How many regular season games do the Patriots play this season?

So? How many, you troutmouth?

  • 0

    Votes: 79 29.3%
  • 1-4

    Votes: 47 17.4%
  • 5-8

    Votes: 47 17.4%
  • 9-12

    Votes: 42 15.6%
  • 13-15

    Votes: 6 2.2%
  • 16

    Votes: 49 18.1%

  • Total voters
    270

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I think if there's thousands of people dying every month that the NFL isn't so stupid as to think they should pack stadiums.
I don't think games will add thousands of deaths each week, but I am sure they will have them sign waivers and will claim that "you can't really dust for vo . . ." I mean "you can't really tell where they got sick".

Remember who the owners are pals with. They don't give a shit about the fans (or the players).
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,132
Pittsburgh, PA
Seems the prudent thing would be to follow the bubble lead of the NBA, picking a a few host Cities with multiple stadiums. You’d then have divisional teams and their opposite conference opponents in the bubble. For example, the AFC East and NFC West are matched up this year, so you’d have 9 games plus a bye week without leaving a bubble... or about three months factoring in some preseason/scrimmage/training camp type activity.

As they play those and we get into thanksgiving/December, the league can determine if it makes sense to add the rest of the schedule, or move to an abbreviated schedule where the playoffs start after 9 games in another bubble type set up.

So far we haven’t heard that type of plan, which makes me doubt they are successful in getting a season in.
Sounds like you missed the excellent "Football Island" post from @The Gray Eagle :

https://sonsofsamhorn.net/index.php?threads/likelihood-of-an-nfl-2020-season.30091/page-2#post-3835540
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
1-4 is my answer. No way it’s zero because they will march them out there at some point to attempt to play a game. The cancelling of the preseason games is specifically so they don’t waste any bullets on games that don’t matter.

The testing results will show that teams will have a ridiculously high infection rate and they’ll shut it down, but not without getting a few games in first.
 

B H Kim

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Oct 24, 2003
5,732
Washington, DC
I picked 5-8. My guess is that they try to start the season and play a couple of games before the league has to stop play. But, even if it takes until next Spring, they'll try to finish some semblance of a season. So, maybe two games in the Fall and 4 or 5 more in the late Winter/Spring before jumping into some sort of expanded playoffs.
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,678
Arkansas
they shouild go to a 10 or 12 week sch

10 games 6 aga div 4 aga other div AFC East vs AFC West but to cut down on travel AFC East vs AFC North AFC South vs WEST
12 6 aga div 4 aga NFC East AFC East vs nfc east AFC North vs nfc north and etc and 2 oddball AFC Games by travel distance
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,678
Arkansas
with a 10-12 week sch season couild be push to November with no byes season over in early-mid jan playoffs start jan 21 super bowl prez day weekend
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,132
Pittsburgh, PA
If the owners try to pull a "we need to pay you less if there are no fans" gambit with the NFLPA, there will be no football. No one is going to buy NFL owners crying poverty.
Who is more desperate to get paid in fall 2020, the owners or the players? Bear in mind the owners know that the answer is the players. They will take any excuse they can get to beat the PA over the head with any available blunt instrument. Like a fellow player.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
I voted 16 last week.

The views here are predominately from left leaning folks in liberal states.

Even with the spikes in Texas and Florida, I have colleagues and friends in those states who just dont care. They want to get back to "normalcy".

Coupled with the NFLs traditional stance - fuck the players, make money - barring some large sponsors from stepping in and advocating the halt of a season (very unlikely), the NFL will want their money.

16 games.
 

Phil Plantier

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 7, 2002
3,420
Sounds like you missed the excellent "Football Island" post from @The Gray Eagle :

https://sonsofsamhorn.net/index.php?threads/likelihood-of-an-nfl-2020-season.30091/page-2#post-3835540
I'm glad you brought it back up, because I did miss it, and now I'll spend all afternoon dreaming about it.

Vieques, Governor's Island, maybe someone brought up Georges Island?

There's a one-in-ten-million chance that it will actually happen, but that would be something I would geek out over immensely. At least until someone tried to flee the island and a giant balloon hunted them down.
 

mwonow

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2005
7,124
I'm glad you brought it back up, because I did miss it, and now I'll spend all afternoon dreaming about it.

Vieques, Governor's Island, maybe someone brought up Georges Island?

There's a one-in-ten-million chance that it will actually happen, but that would be something I would geek out over immensely. At least until someone tried to flee the island and a giant balloon hunted them down.
I dunno - I geeked out over that one, too!
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,379
Philadelphia
I voted 16 last week.

The views here are predominately from left leaning folks in liberal states.

Even with the spikes in Texas and Florida, I have colleagues and friends in those states who just dont care. They want to get back to "normalcy".

