Offseason Rumors/News

Status
Not open for further replies.

Smokey Joe

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2001
1,169
If the lakers send AD to the nets for KD, suddenly there are a whole lot of center minutes available there.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,739
If the lakers send AD to the nets for KD, suddenly there are a whole lot of center minutes available there.
Given his injury history.. which place are you referring to?

Or is that a joke you’re making?
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,250
Is Ayton's situation tied into the durant stuff?
Yes, i guess he could walk to San Antonio, or maybe Houston and just sign for as much money as they have available (or max cap, whatever is less)

But basically it seems like he and the league are waiting around to see what NJ does. Certainly possible an opportunity opens up that is more appealing to him. I do wonder how long people are going to wait, because it could happen this evening, or Nets could just decide they won't deal him
 

ElUno20

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
6,121
Yes, i guess he could walk to San Antonio, or maybe Houston and just sign for as much money as they have available (or max cap, whatever is less)

But basically it seems like he and the league are waiting around to see what NJ does. Certainly possible an opportunity opens up that is more appealing to him. I do wonder how long people are going to wait, because it could happen this evening, or Nets could just decide they won't deal him
I see. So his motivation is he probably prefers playing in BK to whatever is left on the table. Makes sense.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
TJ Warren for the vet minimum is such a good get by BRK
Does Draft Kings have a wager up yet for "Who will play more games for Brooklyn, Ben Simmons or TJ Warren?" yet? I might not bet against Warren. Because I think he can break the ten game barrier.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Is it terrible that I’m rooting for Irving and Durant to end up in Cleveland for Love, LaVert, Markkanen, and Garland?
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,180
Imaginationland
TJ Warren for the vet minimum is such a good get by BRK
Hard to be unhappy with that potential on a minimum contract, but them quadrupling down on a guy who barely plays isn't really ideal, imo. Their top 4 (assuming it includes Warren) has averaged 30 (Durant), 34 (Kyrie), 38 (Simmons) and 24 (Warren) games in each of the last 3 seasons. This makes the Clippers core with Kawhi and George look dependable.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
Had a feeling that was coming. At the minimum it is going to be really tough for a young guy (and his agent) not to follow the minutes. Even though the Celtics do have time available for this role there is little hope for starting without injuries.

Warren was never signing here with two elite wings in front of him and an unclear role.

There are still guys out there at both spots. And maybe things will pick up a bit with the KD/KI business cooling.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,645

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
63,942
Rotten Apple
Zero Dark KD
Kevin Durant Trade Rumors: Nets SF Has ‘Gone Dark’ as Numerous Stars Have Reached Out
It appears Brooklyn Nets star Kevin Durant isn’t interested in hearing pitches from other stars around the NBA after requesting a trade last month.
Various stars have attempted to get in touch with Durant to try to “get a sense of what he’s thinking,” according to Chris Haynes of Yahoo Sports, but the veteran “has gone dark” and isn’t speaking with anyone who’s outside his “inner circle.”
https://newsupdate.uk/kevin-durant-trade-rumors-nets-sf-has-gone-dark-as-numerous-stars-have-reached-out/
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
View: https://twitter.com/ekoreen/status/1544780747919204352


Well Kurucs is going to SL with the Jazz, so that gives a pretty good indication how much teams/the league cares.
Not necessarily. It sounds like their due diligence could have shown no pattern of this behavior. Whereas the Hornets apparently knew about Bridges history and pattern which is why they were prepared to let him walk rather than offering him a max deal. We aren’t privy to any of it so who knows though.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
His contract may be untra
Not necessarily. It sounds like their due diligence could have shown no pattern of this behavior. Whereas the Hornets apparently knew about Bridges history and pattern which is why they were prepared to let him walk rather than offering him a max deal. We aren’t privy to any of it so who knows though.
Yeah, their decision is a lot more understandable now. Though, that really just pushes back the timeline---did they shop him at deadline knowing they likely weren't going to max him for these reasons? Haven't seen any reporting they did, though that's quite an imperfect source of information.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
Yeah, their decision is a lot more understandable now. Though, that really just pushes back the timeline---did they shop him at deadline knowing they likely weren't going to max him for these reasons? Haven't seen any reporting they did, though that's quite an imperfect source of information.
From the sound of things it seems that Bridges transgressions were well known. I doubt these secrets would be staying in house and that they didn’t really try to move his expiring contract bc they knew teams wouldn’t want to deal with the baggage.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
From the sound of things it seems that Bridges transgressions were well known. I doubt these secrets would be staying in house and that they didn’t really try to move his expiring contract bc they knew teams wouldn’t want to deal with the baggage.
Possible--we're into the darkest of grey types of information, right? I gotta say, I saw absolutely zero stories or suggestions from 'in the know' people about Bridges. Not one podcaster or writer who suggested "there's chemistry concerns" or even "there's less interest than you might think around him" or ANYTHING. But, that doesn't mean teams weren't wise to his stuff.

