2015 Cowboys: Romo Nomo

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Bosoxen said:
 
No, I don't think Cassell will make us forget about Romo, either. But he at least presents a downfield threat which should open up the running game. Defenses will no longer be able to hover seven yards from the line of scrimmage and still keep everything in front of them. Checkdown passes will go back to being a safety valve, not the primary mode of moving the football.
 
Career NY/A: 
Romo = 7.11
Weeden = 5.80
Cassel = 5.77

Cassel is a checkdown artist who cannot throw downfield.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,332
Hingham, MA
I agree with SF121 and crystalline. Weeden has completed a high % of his passes and has generally managed the game well. He has been a bit unlucky to be 0-3 at this point. I doubt Cassell does much better.
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,854
Bosoxen said:
 
I don't disagree with your thesis that having a starting-caliber backup QB just isn't going to happen. But that's not what the Cowboys would have hypothetically needed. All they would have needed is a backup QB that could tread water until Romo could return. Weeden is not that. Cassell may not be either, but he does have some track record as a competent quarterback on a team not that dissimilar to the current Cowboys - at least as far as their circumstances go. Once Dez returns, I fully expect Cassell to at least resemble an NFL QB.
 
With that said, I think his numbers in KC and Minnesota require a little bit of context. Those Chiefs/Vikings teams during that time frame were fucking awful, so aren't we looking at a bit of a chicken/egg thing here? Cherry-picking his stats during his stints for the worst teams he has played on isn't terribly instructive. It just shows he played on some shitty teams and, at worst, he merely contributed to their awfulness. When Dwayne Bowe is the best receiving threat you've got, you're well and truly fucked. Not that Terrance Williams is any great shakes but the Cowboys at least have Witten and a viable running game.
 
No, I don't think Cassell will make us forget about Romo, either. But he at least presents a downfield threat which should open up the running game. Defenses will no longer be able to hover seven yards from the line of scrimmage and still keep everything in front of them. Checkdown passes will go back to being a safety valve, not the primary mode of moving the football.
 
Speaking of the running game, there appear to be more changes coming:
 
 
Both local papers have confirmed that Collins will, indeed, be starting at left guard but only the Dallas Morning News has anything regarding Michael.
 
Ok, I sort of cherry-picked the endpoints, but his last half-decent season was 5 years ago.  He's been awful ever since.  He's 33 now and probably not as good now as he was then.  What evidence is there that his performance five years ago is more predictive than everything he's done since then, including getting benched for Brady Quinn in KC, getting benched for Josh Freeman and Christian Ponder in Minn, and getting beat out by Tyrod Taylor in Bufallo?  
 
True, his Vikings and Chiefs teams did not have much in the way of receivers (although Bowe was a good player for a while there, and the Greg Jennings/Jerome Simpson/Coradelle Patterson group in Minn isn't really worse than the current Cowboys sans Dez), but Cassel got to hand off to Jamaal Charles in KC and Adrian Peterson in Minn.  He'll have no such luxury with the Cowboys.  
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
soxfan121 said:
 
Career NY/A: 
Romo = 7.11
Weeden = 5.80
Cassel = 5.77

Cassel is a checkdown artist who cannot throw downfield.
 
I'll defer to you since you got to watch him more up close than I did, but I was under the impression that the 2008 Pats offense was more of a vertical passing offense. I figured that meant he could throw the ball downfield. Maybe that's not his preference but he is capable, right?
 
coremiller said:
 
Ok, I sort of cherry-picked the endpoints, but his last half-decent season was 5 years ago.  He's been awful ever since.  He's 33 now and probably not as good now as he was then.  What evidence is there that his performance five years ago is more predictive than everything he's done since then, including getting benched for Brady Quinn in KC, getting benched for Josh Freeman and Christian Ponder in Minn, and getting beat out by Tyrod Taylor in Bufallo?  
 
True, his Vikings and Chiefs teams did not have much in the way of receivers (although Bowe was a good player for a while there, and the Greg Jennings/Jerome Simpson/Coradelle Patterson group in Minn isn't really worse than the current Cowboys sans Dez), but Cassel got to hand off to Jamaal Charles in KC and Adrian Peterson in Minn.  He'll have no such luxury with the Cowboys.  
 
