2019 Cowboys: And Now for Something Completely Different...

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
How much cap space do they have?
They still have between 20-21 million in cap space for 2019 after the Zeke deal. They can roll that over into 2020 assuming they don't use it all up on more signings. They were projected to have something like 66 million in cap space in 2020 before the Zeke deal so that number will come down some obviously. Although that 66 million doesn't include any potential "roll over" cap from 2019 which could very well be in the 15-20 million range.

The Cowboys have a lot of cap space initially due to Dak being so cheap and a lot of their defensive talent being on cheap rookie deals ...it's down the road where things could get tough. Dak and Cooper could require a combined cap hit of 50 million if they want to sign both...and I think both need to be signed. Zeke was the most expendable IMHO.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
12,085
Mansfield MA
As always, let's see the terms. First of all, signing bonus money can only be spread over five years, so that sixth year is likely 100% non-guaranteed funny money. Second, keeping the next two years intact is a pretty sweet bargain for Dallas. It doesn't take the cap rising too much to make this deal look favorable for the Cowboys a couple years from now.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
As always, let's see the terms. First of all, signing bonus money can only be spread over five years, so that sixth year is likely 100% non-guaranteed funny money. Second, keeping the next two years intact is a pretty sweet bargain for Dallas. It doesn't take the cap rising too much to make this deal look favorable for the Cowboys a couple years from now.
Yeah this was actually pretty big. It keeps the 2020 cap number really good which allows them a lot of flexibility in the Dak/Cooper negotiations. The signing bonus on the Zeke deal was only 7.5 million....they will have the wiggle room to offer larger signing bonuses to Dak or Amari.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
27,886
As always, let's see the terms. First of all, signing bonus money can only be spread over five years, so that sixth year is likely 100% non-guaranteed funny money. Second, keeping the next two years intact is a pretty sweet bargain for Dallas. It doesn't take the cap rising too much to make this deal look favorable for the Cowboys a couple years from now.
Yup. The guaranteed money reportedly is $50 MM. That’s probably a fair deal all around considering his value in that offense.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
Already been mentioned above, but here's a quick rundown on the Cowboys cap situation...they are actually looking pretty solid. I still think there's probably better use of their money than Zeke, but they can afford him. Especially given the low signing bonus which allows them to cut bait pretty easily after the 3rd year of the extension.


The deal for Elliott, the fourth overall pick in the 2017 NFL Draft, rewrites the record books. But unlike most deals of this magnitude, the Cowboys aren’t exactly hamstrung by their splash of cash.
The deal adds on to Elliott’s current rookie contract, which runs through 2020. The Cowboys had more than $86 million in projected salary cap space heading into the next offseason, money that presumably will be used to retain quarterback Dak Prescott long-term as well as wide receiver Amari Cooper, who is in the final year of a contract that will pay him $13.9 million this season.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
19,075
NC
I'm not a fan of it, especially since he had two years left on his rookie deal, but I also know how important he is to the offense, so it's a conflicting feeling.

Just have to hope he keeps producing and can maybe go an offseason without some screw up.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
I'm not a fan of it, especially since he had two years left on his rookie deal, but I also know how important he is to the offense, so it's a conflicting feeling.

Just have to hope he keeps producing and can maybe go an offseason without some screw up.
If they were going to keep him (and they almost certainly were), it's a pretty good outcome. For all intents and purposes, this is a 3 year extension at 16-17 mil per year once you take into account the signing bonus. Cap hit stays low in 2019 and 2020. They can cut the rope after the first 3 years with minimal hit.

Yeah, in an ideal world, it would be nice to let Tony Pollard run the ball for pennies on the dollar behind that elite offensive line, but this isn't an ideal world. We also don't really know what the psychological fallout would have been if they told Zeke to go pound sand. Dak absolutely loves him and they're gonna be investing in Dak too.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
31,523
If they stay healthy, Dak Prescott is going to lead the Cowboys to the Super Bowl out of the NFC.
I know the Giants suck but this Cowboys team looks great. It’s all about Dak. Cooper/Gallup/Cobb is a nice WR trio. Gallup especially looks to be making a leap. Zeke is obviously Zeke. Witten just knows how to get open despite being like 55 years-old. Line is very good. Defense is solid. It’s all really about Dak and health.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
19,075
NC
I thought the defense was really not very good yesterday - they got little heat on an immobile QB and Lawrence was pretty invisible most of the game. But I think they're better than that too, so there's probably room to get better.

The offense was unbelievable and Moore put their weapons in position to get the job done all day. Obviously the Giants are not very good, but if they can carry anything close to that through the season, they're going to be in good shape.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
9,921
I thought the defense was really not very good yesterday - they got little heat on an immobile QB and Lawrence was pretty invisible most of the game. But I think they're better than that too, so there's probably room to get better.

The offense was unbelievable and Moore put their weapons in position to get the job done all day. Obviously the Giants are not very good, but if they can carry anything close to that through the season, they're going to be in good shape.
This pretty much sums it up for me. To expand a little bit:

I saw a tweet yesterday (can't seem to find it now) which was reiterated on The Ticket this morning which put some numbers to the stark difference between this year's offense (to date) and last year's. It was something like play action was used on 48% of snaps vs 25% last year and motion was used on 78% of snaps vs 45% last year (3 WR formations were used on a similar percentage of plays).

