2016 Cowboys: Giddyup for Elliot

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
I was actually thinking about this yesterday...if the Cowboys had lost that exact game except with Tony Romo at QB instead of Dak Prescott, I guarantee all you would hear about is the INT thrown on the WR screen in the 3rd quarter. The narrative would have been all about him choking.
Not to mention the ball being batted down at the line of scrimmage on their last offensive play. That would have been offered up as some sort of character flaw.

Karma is having its way with us for the way we have treated one of the best players in franchise history. I, myself, have been critical of him at times (the way he consistently runs the play clock down to 00 drives me nuts) but I never really considered him part of the problem.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
I was thinking about how I view Romo in the context of his peers. I think that is where he pales a little bit - my expectations for a 'great' quarterback. After seeing Rogers, Brady, Manning, etc over so many years I kind of expect a QB to make that throw, drive the field etc - especially in the big games. Romo has done an awful lot of that. A certain amount of greatness is simply luck or fortunate happenstance. Eli Manning is viewed a lot differently (in subjective ways) if not for a couple of miracle catches. (And for the record I am referring to the top of the helmet catch specifically.) If the morons in the league office don't steal a catch from Bryant, maybe the Romo legacy is different. If the snap isn't fumbled on the field goal, if, if, if. I think there isn't too much separating him from the next tier of his peers - but there really is separation. Some of it is likely subjective (especially for me), but some of it is just that weird stuff happened around him - and he wasn't on the fortunate side of luck or happenstance enough.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
I was thinking about how I view Romo in the context of his peers. I think that is where he pales a little bit - my expectations for a 'great' quarterback. After seeing Rogers, Brady, Manning, etc over so many years I kind of expect a QB to make that throw, drive the field etc - especially in the big games. Romo has done an awful lot of that. A certain amount of greatness is simply luck or fortunate happenstance. Eli Manning is viewed a lot differently (in subjective ways) if not for a couple of miracle catches. (And for the record I am referring to the top of the helmet catch specifically.) If the morons in the league office don't steal a catch from Bryant, maybe the Romo legacy is different. If the snap isn't fumbled on the field goal, if, if, if. I think there isn't too much separating him from the next tier of his peers - but there really is separation. Some of it is likely subjective (especially for me), but some of it is just that weird stuff happened around him - and he wasn't on the fortunate side of luck or happenstance enough.
I've always viewed Romo (at least the past 4 or 5 years or so once he got established longer term) as an exceptionally good QB who was just shy of the Brady/Manning/Rodgers tier but likely better than the Eli Mannings and Joe Flaccos even though the media narrative tends to be against that line of thinking because of superbowl rings. He couldn't drag a terrible team to 11-5/10-6 like those top tier guys could, but he definitely dragged some pretty bad teams to 9-7/8-8, and then got subsequently blamed for them not doing better. The '09 team was probably not playoff material either but better than some of those 2011-2013 squads, so he was able to get them to 11-5.

His two best shots at a SB...2007 and 2014 ended with some pretty shitastic luck mixed in. We already know about he 2014 loss with the Dez catch (and don't forget Demarco Murray fumbling the ball with daylight in front of him and the 6 point swing at the end of the first half on a missed Baily FG and then allowing GB to convert about a 3rd and 20 to get their own FG), but 2007 had the "underrated" catastrophic drop by Patrick Crayton late in the 3rd quarter when the Giants sold out on a jail-break blitz on 3rd down and Romo scorched them with what should have been about an 80 yard TD catch but Crayton had the ball hit him between the 8 and the 4 and dropped it. It would have given the Cowboys a 10 point lead. Instead they punted and the Giants scored a TD off that possession to take a 21-17 lead which would end up the final score. That game is always remembered for the Cabo trip during the bye week in wildcard round, but that dropped catch was an absolute back breaker that has slid under the radar to most of the general fan base. There were also smaller things like Terrell Owens getting injured at the end of 2007 and wasn't 100% for the playoffs.

It's a shame he only got to play with the offensive line rebuilt for one season before the injuries started setting in. I've always felt if they had assembled the O-line a few seasons earlier, he probably gets a couple deep playoff runs in there.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
20,502
NC
Patrick Crayton had a chance to atone for his error in that game by hauling in the winning touchdown on third down with a few seconds left and stopped running his route after getting open. Fuck I hate that guy.

