2014-15 Champions League: the Quixotic Quest to Qualify

Status
Not open for further replies.

SoxFanInCali

has the rich, deep voice of a god
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 3, 2005
15,602
California. Duh.
lars10 said:
This doesn't even take into account that the player is suspended for the next match as well.  How many teams carry more than two or three keepers?  It seems awfully harsh considering how big an impact a goaltender can have… an almost guaranteed goal, a portion of a game played down a man..and one less sub since you had to sub for the keeper, and another game with your second keeper.  What's even more ridiculous is when the team has to play a field player in net because they're out of subs…seems like there should be another way of doing that.  
Liverpool had to play their 3rd string keeper in an FA Cup semi at Wembley a few years ago thanks to the top 2 being sent off within a week of each other.
 

cgori

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 2, 2004
4,033
SF, CA
As an aside, does anyone with directv have a clever way to record all champions league matches on the DVR? Right now I have to manually record each one but based on the way they categorize the games I can't figure out how to get a "season pass" for them (Europa league same thing).
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,400
Philadelphia
UEFA is going to change the seeding rules for the Champions League next year. Instead of the eight teams with the highest UEFA coefficients, Pot 1 will consist of the winners of the seven biggest leagues (currently England, Spain, Germany, Italy, France, Portugal, and Russia) and the previous years UCL champion. Its not yet clear what happens if, as is likely to happen relatively frequently, the previous years' champion is also a league winner.

The big winners are clubs like Zenit/CSKA, Juventus/Roma, and Porto/Benfica, who will get into Pot 1 by winning their national competitions. Some of these teams - especially the Portuguese ones - currently have high UEFA rankings anyway, largely due to their recent performance in the Europe League. But those rankings were probably not sustainable in the long run so having an auto-entry into Pot 1 is a boon.

The big losers here are clubs in England and Spain, which had been accustomed to having at least two and often three spots in Pot 1. A club like Arsenal would seem to be the biggest loser, given its longtime standing in Pot 1 without having won the league, but Arsenal were quite likely to drop out of Pot 1 anyway next year. Clubs like City and (when they return to the competition) United might be short term beneficiaries, given that their current UEFA coefficients aren't good enough for Pot 1 anyway, but still long term losers.
 
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,854
The other big losers are the Big 4 champions who would have been seeded anyway, because their draw just got potentially much more difficult.  Under the new system, Bayern Munich (ranked 3rd) could draw Barcelona (2nd) or Chelsea (4th) in their group, while the old system prevented that.  One of Real Madrid/Barca is almost guaranteed to not be seeded every single year (unless one wins the league while the other wins the CL) -- those are currently the two highest ranked clubs.  
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,400
Philadelphia
coremiller said:
The other big losers are the Big 4 champions who would have been seeded anyway, because their draw just got potentially much more difficult.  Under the new system, Bayern Munich (ranked 3rd) could draw Barcelona (2nd) or Chelsea (4th) in their group, while the old system prevented that.  One of Real Madrid/Barca is almost guaranteed to not be seeded every single year (unless one wins the league while the other wins the CL) -- those are currently the two highest ranked clubs.  
 
Yup, definitely true.  Assuming that at some point Manchester United becomes a top team again, you're likely to have a situation in which Pot 2 regularly includes 2/3 of the United/City/Chelsea trio, one of Barca/Real, and one of Bayern/Dortmund (most likely Dortmund obviously).  One of those teams may be bumped to Pot 1 due to the identity of the previous year's champion but that is still a pretty tough "core" within Pot 2.
 
Edit: Looking closer, Dortmund and Schalke are among the bigger losers as well.  Their recent successes had them well positioned to become Pot 1 teams in the future but now they'll have to beat Bayern in the league to get there.
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,854
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
 
Yup, definitely true.  Assuming that at some point Manchester United becomes a top team again, you're likely to have a situation in which Pot 2 regularly includes 2/3 of the United/City/Chelsea trio, one of Barca/Real, and one of Bayern/Dortmund (most likely Dortmund obviously).  One of those teams may be bumped to Pot 1 due to the identity of the previous year's champion but that is still a pretty tough "core" within Pot 2.
 
Edit: Looking closer, Dortmund and Schalke are among the bigger losers as well.  Their recent successes had them well positioned to become Pot 1 teams in the future but now they'll have to beat Bayern in the league to get there.
 
