentz also showed how inconsistent he is.

still, it's great to be able to win while scoring less than 20. that's not something we could do earlier this decade. and we might need to do it in the playoffs more than once this year.

also the offense has been putting some drives together but just shooting themselves in the foot out of points. if Edelman gets over the dropsies this is a two possession win at least and Baltimore is much closer. the James White trip last week too. these are likely flukes that will get cleaned up, and I think they can consistently score in the mid-high 20s again.
 
Last edited:

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,260
I’ll say it again but man everyone is hanging a lot on a 2nd year player who has barely played in the NFL.
well when David Andrews gets felled by blood colts and the likes of Mason/Cannon aren't playing as well, unfortunately that's where you're at.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,244
I think Brady deserves some love. After watching the Watson-Jackson not-showdown in which Watson kept losing yards, and Wentz getting sacked, the value of Brady just throwing the ball into the turf to avoid sacks and help keep the field position advantages does not get enough notice. He's making the best of a bad OL situation.

Anyone else catch a very dejected vibe from Brady in that postgame PC? Rare to see him that somber following a win. I think this offense's real inability to come together is wearing on him.
I think he was also quite beaten up. He looked like he had 2 black eyes.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,012
Mansfield MA
On pace for 1200 yards and 7 td. Third in receptions on pace for 112 it’s not out of the question.
He's 17th in receiving yards right now. All Pro means top 3 WR. It is out of the question.

Unrelated, but looking at stats for this post further illustrated how incredible Michael Thomas is. He’s on pace for 150 catches for 1826 yards and 8 tds. Already at 94 for 1141 and 5 which is a great season and he’s played 10 games. Absurd.
Yeah, that's what an All-Pro season looks like.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,012
Mansfield MA
All this “Brady looked like a 42 year-old” stuff is stupid. The problems with the line lead to everything else. We talk about the 2014 KC game but does anyone actually remember the three games that preceded it? Brady’s timing was a mess. His footwork was bad, he missed guys left and right and his decision making was really poor. It was almost entirely because his OL play under Googs was a tire fire. Once they cleaned that up, it was off to the races. And with Wynn coming back they have a chance to clean things up.

That’s the good news. The bad news is that David Andrews isn’t coming back. And I think he’s the more important player because he is the guy who communicates everything. Mason has been a shell of himself this year without Andrews next to him. So I think the impact won’t be transformative just better. I also think Lacosse being back will be bigger than people think.

Brady is frustrated because he can’t do what he normally does. With Wynn back he should be able to do more of it.
The OL got the headlines in 2014 and obviously it was a big problem, but the receiving group was also a problem early. Gronk was coming off injury and only played about half the snaps in the first four weeks. LaFell was new and he and Brady didn't click until Week 6 or so. Then apart from the personnel issues on the OL (exacerbated by trading Mankins on the eve of the season), you had a new coach, which was another adjustment.

The parallels I guess are that in addition to the Andrews and Wynn absences, you've got two new WR in Sanu and Harry. Arguably LaCosse and Watson will play a bigger role down the stretch (Izzo is still leading all TE in snaps played). So there's some room for growth there.

The other reality is that the OL in 2014 improved, but only to a point. It was better after Week 4, it was acceptable, but it wasn't good. Brady had one of his weaker years statistically, the run game finished 22nd in YPC (3.9) and they had to totally give up on running the ball in two of the three playoff games, as well as several other ones. If 2014 is a parallel, the OL might get shored up, but it's not going to be a strength like it was last year.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,297
AZ
I think Brady deserves some love. After watching the Watson-Jackson not-showdown in which Watson kept losing yards, and Wentz getting sacked, the value of Brady just throwing the ball into the turf to avoid sacks and help keep the field position advantages does not get enough notice. He's making the best of a bad OL situation.
He's always been a fantastic throw-away QB, and is especially good given that it's a significant challenge for him to get outside the tackle box. People complain about the "only Brady" intentional grounding calls, but I actually think most of them are deserved and the primary difference is that most NFL quarterbacks now have the ability to get three steps to the left or right in order to hoist one to sideline, but Brady doesn't. (By the way, the tackle box rule is stupid at this point given the many different styles of QBs and it is overly punitive for a particular style.) Anyway, the result is that he has to get more clever than most QBs to throw the ball away.

