NBA 20/21 season thread

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,216
It makes the most sense if they’re trying to tank while not lowering leverage in a possible Harden trade too much.

It’s hard for me to imagine that the Houston front office isn’t 100x more familiar with their future pick obligations than I am, and the strategy jumps off the page within about 30 seconds of analysis.

Houston doesn’t have to be the 2014-2018 Nets unless they want to be.
Yeah, I think it's only a matter of time before Harden is moved. He has to move. Their window has slammed shut and he is now 31 years-old and has a player option in 2 years. If you wait until the deadline, the acquiring team is only going to be guaranteed 1+ years of him, which will reduce the return.
 

CreightonGubanich

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 13, 2006
1,383
north shore, MA
It's not about Basketball fit, it's.... we need to move Russ to keep Harden happy, nobody wants that money, except WAS who will give us a pick (that might be good) and John Wall's identical contract. If you need to move Russ this is what you get. Then you hope Wall looks great coming off injury (unlikely) so you can flip him into a couple players to a team like the Knicks.
I get the dynamics, I just don't see how this makes Harden happy long term. The team as currently constituted isn't winning anything. Wall's one redeeming quality used to be his transition scoring, and that was like three years ago pre-injury. Houston doesn't run. Harden might have wanted Russ gone, but ultimately he's going to ask out anyway if Houston isn't a contender. At least with Russ, there's at least an outside shot at assembling a contender around those two guys.

I'm not saying you could trade Russ for anything that helps; it's pretty clear that wasn't an option. More like, what's the point of this deal, unless you're going to deal Harden anyway. I think that Houston probably thinks there's a viable path forward with Harden after this; I strongly disagree.
 
Last edited:

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,797
It's not about Basketball fit, it's.... we need to move Russ to keep Harden happy, nobody wants that money, except WAS who will give us a pick (that might be good) and John Wall's identical contract. If you need to move Russ this is what you get. Then you hope Wall looks great coming off injury (unlikely) so you can flip him into a couple players to a team like the Knicks.
Is this actually true though? My understanding is that Westbrook and Harden are really good friends off the court and got along well during their year in Houston, but the experiment with them on the court clearly didn't work and Houston wanted to get off his contract, so they decided to swap it for the Wall contract and get a pick out of it. I don't think that this was really a move because Harden and Westbrook didn't like playing with each other. I think Harden is going to be on the move pretty soon...
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,642
I get the dynamics, I just don't see how this makes Harden happy long term. The team as currently constituted isn't winning anything. Wall's one redeeming quality used to be his transition scoring, and that was like three years ago pre-injury. Houston doesn't run. Harden might have wanted Russ gone, but ultimately he's going to ask out anyway if Houston isn't a contender. At least with Russ, there's at least an outside shot at assembling a contender around those two guys.

I'm not saying you could trade Russ for anything that helps; it's pretty clear that wasn't an option. More like, what's the point of this deal, unless you're going to deal Harden anyway. I think that Houston probably thinks there's a viable path forward with Harden after this; I strongly disagree.
He'll probably still ask out, but given his contract they have a bit of time before they need to trade him, so they're flailing around looking for something.

Edit- Also I think part of it is as simple as... there isn't a good Harden offer out there. Do you like the Brooklyn offer? Well it's definitely still going to be there the rest of the year, and probably in the offseason too, because it isn't a very good deal. Might as well wait. maybe PHI decides to blow up Embiid/Simmons, maybe Giannis signs an extension and teams who were hoarding cap space for him suddenly need to look to you for their top 7 player.