Also, Gallup's emergence was already covered but I'd be remiss if I didn't talk about Randall Cobb. This is not to say that Cole Beasley wouldn't have thrived in this style of offense but there's no way he converts that third and long down inside the red zone. That conversion by Cobb, though generally unnecessary in a game like Sunday's, could be a difference maker in a tight game. I was pretty lukewarm on the Cobb signing - mostly because of his injury history - but I'm sold now. Then again, that play may have been the reason he's on the injury list this week so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

The city is abuzz because of that performance on Sunday and the sheepiest of the sheep are throwing out predictions like 14-2 and 16-0. Obviously it will never again be that easy, aside from maybe Miami, but even my cynical ass can't help but feel a little hopeful. Guess we'll see. Washington should also be a W but that defense will be a better litmus test for the new offense.
 
Last edited:

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
9,921
I'm quite certain the offense will have already been tested repeatedly by then.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
I'm quite certain the offense will have already been tested repeatedly by then.
They'll face the Vikings two weeks before the Patriots game.

Hard to gauge who else will be a real defensive test before that. Not sure if we believe in GB's defense yet or if that was more futility on Chicago's part. Cowboys will play the Eagles too before that but they are tough more because of their offense rather than defense. Cowboys didn't have a lot of trouble moving the ball against Philly last year. Saints might be in the same boat...Houston moved it with ease last night.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
19,075
NC
Cobb has some sort of issue with his rib - doesn't sound serious but yeah he's obviously going to be a fixture on the injury report.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
9,921
They'll face the Vikings two weeks before the Patriots game.

Hard to gauge who else will be a real defensive test before that. Not sure if we believe in GB's defense yet or if that was more futility on Chicago's part. Cowboys will play the Eagles too before that but they are tough more because of their offense rather than defense. Cowboys didn't have a lot of trouble moving the ball against Philly last year. Saints might be in the same boat...Houston moved it with ease last night.
Hard to quantify the effect but I count four top 15 scoring defenses from 2018 on the schedule before they play New England. Only two of them were in the top 15 in yards allowed so, like your Eagles example, the ball can be moved on them but it would be important to not settle for field goals. I think that's ultimately what's going to prove to be the biggest difference for the offense: minimizing the amount of drives that bog down on the opponent's side of the field.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
Hard to quantify the effect but I count four top 15 scoring defenses from 2018 on the schedule before they play New England. Only two of them were in the top 15 in yards allowed so, like your Eagles example, the ball can be moved on them but it would be important to not settle for field goals. I think that's ultimately what's going to prove to be the biggest difference for the offense: minimizing the amount of drives that bog down on the opponent's side of the field.
I'm really liking the Jarwin/Witten combo to help loosen things up in the red zone. Jarwin emerged late last year and adding the still-reliable Witten to the red-zone package should help. And Cobb/Gallup is superior to Beasley/2018-Gallup. Oh, and they also added Travis Frederick back to the line which can only help in the red zone.

Of course now that we're excited, we know this will mean they kick 4 FGs inside the 20 against Washington this week.

But in all seriousness, it's hard not to be excited when you look at both the development (Gallup and Jarwin) and what they have added compared to 2018 (Witten/Frederick/Cobb).
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
Not sure I've seen a line like this in the NFL. I'm sure it's happened before, but I just don't remember one. I've seen 18 or 19 points before.

MIA @ DAL (-21)
 

DrewDawg

Dorito Dink
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
36,069
Not sure I've seen a line like this in the NFL. I'm sure it's happened before, but I just don't remember one. I've seen 18 or 19 points before.

MIA @ DAL (-21)
Denver was -26.5 in like 2013, Pats were -20.5 once as well.
 

ZMart100

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2008
1,337
The two leading point differential teams in the NFL are also the two teams that have played MIA. MIA is -92 through 2 games, the closest team are the Steelers who are -32. MIA might be the worst team since the '76 Buccaneers.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
Denver was -26.5 in like 2013, Pats were -20.5 once as well.
I looked that one up but didn't remember it. It was against Jacksonville but Denver only won the game 35-19 so they didn't come close to covering.
 

21st Century Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2006
549
Gallup to miss 2-4 weeks with meniscus tear. Shame, he was off to the races early. They can back fill, and with all the injuries this weekend, Dallas relatively unscathed.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
19,075
NC
Gallup to miss 2-4 weeks with meniscus tear. Shame, he was off to the races early. They can back fill, and with all the injuries this weekend, Dallas relatively unscathed.
Shame but I think they like Cedrick Wilson some and obviously Devin Smith came out of nowhere to have a nice game yesterday. Helps they have the human bye week this Sunday.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
9,921
They got lucky on Antwaun Woods too. I thought he might be done for a significant stretch of time but it looks like he's just day-to-day.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
10,829
Use this week to get healthy....obviously Gallup will be out a bit longer, but these other guys that are marginal, no need to play them. It shouldn't matter against a team like Miami.