2013 Jets: Rex back for 2014

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,345
Philadelphia
soxfan121 said:
 
Idzik would be wise to admit his mistake and draft another QB. He won't get fired for that until the 2nd guy fails. If GENO doesn't improve, he's fired after next year anyway.
 
I don't think Geno is really "Idzik's guy" at all.  They drafted him largely because he fell in the draft and their QB situation was so bad that it made sense to take a gamble on him and see what he had.  They didn't draft him in the first or aggressively move up when it looked like another team might grab him at the top of the second, so I don't see much real commitment to him.  And they're paying him relative peanuts, like all non first round picks.
 
Stitch01 said:
I still think its too early to completely write off Smith, his upside is way better than someone like Sanchez, but its a pretty big mistake to keep running him out there at this point this season.
 
It may be too early to completely write him off but the early returns are pretty awful.  He is throwing interceptions or fumbling on over 7% of his times handling the ball (passes, sacks, runs combined), which is shockingly bad.  I'd be interested to know whether any QB has ever turned the ball over at that rate in their rookie year and gone on to have success.  I looked at both Peyton and Eli, two notorious cases of turnover prone rookie QBs, and Peyton was around 5% and Eli was around 6% in limited action.
 
Geno's supposed strengths, at least from a statistical standpoint, are also starting to disappear.  His completion percentage and YPA have been falling for weeks and seem likely to eventually converge on Sanchez levels given that he's got the cold weather portion of the season yet to play.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
If I were running a shitty NFL team I'd draft QBs in round one or two or three every year until I hit a home run. The position's value is so high (and the value of a good QB on a rookie deal so incredibly high) that it's worth burning picks on that position. 
 
What should be disconcerting about Smith's performance of late is that now that we're into the second half of the season and every team knows essentially what every other team is going to try to do he can't adjust: now that teams have figured out the fake read-option plays and which routes he likes to throw to he can't adjust.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,089
A Scud Away from Hell
This post actually exists. I almost spit out my coffee all over my keyboard. And last coffee I had was 2 days ago: http://www.jetsinsider.com/forums/threads/261544-Tom-Brady
 
This looks liek it's shaping up for some real off-season drama. 
 
Tom knows he probably won't get another ring in NE, but what a hero would he be to get his last ring with his hometown NEW YORK JETS!!!
 
Here's where it's interesting! BB sees what kind of upside Geno has, as well as the shocking electricity SIMMS brings in, with that Pedigree and ARM! BB can get it done with anyone and he knows this. His relationship w Tom is waning after he duped him with the contract and we all know how that goes!
 
Maybe we're gonna see a package deal of Geno/Simms or Simms/Sanchez, and maybe something like Ed Reed or a mid-round pick (Tampa's 3rd perhaps? HMMMM!) for Tom, who would then be reuinited with Sudfield and backed by a Rex Ryan Defense that he'd never have to face again! 
 
The next post completes it - doesn't matter if it was sarcastic or serious:
 
There's no way this isn't happening. It all just makes too much sense.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,694
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
 
I don't think Geno is really "Idzik's guy" at all.  They drafted him largely because he fell in the draft and their QB situation was so bad that it made sense to take a gamble on him and see what he had.  They didn't draft him in the first or aggressively move up when it looked like another team might grab him at the top of the second, so I don't see much real commitment to him.  And they're paying him relative peanuts, like all non first round picks.
 
 
It may be too early to completely write him off but the early returns are pretty awful.  He is throwing interceptions or fumbling on over 7% of his times handling the ball (passes, sacks, runs combined), which is shockingly bad.  I'd be interested to know whether any QB has ever turned the ball over at that rate in their rookie year and gone on to have success.  I looked at both Peyton and Eli, two notorious cases of turnover prone rookie QBs, and Peyton was around 5% and Eli was around 6% in limited action.
 
Geno's supposed strengths, at least from a statistical standpoint, are also starting to disappear.  His completion percentage and YPA have been falling for weeks and seem likely to eventually converge on Sanchez levels given that he's got the cold weather portion of the season yet to play.
 
Who knows who is whose guy, I think the idea Geno is the Idzik guy is not just that he drafted him but that supposedly he was pushing for him to start over Sanchez during the pre-season.  The sign of a smart organization is that there's no such thing as a favorite, just cold-blooded evaluation of what's best for the team. And, as you indicate, that may be the case here: Idzik didn't reach for Geno and pushing for him over Sanchez is only a stretch in Rex Ryan land where there is precisely that sort of outsized loyalty to his guy. I do think they should sit Geno for a bit both to let things calm down for him and because they are in a playoff race and Simms looks like a competent back-up type. I also agree that they should keep going to the QB well on draft day. That said, as awful as Geno is he's also a rookie with a bad cast around him who has shown flashes that, for example, Mark Sanchez never did -- I'm not sure he's hopeless yet.
 