 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
Patrick Crayton had a chance to atone for his error in that game by hauling in the winning touchdown on third down with a few seconds left and stopped running his route after getting open. Fuck I hate that guy.

The horseshoe up that Giants teams' asses had a horseshoe up its ass. I remember the Caldwell moment but completely forgot about that play. Perfect pass by Romo. Poor guy.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
20,502
NC
The horseshoe up that Giants teams' asses had a horseshoe up its ass. I remember the Caldwell moment but completely forgot about that play. Perfect pass by Romo. Poor guy.
Anthony Fasano also had a killer drop at the goal line on Dallas's first drive of the second half that would have put them up 21-14
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Romo to the Skins would be great drama, but I think from his perspective he wouldn't do it unless he had no other options. He's got a legacy in Dallas, and he has to realize the impact going to Wash would have of that during post-retirement times. Plus, Washington seems like a less likely bet to get to the Bowl than Den or Houston.

If I'm Den, and to a lesser extent Houston, I do whatever it takes to get Romo on the team. It's a QB league and you're not going anywhere with crap at QB.
Quite frankly I find it funny to think professional athletes in this day and age - especially in the NFL, where contract aren't guaranteed and careers are so short - care about their "legacy" over and above their bank account. And rightfully so. They should get the best dime they can in the best situation they can and that's what they do.

As a 37 year old who has played 5 games in the last two seasons, he'll take the biggest offer he can, rivalry be damned. If he gets cut, his 'legacy' isn't tarnished by going to the Skins. And to Bosoxen's point, he's not exactly ingrained in their organizational history to begin with.

Did Donovan McNabb's 'legacy' get tarnished by playing for the Skins?
 

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
14,101
Boulder, CO
Agreed on all counts except I interpret "legacy" as "opportunity to make post playing days endorsements/speaking/broadcast income". In which case, legacy matters.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
I didn't take it meant like that, but I could be reading it wrong. If you want to pull that in, sure, it matters, but I don't think whose uniforms you wore make much difference and I think Romo's future on that realm has likely already been decided.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
Anthony Fasano also had a killer drop at the goal line on Dallas's first drive of the second half that would have put them up 21-14
Before this subject gets buried, I wanted to bring up another play. On NY's first possession of the game, Demarcus Ware got called offside on a play in which he timed the snap perfectly. That play would have resulted in NY punting. Instead, they got the free first down and scored a touchdown on the following play.

But all dipshit Cowboys fans remember is the interception in the end zone at the end of the game (to be fair, it's not just them - the media is equally as guilty of this). Ergo, it's all Romo's fault.

I've given up arguing this stuff with people I encounter. The facts simply don't matter anymore. Post-factual world, indeed.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
I didn't take it meant like that, but I could be reading it wrong. If you want to pull that in, sure, it matters, but I don't think whose uniforms you wore make much difference and I think Romo's future on that realm has likely already been decided.
I think this is exactly right. Cowboys fans view Romo more like Danny White than Roger Staubach (they would have won the Super Bowl multiple times if not for that crappy QB). Hell, even Don Meredith has kind of a shit reputation among that lot - seems he's more fondly remembered as the voice of MNF than as QB of the Cowboys.

This is all Jerry's fault and the onus is on him to repair Romo's reputation. And I mean the team needs to elevate him to a status higher than just Witten's buddy.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
Before this subject gets buried, I wanted to bring up another play. On NY's first possession of the game, Demarcus Ware got called offside on a play in which he timed the snap perfectly. That play would have resulted in NY punting. Instead, they got the free first down and scored a touchdown on the following play.

But all dipshit Cowboys fans remember is the interception in the end zone at the end of the game (to be fair, it's not just them - the media is equally as guilty of this). Ergo, it's all Romo's fault.

I've given up arguing this stuff with people I encounter. The facts simply don't matter anymore. Post-factual world, indeed.
Holy shit, I remember the Ware play now that you brought it up. I had completely forgotten. The replay showed him not offsides...it actually wasn't close either but he got up out of his stance at the perfect time so it "looked" offsides in real time.