It's quite possible that in many years Pot 2 will actually be stronger than Pot 1.
 
Average coefficient of 2014 hypothetical Pot 1 teams (Top 7 winners + holder): 12.375
Average coefficient of 2014 hypothetical Pot 2 teams (8 highest ranked teams in the competition that did not win their league): 10
 

Infield Infidel

teaching korea american
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,463
Meeting Place, Canada
It's not that bad for the teams in Pot 2, since, say, the English non-champs avoid one of Real/Barca, one of Dortmund/Bayern, and also have a 1/7 or 1/6 shot at being in a group headed by Zenit/CSKA, depending on if the previous champs were English. 
 
edit- However, if Barca/Real/Bayern/Dortmund win it, those countries would be the only ones with two teams in Pot 1. English teams will certainly be hoping a fellow EPL team wins it. 
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
UEFA is going to change the seeding rules for the Champions League next year. Instead of the eight teams with the highest UEFA coefficients, Pot 1 will consist of the winners of the seven biggest leagues (currently England, Spain, Germany, Italy, France, Portugal, and Russia) and the previous years UCL champion. Its not yet clear what happens if, as is likely to happen relatively frequently, the previous years' champion is also a league winner.

The big winners are clubs like Zenit/CSKA, Juventus/Roma, and Porto/Benfica, who will get into Pot 1 by winning their national competitions. Some of these teams - especially the Portuguese ones - currently have high UEFA rankings anyway, largely due to their recent performance in the Europe League. But those rankings were probably not sustainable in the long run so having an auto-entry into Pot 1 is a boon.

The big losers here are clubs in England and Spain, which had been accustomed to having at least two and often three spots in Pot 1. A club like Arsenal would seem to be the biggest loser, given its longtime standing in Pot 1 without having won the league, but Arsenal were quite likely to drop out of Pot 1 anyway next year. Clubs like City and (when they return to the competition) United might be short term beneficiaries, given that their current UEFA coefficients aren't good enough for Pot 1 anyway, but still long term losers.
 
 
I'm calling this the Wenger Rule.
 
Even as an Arsenal fan, I love the proposed changes. They take the competition back slightly in the direction of being a "Champions League" again...and if that means some teams get screwed in the group stage draw every year, well, in the old European Cup the two best teams in Europe could draw each other in the first round, with one of them getting knocked out before October. Which, coincidentally, can still happen in domestic competitions like the FA Cup all across Europe every year; the chaotic nature of cup draws is a historical part of football/soccer, and these changes should make the group stage much more watchable.
 

coremiller

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
5,854
ConigliarosPotential said:
Even as an Arsenal fan, I love the proposed changes. They take the competition back slightly in the direction of being a "Champions League" again...and if that means some teams get screwed in the group stage draw every year, well, in the old European Cup the two best teams in Europe could draw each other in the first round, with one of them getting knocked out before October. Which, coincidentally, can still happen in domestic competitions like the FA Cup all across Europe every year; the chaotic nature of cup draws is a historical part of football/soccer, and these changes should make the group stage much more watchable.
 
I don't find "but tradition!" to be a compelling argument with the European Cup. which existed for less than 40 years in its original incarnation.  Besides the fairness issue for particular clubs (which I think is legitimate), an unbalanced draw hinders the goal of having the best team win.  The FA Cup is a bit different, as the tradition argument there has real force (it's been basically the same since the 1860s) and the goal isn't really to determine the best team (we have league play for that).  The European Cup winner can call itself Champion of Europe, the FA Cup winner is not Champion of England.
 
Even from an entertainment perspective, the result of an unbalanced draw usually ends up being much less interesting late-stage knockout games.  Remember when, due to some upsets and a favorable draw,  Man Utd throttled an overwhelmed Schalke 6-1 in the 2011 semifinals?  An unbalanced draw will give you more of that.  I'll trade a boring group stage for good semifinals every time.  Nobody in their right mind thinks Federer and Nadal should play in the second round in order to spice up the first week of Wimbledon.
 
coremiller said:
 
I don't find "but tradition!" to be a compelling argument with the European Cup. which existed for less than 40 years in its original incarnation.  Besides the fairness issue for particular clubs (which I think is legitimate), an unbalanced draw hinders the goal of having the best team win.  The FA Cup is a bit different, as the tradition argument there has real force (it's been basically the same since the 1860s) and the goal isn't really to determine the best team (we have league play for that).  The European Cup winner can call itself Champion of Europe, the FA Cup winner is not Champion of England.
 