RFDA2000

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 16, 2005
367
Idzik absolutely should have been pushing for Geno to start whether he thinks he's the answer or not. Sanchez was not part of the Jets' long term plans, and they needed to evaluate Geno before this next class of QBs comes out. Maybe work him in part way through the season, but you would have had to be crazy, from an organizational standpoint, to start Sanchez all season long. Geno starting now has no relationship to how Idzik feels about him long term IMO.
 

crystalline

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 12, 2009
5,771
JP
The knock on Geno before the draft was that he didn't have a good work ethic, and wouldn't improve.

That may be what we are seeing here. If so the Jets need to move on.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
70,716
Ed Reed's teams are now 0-9 in games he's played this year, no idea why they benched Antonio Allen for him except pure nostalgia by Rex. 
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,089
A Scud Away from Hell
tims4wins said:
How long can Rex pull off his whole "offense isn't my responsibility" schtick and get away with it?
 
Longer than you'd think. Very few HCs are good at both sides of the ball.
 
Having said that, his input on the entire roster is on his back. But I think he's back next year. 
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,694
It's not to say that HCs are generally equally good on both sides of the ball to observe that I've never seen a head coach get away with washing his hands of one side of the ball in the way that Rex does...and get away with it.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Tony C said:
It's not to say that HCs are generally equally good on both sides of the ball to observe that I've never seen a head coach get away with washing his hands of one side of the ball in the way that Rex does...and get away with it.
 
Mike McCarthy and Sean Payton say hello, and offer you a glass of Chablis while you wait.
 

JMDurron

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
5,127
An emphasis on the side of the ball that the current NFL rules are designed to enable?
 
I think that's actually the root cause of what you were referring to, anyway. 
 

Salva135

Cassandra
Oct 19, 2008
1,568
Boston
Ralphwiggum said:
This team somehow beat the Pats and the Saints.
And that's enough for a lot of Jet fans to scream extension.  ESPN pegged them at 32 in the preseason power rankings, they've won 5 games, so Rex is working on his Coach of the Year speech.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
( . ) ( . ) and (_!_) said:
I know what are you saying. But what do McCarthy and Payton have that Rex doesn't?
 
Above average coordinators tending their "bad" side of the ball? 
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
JMDurron said:
An emphasis on the side of the ball that the current NFL rules are designed to enable?
 
I think that's actually the root cause of what you were referring to, anyway. 
 
Actually, this is a better answer.
 

simplyeric

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 14, 2006
14,037
Richmond, VA
Shelterdog said:
If I were running a shitty NFL team I'd draft QBs in round one or two or three every year until I hit a home run. The position's value is so high (and the value of a good QB on a rookie deal so incredibly high) that it's worth burning picks on that position. 
 
What should be disconcerting about Smith's performance of late is that now that we're into the second half of the season and every team knows essentially what every other team is going to try to do he can't adjust: now that teams have figured out the fake read-option plays and which routes he likes to throw to he can't adjust.
Why not one AND two AMD three? Like BB drafting TE's!

I feel like it would make more sense to use the 1st on other high talent, like defense or o-line, and use the second round to try to luck into something at QB. First round QB would be too expensive to just consistently gamble on unless
A. You are doing well spinning off your middling qb's for draft picks a couple years later
Or b. someone really dynamic falls in the draft so you're getting a high upside pick.
Which is basically what Geno is, no?
 

NatetheGreat

New Member
Aug 27, 2007
619
It strikes me as almost inevitable that the Jets will continue to suck at least through next year, only to end up drafting Johnny Manziel.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,694
( . ) ( . ) and (_!_) said:
I know what are you saying. But what do McCarthy and Payton have that Rex doesn't?
 
And the correct answer, is, Alex:  A Super Bowl ring.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
McCarthy is godawful on both sides of the ball and should deposit like 70% of his paycheck directly into Rodgers bank account.  Awful in game decision maker and his team has completely collapsed.  Rex is a better head coach, but that's not a high bar to clear.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,694
I don't know enough about McCarthy to comment, frankly. The point is that Rex Ryan is a career .500 coach with 2 Wild Card appearances with teams that have overspent on groceries and who, by all accounts, have given him considerable input on how to spend that grocery money, including on Sanchez and including picking Sparano as his OC. He has some great qualities -- as a DC and as a motivator -- and some very bad qualities -- particularly on the offensive side of the ball and in terms of having teams that seem to play on an emotional roller coaster, with the requisite dips. As with anything, if it works you're bullet-proof. When it doesn't, it's a cop-out to say that he doesn't control the offensive side of the ball -- he's the head coach.
 