With the possible exception of Quinn, couldn't it be argued that all of those quarterbacks that displaced him had longterm value to their clubs? I know we can look at getting benched in favor of Freeman and Ponder as bad things now, but those guys were their respective franchise's "future" at that time. The same may be true of Taylor but with his age and considering the coach, I'm not even going to try to apply any sort of logic to that.
 
I don't know if my stance is clear or if it's getting lost. I don't expect Cassell to be the Pro Bowler he was five years ago or the season savior he was seven years ago. I merely expect him to play .500 ball and keep the season afloat for when Romo returns. All he needs to do is allow the offense a little room to breathe so they can get their running game going and let the chips fall where they may.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Bosoxen said:
 
I'll defer to you since you got to watch him more up close than I did, but I was under the impression that the 2008 Pats offense was more of a vertical passing offense. I figured that meant he could throw the ball downfield. Maybe that's not his preference but he is capable, right?
 
Not really, and 2008 was a long time ago. Last season Dave Archibald looked at the Cassel-led Vikings offense - it wasn't good.
 
Cassel certainly has a weaker arm, compared to Weeden. Cassel might be a bit more accurate deep, but we're talking a meaningless distinction. Cassel might not be as prone to terrible decision, though even that's debatable based on last year's film. 

Sorry...Cassel is basically the same guy as Weeden; neither is very good, or capable of going downfield. 
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
soxfan121 said:
 
Not really, and 2008 was a long time ago. Last season Dave Archibald looked at the Cassel-led Vikings offense - it wasn't good.
 
Cassel certainly has a weaker arm, compared to Weeden. Cassel might be a bit more accurate deep, but we're talking a meaningless distinction. Cassel might not be as prone to terrible decision, though even that's debatable based on last year's film. 

Sorry...Cassel is basically the same guy as Weeden; neither is very good, or capable of going downfield. 
Even in 2008, Cassel was a liability throwing deep. Moss was coming off a record-breaking season and barely got 1000 yards. It's the worst part of Cassel's game. One thing he has going for him is a little mobility; maybe the Cowboys can cobble together some O out of bootlegs and rollouts. Until Dez gets back, they might have a bottom-5 WR corps, which is a big part of the problem right now; they might be struggling even with Romo.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
Greg29fan said:
The next thing is going to be the Cowboys stupidly rushing Dez back from his foot injury to try to save things.
 
Winner winner, chicken dinner!
 
While owner Jerry Jones continues to target Sunday’s game against the New York Giants for the possible return of wide receiver Dez Bryant, coach Jason Garrett remains beholden to a deliberate rehab process.
...
Jones said Bryant will make the ultimate decision.
 
Garrett, however, said that decision will be a collaborative effort between Bryant, the medical staff and the coaches.
 
Stephen needs to restrain Jerry, just like he did during the draft when he prevented him from picking Manziel.
 
But at least some good news out of that article: Randy Gregory is expected to play Sunday.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
He's alive and "progressing", whatever that means.
 
Thankfully, Dez didn't practice yesterday, reducing the likelihood that they'll be stupid enough to have him play Sunday. They need him at 100% if they're going to have a prayer at salvaging the season.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Bosoxen said:
He's alive and "progressing", whatever that means.
 
Thankfully, Dez didn't practice yesterday, reducing the likelihood that they'll be stupid enough to have him play Sunday. They need him at 100% if they're going to have a prayer at salvaging the season.
So they traveled east, left Dez behind, and created the fiction that he could fly in and still play. Finally, he has been downgraded to out.

I imagine Stephen Jones has his hands full these days with the old man. The hyper-rich share many of the common man's problems.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
dcmissle said:
So they traveled east, left Dez behind, and created the fiction that he could fly in and still play. Finally, he has been downgraded to out.

I imagine Stephen Jones has his hands full these days with the old man. The hyper-rich share many of the common man's problems.
 
Monday:
"Heh, heh...Stephen, we'll tell 'em Dez might play and they'll spend time preparing for him. I'm a football genius."
"Sure you are Dad."

Saturday: 
"Heh, heh...Stephen, we'll tell 'em Dez could fly to the game and be active and they'll prepare for it. I am a football genius."
"Sure you are Dad."