Coupled with the NFLs traditional stance - fuck the players, make money - barring some large sponsors from stepping in and advocating the halt of a season (very unlikely), the NFL will want their money.

16 games.
I agree with this. I don't think they have fans in the stands but if its just a matter of endangering players and coaches then the combined weight of the NFL's financial interest and the pressure Trump will apply to have a real season should be enough to win out.
 

m0ckduck

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,743
Related mini-rant: I live in Europe, so I get the GamePass on NFL.com. You pay $180 and get streaming access to all games. It's a lot of coin, but I get my money's worth.

Yesterday, I got a notification that my subscription would be renewing for 2020 season. What was missing from this email, and from their website and terms and conditions, was any mention of COVID-19 and what happens if the season is partially or entirely cancelled. I exchanged emails with customer service and got an explanation that, in the event that football is interrupted, they will review the refund policy at that time and get back to me then. Har har har.

In fairness, I expect that they will in fact offer some refund if and when games are cancelled (they have issued refunds in the past due to service problems.) But it’s just so like the NFL not to have thought this through and defined a clear policy.

Edit: reduced vitriol
 
Last edited:

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
I voted 16 last week.

The views here are predominately from left leaning folks in liberal states.

Even with the spikes in Texas and Florida, I have colleagues and friends in those states who just dont care. They want to get back to "normalcy".

Coupled with the NFLs traditional stance - fuck the players, make money - barring some large sponsors from stepping in and advocating the halt of a season (very unlikely), the NFL will want their money.

16 games.
Yup, this is exactly my thinking. I think the only way we don't get a full 16-game season is if there is a player strike or if the Covid situation gets so bad that we have a nationwide ban on all sports or something like that. It certainly won't be a normal season - as with the other sports I assume a decent number of players will decide to opt out, there will probably be tweaks to roster rules, etc. - but this is the NFL we are talking about: there is no way the owners are going to willingly give up even a single regular season game's worth of TV revenue.

Edit: Even if you think the season is going to curtailed or drastically altered, the plurality of voters voting 0 games makes no sense to me. If the NBA - a sport played indoors and with just as much if not more close contact between participants - is going to play at least some games, why would the NFL not?
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Yup, this is exactly my thinking. I think the only way we don't get a full 16-game season is if there is a player strike or if the Covid situation gets so bad that we have a nationwide ban on all sports or something like that. It certainly won't be a normal season - as with the other sports I assume a decent number of players will decide to opt out, there will probably be tweaks to roster rules, etc. - but this is the NFL we are talking about: there is no way the owners are going to willingly give up even a single regular season game's worth of TV revenue.

Edit: Even if you think the season is going to curtailed or drastically altered, the plurality of voters voting 0 games makes no sense to me. If the NBA - a sport played indoors and with just as much if not more close contact between participants - is going to play at least some games, why would the NFL not?
The NBA has much smaller rosters and staffs and the players will be quarantined for the majority of the remaining season. It's also coming at a low time in infection rates, while they are expected to (and already begun to) go back on the upswing. You're also talking about a set number of people in one location, participating in a controlled environment designed to minimize spread beyond those inside the bubble. You're need a shit ton more people spread across the country for the NFL. I'm not saying it won't end in tears, but they likely have the best shot at pulling it off.
 

Devizier

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 3, 2000
19,569
Somewhere
Obesity is a co-morbidity with the virus. How many obese staff do you think are around the teams? So is diabetes and heart disease. None of the staff have these medical issues?
It would be something if the NFL killed off its reigning super bowl winning coach.
 

sodenj5

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
6,621
CT
JJ Watt posted this on Twitter. Unsurprisingly it looks like the NFL is in complete disarray and has no idea how to hand this situation. From Watt's POV, it looks like the NFL is closing their eyes, covering their ears, and yelling while hoping Covid-19 just goes away.

View: https://twitter.com/JJWatt/status/1283826377230356483?s=20
JJ Watt: leading the charge of “we want to play” but also saying he wouldn’t play if they required face shields or face masks.

Sounds right up the NFL’s alley.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,486
My Twitter feed is full of a coordinated NFLPA effort to demand that the NFL get better health protocols in place before starting camps. This is not heading in a good direction.
 

Fisks Of Fury

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,545
Plaistow, NH
Got an official email to season ticket holders this morning.