Is this actually true though? My understanding is that Westbrook and Harden are really good friends off the court and got along well during their year in Houston, but the experiment with them on the court clearly didn't work and Houston wanted to get off his contract, so they decided to swap it for the Wall contract and get a pick out of it. I don't think that this was really a move because Harden and Westbrook didn't like playing with each other. I think Harden is going to be on the move pretty soon...
They may be friendly outside the team, but the word was that it was not a great situation in terms of work environment, and that HOU thought they needed to move Russ.
 

ugmo33

Member
SoSH Member
May 6, 2016
165
Is it just me or has this been a bizarre offseason? It seems like none of the contenders got any better but there was an arms race for the lower seeds. The Lakers, Bucks, and Clippers made some lateral moves and maybe got a tiny bit better but the Celtics, Rockets, Warriors, Heat, 76ers, Raptors, Nuggets, and OKC all lost major pieces or at least a starter or two and none of them really replaced that player with anything while the Suns, Hornets, and Hawks all got significantly better but probably not good enough to make it out of the first round. I know that the salary cap situation and uncertainty about the 2021 season probably made owners hesitant, but is anybody in GFITN mode?
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,216
Is it just me or has this been a bizarre offseason? It seems like none of the contenders got any better but there was an arms race for the lower seeds. The Lakers, Bucks, and Clippers made some lateral moves and maybe got a tiny bit better but the Celtics, Rockets, Warriors, Heat, 76ers, Raptors, Nuggets, and OKC all lost major pieces or at least a starter or two and none of them really replaced that player with anything while the Suns, Hornets, and Hawks all got significantly better but probably not good enough to make it out of the first round. I know that the salary cap situation and uncertainty about the 2021 season probably made owners hesitant, but is anybody in GFITN mode?
Seems like the shortened offseason has made it difficult to really do any major deals. The draft was merely a few weeks ago so teams don't really know what they have. I do think we could see a decent amount of activity as the pretenders quickly look to offload contracts for salary cap/profitability purposes.

I think Ainge may have quite a few options to use that TPE on, if he is so inclined. I also think Giannis' apparent desire to remain in Milwaukee has quieted down some of the potential craziness. Harden really is the only realistic white whale out there and he probably only is possible for a few teams to acquire. We'll see if any of those John Collins types become available as contract negotiations take place.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,642
Is it just me or has this been a bizarre offseason? It seems like none of the contenders got any better but there was an arms race for the lower seeds. The Lakers, Bucks, and Clippers made some lateral moves and maybe got a tiny bit better but the Celtics, Rockets, Warriors, Heat, 76ers, Raptors, Nuggets, and OKC all lost major pieces or at least a starter or two and none of them really replaced that player with anything while the Suns, Hornets, and Hawks all got significantly better but probably not good enough to make it out of the first round. I know that the salary cap situation and uncertainty about the 2021 season probably made owners hesitant, but is anybody in GFITN mode?
I think the Lakers and 76ers got a good amount better. The Warriors would have gotten much better if Klay wasn't hurt (Oubre is a really good add for nothing), and while I'm not as high as some on the Blazers' additions (you can't really improve your defense when you play 38 minutes of two bad backcourt defenders) they're clearly better.

Overall though, part of it is that there is a real short offseason so harder to bed in new acquisitions, plus the new playoff format encourages the mid-tier to stick with it for a while, coupled with Giannis making some contenders hold off off to see what he does.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,569
Somewhere
I am mostly surprised at how Wood slipped through the market with minimal interest from contenders. There must be some kind of hole in his game.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
Is it just me or has this been a bizarre offseason? It seems like none of the contenders got any better but there was an arms race for the lower seeds. The Lakers, Bucks, and Clippers made some lateral moves and maybe got a tiny bit better but the Celtics, Rockets, Warriors, Heat, 76ers, Raptors, Nuggets, and OKC all lost major pieces or at least a starter or two and none of them really replaced that player with anything while the Suns, Hornets, and Hawks all got significantly better but probably not good enough to make it out of the first round. I know that the salary cap situation and uncertainty about the 2021 season probably made owners hesitant, but is anybody in GFITN mode?
I think you answered your own question - the Lakers, Bucks, and Clippers are the only teams that are clearly in GFIN now mode, but they all already have their primary pieces. I guess the other team you could throw in this group is the Nets - and there is still the possibility they swing a trade for Harden.