One more nugget from that game, don't forget after the Cowboys took a 14-7 lead in the 2nd quarter with 46 seconds left after a 10 minute TD drive, they somehow allowed the Giants to score a TD on the following possession right before the half, nevermind just a FG. An absolute disaster defensive series immensely aided by a 15 yard facemask penalty by Jacques Reeves after he had blown a coverage on the play before against Steve Smith (the Giants' Steve Smith). It was unbelievable...esp against an offense like NY which shouldn't be able to move the ball that quickly down the field.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
Me too. Wow. He literally just stopped running his route. That must be impossible for Romo to watch.
Well, sure, it was his fault the pass was incomplete. How could he not anticipate that Crayton would stop running his route when he's gotten behind the coverage and the corner of the end zone was wide open?
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
Well, sure, it was his fault the pass was incomplete. How could he not anticipate that Crayton would stop running his route when he's gotten behind the coverage and the corner of the end zone was wide open?
Can you clarify this? I was saying Romo couldn't watch the video because Crayton screwed him, not because Romo messed up.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
Can you clarify this? I was saying Romo couldn't watch the video because Crayton screwed him, not because Romo messed up.
I was sarcastically commenting from the point of view of an idiot fan who thinks Romo can do no right. People literally still put the entirety of the blame for that game on Romo's shoulders but we've outlined, what, five plays which altered the course of the game. None of which had anything to do with Romo's "tendency to choke".

Apologies if that wasn't clear.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,314
Is the Ezekiel domestic violence allegation closed or not? I keep seeing click baity headlines about the NFL wanting further information, but they don't seem to be from reputable sites and I don't want to click through.
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
20,502
NC
Before this subject gets buried, I wanted to bring up another play. On NY's first possession of the game, Demarcus Ware got called offside on a play in which he timed the snap perfectly. That play would have resulted in NY punting. Instead, they got the free first down and scored a touchdown on the following play.

But all dipshit Cowboys fans remember is the interception in the end zone at the end of the game (to be fair, it's not just them - the media is equally as guilty of this). Ergo, it's all Romo's fault.

I've given up arguing this stuff with people I encounter. The facts simply don't matter anymore. Post-factual world, indeed.
There was also a penalty against Romo late in the fourth quarter for intentional grounding where he was not under pressure and threw the ball to the sidelines, but someone had run the wrong route and was not there. Usually in that situation where there's no pressure they don't throw the flag, but in this case they got together and penalized him for it. I thought that was curious.

And Marciano, no it is not closed and Zeke has spoken out about the length of time that it has taken for it to conclude.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
I was sarcastically commenting from the point of view of an idiot fan who thinks Romo can do no right. People literally still put the entirety of the blame for that game on Romo's shoulders but we've outlined, what, five plays which altered the course of the game. None of which had anything to do with Romo's "tendency to choke".

Apologies if that wasn't clear.
Aight, thanks for the clarification. Seriously though, that Crayton play is unacceptable.
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Agreed on all counts except I interpret "legacy" as "opportunity to make post playing days endorsements/speaking/broadcast income". In which case, legacy matters.
I think fans overthink this. Almost every player has a second team these days. Will Jets fans hate Derelle Revis because he played for the Pats? Do 49ers fans hate Jerry Rice because he played for the Raiders? Heck, most Pats fans I know still love Curtis Martin even.

My point is really that, as long as a player doesn't go somewhere else and crush it after being limited in their original home (Chris Carter, Mike Vrabel), and as long as they keep their record clean off the field, I think their ability to make money in car dealership ads is largely the same as it would be before they left.

Randall Cunningham can still take my car for his own purposes with 5 minutes notice, regardless of his time in Minnesota. Although Gary Andersen may have helped with that.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
My point is really that, as long as a player doesn't go somewhere else and crush it after being limited in their original home (Chris Carter, Mike Vrabel), and as long as they keep their record clean off the field, I think their ability to make money in car dealership ads is largely the same as it would be before they left.
That kind of plays into what I'm saying. If Romo goes to Houston or Denver and wins a Super Bowl there, he will not be viewed kindly in Dallas. Especially if the NFC opponent is the Cowboys.

Sure, this may cause some Cowboys fans to reflect on whether their opinion of Romo was correct or not and be happy for him - like they were for Ware - but the majority of them will view him as Judas.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
That kind of plays into what I'm saying. If Romo goes to Houston or Denver and wins a Super Bowl there, he will not be viewed kindly in Dallas. Especially if the NFC opponent is the Cowboys.