I'm happy to have the Jets keep him -- he's both entertaining and an overall .500-ish mediocrity who will soon more be known for his teams' late season collapses rather than squeaking into the playoffs twice and winning games once in the playoffs. But if I'm Idzik I'm moving on and I frankly don't see the argument for keeping him. Yes there are worse coaches. But, yes, the Jets can do much better, as well. Why stick to what hasn't worked?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
BigSoxFan said:
Geno Smith never had a high upside. He was a "name" putting up fluff stats in a garbage conference.
 
Forget the stats look at the player.  He's a good athlete with a really good arm so I for one can see the upside.  The question is whether he can learn an NFL offense, read a defense, maintain poise, maintain throwing technique, make great decisions, etc.  Those were all in doubt because he did play in a funky offense in a grabage conference but that doesn't mea it was known whether he could learn those skills are not.
 
The early results are fucking terrible but there's enough raw talent there to think that he had (and may even still have) high upside.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,089
A Scud Away from Hell
SeoulSoxFan said:
Projecting future games - assuming Geno continues his up/down pattern:
  • vs Pitt: W (4-2)
  • vs NE: W (5-2)
  • at Cincy: L (5-3)
  • vs NO: L (5-4)
  • at Buff: W (6-4)
  • at Balt: L (6-5)
  • vs Miami: W (7-5)
  • vs Oak: W (8-5)
  • at Car: L (8-6)
  • vs Clev: W (9-6)
  • at Miami: L (9-7)
Finishes 9-7, misses the PO by a game/tie-breaker. Rex is retained amid renewed hope. 
 
Frankly, best possible scenario for Pats fans.
 
Let's see how this prediction is working out almost 2 months later:
  • vs Pitt: W (4-2) > LOSS (3-3)
  • vs NE: W (5-2) > WIN (4-3)
  • at Cincy: L (5-3) > LOSS (4-4)
  • vs NO: L (5-4) > WIN (5-4)
  • at Buff: W (6-4) > LOSS (5-5)
  • at Balt: L (6-5) > LOSS (5-6)
  • vs Miami: W (7-5) > LOSS (5-7)
The two divisional losses at Buffalo and at home to Miami are real killers. And for upcoming games, I'll stick with the original prediction (updated W-L record):
  • vs Oak: W (6-7): Raiders travelling to Jersey for an early 1pm game is just the ticket to break the losing streak
  • at Car: L (6-8): Another road blowout loss seems inevitable
  • vs Clev: W (7-8): Weeden is not beating the Jets on the road
  • at Miami: L (7-9): Miami always plays well vs. Jets at home, playoff-hunting or not
So a lot closer to my original camp prediction of 6-10 than the more optimistic 9-7 record that happened right after the Falcons win. 
 
7-9 should net somewhere in the 11th~16th pick range, where Idzik will be pressured to either pick another QB, or at a skilled position. 
 
A middling record, no playoffs, and a genuine QB crisis is a pretty good early gift from Santa. 
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,694
That sounds about right, and is almost an ideal scenario. QB crisis and not a high enough pick to choose an elite QB prospect (but Johnny Football may be there, raising the Russell Wilson comparisons based on Idzik's Seattle connection), along with gaping holes all over the offensive side of the ball and secondary issues on the defensive side.
 
The only thing that has really gone right has been Sheldon Richardson looking like an elite pairing w/ Wilkerson.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Tony C said:
I don't know enough about McCarthy to comment, frankly. The point is that Rex Ryan is a career .500 coach with 2 Wild Card appearances with teams that have overspent on groceries and who, by all accounts, have given him considerable input on how to spend that grocery money, including on Sanchez and including picking Sparano as his OC. He has some great qualities -- as a DC and as a motivator -- and some very bad qualities -- particularly on the offensive side of the ball and in terms of having teams that seem to play on an emotional roller coaster, with the requisite dips. As with anything, if it works you're bullet-proof. When it doesn't, it's a cop-out to say that he doesn't control the offensive side of the ball -- he's the head coach.
 
