No issues with that pick at all. Losing Solder is huge, and the Pats have to shore up that offensive line. Pressure on Brady is the only thing that slows down their offense.
Are they gonna jump over him?This guy is too short to play tackle
I loved these statements...This is a need but could have gotten later.
While we lose 45-38 in the Super BowlNo issues with that pick at all. Losing Solder is huge, and the Pats have to shore up that offensive line. Pressure on Brady is the only thing that slows down their offense.
Guys doing draft on ESPN Radio universally love this pick.Someone tell me this is like when the Cowboys picked the center Frederick and everyone laughed at them.
After Brady sacked on final drive?While we lose 45-38 in the Super Bowl
Guys are sliding...I love the trench pick but was hoping for something sexier here, I confess.
If that's the argument, they should've publicly executed Logan Mankins and drafted about 5 guards in the 2008 draft.After Brady sacked on final drive?
You realize we lost the best player on our OL since then?If we had Wynn last year maybe we woulda scored more than 33 fucking points in the Super Bowl.
Do you guys just copy & paste your reactions every year? It's like no one here has actually followed BB's career.
ThumbsUp.coolGuys doing draft on ESPN Radio universally love this pick.
Is this an award for posting irrelevance?And the winner of this years Eugene Chung Award.....
Okay. You side with Jerry Curl and his draft research.If that's the argument, they should've publicly executed Logan Mankins and drafted about 5 guards in the 2008 draft.
Good thing they have more than 1 pick. Hang in there.So the thing I'm trying to remind myself is that OL isn't considered a strong group in this year's draft, and is a glaring need, while there will still be impact defensive players through the first 3 rounds...
How many years would they have let him hold a clipboard?Wanted Jackson badly. He’s gonna be a star. Brady’s successor was right there for the taking. Teams are gonna regret passing on him same as Deshaun Watson.
I do. I actually have no problem with the pick. In the wake of the Super Bowl I couldn't fathom not taking defensive player after defensive player, but I'll defer to Bill and I never have a problem taking an offensive lineman.You realize we lost the best player on our OL since then?
Who do you think takes Jackson before the Pats pick again at 31?Wanted Jackson badly. He’s gonna be a star. Brady’s successor was right there for the taking. Teams are gonna regret passing on him same as Deshaun Watson.
Yeah, the Giants really regret the one they took a few years ago...never ever take a WR in the first round
It's not over yet. The only possible team needing a QB between now and #31 is Jacksonville, barring a trade.Wanted Jackson badly. He’s gonna be a star. Brady’s successor was right there for the taking. Teams are gonna regret passing on him same as Deshaun Watson.
Ravens?It's not over yet. The only possible team needing a QB between now and #31 is Jacksonville, barring a trade.
I think they're re-committed to Bortles now after his showing in the playoffs.It's not over yet. The only possible team needing a QB between now and #31 is Jacksonville, barring a trade.
Not Josh Jackson to replace Sherman?Many mocked Ridley to BAL at 15, he kind of has to go to them at 25.
Atlanta probably goes DT, then Seattle has to decide between Harold Landry and another trade down (leaning towards the trade).
And they signed Bortles to a $54 million deal in FebruaryIt's not over yet. The only possible team needing a QB between now and #31 is Jacksonville, barring a trade.
Arms are too short.Not Josh Jackson to replace Sherman?
Roethlisberger doesn’t have much left in the tank IMOIt's not over yet. The only possible team needing a QB between now and #31 is Jacksonville, barring a trade.
Then the Ravens shouldn't be interested in Jackson based on this idea.And they signed Bortles to a $54 million deal in February