Even from an entertainment perspective, the result of an unbalanced draw usually ends up being much less interesting late-stage knockout games.  Remember when, due to some upsets and a favorable draw,  Man Utd throttled an overwhelmed Schalke 6-1 in the 2011 semifinals?  An unbalanced draw will give you more of that.  I'll trade a boring group stage for good semifinals every time.  Nobody in their right mind thinks Federer and Nadal should play in the second round in order to spice up the first week of Wimbledon.
 
These are great arguments, but ultimately I think this is largely a matter of personal taste. Personally, I'd love to see Federer and Nadal get drawn against each other in the first round of Wimbledon, because sport is ultimately about entertainment more than it is about merit; if the latter were true, you'd probably re-seed the draw after every round of Wimbledon to help ensure that the best two players remaining in the field always had the best chance of reaching the final. Upsets happen, and some teams will have easier or harder paths to the final; that's just the nature of knockout competitions. And wouldn't the World Cup be a tad boring without at least one "Group of Death" to spice things up?
 
One point re: "Champion of Europe": the Champions League winner isn't "the best team in Europe" any more than the World Cup winner is "the best national side in the world", or the Super Bowl winner is "the best team in the NFL". The Champions League winner deserves to be crowned "Champion of Europe", but to me that means something different than saying "if the 2013-14 Champions League had been held 1,000 times, Real Madrid would have won it more often than any other club". Sometimes the best team clearly does win, but I wouldn't enjoy sport nearly as much as I do if it always won.
 

fletcherpost

sosh's feckin' poet laureate
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,187
Glasgow, Scotland
City got jipped there with the penalty, but what was Yaya doing with the back heel flick in the middle of the park?
 
And it's a disgrace that City weren't able to take travelling fans to the game.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,400
Philadelphia
Well, City went into this match knowing that there was a good chance they'd have to beat Roma away to advance...and now they almost definitely have to beat Roma to advance.  They just have to hope that Roma doesn't get a result against Bayern later today as that would really put them behind the 8 ball.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,400
Philadelphia
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
Well, City went into this match knowing that there was a good chance they'd have to beat Roma away to advance...and now they almost definitely have to beat Roma to advance.  They just have to hope that Roma doesn't get a result against Bayern later today as that would really put them behind the 8 ball.
 
Bayern is up 5-0 after 36 minutes in Rome.  Didn't see that one coming.
 

Vinho Tinto

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 9, 2003
7,070
Auburn, MA
[SIZE=13.63636302948px]Sporting was down 3-1 and playing with ten men, but fought back to tie the match at 3. That was until the ref gave Schalke a penalty because Sporting's defender handled a Huntelaar header with his face. 4-3 final.  [/SIZE][SIZE=13.63636302948px] [/SIZE]
 

SoxFanInCali

has the rich, deep voice of a god
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 3, 2005
15,602
California. Duh.
PedroSpecialK said:
Mignolet is really trying my patience. He has no idea when to come off his line, ever
While that's true, I don't think there is much he could have done on that Benzema header.
 
Yeah, our defense is scary, but Real have scored twice on world class finishes.
 

PedroSpecialK

Comes at you like a tornado of hair and the NHL sa
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2004
27,169
Cambridge, MA
SoxFanInCali said:
While that's true, I don't think there is much he could have done on that Benzema header.
 
Yeah, our defense is scary, but Real have scored twice on world class finishes.
 
Ok this time...
 

fletcherpost

sosh's feckin' poet laureate
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,187
Glasgow, Scotland
Liverpool's defense is a fuckin mess. No one knows what they're doing. No one has any confidence. And they're not closing down around the box. The worst thing you can give quality players is time. Problem is, quite a few big teams are looking for a quality central defense.
 