I'm happy to have the Jets keep him -- he's both entertaining and an overall .500-ish mediocrity who will soon more be known for his teams' late season collapses rather than squeaking into the playoffs twice and winning games once in the playoffs. But if I'm Idzik I'm moving on and I frankly don't see the argument for keeping him. Yes there are worse coaches. But, yes, the Jets can do much better, as well. Why stick to what hasn't worked?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Just meant it as more of a tangent about McCarthy being really, really horrible and a decent data point that coaches worse than Rex have won Super Bowls and that the Jets have a real chance of changing to someone who is a downgrade at head coach.
 
McCarthy is a hot button for me, I sort of like the Packers and think they have massively underachieved under his watch.  Kicking a short FG in OT on the first possession against Minnesota wasGrady/Pedro level bad (lesser stakes, obviously).  Like bad enough that you could fire him simply based on what that decision says about his in-game decision making skills almost regardless of anything else.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,694
 
Section15Box113 said:
Oh, I'm sore-y. We needed your response in the form of a question.
 
:)
 
and this from a guy who has been known to scream "moron" at guys who forget that...d'oh!
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,089
A Scud Away from Hell
Tony C said:
That sounds about right, and is almost an ideal scenario. QB crisis and not a high enough pick to choose an elite QB prospect (but Johnny Football may be there, raising the Russell Wilson comparisons based on Idzik's Seattle connection), along with gaping holes all over the offensive side of the ball and secondary issues on the defensive side.
 
The only thing that has really gone right has been Sheldon Richardson looking like an elite pairing w/ Wilkerson.
 
I'd be shocked to see JF get drafted by the Jets, although that's indeed the dream scenario. A shiny prize like WR Mike Evans (6-5, 255lbs) would be a plausible non-QB pick. 
 
The player I'm really jealous of is Damon Harrison, who went undrafted in 2012 and has been really stout at nose. I thought he benefited from the stud linemates but he also beats a lot of gaps by himself. 
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
SeoulSoxFan said:
 
Let's see how this prediction is working out almost 2 months later:
  • vs Pitt: W (4-2) > LOSS (3-3)
  • vs NE: W (5-2) > WIN (4-3)
  • at Cincy: L (5-3) > LOSS (4-4)
  • vs NO: L (5-4) > WIN (5-4)
  • at Buff: W (6-4) > LOSS (5-5)
  • at Balt: L (6-5) > LOSS (5-6)
  • vs Miami: W (7-5) > LOSS (5-7)
The two divisional losses at Buffalo and at home to Miami are real killers. And for upcoming games, I'll stick with the original prediction (updated W-L record):
  • vs Oak: W (6-7): Raiders travelling to Jersey for an early 1pm game is just the ticket to break the losing streak
  • at Car: L (6-8): Another road blowout loss seems inevitable
  • vs Clev: W (7-8): Weeden is not beating the Jets on the road
  • at Miami: L (7-9): Miami always plays well vs. Jets at home, playoff-hunting or not
So a lot closer to my original camp prediction of 6-10 than the more optimistic 9-7 record that happened right after the Falcons win. 
 
7-9 should net somewhere in the 11th~16th pick range, where Idzik will be pressured to either pick another QB, or at a skilled position. 
 
A middling record, no playoffs, and a genuine QB crisis is a pretty good early gift from Santa. 
 
5-11 is more likely than 7-9.  How exactly are the Jets scoring over 10 points this week?  The offense is utterly broken and Smith is starting again.
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,089
A Scud Away from Hell
BTW, 2014 QB FA list is pretty bleak: http://www.kffl.com/static/nfl/features/freeagents/fa.php?y=2014
 
Bears aren't letting Cutler walk, and best chance for a vet pickup would be Josh McCown. 
 
As Shelter mentioned upthread, Jets will have some money to spend, and if Idzik is smart (and he is), he'll do the following:
  • Extend Wilkerson and Kerley
  • Cut Cromartie ($9.5m cap hit - ouch!) and Holmes ($8.3 - double ouch)
  • Keep David Harris ($5m)
That leaves about $20m in cap space more or less, accounting for the $ needed for 2014 draft ($2m+). To fill the biggest holes via FA, do one of :
  • Get a #1 WR by making a huge push for Eric Decker
  • Kick the tires on Hakeem Nicks and Emmanuel Sanders
  • Make a double-move with overpaying Edelman as slot WR
  • Get a Geno binkie by getting Pitta
And one of:
  • Instantly upgrade the safety spot by signing FS Jairus Byrd
  • Steal #1 back Talib away from Pats
  • Get vet LB/leader in London Fletcher
And of course, sign UFA Bernard Pollard for the ultimate FU move. 
 

