2017 Patriots FA & Trades Thread

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,367
Looks like Pats are going to get CB Gilmore from the Bills.


Probably the end of the Logan Ryan Era.
 

NortheasternPJ

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2004
19,367
Ed Werner reporting that Hightower is in the $10-$13m range right now


I'd love to see him back in the 12mm range.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,790
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
Curious if the Patriots would kick the tires on Burkhead to fill the RB opening created by LGB. He seems like a very Patriots-esque type player, although his skillset may overlap a bit too much with what we currently have,
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
Just watched Cooks highlights.

I'd seen him play a bit, but man is he fast. He reminds me a bit of early-years Branch, but quicker.

But here's what I don't get: you'd have Edelman, Gronk, Allen, Mitchell, Hogan, Amendola, Cooks. Someone is the odd-man out.

Is it Gronk, with the idea being they'll move to more 4-WR sets and sign a power runner (like Adrian Peterson)?
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,104
A Scud Away from Hell
From ESPN's Mike Triplett:

On the surface, a potential trade of WR Brandin Cooks for Patriots CB Malcolm Butler would make a ton of sense for the Saints. They're willing to sacrifice an offensive skill position player to improve the defense -- and Butler is another young, very talented player who would fill one of their biggest needs. The only drawback would be contract issues, since Butler is already a restricted free agent who will command top cornerback money. Cooks has one cheap year left on his rookie deal, then a team option for about $8-8.5 million in 2018.
 

Dr. Gonzo

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2010
5,231
Just watched Cooks highlights.

I'd seen him play a bit, but man is he fast. He reminds me a bit of early-years Branch, but quicker.

But here's what I don't get: you'd have Edelman, Gronk, Allen, Mitchell, Hogan, Amendola, Cooks. Someone is the odd-man out.

Is it Gronk, with the idea being they'll move to more 4-WR sets and sign a power runner (like Adrian Peterson)?
Amendola will be cut at his present cap number. Mitchell has a history of knee issues and Edelman has the foot issues as well as the number of hits he has taken over the years. I believe Cooks would upgrade the group and give them more depth and act as a buttress against Edelman going down.
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
Didn't Amendola say he's willing to restructure to stay?
 

MillarTime

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
1,338
Curious if the Patriots would kick the tires on Burkhead to fill the RB opening created by LGB. He seems like a very Patriots-esque type player, although his skillset may overlap a bit too much with what we currently have,
This. Love the player...extremely underrated.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Just watched Cooks highlights.

I'd seen him play a bit, but man is he fast. He reminds me a bit of early-years Branch, but quicker.

But here's what I don't get: you'd have Edelman, Gronk, Allen, Mitchell, Hogan, Amendola, Cooks. Someone is the odd-man out.

Is it Gronk, with the idea being they'll move to more 4-WR sets and sign a power runner (like Adrian Peterson)?
Using more power running and trading Gronk to focus on 4 WR sets seems like inconsistent strategy

There's no odd-man out, Pats would play with different personnel in different matchups.
 

Dr. Gonzo

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2010
5,231
Didn't Amendola say he's willing to restructure to stay?
Girardi reported that he would but I still believe he should be cut if Cooks is acquired.

Miguel had a post about the 2017 options for Amendola and the Pats.

Cut or Trade Danny Amendola before June 1:

Amendola’s 2017 cap number would then decrease from $7,791,668 to $1,416,668 – the rest of his signing bonus proration for a gross cap savings of $6.375 million. Since a player with a $465,000 salary would then take his place in the Top 51 list, the net cap savings for the Patriots would be $5,910,000 ($6.375 million minus $465,000).

Danny Amendola retires before June 1:

Amendola’s 2017 cap number would then decrease from $7,791,668 to $1,416,668 – the rest of his signing bonus proration for a gross cap savings of $6.375 million. Since a player with a $465,000 salary would then take his place in the Top 51 list, the net cap savings for the Patriots would be $5,910,000 ($6.375 million minus $465,000).

Cut Danny Amendola before June 2 and make him a post June 1 designation:

That means the Pats would carry his $6 million salary and his $375,000 roster bonus on their books until June 2nd. On June 2nd he would be released. His 2017 cap number would then drop from $7,791,668 to $1,416,668 – the rest of his signing bonus proration for a gross cap savings of $6.375 million. Since a player with a $465,000 salary would then take his place in the Top 51 list, the net cap savings for the Patriots would be $5,910,000 ($6.375 million minus $465,000).