Sunday:
"Dez is playing next week."
"No Dad."
"But I paid for him! And I'm a football genius!"
"He's hurt."
"But if we SAY he's gonna play..."
"Sure, Dad. Go tell the press Dez is gonna play."
 
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
A -4 turnover margin will do that to you. Toss in giving up a special teams touchdown and having a touchdown of their own called back on a horse shit call and it's a miracle they were even in that game.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,477
@PSchrags: Greg Hardy answers six straight questions with "no comment". Should make for an entertaining week of build up before Seahawks come to town.
 

pjr

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
780
Quincy,MA
[twitter]https://twitter.com/jonmachota/status/658445966081658880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw[/twitter]
 
 
Jon Machota Verified account 
‏@jonmachota   Jerry Jones on Greg Hardy: "That's the kind of thing that inspires. He's just getting guys ready to play in my view."
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,091
Newton
pjr said:
[twitter]https://twitter.com/jonmachota/status/658445966081658880?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw[/twitter]
 
 
Jon Machota Verified account 
‏@jonmachota   Jerry Jones on Greg Hardy: "That's the kind of thing that inspires. He's just getting guys ready to play in my view."
This is like the second time Jerrah has enabled bad Hardy behavior in less than 3 weeks. Feel like this isn't going to end well.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
Yeah you really don't need the owner supporting the behaviour, he did it with Dez but Dez always seemed like a guy who just cared too much. A loveable emotional freakish talent.
 
Hardy? Not so much. I'd have thought the coaching staff would like to have a say, and now what can they do Hardy will say the boss likes it, so bugger off.
 
I'd be delighted to see him kicked off the team and out of football, and it's a shame that the cowboys need him 
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,477
Mike Doocy ‏@MikeDoocyFox4  3m3 minutes ago
Garrett just had an unusual moment of frankness, essentially admitting that Hardy gets a pass because he's a really good player
 

Three10toLeft

New Member
Oct 2, 2008
1,560
Asheville, NC
soxhop411 said:
Mike Doocy ‏@MikeDoocyFox4  3m3 minutes ago
Garrett just had an unusual moment of frankness, essentially admitting that Hardy gets a pass because he's a really good player
 
 
What a shit show of an organization.
 
I guess good on Garrett for calling it like it is. But good looking building an actual team that way.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
That must have occurred at his daily press conference because I'm not finding anything regarding what was actually said.
 
I really wish they'd just end the charade and cut him already. No good will come from this.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Oh, I disagree. When Hardy and Bryant get into a fist fight on the sidelines, something good will have come from this. 

Dogs, fleas, Jerry Jones...
 

Greg29fan

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
20,502
NC
Bosoxen said:
That must have occurred at his daily press conference because I'm not finding anything regarding what was actually said.
 
I really wish they'd just end the charade and cut him already. No good will come from this.
 
It was on Garrett's show on 105.3 this afternoon
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,477
@RapSheet: #Cowboys were concerned about Greg Hardy last week. He wasn’t on time Thursday, didn’t call & they called around. DNP for practice (illness)
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,671
soxfan121 said:
Oh, I disagree. When Hardy and Bryant get into a fist fight on the sidelines, something good will have come from this. 

Dogs, fleas, Jerry Jones...
 
My first thought is that Hardy would destroy Bryant.  But then I remembered the story about Hugh Douglas confronting Terrell Owens in the locker room.  Douglas was a much bigger, stronger man, but apparently Owens kicked his ass.  So who knows?  But Hardy...goodness, he's a ticking time bomb.  
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
While watching him against the Pats I'll admit to thinking "he has many, many flaws but Hardy is a hell of a football player...maybe he's worth it?"
 
I'm now fully back in the camp that the rest of the league correctly assessed the benefit/burden of Hardy during this offseason.
 

( . ) ( . ) and (_!_)

T&A
SoSH Member
Feb 9, 2010
5,302
Providence, RI
I feel for our cowboy fans brethren here. If they really want to do some long term deal then they are sitting on not one but two ticking time bombs. The eventual hardy suspension and the new contract. The order in which these events happen will matter a lot to the Cowboys.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
Well, it looks like Joseph Randle's time with the team may be coming to an end:
 
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/659732681912020992
 
And this:
 
Running back Joseph Randle has lost his starting job. Now his status with the Cowboys could be in jeopardy after he bolted from the facility Wednesday for what has been termed “a personal issue” by a source.
 