All those other teams are in varying stages of rebuilds and/or development of young guys. I guess you could argue the Heat should have done more to try to put them over that final hump but I’m not quite sure what major moves they could have made to make them significantly better in the short term given their roster/cap situation.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,706
So PG is out trying to throw blame on Doc:


He had his highest percentage of plays in the PnR of his career.

I'm so glad we dodged PG3, he's not only declined as a player he just screams lockerroom cancer and weak in pressure.
Boy, what a self-own. PG has gone from a very efficient, soft-spoken player who seemed like the perfect #2 to guys like Kawhi (or LeBron or whomever else) to someone who is clearly cancerous. What a bad situation. That said, I think Lue is really good and might be the perfect dude for managing personalities like Kawhi and PG.


Westbrook, Beal, Bertans is a fun trio.

I guess they have Lopez to plat some defense. But the rest of the team is pretty meh
Really fun trio. I'm #1 in seeing Westbrook as overrated, but I can really see that trio as complementary. Bertrans obviously with his shooting from deep, but Beal is also a player who can be efficient in a #. of different roles. And, a bit contrary to what you write here, the Wiz have a few complementary players as well. I think that's a decent team that will likely make the playoffs. And unloading Wall is just a major coup. Westbrook may be overrated, but he has game. Wall had major faults when healthy....and very hard to imagine how he can be effective coming off injury.
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,898
Man, I think the Lakers absolutely got better, like significantly. Sixers too, and the Bucks, to a lesser extent, but in meanifin terms of the playoffs.

I also like what the Heat have going, but that’s probably because I’m more bullish on one or more of Precious, Okpaka or Eboua panning out with their length and athleticism, but that’s a longer term thing. Harkless and Bradley should be useful enough for them this year.

But I think the Celtics still can compete, with continued improvement from the Jays, Marcus, Theis (in his prime and still getting used to the NBA- there’s some room for improvement there) and Grant. That’s particularly dependent on Tatum becoming a 1st team All NBA caliber guy, but I think that’s a reasonable bet.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,729
Saint Paul, MN
I think the Lakers and 76ers got a good amount better.
I agree on the Lakers, unsure that 76ers got materially better.

Al Horford was not good last year and the fit with Embiid never really worked, but they didn't replace that PF spot on their roster. They can go small and play Harris at the 4 more, but there is going to be a lot of Mike Scott at the 4 - and well, that is not ideal.

I view Green as a downgrade from Richardson, both offensively and defensively.

Dwight Howard is a fine addition, but he is no better than even a bad Al Horford, and Howard most certainly doesn't have the positional flexibility that Horford does.

So... to me it comes down to Seth Curry I guess. He will provide the spacing and shooting that they lack, and he is a most excellent shooter, but if the entire offseason grade comes down to the addition of the other Curry brother - color me skeptical
 

DannyDarwinism

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 7, 2007
4,898
I agree on the Lakers, unsure that 76ers got materially better.

Al Horford was not good last year and the fit with Embiid never really worked, but they didn't replace that PF spot on their roster. They can go small and play Harris at the 4 more, but there is going to be a lot of Mike Scott at the 4 - and well, that is not ideal.

I view Green as a downgrade from Richardson, both offensively and defensively.

Dwight Howard is a fine addition, but he is no better than even a bad Al Horford, and Howard most certainly doesn't have the positional flexibility that Horford does.

So... to me it comes down to Seth Curry I guess. He will provide the spacing and shooting that they lack, and he is a most excellent shooter, but if the entire offseason grade comes down to the addition of the other Curry brother - color me skeptical
I don’t think they’ll run too much Mike Scott at the four. PF depth isn’t a huge concern in today’s game, especially when you have Ben Simmons out there.
 

Marbleheader

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2004
11,728
A question for the group. I know people are concerned about Kemba's knee and contract. I also know that the board as a whole is not crazy about Harden. I know it will take more than just one player to trade for Harden, but would you trade Kemba for Harden?