SoxFanInCali

has the rich, deep voice of a god
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 3, 2005
15,602
California. Duh.
fletcherpost said:
Liverpool's defense is a fuckin mess. No one knows what they're doing. No one has any confidence. And they're not closing down around the box. The worst thing you can give quality players is time. Problem is, quite a few big teams are looking for a quality central defense.
I actually think Lovren can be pretty good. The biggest problem is Mignolet, he doesn't seem to communicate very well and the defenders never know if he's going to come off the line or not.
 

BRS BC

New Member
Feb 26, 2007
97
I think Johnson is pretty bad too. Certainly on the Benzema goal he was terrible. He has plenty of time to get tight to Benzema and just doesn't.
 

fletcherpost

sosh's feckin' poet laureate
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,187
Glasgow, Scotland
I hope Lovren is gonna get better. But he's been dropped in the deep end and so far he hasn't risen to the challenge. A great team needs a great spine. The goalie and the two central defenders are the bedrock of a good solid team, add in a quality holding midfielder and you're on your way. It's not a great mystery. If you can't buy all the big players like Real then you have to be canny.
 
I remember when Utd bought Pallister, for a big price at the time, he came from a small club, but he rose to the challenge. Same with Rio when he went to Leeds, wasn't too long before Utd broke the bank for him. Lovren has to embrace this opprtunity.
 
I agree mignolet is a bust. If he can't marshall the defense it all goes to pot. QPR carved Liverpool open several times on Sunday. Maybe its for the bestin the long run that we get to see Liverpool sans Suarez and Sturridge and see what those guys papered over. At least Sterling is the real deal, he oozes class, he's got that nasty edge too.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,400
Philadelphia
Cazorla misses a golden chance.  He's not doing much to show me that he should be starting over Ox, or Walcott for that matter pretty soon.
 
Dortmund is 3-0 up on Galatasaray so even if Arsenal squeek a win here our chances of finishing first in the group are very slim.  They're going to be way ahead of us on goal differential so we'd probably need to win all our remaining games (including vs BvB at Emirates) and have them slip up at home against Gala or Anderlecht.
 

blueguitar322

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
1,104
Pro: 1-2 Arsenal!
Con: Podolski was the one who scored, and the camera immediately went to Wenger, who was scowling, thinking "drat, now I have to play him more often"
 

SoxFanInCali

has the rich, deep voice of a god
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 3, 2005
15,602
California. Duh.
PedroSpecialK said:
Ludogorets scores!!!!!!!!
That's huge.  I was just hoping for a draw, this is better.
 
Of course, Liverpool have to actually win their games against both teams for it to matter.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,400
Philadelphia
Some critical CL matches today and tomorrow.  I'm sure most of us will be watching Liverpool-Madrid or Arsenal-Anderlecht, but its the other matches that seem more important in terms of qualification.
 
-Leverkusen are now 2-0 up on Zenit.  A win here virtually clinches qualification and makes them huge favorites to win the group.  We're likely to see four German teams in the round of 16, and probably three going there as group winners.
 
-That result helps keep Benfica alive.  They only have one point from three matches but if they can beat Monaco today, then they've still got a real chance to qualify, especially as they could face a Leverkusen squad at home on the last matchday that had already locked up first place in the group.
 
-Juventus is facing an almost must-win against Olympiacos at home.  If they draw here, they go into the final two matches, including one against Atleti, needing to make up three points on the Greeks. 
 
-Basel-Ludogorets might be interesting as neither club is particularly dynamic in attack but both really need a win to have a good chance of qualifying from the group.
 
-Arsenal's group is by far the most boring at this point.  A Dortmund win today virtually assures them of first place while anything but a loss virtually assures Arsenal of qualification in second.
 

SoxFanInCali

has the rich, deep voice of a god
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 3, 2005
15,602
California. Duh.
Skrtel just did his best to give Real the lead, but they put it over the bar.
 
This is going to be a very long 80 minutes.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,400
Philadelphia
Arsenal have had a couple great chances but also a couple bad giveaways that a better opponent would have done better with on the break.  In other words, par for the course.
 
Ox really needs to improve his final ball to turn into a top player.  If he was a little sharper and more composed in picking passes in the box, he'd be deadly. 
 

SoxFanInCali

has the rich, deep voice of a god
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jun 3, 2005
15,602
California. Duh.
I will say that it's nice to see that Liverpool aren't just sitting back and defending, they are still trying to get forward when they can.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.