Sometimes I think he is a little too sack averse. On the one hand, it's probably good given that we're probably not going to win a division playoff game with Stidham under center this year. On the other hand, the QB protection rules are a little better than in the past and sometimes I think the defense would be a bit more honest if he hung in there a bit longer. So much of the offensive game planning to seems to be about sack avoidance.

Only 17 sacks allowed this year, which is fairly remarkable given the offensive line's troubles. I may get blasted for making the point, but I almost wonder if that's a bit too few. Maybe the bottom line is that no receivers ever get open very quickly 10 to 25 yards down field and so that's why we don't see those types of plays completed, but it really seems like Josh has no desire even to call them or Brady no desire to throw them at times. Sacks stop drives (usually) but so do three and outs.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,244
Sometimes I think he is a little too sack averse. On the one hand, it's probably good given that we're probably not going to win a division playoff game with Stidham under center this year. On the other hand, the QB protection rules are a little better than in the past and sometimes I think the defense would be a bit more honest if he hung in there a bit longer. So much of the offensive game planning to seems to be about sack avoidance.

Only 17 sacks allowed this year, which is fairly remarkable given the offensive line's troubles. I may get blasted for making the point, but I almost wonder if that's a bit too few. Maybe the bottom line is that no receivers ever get open very quickly 10 to 25 yards down field and so that's why we don't see those types of plays completed, but it really seems like Josh has no desire even to call them or Brady no desire to throw them at times. Sacks stop drives (usually) but so do three and outs.
The bolded is a good point. It does loook that's often the case. But it's almost like he's done the calculation in his head pre-snap and not getting sacked, losing yards or fumbling is such a huge factor that takes a lot to overcome.
The combination of a crappy line AND a top-flight defense might make him/BB/McD value sack-avoidance even more, since it plays right into the field position game. Somewhere, Ernie Adams has a thesis written on why three-and-outs with a good punter, ST and defense aren't so bad.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
53,850
I just got a push notification for a Yahoo Sports story that Brady is now Manning 2015. That season Manning had 9/17 TD/INT and a passer rating of 67.9

Because that's just like Brady's numbers this season.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,403
Overland Park, KS
I was working yesterday and only was able to see parts of the game. What was the BS excuse the refs gave for the non-interception TD that Philly 'scored'. If that happens anywhere else on the field is that an interception?
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,244
I was working yesterday and only was able to see parts of the game. What was the BS excuse the refs gave for the non-interception TD that Philly 'scored'. If that happens anywhere else on the field is that an interception?
At the time I thought it was a TD. Im not sure it would be an INT "anywhere else." When the receiver's elbow hit the ground he was down with the ball. At most, as Steratore said, it was 50-50 when he was down, so it's a catch. If it had been ruled an INT anywhere else, it would have been reviewed as a change of possession, and probably overturned.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,297
AZ
I was working yesterday and only was able to see parts of the game. What was the BS excuse the refs gave for the non-interception TD that Philly 'scored'. If that happens anywhere else on the field is that an interception?
I may be wrong about the rule but I think you can't fumble once you're down. He had the ball when his knee hit -- or at worst it was simultaneous possession -- so you can't call it a fumble.

I guess maybe the same is true on an interception -- that once the knee is down, possession can't change. The player has control and is down and the play is over.
 

E5 Yaz

Transcends message boarding
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,032
Oregon
Peter King with the outlier opinion

Coach of the Week

Josh McDaniels, offensive coordinator, New England.
For hanging in there when nothing was going right, ending with the Tom Brady backward pass to Julian Edelman, who threw a gorgeous spiral to Phillip Dorsett for the winning TD. Beautiful play design and execution. McDaniels knows with the talent gap on offense he’s going to have to pull some stuff out of his hat while new offensive pieces develop (he and Brady hope). The Patriots whittled their way back from a 10-0 deficit with four scoring drives, including the only score of the second half, the 15-yard perfecto from Edelman to Dorsett.
 

m0ckduck

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,714
Sometimes I think he is a little too sack averse. On the one hand, it's probably good given that we're probably not going to win a division playoff game with Stidham under center this year. On the other hand, the QB protection rules are a little better than in the past and sometimes I think the defense would be a bit more honest if he hung in there a bit longer. So much of the offensive game planning to seems to be about sack avoidance.