Did you hear/see anything at all?
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
Possible--we're into the darkest of grey types of information, right? I gotta say, I saw absolutely zero stories or suggestions from 'in the know' people about Bridges. Not one podcaster or writer who suggested "there's chemistry concerns" or even "there's less interest than you might think around him" or ANYTHING. But, that doesn't mean teams weren't wise to his stuff.

Did you hear/see anything at all?
Yes, from his wife’s statement saying that she won’t allow the people around him to continue to silence her. I find it hard to believe the Hornets weren’t aware and their head scratcher of not offering him a max deal now makes sense.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,645
Not necessarily. It sounds like their due diligence could have shown no pattern of this behavior. Whereas the Hornets apparently knew about Bridges history and pattern which is why they were prepared to let him walk rather than offering him a max deal. We aren’t privy to any of it so who knows though.
I'd buy that more if the Raptors didn't also have Terrence Davis (who took a deal on DV charges last year) and Adrian Griffin who has been accused of DV as well. The Raps have been pretty clear, if you don't go to prison and can play... they don't care. that's to be fair also been the view of the league... even if you do go to jail, if you can play you get to.

Edit- generally the NBA approach to all criminal issues is to pretend they didn't happen. That may change if something catches the public, and possibly if the owners want to make it an issue in the next CBA, but generally the CBA is incredibly favorable to players on off-court issues. They've been lucky enough to skate on public outcry because it hasn't been stars and honestly the audience isn't as big as the NFL.
 
Last edited:

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,797
Fucking unreal for a guy who finished last year with a 2 DARKO (trending down hard) and a 0.8 BPM.
It's so bad. He stunk last year, and even when he was at 30 ppg the team wasn't very good. He absolutely can't be the best player on a contending team and yet, he gets that contract. The Wizards just go done with the Wall ordeal too.

The only guys I want on the super-duper max are like, KD, Curry, Giannis, LeBron and Kawhi because you know they can be the best guys on a title team. I'd also accept young alphas that look like they'll be capable of that, like Tatum, Jokic and Embiid. A deceisvley "B" tier star like Beal shouldn't sniff that contract.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,135
It's so bad. He stunk last year, and even when he was at 30 ppg the team wasn't very good. He absolutely can't be the best player on a contending team and yet, he gets that contract. The Wizards just go done with the Wall ordeal too.

The only guys I want on the super-duper max are like, KD, Curry, Giannis, LeBron and Kawhi because you know they can be the best guys on a title team. I'd also accept young alphas that look like they'll be capable of that, like Tatum, Jokic and Embiid. A deceisvley "B" tier star like Beal shouldn't sniff that contract.
Yep, he is like Carmelo in his prime, a guy who could actually be a third guy on a title team if he just accepted that, but he'd prefer to get paid like a #1 and never win anything.
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,270
Washington
I know it is very unlikely, but I would be greatly entertained if Brooklyn can't find a deal that it wants for either Durant or Kyrie and convinces both of them to buy into at least one more year of playing together. And then Ben gets on the court too.

I want all the drama, sure, but I'm also curious what that could look like on the court if everyone is healthy and playing together for a little while.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,439
It's so bad. He stunk last year, and even when he was at 30 ppg the team wasn't very good. He absolutely can't be the best player on a contending team and yet, he gets that contract. The Wizards just go done with the Wall ordeal too.

The only guys I want on the super-duper max are like, KD, Curry, Giannis, LeBron and Kawhi because you know they can be the best guys on a title team. I'd also accept young alphas that look like they'll be capable of that, like Tatum, Jokic and Embiid. A deceisvley "B" tier star like Beal shouldn't sniff that contract.
I agree but this has to be as much about keeping fans interested in the laundry as it does about winning. He’s their star and it’s generally good for business to keep those guys on your team. They can make the playoffs with Beal as their best player, and maybe that’s enough for now. Also, damn he has a good agent.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
Yep, he is like Carmelo in his prime, a guy who could actually be a third guy on a title team if he just accepted that, but he'd prefer to get paid like a #1 and never win anything.
Isn’t that a no-brainer of a business decision though? Who would accept half of their pay in any job?
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,135
I mean, I am an outlier to our species in many ways but if I was in that position (15-25th best player in the league, let's say), once I hit FA, I would try to find a place to slot in behind two even better players, the Chris Bosh route over the Melo/Beal one. If my career earnings ended up at $250M instead of $400M because of that, that tradeoff would be OK with me, and in fact I would be willing to go down to $150M to have the career of Robert Horry, 7 titles and 7-0 in Finals.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,496
around the way
I agree but this has to be as much about keeping fans interested in the laundry as it does about winning. He’s their star and it’s generally good for business to keep those guys on your team. They can make the playoffs with Beal as their best player, and maybe that’s enough for now. Also, damn he has a good agent.
Facts not in evidence.