Talent-wise it seems like a no-brainer, but I think there's still many of us that would be concerned about Harden's impact on the Jays and the franchise as a whole. On the flip side, Harden definitely moves the needle towards championship aspirations.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,642
I agree on the Lakers, unsure that 76ers got materially better.

Al Horford was not good last year and the fit with Embiid never really worked, but they didn't replace that PF spot on their roster. They can go small and play Harris at the 4 more, but there is going to be a lot of Mike Scott at the 4 - and well, that is not ideal.

I view Green as a downgrade from Richardson, both offensively and defensively.

Dwight Howard is a fine addition, but he is no better than even a bad Al Horford, and Howard most certainly doesn't have the positional flexibility that Horford does.

So... to me it comes down to Seth Curry I guess. He will provide the spacing and shooting that they lack, and he is a most excellent shooter, but if the entire offseason grade comes down to the addition of the other Curry brother - color me skeptical
I like Richardson, but they needed more shooting than defense and the Curry/Green combo gives them that. As to bigs... I think Dwight works because he's going to play the minutes Embiid can't and give you a similar player type, and I think Tobi is a 4 now and given the size you have in Simmons and the bench wings, you don't need that many Mike Scott minutes.
 

bbc23

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2009
994
The Lebron, Davis, and Bam extensions seem to indicate Giannis is staying in Milwaukee. That would be great for the league.
The Lakers option always required one/two of them to take paycuts, Miami can absolutely make the space if that's where Giannis wants to go, and Dallas is still a very appealing option. I'd personally love if he stayed in Milwaukee because the roster is already aging in a significant way and I wouldn't feel threatened by that team beyond the next couple of years. If Riley/Cuban got him, he's a threat for the next decade.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,302
Santa Monica
A question for the group. I know people are concerned about Kemba's knee and contract. I also know that the board as a whole is not crazy about Harden. I know it will take more than just one player to trade for Harden, but would you trade Kemba for Harden?

Talent-wise it seems like a no-brainer, but I think there's still many of us that would be concerned about Harden's impact on the Jays and the franchise as a whole. On the flip side, Harden definitely moves the needle towards championship aspirations.
Yes. Kemba + anyone not named Jaylen, Marcus or Jayson* in a heartbeat for Harden. Houston would say no

*JayCrew/Marcus is the Celtics core IMO. A benefit of Hayward moving on (not getting hit with the repeater), not taking on Myles Turners contract, will be Marcus Smart playing the rest of his career here.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
I don't understand this move for Houston unless they're dealing Harden. They dealt Russ for perhaps the only point guard who's worse off the ball than he is. You'd have to actively try to make a fit this bad from a basketball standpoint. If you're really building around Harden, he should be your point guard.

Still, I'd be surprised if they traded Harden before the season. What a mess.
I think Wall is much better off the ball than Westbrook is. He's not good, but he shoots better, passes better, and moves better.

Houston doesn't really have a choice of keeping Westbrook or a good fit, remember. They have a choice of Westbrook or Wall + a pick. That's really about the only trade one can imagine. I think basketball-wise Wall is a better pick, if he's somewhat healthy. Whether he is, total gamble and I get hating the trade for that reason. But I think really tough to argue that style and personality wise they are not a bit better off....even if it's stil a bad fit.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
I think the Lakers and 76ers got a good amount better. The Warriors would have gotten much better if Klay wasn't hurt (Oubre is a really good add for nothing), and while I'm not as high as some on the Blazers' additions (you can't really improve your defense when you play 38 minutes of two bad backcourt defenders) they're clearly better.