Only 17 sacks allowed this year, which is fairly remarkable given the offensive line's troubles. I may get blasted for making the point, but I almost wonder if that's a bit too few. Maybe the bottom line is that no receivers ever get open very quickly 10 to 25 yards down field and so that's why we don't see those types of plays completed, but it really seems like Josh has no desire even to call them or Brady no desire to throw them at times. Sacks stop drives (usually) but so do three and outs.
To add what's been said above, I think there's a clear playoff vs. regular season calculation happening at this point in Brady's career. He's decided that he simply isn't going to take big hits for 19 games. I expect that he'll hang in longer in the postseason, as there were some of this happening last year too.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,021
Imaginationland
Peter King with the outlier opinion

Coach of the Week

Josh McDaniels, offensive coordinator, New England.
For hanging in there when nothing was going right, ending with the Tom Brady backward pass to Julian Edelman, who threw a gorgeous spiral to Phillip Dorsett for the winning TD. Beautiful play design and execution. McDaniels knows with the talent gap on offense he’s going to have to pull some stuff out of his hat while new offensive pieces develop (he and Brady hope). The Patriots whittled their way back from a 10-0 deficit with four scoring drives, including the only score of the second half, the 15-yard perfecto from Edelman to Dorsett.
The Pats scored one TD the week after a bye against a good (not great) defense. This is either an awful, awful take or an acknowledgement that the players on the field have such a low ceiling that basically the bare minimum of offensive performance means the coach did an exemplary job. Either way, yuck.
 

E5 Yaz

Transcends message boarding
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,032
Oregon
The Pats scored one TD the week after a bye against a good (not great) defense. This is either an awful, awful take or an acknowledgement that the players on the field have such a low ceiling that basically the bare minimum of offensive performance means the coach did an exemplary job. Either way, yuck.
It's not even the only McDaniels note in the column
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
26,993
Newton
The OL got the headlines in 2014 and obviously it was a big problem, but the receiving group was also a problem early. Gronk was coming off injury and only played about half the snaps in the first four weeks. LaFell was new and he and Brady didn't click until Week 6 or so. Then apart from the personnel issues on the OL (exacerbated by trading Mankins on the eve of the season), you had a new coach, which was another adjustment.

The parallels I guess are that in addition to the Andrews and Wynn absences, you've got two new WR in Sanu and Harry. Arguably LaCosse and Watson will play a bigger role down the stretch (Izzo is still leading all TE in snaps played). So there's some room for growth there.

The other reality is that the OL in 2014 improved, but only to a point. It was better after Week 4, it was acceptable, but it wasn't good. Brady had one of his weaker years statistically, the run game finished 22nd in YPC (3.9) and they had to totally give up on running the ball in two of the three playoff games, as well as several other ones. If 2014 is a parallel, the OL might get shored up, but it's not going to be a strength like it was last year.
He's always been a fantastic throw-away QB, and is especially good given that it's a significant challenge for him to get outside the tackle box. People complain about the "only Brady" intentional grounding calls, but I actually think most of them are deserved and the primary difference is that most NFL quarterbacks now have the ability to get three steps to the left or right in order to hoist one to sideline, but Brady doesn't. (By the way, the tackle box rule is stupid at this point given the many different styles of QBs and it is overly punitive for a particular style.) Anyway, the result is that he has to get more clever than most QBs to throw the ball away.

Sometimes I think he is a little too sack averse. On the one hand, it's probably good given that we're probably not going to win a division playoff game with Stidham under center this year. On the other hand, the QB protection rules are a little better than in the past and sometimes I think the defense would be a bit more honest if he hung in there a bit longer. So much of the offensive game planning to seems to be about sack avoidance.