Cut or Trade Danny Amendola after June 1:

Amendola’s 2017 cap number would then decrease from $7,791,668 to $1,416,668 – the rest of his signing bonus proration for a gross cap savings of $6.375 million. Since a player with a $540,000 salary would then take his place in the Top 51 list, the net cap savings for the Patriots would be $5,835,000 ($6.375 million minus $540,000).

Danny Amendola retires after June 1:

Amendola’s 2017 cap number would then decrease from $7,791,668 to $1,416,668 – the rest of his signing bonus proration for a gross cap savings of $6.375 million. Since a player with a $540,000 salary would then take his place in the Top 51 list, the net cap savings for the Patriots would be $5,835,000 ($6.375 million minus $540,000).

Lower Danny Amendola’s salary from $6 million to $1.5 million:
This would lower his 2017 cap number from $7,791,668 to $2,916,668 for a cap savings of $4.5 million. If Danny Amendola is active for all 16 games, he will then earn $2 million in cash which is more than he earned in 2016 so one could look as this as a raise.

Lower Danny Amendola’s salary from $6 million to x million with a chance to recoup reduced salary by reaching NLTBE incentives (This is my preferred scenario)
Danny Amendola could agree to lower his salary and he would have the chance to earn the money back by reaching NLTBE incentives. The incentives could be for

  1. Receptions – Anything more than 23 receptions would be NLTBE
  2. Receiving Yards – Anything more than 243 receiving yards would be NLTBE
  3. Receiving TDs – Anything more than 4 receiving TD would be NLTBE
  4. Wins – Anything more than 14 wins would be NLTBE
These incentives could have different levels. One example is
250 yards – is worth $250,000
500 yards – is worth another $250,000 for a total of $500,000
800 yards – is worth another $500,000 for a total of $1 million

Another example would be to copy his 2015 receptions incentives tiers:

* 40 catches for $150,000
* 50 catches for another $150,000 ($300,000 total)
* 60 catches for another $225,000 ($525,000 total)
* 70 catches for another $225,000 ($750,000 total)

Lower Danny Amendola’s salary from $6 million while extending his contract by a year and giving Amendola a signing bonus

Example – Lower Danny Amendola’s salary to $1 million while giving him a $1,000,000 signing bonus. His 2018 salary would be $2 million. His 2017 cap number would be lowered by $4.5 million. His 2018 cap number would be $2.5 million. I will be surprised if Amendola’s extension happens because I have heard on at least one podcast that Amendola is thinking of retiring this year.

Lower Danny Amendola’s salary from $6 million to $900,000
$900,000 is the lowest minimum salary for a player with Danny Amendola’s experience for a cap savings of $5,100,000. I doubt that Amendola would agree to such a drastic paycut.
 

jimbobim

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2012
1,558
This feels like the day Sox traded for Sale.... Saints just signed Ginn BTW....
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,098
There were some Robert Woods rumors floating around, but he's signing with the Rams.
 

bsj

Renegade Crazed Genius
SoSH Member
Dec 6, 2003
22,790
Central NJ SoSH Chapter
Anyone else get the impression that the Cooks smoke is simply to distract from something else going on? it is very unlike the Patriots to pull the trigger on a deal like this that has been bandied about so publicly.

I still think they end up with Desean
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,371
Anyone else get the impression that the Cooks smoke is simply to distract from something else going on? it is very unlike the Patriots to pull the trigger on a deal like this that has been bandied about so publicly.

I still think they end up with Desean
All but officially signed with Tampa, it seems.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,098
Anyone else get the impression that the Cooks smoke is simply to distract from something else going on? it is very unlike the Patriots to pull the trigger on a deal like this that has been bandied about so publicly.

I still think they end up with Desean
All reports, including Schefter, are that he's signing in Tampa.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,106
Newton
Chris Burke‏Verified account @ChrisBurke_SI 2h2 hours ago
Trading with Belichick has to be as comforting as forming an alliance in Westeros.
Saw that -- I don't buy it. Sure, he has a track record of turning 4th round picks into quality (Marty) or HOF-caliber (Moss) receivers. But Belichick isn't in the business of making trade partners look bad, much less friends like Payton.

Want no part of Desean ...
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
Ian Rapoport‏Verified account @RapSheet
The belief is that the #Saints will be able to trade away WR Brandin Cooks by this afternoon. #Patriots, #Titans remain in the mix.
The only thing I'm worried about at this point is an overpay. Like, Butler plus #32 for Cooks. Tennessee can offer the higher pick, but not the quality of player to go along with it. So the only way I see the Pats beating what Tenn can offer is both Butler AND a pick.