Overall though, part of it is that there is a real short offseason so harder to bed in new acquisitions, plus the new playoff format encourages the mid-tier to stick with it for a while, coupled with Giannis making some contenders hold off off to see what he does.
I agree, the Lakers definitely have a better roster. A point that has been made by a couple writers/analysts that I agree with is that it's not clear the current roster will play better in a playoff series than what they got last year vs Denver and Miami. Not suggesting that keeping Rondo would have accomplished that either. Schroder to me will certainly help them, but I'm not sure he'll be better than the rebirth of "playoff Rondo"

One big uncertainty is Gasol---the moderate "do" of him next year is a pretty big upgrade. But the version the Celtics saw in the playoffs is not.

Most analysts are not big on Harrell as an add; I see more value there especially when AD is on the bench.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,729
Saint Paul, MN
Yes. Kemba + anyone not named Jaylen, Marcus or Jayson* in a heartbeat for Harden. Houston would say no

*JayCrew/Marcus is the Celtics core IMO. A benefit of Hayward moving on (not getting hit with the repeater), not taking on Myles Turners contract, will be Marcus Smart playing the rest of his career here.
Marcus Smart sure is loved by Boston fans. I imagine Ainge woudl trade Smart without blinking if it netted him James Harden
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,371
I have an irrational appreciation for Russell Westbrook. He has a ton of warts, but his ultra-aggressive style is so rare in today's game that it's a pleasure for me to watch, even when he's bricking shots. He's probably a top-5 in game dunker all-time for me and though his athleticism has waned, he can still on occasion murder the rim.

The Dunc'd On guys often talk about Floor Raisers vs. Ceiling Raisers and I think that's a good distinction for where Russ fits into the modern NBA - he's a floor raiser. Because of his dominance of the ball, he can make a bad team pretty okay - just look at those OKC rosters after KD left. Because of his limitations, he is not going to make a good team great, and that's always going to be frustrating. I have a silly hypothesis that if you flipped prime Westbrook with prime Steph Curry, both the Warriors and Thunder would be worse since Russ wouldn't elevate the great players on the Warriors and Steph couldn't carry the talent on OKC (and that's what makes Steph better - it's harder to add wins to teams that are already really good).

So I think this probably works for the Wizards because they want to go from being bad to being pretty good and I could see this squad making the eighth seed. We can disagree about whether that's a good goal, but their team is certainly better now and they didn't really give up anything of value to improve that position.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
Marcus Smart sure is loved by Boston fans. I imagine Ainge woudl trade Smart without blinking if it netted him James Harden
I agree, I don't think there's really any question they'd move Smart to get a legit star---and I say that being a big believer that Smart's game and intensity has unique value. But as the Lakers just showed very clearly in the finals, the league is about apex-stars.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,216
I have an irrational appreciation for Russell Westbrook. He has a ton of warts, but his ultra-aggressive style is so rare in today's game that it's a pleasure for me to watch, even when he's bricking shots. He's probably a top-5 in game dunker all-time for me and though his athleticism has waned, he can still on occasion murder the rim.

The Dunc'd On guys often talk about Floor Raisers vs. Ceiling Raisers and I think that's a good distinction for where Russ fits into the modern NBA - he's a floor raiser. Because of his dominance of the ball, he can make a bad team pretty okay - just look at those OKC rosters after KD left. Because of his limitations, he is not going to make a good team great, and that's always going to be frustrating. I have a silly hypothesis that if you flipped prime Westbrook with prime Steph Curry, both the Warriors and Thunder would be worse since Russ wouldn't elevate the great players on the Warriors and Steph couldn't carry the talent on OKC (and that's what makes Steph better - it's harder to add wins to teams that are already really good).

So I think this probably works for the Wizards because they want to go from being bad to being pretty good and I could see this squad making the eighth seed. We can disagree about whether that's a good goal, but their team is certainly better now and they didn't really give up anything of value to improve that position.
Westbrook certainly was a great player in his prime. Since he relies on athleticism and his almost maniacal energy level, his decline was always going to be more pronounced than other stars.