Only 17 sacks allowed this year, which is fairly remarkable given the offensive line's troubles. I may get blasted for making the point, but I almost wonder if that's a bit too few. Maybe the bottom line is that no receivers ever get open very quickly 10 to 25 yards down field and so that's why we don't see those types of plays completed, but it really seems like Josh has no desire even to call them or Brady no desire to throw them at times. Sacks stop drives (usually) but so do three and outs.
These are both good posts – it’s not really apples-to-apples with 2014 and the league has changed somewhat since then. But here’s the question I’m thinking about:

Does Brady look any different now than he did in 2014 for the first four games when his OL was a mess and Gronk wasn’t fully back yet? If so, how?
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,069
Hingham, MA
He's always been a fantastic throw-away QB, and is especially good given that it's a significant challenge for him to get outside the tackle box. People complain about the "only Brady" intentional grounding calls, but I actually think most of them are deserved and the primary difference is that most NFL quarterbacks now have the ability to get three steps to the left or right in order to hoist one to sideline, but Brady doesn't. (By the way, the tackle box rule is stupid at this point given the many different styles of QBs and it is overly punitive for a particular style.) Anyway, the result is that he has to get more clever than most QBs to throw the ball away.

Sometimes I think he is a little too sack averse. On the one hand, it's probably good given that we're probably not going to win a division playoff game with Stidham under center this year. On the other hand, the QB protection rules are a little better than in the past and sometimes I think the defense would be a bit more honest if he hung in there a bit longer. So much of the offensive game planning to seems to be about sack avoidance.

Only 17 sacks allowed this year, which is fairly remarkable given the offensive line's troubles. I may get blasted for making the point, but I almost wonder if that's a bit too few. Maybe the bottom line is that no receivers ever get open very quickly 10 to 25 yards down field and so that's why we don't see those types of plays completed, but it really seems like Josh has no desire even to call them or Brady no desire to throw them at times. Sacks stop drives (usually) but so do three and outs.
Sacks stop drives, but they also adversely affect field position. Given the punter (and Slater and Bethel), and given the D, punting is not a bad outcome in many instances. The further upfield they punt the better. This offense is built on consistently gaining yardage, not on chunk plays. Sacks / negative plays are pretty much the worst thing that can happen to this offense (outside of turning it over). If this team avoids turnovers and just lets the special teams and defense go to work, they can contend. If the offense improves, they are the favorite. Simple as that IMO.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,297
AZ
To add what's been said above, I think there's a clear playoff vs. regular season calculation happening at this point in Brady's career. He's decided that he simply isn't going to take big hits for 19 games. I expect that he'll hang in longer in the postseason, as there were some of this happening last year too.
Just because your post made me curious I decided to look at the last few years of playoffs and see what kind of sack totals the Patriots' opponents have. I'm kind of starting to think that some of my premises were just not very valid and that sacks may not be much of a predictor of anything. Maybe if it were broken further down into knockdowns and hurries it would be more applicable. Also, they play so few games in football that small sample size issues are always lurking. One thing that does stand out in the stats is that the Patriots seem like they rarely give up too many yards on sacks. I didn't run the average over this time, but it seems like about 4 to 5 yards on average for the most part. (Maybe they get hit more with quick blitz sacks rather than coverage sacks and the former are usually a bit shorter in yardage?) Anyway, here's the info just because I looked it up. Again, not sure it really tells us anything and I don't think makes my point either way.

2014 SEA 1 IND 1 BAL 2

2015 DEN 4 KC 0

2016 ATL 5 PIT 2 HOU 2

2017 PHL 1 JAX 3 TEN 0

2018 STL 1 KC 0 SD 0
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,244
Just because your post made me curious I decided to look at the last few years of playoffs and see what kind of sack totals the Patriots' opponents have. I'm kind of starting to think that some of my premises were just not very valid and that sacks may not be much of a predictor of anything. Maybe if it were broken further down into knockdowns and hurries it would be more applicable. Also, they play so few games in football that small sample size issues are always lurking. One thing that does stand out in the stats is that the Patriots seem like they rarely give up too many yards on sacks. I didn't run the average over this time, but it seems like about 4 to 5 yards on average for the most part. (Maybe they get hit more with quick blitz sacks rather than coverage sacks and the former are usually a bit shorter in yardage?) Anyway, here's the info just because I looked it up. Again, not sure it really tells us anything and I don't think makes my point either way.
I'd guess a lot of it is that Brady is unlikely to run around long or far enough to turn a 5 yard sack into a -15 catastrophe.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,297
AZ
I'd guess a lot of it is that Brady is unlikely to run around long or far enough to turn a 5 yard sack into a -15 catastrophe.
Yeah, there's probably that. I've never really noticed but he probably stays a bit shallow in the pocket too -- more than some QBs who go way back.