Sure, this may cause some Cowboys fans to reflect on whether their opinion of Romo was correct or not and be happy for him - like they were for Ware - but the majority of them will view him as Judas.
At this point, Romo's nearly broken in two. I don't think Dallas fans have to worry about him winning a Super Bowl with another team. It would be a shock if he lasted a full season before he packs it in. Houston would obviously be a good fit, with some really solid pieces, but Romo's time has passed.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
That kind of plays into what I'm saying. If Romo goes to Houston or Denver and wins a Super Bowl there, he will not be viewed kindly in Dallas. Especially if the NFC opponent is the Cowboys.

Sure, this may cause some Cowboys fans to reflect on whether their opinion of Romo was correct or not and be happy for him - like they were for Ware - but the majority of them will view him as Judas.
I disagree that the majority of fans would view him that harshly if he went to an AFC team and won. I mean, it's not like he went there while leaving an offer from Dallas on the table. If he went to an NFC team then I could see more backlash.

There would obviously be a small portion that never views him fondly...but those are probably the same fans who wouldn't give him credit if the Cowboys had won in 2014. They would credit Demarco Murray and the running game and say Romo was just along for the ride. That portion of the fan base is irrational. I think most would probably find themselves rooting for him if his team made the super bowl provided the opponent wasn't the Cowboys.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
At this point, Romo's nearly broken in two. I don't think Dallas fans have to worry about him winning a Super Bowl with another team. It would be a shock if he lasted a full season before he packs it in. Houston would obviously be a good fit, with some really solid pieces, but Romo's time has passed.
That's certainly a possibility. I happen to think he has one or two years left in him but the fact that retirement is apparently still on the table seems to suggest he's not entirely certain of that himself.

I disagree that the majority of fans would view him that harshly if he went to an AFC team and won. I mean, it's not like he went there while leaving an offer from Dallas on the table. If he went to an NFC team then I could see more backlash.

There would obviously be a small portion that never views him fondly...but those are probably the same fans who wouldn't give him credit if the Cowboys had won in 2014. They would credit Demarco Murray and the running game and say Romo was just along for the ride. That portion of the fan base is irrational. I think most would probably find themselves rooting for him if his team made the super bowl provided the opponent wasn't the Cowboys.
I guess I just don't have a rosy picture of Cowboys fans in general - I get to see them from both sides of the fan spectrum as a Cowboys and Red Sox fan. They're an irrational lot with delusions of entitlement. I fancy myself a realist (though some call that pessimism) and I just don't see how his treatment would improve by going to another team. He's not treated particularly well now so I just don't see how popular opinion would change for the better if he were to go somewhere else and find success.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,075
New York City
That's certainly a possibility. I happen to think he has one or two years left in him but the fact that retirement is apparently still on the table seems to suggest he's not entirely certain of that himself.
I'm not his doctor, obviously, but I do play one on the internet. He's one hit away from being crippled for the rest of his life and he's got money and a potential future in broadcasting, so he's set for life. That must be scary for him, in a way I could never relate to. Is it worth the risk?
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
I'm not his doctor, obviously, but I do play one on the internet. He's one hit away from being crippled for the rest of his life and he's got money and a potential future in broadcasting, so he's set for life. That must be scary for him, in a way I could never relate to. Is it worth the risk?
We were having this same conversation about Peyton a few years ago. I think Romo gives it one last shot somewhere else and then hangs it up if/when he gets hurt.
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
We were having this same conversation about Peyton a few years ago. I think Romo gives it one last shot somewhere else and then hangs it up if/when he gets hurt.
I don't know enough about the guy to say one way or the other, but it is hard for me to imagine a guy as talented as he is looking at Denver and Houston and not thinking that there were a few folks he would like to make eat their words. I may be wrong, but I sure think that both of those clubs have a much better chance of making it to the SB with him.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,314
I don't know enough about the guy to say one way or the other, but it is hard for me to imagine a guy as talented as he is looking at Denver and Houston and not thinking that there were a few folks he would like to make eat their words. I may be wrong, but I sure think that both of those clubs have a much better chance of making it to the SB with him.
I hope he has room in his house for all the flowers Hopkins, Sanders and Thomas must be sending him.
 