I do agree that this is a good deal for Washington. Wall is damaged goods at this point so Westbrook at least will be available.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,496
around the way
Yes. Kemba + anyone not named Jaylen, Marcus or Jayson* in a heartbeat for Harden. Houston would say no

*JayCrew/Marcus is the Celtics core IMO. A benefit of Hayward moving on (not getting hit with the repeater), not taking on Myles Turners contract, will be Marcus Smart playing the rest of his career here.
Agreed with all of this.

I don't like Harden's style of play and have said so many times. But it's excruciatingly effective. And on defense, he's no longer a hole. He's a top 5ish player. Anyone who wouldn't trade Kemba for Harden doesn't care enough about championships.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,726
I like Richardson, but they needed more shooting than defense and the Curry/Green combo gives them that. As to bigs... I think Dwight works because he's going to play the minutes Embiid can't and give you a similar player type, and I think Tobi is a 4 now and given the size you have in Simmons and the bench wings, you don't need that many Mike Scott minutes.
I don't know about PHI. I mean maybe they got players who are a better fit (slightly) but they are not as good basketball players as Al and Richardson. Also, in a league that seems to emphasize wings, PHI has these players to choose from.

PHI's biggest issue come playoffs is that they don't have an offensive ID. When they had Butler, they could throw it to him and let them create. But we've seen Joel can't carry a team offensively, and Joel and Simmons are still a terrible pairing. I mean Doc is on record as saying Korkmaz could be a key piece to this team but he's a difficult guy to play against teams with wings because he's so bad at defense.

Ryan Broekhoff
G​
30​
6' 6"​
215 lbs​
Lamine Diane
F​
--​
6' 7"​
205 lbs​
Terrance Ferguson
G​
22​
6' 6"​
190 lbs​
Danny Green
G​
33​
6' 6"​
215 lbs​
Tobias Harris
F​
28​
6' 8"​
226 lbs​
Isaiah Joe
G​
--​
6' 5"​
180 lbs​
Furkan Korkmaz
F​
23​
6' 7"​
202 lbs​
Theo Maledon
G​
19​
6' 5"​
174 lbs​
Dakota Mathias
G​
25​
6' 4"​
200 lbs​
Paul Reed
F​
--​
6' 9"​
220 lbs​
Mike Scott
F​
32​
6' 7"​
237 lbs​
Matisse Thybulle
G​
23​
6' 5"​
201 lbs​


 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,642
I don't know about PHI. I mean maybe they got players who are a better fit (slightly) but they are not as good basketball players as Al and Richardson. Also, in a league that seems to emphasize wings, PHI has these players to choose from.

PHI's biggest issue come playoffs is that they don't have an offensive ID. When they had Butler, they could throw it to him and let them create. But we've seen Joel can't carry a team offensively, and Joel and Simmons are still a terrible pairing. I mean Doc is on record as saying Korkmaz could be a key piece to this team but he's a difficult guy to play against teams with wings because he's so bad at defense.
I think the offensive ID issues are Embiid/Simmons issues. However... if your two best players can't shoot, the ideal solution is to put 3 guys on the floor who can, and Curry/Green is a good start towards that.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,150
View: https://twitter.com/espn_macmahon/status/1335808483590082562


So Harden was supposed to have an individual workout (he can't be with the team for COVID protocols) but he hasn't shown.

Also he's been spotted at the strip clubs all week, so he's not even started on clearing protocol.