Randle, who skipped a treatment session for a strained oblique that already had him iffy for Sunday’s game against the Seattle Seahawks, is expected to return and meet with the Cowboys coaches Thursday.
 
Per a source, a decision on his status with the team, let alone Sunday’s game, will be made then.
 
What a moron. Guy just can't get out of his own way.
 
Fucking Dunbar. That dumbshit decision to run the ball out from eight yards deep in the end zone keeps fucking the team.
 

Rook05

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
3,116
Boulder, CO
Pretty amusing the compare the treatment of Randle and Hardy. Both have off field issues, both have are absent from practice without permission...but one's a game changer, and one's not.

ESPN should partner with Jerruh to reboot Playmakers.
 

Bosoxen

Bounced back
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 29, 2005
10,186
I wonder how much their respective contracts and position on the field play into the decision making.
 
(That's a rhetorical question. You don't need to answer it.)
 
But seriously, I'm sure there's a fatigue factor involved, as well. They're both assholes but they may not yet have reached the point where they're sick of Hardy's shit - I'm certain that day will come. It's likely they've reached that point with Randle, however.
 

yecul

appreciates irony very much
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 8, 2001
18,482
You're clearly underplaying Hardy's leadership here. Randle doesn't have that.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,453
deep inside Guido territory
yecul said:
You're clearly underplaying Hardy's leadership here. Randle doesn't have that.
Clearly.  I mean who wouldn't follow Hardy's lead?  Beat a woman, get a year long vacation while getting paid seven figures, then blow up at a superior while your boss lauds your leadership ability.  He's got it made.
 

LondonSox

Robert the Deuce
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
8,956
North Bay California
RedOctober3829 said:
Clearly.  I mean who wouldn't follow Hardy's lead?  Beat a woman, get a year long vacation while getting paid seven figures, then blow up at a superior while your boss lauds your leadership ability.  He's got it made.
And the resultant reaction will totally impact his future behaviour because he ended up getting a contract extension discussion. So the lesson is, act up if you matter or are good

Maybe dez could punch a baby for an extension? Or is that what is in the video and already helped.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
It really pisses me off to see the hit by Heath described as a blind side hit.  I hate the damage of such plays - and I can see the argument of those who say he didn't have much by way of reaction time.  But it was head on, there wasn't much by way of any angle at all, it wasn't a blind side at all.  Heath himself was obviously bothered by the result of the play.  It sucks to me that the hit might be viewed as anything but a devastating but clean hit.
 
If the league wants to outlaw two on one special teams coverage I'm for it to avoid such hits.
 
Am I viewing this from the wrong lens???
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,883
Henderson, NV
RetractableRoof said:
It really pisses me off to see the hit by Heath described as a blind side hit.  I hate the damage of such plays - and I can see the argument of those who say he didn't have much by way of reaction time.  But it was head on, there wasn't much by way of any angle at all, it wasn't a blind side at all.  Heath himself was obviously bothered by the result of the play.  It sucks to me that the hit might be viewed as anything but a devastating but clean hit.
 
If the league wants to outlaw two on one special teams coverage I'm for it to avoid such hits.
 
Am I viewing this from the wrong lens???
 
Nope.  As a Seahawks fan, I totally agree it was not a blindside hit.  Lockette slipped or pulled something trying to get away from the gunners, looked up and saw Heath coming right at him and just reacted by ducking his head.  It was an unfortunate play, but not dirty or illegal at all.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,789
How out there is Hardy's behavior? Jerry Jones put up with Charles Haley calling him Massa Jerry among other crazy shit so I don't see why he would care too much about this stuff
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,477
@RapSheet: PETA contacted DeSoto (TX) Animal Control to request investigation into #Cowboys WR Dez Bryant’s “possible illegal possession” of a monkey

@RapSheet: PETA’s Brittany Peet: “Monkeys belong in the wild—not (for) football players who acquire exotic animals just to make a splash on Instagram.”