Oil Can Dan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2003
8,035
0-3 to 4-3
I think fans overthink this. Almost every player has a second team these days. Will Jets fans hate Derelle Revis because he played for the Pats? Do 49ers fans hate Jerry Rice because he played for the Raiders? Heck, most Pats fans I know still love Curtis Martin even.

My point is really that, as long as a player doesn't go somewhere else and crush it after being limited in their original home (Chris Carter, Mike Vrabel), and as long as they keep their record clean off the field, I think their ability to make money in car dealership ads is largely the same as it would be before they left.

Randall Cunningham can still take my car for his own purposes with 5 minutes notice, regardless of his time in Minnesota. Although Gary Andersen may have helped with that.
I hear you on this, but it's the Redskins I was talking about. Romo to Washington definitely impacts his 'legacy' with both the Cowboys organization and the fans, IMO. Going from Dallas to Denver is not nearly the same thing as going Dallas to Washington. Especially if he leads Washington to the Bowl, or God forbid wins it. It's why Andy Pettitte was never coming to Boston even though they flirted when he was a FA. And it's why Wade Boggs isn't really all that adored by Sox fans. Or why Johnny Damon is outright disliked here. I don't agree with any of it and I think it's all stupid, but I think it exists. Whether it's a real thing that Romo gives two shits about, who knows.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
I don't know enough about the guy to say one way or the other, but it is hard for me to imagine a guy as talented as he is looking at Denver and Houston and not thinking that there were a few folks he would like to make eat their words. I may be wrong, but I sure think that both of those clubs have a much better chance of making it to the SB with him.
This is my thinking on Romo. From all accounts he feels physically the best he has in years. And while it was only one drive in the final game, I think he put to rest the folks who were speculating that he would be out there throwing wobbly ducks and overwhelmed by the game after missing a full season...the dude was throwing seeds. Obviously he could still be one hit away from retirement, that hasn't changed, but I would be shocked if he didn't give it another go.

Denver does seem to be a great spot for a short term Romo stint while the young guys develop a little more, but the rumors are that they are sticking to their young guns...but we all know how rumors go. Houston might be even more ideal, but that Brock contract is just devastating and I'm not sure they can make the money work. Who knows though. Maybe Jacksonville? Not sure the offensive pieces are there for him though.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
If you were curious about the unsportsmanlike conduct penalty called on Dallas early in the game (the weird one with Brice Butler running onto the field and then running off), you're not alone. Turns out, the NFL may be admitting that was not the correct call:

According to Michael Lombardi, The NFL says the Unsportsmanlike penalty called on Cowboys’ receiver Brice Butler shouldn’t have been called.
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/01/19/nfl-admits-mistake-on-huddle-penalty-on-brice-butler/
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,314
If you were curious about the unsportsmanlike conduct penalty called on Dallas early in the game (the weird one with Brice Butler running onto the field and then running off), you're not alone. Turns out, the NFL may be admitting that was not the correct call:



http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2017/01/19/nfl-admits-mistake-on-huddle-penalty-on-brice-butler/
That's cool it was only 5 yards and didn't affect scoring.... Football is more fun if you just watch it like the WWE.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
That's cool it was only 5 yards and didn't affect scoring.... Football is more fun if you just watch it like the WWE.
How can you say that? Was a 15 yard penalty. If there is no penalty, the 22 yard reception stands and they have the ball First and 10 on GB 16, instead of 2-10 on the GB 48. When "Dallas couldn't move the ball"..

Maybe I'm misreading the article or your sarcasm...
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,314
How can you say that? Was a 15 yard penalty. If there is no penalty, the 22 yard reception stands and they have the ball First and 10 on GB 16, instead of 2-10 on the GB 48. When "Dallas couldn't move the ball"..

Maybe I'm misreading the article or your sarcasm...
Maybe you're definitely misreading my sarcasm somehow.
 

edmunddantes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2015
4,737
Cali
There seems to be some back and forth by Blandino saying "no, it's right".

also Zebras has it as the right call too.

and in one of those classics "i've never seen it called before in my life" quotes.

Yes you have Garret. 2014. Against Washington by Tony Corrente, when...

<drum roll>

They played the Dallas Cowboys.