Seems like he is going to try a new pandemic related way of forcing yourself out of town.
Makes sense—the team is being strip-mined. He should be taking any excuse to force his way out.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,569
Somewhere
It’s just delicious that the team that makes the most sense as a trade partner, and one that would be very dangerous with either of their remaining stars plus Harden, is just a complete nonstarter for Fertitta.
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,131
Is Fertitta really going to be that petty? Harden for Simmons just makes so much sense for both sides. Houston probably isn’t getting a better centerpiece of a trade than Simmons, and he’s young enough to build around going forward to keep the fans excited. Meanwhile Philly gets the better player and a perfect complement for Embiid to make a run now.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,150
Is Fertitta really going to be that petty? Harden for Simmons just makes so much sense for both sides. Houston probably isn’t getting a better centerpiece of a trade than Simmons, and he’s young enough to build around going forward to keep the fans excited. Meanwhile Philly gets the better player and a perfect complement for Embiid to make a run now.
I don't know that he'd be that petty if the offer is Simmons, but Simmons probably won't be the offer. Would more likely be All The Picks plus salary to make it work.
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,131
I don't know that he'd be that petty if the offer is Simmons, but Simmons probably won't be the offer. Would more likely be All The Picks plus salary to make it work.
Well, I could see him turning down that package, Morey or no Morey. They desperately needs picks after the Westbrook debacle, but if they're trading Harden to a team that also has Simmons and Embiid, those are going to be pretty late first round picks for the foreseeable future, not quite a Billy King Nets package.

There's a bit of a catch-22 in terms a bad team with worthwhile picks wouldn't be a place Harden would be happy to play for and a smart team probably wouldn't trade their future for a disgruntled star. Which team is bad enough for their picks to have some juice but that would either entice Harden with an attractive location (warm weather, fun city, etc.), or otherwise would be stupid enough to pull a Billy King even if Harden isn't demanding to go there specifically, and also isn't committed to a young guard running the show (like Fox in Sacramento)? Orlando, Charlotte, Detroit or Chicago seem pretty poorly run or at least in need of a jump start. How about a deal centered on one of LaMelo Ball or Devonte' Graham and future picks? But then the other issue is that Harden's $41 million is tough to match without a big salary coming back. Is Houston taking on Rozier and Zeller's money to make a trade work? How about LaVine and some combination of of Markkanen, Carter and/or White, plus future picks (probably need to include Satoransky as well to make the salaries work)? Houston gets some present value and Chicago's future, even with Harden, doesn't look like a perennial contender, so their picks have decent future value.

Every time I look at it, Simmons for Harden just makes the most sense. Probably won't happen given how Simmons seems to be valued by Philly, but maybe Morey might have a different view.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,150
Well, I could see him turning down that package, Morey or no Morey. They desperately needs picks after the Westbrook debacle, but if they're trading Harden to a team that also has Simmons and Embiid, those are going to be pretty late first round picks for the foreseeable future, not quite a Billy King Nets package.
...
Just a note here that, at the time of the deal, those Brooklyn picks weren't expected to be very good. Deron Williams' career hadn't tanked completely yet, and they were expected to pay the luxury tax and sign free agents for awhile. The deal was primarily bad for Brooklyn in that it gave no out if things went wrong, and created a vicious cycle that trapped the team for a few years.

You can deal picks up to 7 years out, so if Philly hamstrung their picks for awhile and you get into Embiid's 30s and Harden is retired, that starts to look pretty appealing, even with Simmons there. There's not a good path to upgrade.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,770
Simmons plus $3m of other players for Harden works, money wise. I don’t see any attractive young players on rookie deals on the Sixers’ roster, that are going to make Houston jump at a deal, so if Simmons is the centerpiece of the return on Harden, the other player or two will be trade ballast to make the money work.

Maybe Houston can force the Sixers to take four years of Gordon at $16m, for the expiring contract of Danny Green, and throw in two first round picks.
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,131
Just a note here that, at the time of the deal, those Brooklyn picks weren't expected to be very good. Deron Williams' career hadn't tanked completely yet, and they were expected to pay the luxury tax and sign free agents for awhile. The deal was primarily bad for Brooklyn in that it gave no out if things went wrong, and created a vicious cycle that trapped the team for a few years.