Season GP W L W–L% Finish Playoffs
2017–18 82 43 39 .524 2nd, Southeast Lost in First Round, 2–4 (Raptors)
2018–19 82 32 50 .390 4th, Southeast Did not qualify
2019–20 72 25 47 .347 3rd, Southeast Did not qualify
2020–21 72 34 38 .472 3rd, Southeast Lost in First Round, 1–4 (76ers)
2021–22 82 35 47 .427 4th, Southeast Did not qualify
 

EvilEmpire

paying for his sins
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 9, 2007
17,270
Washington
I think the problem with taking a huge pay cut to play on a loaded team is that we've seen plenty of loaded teams have unsuccessful runs. And when a team has the highest of expectations and fails, fingers start to get pointed and the fans and press turn on you quick. Dealing with all of that and also not getting paid really sucks.

Find a team that will pay you well, that has teammates you like being around, and with an organization that respects you. Even if it looks like a bad situation on the court, sometimes that can change more quickly than some of those other things.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
I mean, I am an outlier to our species in many ways but if I was in that position (15-25th best player in the league, let's say), once I hit FA, I would try to find a place to slot in behind two even better players, the Chris Bosh route over the Melo/Beal one. If my career earnings ended up at $250M instead of $400M because of that, that tradeoff would be OK with me, and in fact I would be willing to go down to $150M to have the career of Robert Horry, 7 titles and 7-0 in Finals.
The confidence and ego a player must have to be the top 15-25 player in the league would never allow that person to think there are two better players than them in the league much less on the same team .
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,135
The confidence and ego a player must have to be the top 15-25 player in the league would never allow that person to think there are two better players than them in the league much less on the same team .
My Chris Bosh example? He was a five-time All-Star at 25 when he went to Miami, and the clear #3 from day 1.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
My Chris Bosh example? He was a five-time All-Star at 25 when he went to Miami, and the clear #3 from day 1.
One thing with this is Bosh signed the exact same contract as LeBron, both of whom signed slightly bigger contracts than Wade IIRC. They all took minor pay cuts together.

A clear pecking order on the court, yes, but the contract gave a lot of cover where status was concerned.
 

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,993
Isle of Plum
I know it is very unlikely, but I would be greatly entertained if Brooklyn can't find a deal that it wants for either Durant or Kyrie and convinces both of them to buy into at least one more year of playing together. And then Ben gets on the court too.

I want all the drama, sure, but I'm also curious what that could look like on the court if everyone is healthy and playing together for a little while.
Same, and I actually think it is currently most likely outcome.

Nets can’t afford to tank given they have noneof their own picks, and who has enough spare talent to cough up a couple of all stars and picks and still be competitive enough with KD to win?

Cs could I suppose (I’m out because the madness factor isn’t worth the slightly increased win chance for one year) but I’m still awaiting the fitting suitor.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,150
Same, and I actually think it is currently most likely outcome.

Nets can’t afford to tank given they have noneof their own picks, and who has enough spare talent to cough up a couple of all stars and picks and still be competitive enough with KD to win?

Cs could I suppose (I’m out because the madness factor isn’t worth the slightly increased win chance for one year) but I’m still awaiting the fitting suitor.
KD is a top 3 player, but 34 year-olds with injury histories decline rapidly all the time. You're probably getting a 2 year window with KD as The Guy.

The Nets just had that guy for two straight postseasons, and won 1 series. Yes, there were health problems, but that's the thing with short windows: shit happens, and suddenly the window has closed.

I know the common wisdom was that this would be an unprecedented haul, but I'm not seeing it. Teams seem very, very reluctant to part with young stars to get that, particularly if they're expected to give up picks too.

Totally agree that "run it back" has a greater chance than people think, at least to start the year. Rehabilitating Simmons before dealing KD would also be useful.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,373
One thing with this is Bosh signed the exact same contract as LeBron, both of whom signed slightly bigger contracts than Wade IIRC. They all took minor pay cuts together.

A clear pecking order on the court, yes, but the contract gave a lot of cover where status was concerned.
Also, Bosh was a play finisher, not a play starter. Beal typically has the ball in his hands, so it's not as easy for him to take a back seat. You're not going to ask him to be a 3 and D player because he's not great at the D or 3 part of that role.

I love the posters saying $150 million is trivial. First off, these guys do pay taxes on their salary, so $250 million is actually more like $125 million, and that doesn't include agent fees, lawyers, and the other things of that nature. You can't take for granted this one opportunity to make money in your life and ensure your grandkids' grandkids' grandkids can go to whatever college they want, never have to worry about housing in their life, etc.

Are any of us taking less money to work for the most efficient company? Or the best performing team? Shit no. And you can tell me it's not the same, but then I'm sure someone working as a cashier in a grocery store is looking at our cushy jobs and wonders why we fight for raises in our positions when our salary would be plenty for them. Why should athletes not fight for every cent they can get? They have the most rare skills on earth.

The league is making money hand over fist. They're about to come to a new TV deal that is 2-3X their current one. All that BRI has to go somewhere - not everyone has a Lebron, or a playoff roster - so some of these guys are going to sign what are viewed as bad contracts. That's overall a good thing for basketball and as we've seen over the last few years, no contract is immovable. Just last year people were saying the same thing about the Gobert contract aging poorly and look what happened.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,925
The funny thing is that Beal isn't good enough for his reputation to be tarnished by not winning a title.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.