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,089
A Scud Away from Hell
Stitch01 said:
5-11 is more likely than 7-9.  How exactly are the Jets scoring over 10 points this week?  The offense is utterly broken and Smith is starting again.
 
Sure, but Jets could win 10-9 ;)
 
Jets front-seven can handle the #10 rushing DVOA, and Raiders are #28 in passing DVOA. Cross-country travels for Oakland + home game means Jets are 3 or 3.5 points favorites.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
Right now Im seeing Oakland +2.5 with extra juice on the Jets, and the o/u is 40.5
 
Count me in to hammer this under and take Oakland and the points and money line and in every teaser imaginable.  Jets giving points to anyone right now is insane.  I think they're going to be 32nd in weighted offensive DVOA this week
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
SeoulSoxFan said:
 
 
  • vs Oak: W (6-7): Raiders travelling to Jersey for an early 1pm game is just the ticket to break the losing streak
  • at Car: L (6-8): Another road blowout loss seems inevitable
  • vs Clev: W (7-8): Weeden is not beating the Jets on the road
  • at Miami: L (7-9): Miami always plays well vs. Jets at home, playoff-hunting or not
So a lot closer to my original camp prediction of 6-10 than the more optimistic 9-7 record that happened right after the Falcons win. 
 
I've seen bits and pieces of their last few games - if they win again, I'll be really surprised. They sold themselves on a shot at the playoffs a few weeks back (mistakenly) and then let GENO have too much rope, which he has fashioned into a noose that he has hung himself with, leaving them Matt Simms. I might prefer Chris Simms or Phil Simms. They're not going to score and all four teams left on the schedule can score, even with their own QB issues. If they lose to Oakland, they lose out - Carolina will demoralize them and Cleveland has Josh Gordon and frisky defense. 
 
I also think Miami's gonna get the 6 spot, which I would have NEVER thought possible a month ago. The Jets were fucked the moment Sanchez decided on surgery AFTER they put him on IR-return. Had he not gotten the surgery, he'd likely be back starting at QB and he'd be a massive upgrade on what GENO has been giving them. Think about that for a moment.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,345
Philadelphia

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,089
A Scud Away from Hell
Morgan's Magic Snowplow said:
That video is brutal and its not particularly unfair. Geno's last 4-5 games is one of the worst extended stretches of QB play that I've ever witnessed. This is not even Sanchez-level bad, its 1998 Ryan Leaf bad.
 
That's why every Jets game has been a must-see game for me (not that I would miss any). The problem is he has progressively gotten worse both in his decision making and his throws. 
 
You'd think he and his receivers will be more on page as games pass by, but it's been just the opposite. A lot of crossed reads, WRs standing in one spot while ball sails 10 yards the other way, as well as the sideline throws (those have been particularly awful) that just have no chance of being caught. 
 
Words like bewildered, overwhelmed, shell-shocked come to mind. He's literally playing to the level of the pre-season games that got him one bone-headed Rex decision away from getting red-shirted for the year. 
 

OCST

Sunny von Bulow
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2004
24,483
The 718
I am trying to think of another NFL unit in my football watching history as inept as the 2013 Jets offense, and I can't.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,694
Not sure of the NY Post/Brian Costello's reliability, but Costello's sure not a big believer in the Rex didn't buy the groceries excuse for the offense

 
Ryan has had a huge say in personnel during his time here. One of the biggest criticisms of former general manager Mike Tannenbaum was he gave Ryan too much say in picking the players. Things don’t appear to have changed under John Idzik either. The Jets selected two defensive players in the first round of April’s draft, and they signed a washed-up Ed Reed three weeks ago because Ryan loves the guy.
...
But Ryan is like the guy who keeps fixing up his pool while the foundation of his house is crumbling. The Jets have not used a first-round pick on an offensive player since Mark Sanchez in 2009.
Anyone who questions Ryan’s influence in the draft room should read the new book “Collision Low Crossers” by Nicholas Dawidoff, who spent a year with the Jets and had tremendous access. In 2011, the Jets were preparing to make their final pick of the draft. The scouts wanted linebacker Nick Bellore. Ryan, Tannenbaum and top advisor Terry Bradway left the room. When they returned, Tannenbaum announced they were drafting wide receiver Scotty McKnight, who the scouts did not have a draftable grade on but was Sanchez’s childhood friend. Ryan had promised Sanchez he would take him and wanted to keep his word, infuriating the scouts.
You can blame Tannenbaum and Idzik for giving Ryan too much power, but don’t excuse Ryan for what this offense has become.
 
 
http://nypost.com/2013/12/04/rex-ryan-has-contributed-to-jets-offensive-woes/