You can deal picks up to 7 years out, so if Philly hamstrung their picks for awhile and you get into Embiid's 30s and Harden is retired, that starts to look pretty appealing, even with Simmons there. There's not a good path to upgrade.
Sure, I'd bet even Ainge wouldn't have thought those picks had too likely a chance of being top 3 or top overall picks at the time of the deal. But the 76ers are generally a younger team than those Nets were (Simmons is only 24, Deron Williams was 29 at the time of that trade), Harden is younger than Pierce/Garnett were, and if you're banking on the downside of the last few years of the end of the seven year period for your picks, you're losing a good bit of value from the multiple picks from the earlier seasons, when you could be getting better picks those years from a worse team that looks to be less of a contender in the interim. Without offering either Simmons or Embiid, Philly really doesn't have that attractive an offer compared with another team that would be willing to make a similar deal centered on future picks.

Plus as noted, the salaries are just impossible without bringing in another team. After Embiid/Simmons/Harris, it would take their next five highest paid players to match the money (assuming ESPN's trade machine is accurate), which would be a roster crunch on Houston's end, even assuming it would want those guys. Morey is creative and maybe there's a multi-team trade that works, but whatever assets Philly has to give up to facilitate that deal is assets not going to Houston.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
I don't know that he'd be that petty if the offer is Simmons, but Simmons probably won't be the offer. Would more likely be All The Picks plus salary to make it work.
I think it’s safe to say that any prospective Harden deal where Tobias Harris is the big get is a complete non-starter for Houston.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,213
Assuming Philly is willing to do it, Simmons for Harden is the only way this ends up. Nobody will offer anything better, and Philly gets beat on any offer that doesn't involve Simmons.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,302
Santa Monica
You ready for a fun one......

Harden

for

Wiseman
Wiggins
Pool

All the picks and swaps
I like it. from Houston's perspective, the Warriors will flame out in about 3 seasons. Unprotected picks and swaps past 2024 will be gold. Maybe sooner if Steph gets more fragile with age

paging SRN
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,216
Assuming Philly is willing to do it, Simmons for Harden is the only way this ends up. Nobody will offer anything better, and Philly gets beat on any offer that doesn't involve Simmons.
I'd be curious to know what Doc thinks of Harden. I'm sure he respects the talent but Harden doesn't really fit the makeup of what Doc looks for in a star. Seems to me like the most realistic option is Golden State. They have a marketable chip in Wiseman, salaries to make it work, and the likely motivation to make a splash given the age of Curry and the timing/uncertainty of Klay's recovery.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,797
I'd trade Embiid for Harden; then move Simmons into basically a Jokic-like role where he sets a lot of screens for Harden, rolls to the basket, passes out of the high post, but can also be a beast in transition and guard 1-5. Embiid just hasn't shown me that he has the conditioning to be a true franchise player that can bring you to the finals.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
You ready for a fun one......

Harden

for

Wiseman
Wiggins
Pool

All the picks and swaps
That's a fascinating one. GSW may believe they are going to 'bridge' to the next core with Wiseman and that Minny pick next year....but it is awful tough to turn down a chance to go Curry/Green/Harden this year and add Klay to it next year. Plus, you dump the Wiggins contract as part of the value you get in the swap.

Interesting. I think GSW says no, but it's worth a long look
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,213
I'd be curious to know what Doc thinks of Harden. I'm sure he respects the talent but Harden doesn't really fit the makeup of what Doc looks for in a star. Seems to me like the most realistic option is Golden State. They have a marketable chip in Wiseman, salaries to make it work, and the likely motivation to make a splash given the age of Curry and the timing/uncertainty of Klay's recovery.
I suppose that's possible. But Simmons is a much bigger chip than Wiseman, and I'd wonder a lot more about Harden's fit with Curry and Kerr that with Doc.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,216
I suppose that's possible. But Simmons is a much bigger chip than Wiseman, and I'd wonder a lot more about Harden's fit with Curry and Kerr that with Doc.
I'm operating under the assumption that Philly/Houston can't consummate a deal for a variety of reasons ranging from Philly not being willing to deal Simmons, front office issues between the organizations, etc. (admittedly a big assumption on my part). Agree that Simmons would be preferred but I expect a Philly/Houston standoff so, if Harden gets dealt, I would bet on it being Golden State or some mystery team.