Unless Tenn is considering the "other" McCourty and their pick. In which case, it would come down to whether NO would rather have the lower 1st but the better player, or the higher 1st and the lesser, but still solid, player.
 

boca

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
516
Saints have tweeted out the same "eyes" emoji that was doing the rounds at the NBA trade deadline.....
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,444
I'd love Cooks on this team but afraid of the cost. Hopefully those reports are just normal negotiating through media.
 

JohnnyK

Member
SoSH Member
May 8, 2007
1,941
Wolfern, Austria
I wonder what is going on with the Alan Branch negotiations. With Calais Campbell reportedly getting 13 to 14 millions a year can we still be hopeful he comes back for 5 to 6?
 

Mooch

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,539
Love getting Harmon back into the fold for the right money. He's a valuable 3rd safety in the Pats scheme.
 
Apr 7, 2006
2,547
Setting aside the fact that he's arguably the best TE ever, and whatever caveat people want to fret about re his back, it's worth noting that Gronk is on a REALLY favorable contract for the Patriots. Plus, the guy they just traded for, Allen, has had a bit of a time staying healthy consistently. Gronk, imo, is NOT getting traded. Why would the FO even reasonably consider it?
 

H78

Fists of Millennial Fury!
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2009
4,613
Setting aside the fact that he's arguably the best TE ever, and whatever caveat people want to fret about re his back, it's worth noting that Gronk is on a REALLY favorable contract for the Patriots. Plus, the guy they just traded for, Allen, has had a bit of a time staying healthy consistently. Gronk, imo, is NOT getting traded. Why would the FO even reasonably consider it?
Getting value in the form of another player than can consistently play through a full season?

I've said it once, and I'll say it again: it doesn't matter how good a player is or how cheap they are or how much fun they are to watch party if they can't consistently - and more importantly, reliably - produce for your football team. You could have God on your roster, but if God is injury prone because of the way DBs have to approach tackling him, God doesn't matter all that much come your playoff run.

I realize Gronk himself isn't at fault for this, but it is what it is and his frequent trips to IR don't make his contract all that friendly if they're not consistently producing on-field results.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,104
A Scud Away from Hell
Ideal scenario: extend Butler, trade JG, get Cooks for picks, sign Verner, sign HT, sign Gillislee for a fifth, draft DE, LB, and TE. All doable.
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,109
Duval
I'll take a trade Butler for Cooks, trade JG for 12 and 33, resign DHT, get an underutilized DE for about 4 mil, draft a CB, Watt, and a DE with 12, 32, and 33, start counting the days until opening night.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,526
Getting value in the form of another player than can consistently play through a full season?

I've said it once, and I'll say it again: it doesn't matter how good a player is or how cheap they are or how much fun they are to watch party if they can't consistently - and more importantly, reliably - produce for your football team. You could have God on your roster, but if God is injury prone because of the way DBs have to approach tackling him, God doesn't matter all that much come your playoff run.

I realize Gronk himself isn't at fault for this, but it is what it is and his frequent trips to IR don't make his contract all that friendly if they're not consistently producing on-field results.
How do you figure that out?
 

shoosh77

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,385
New Canaan, CT
If Butler can be franchised after this season, would he take a 2 year deal for slightly more than the RFA-1st + Tag next year, with the agreement not to tag him at the end of it? He gets his money more evenly spread out then.
 

pedroia'sboys

New Member
Aug 26, 2007
640
Newington CT
I'll take a trade Butler for Cooks, trade JG for 12 and 33, resign DHT, get an underutilized DE for about 4 mil, draft a CB, Watt, and a DE with 12, 32, and 33, start counting the days until opening night.
I think this is a "it's better to be a year early than late" move.
They have one reciever under 28.
Edelman is going to fall off a cliff sooner rather than later.
Gronk we know his history.
They sure as hell haven't had the best results when drafting speed recievers.
They had no one who could create seperation vs the Falcons until they were gassed.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,212
Getting value in the form of another player than can consistently play through a full season?

I've said it once, and I'll say it again: it doesn't matter how good a player is or how cheap they are or how much fun they are to watch party if they can't consistently - and more importantly, reliably - produce for your football team. You could have God on your roster, but if God is injury prone because of the way DBs have to approach tackling him, God doesn't matter all that much come your playoff run.

I realize Gronk himself isn't at fault for this, but it is what it is and his frequent trips to IR don't make his contract all that friendly if they're not consistently producing on-field results.
One key point is that Gronk's 2017 contract is what it is; the Pats don't save very much at all (maybe $1M) if he's traded due to the bonus acceleration.

The other issue is that Gronk is a risk, so I don't think the trade market for him will be all that great. Not sure a 5th round pick is all that compelling; better to take chances with Gronk for another season.