Highlights:
- Formally announced no preseason games. We'll receive a refund or credit for those tickets.
- Still hoping to open the season with some fans at reduced/20% capacity, pending state and local approval to operate.
- If they DO run at that reduced capacity, ticket quantity and game availability will be extremely limited, due to the high percentage to season ticket holders.
- Currently projecting that we will have access to one or two games at most, and likely in completely different seats, as they will be spacing attending fans out throughout the stadium.
- Can still opt to defer on the season entirely, and have the entire season ticket balance refunded or put towards next year. "Deadline" on this is July 31st.
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,379
Philadelphia
So what is the NFL's plan if there is a Marlins-like outbreak? Say 15 players on one team test positive in the days before a game. At that point, you definitely can't play that Sunday. That team probably can't play the following week either, assuming most of the team is placed in quarantine. Even if the outbreak is contained, does that team just forfeit two games (assume their bye week does not match up with that of the missed game opponents)?
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
So what is the NFL's plan if there is a Marlins-like outbreak? Say 15 players on one team test positive in the days before a game. At that point, you definitely can't play that Sunday. That team probably can't play the following week either, assuming most of the team is placed in quarantine. Even if the outbreak is contained, does that team just forfeit two games (assume their bye week does not match up with that of the missed game opponents)?
I doubt this will happen but if they were smart the NFL would build in two or so weeks of downtime between the end of the season and the playoffs where teams could make up games that were canceled. That would hardly be ideal either since it would mean some teams might get a ton of rest before the playoffs while others won’t, but it would seem to be the only way the NFL MIGHT be able to make it through the season without the entire schedule getting totally fucked.
 

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
14,101
Boulder, CO
I see absolutely no way this season happens. Same thing I said about MLB; there WILL be an outbreak that shuts them down.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,108
So what is the NFL's plan if there is a Marlins-like outbreak? Say 15 players on one team test positive in the days before a game. At that point, you definitely can't play that Sunday. That team probably can't play the following week either, assuming most of the team is placed in quarantine. Even if the outbreak is contained, does that team just forfeit two games (assume their bye week does not match up with that of the missed game opponents)?
You don't even need 15. What if the center gets and he passes it to the guards?
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Changed vote to 1-4 (was previously 9-12). There's no way in hell they pull this off, but I still expect them to try. Could see an equally abortive attempt as MLB is now seeing; run them out there for one or two games and then when it runs rampant through a locker room, shut it down.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
Changed vote to 1-4 (was previously 9-12). There's no way in hell they pull this off, but I still expect them to try. Could see an equally abortive attempt as MLB is now seeing; run them out there for one or two games and then when it runs rampant through a locker room, shut it down.
Going to be really interesting to see how they handle the 2021 draft if they can’t finish a season, particularly since you’ve got a potential franchise altering guy like Lawrence coming out. Not sure what the “fair” solution would be if they played, say, 6 games or something.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,484
Oregon
Going to be really interesting to see how they handle the 2021 draft if they can’t finish a season, particularly since you’ve got a potential franchise altering guy like Lawrence coming out. Not sure what the “fair” solution would be if they played, say, 6 games or something.
32 ping pong balls
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
1,807
Melbourne, Australia
“This year” is what I am hanging my hat on. Could the season start in November and have 8 games? But this has all been discussed elsewhere. More likely the season doesn’t happen without a viable vaccine or bubble.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,132
Pittsburgh, PA
I see absolutely no way this season happens. Same thing I said about MLB; there WILL be an outbreak that shuts them down.
Next man team up.

They roll two squads deep on game day and 3-4 deep including the PS and other reserves. I guarantee they'll find a way to ignore the outbreak and play the game anyway, even if it's a competitive farce.

Duff-Man never does, just the actors who play him.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
So what is the NFL's plan if there is a Marlins-like outbreak? Say 15 players on one team test positive in the days before a game. At that point, you definitely can't play that Sunday. That team probably can't play the following week either, assuming most of the team is placed in quarantine. Even if the outbreak is contained, does that team just forfeit two games (assume their bye week does not match up with that of the missed game opponents)?
I’ve said all along that the only way the NFL could do this is if they allow teams to have basically like 65-70 man rosters for this season. You keep 25 of them at a different site so that if you have even mass covid positives, you’ve got enough guys who haven’t been around the infected players who can fill in. It would make for some ugly football at times but if they want to complete the season, it seems hard to imagine without something like this.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,279
from the wilds of western ma
Went with 1-4, but the recent events in baseball, and what seems like a big wave of opt-outs about to happen, has me thinking more and more and that they might not even get off the ground.
 

Shelterdog

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2002
15,375
New York City
I see absolutely no way this season happens. Same thing I said about MLB; there WILL be an outbreak that shuts them down.
There are what, close to 2000 guys in their twenties on rosters and practice squads, many in regions where compliance to safety precautions is lax? I'm sure they'll all be socially distancing at home and on their days/weeks off for the next six weeks.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
I’ve said all along that the only way the NFL could do this is if they allow teams to have basically like 65-70 man rosters for this season. You keep 25 of them at a different site so that if you have even mass covid positives, you’ve got enough guys who haven’t been around the infected players who can fill in. It would make for some ugly football at times but if they want to complete the season, it seems hard to imagine without something like this.
Is this better than just grabbing street free agents and having them come in cold? Sure, in your scenario they can get some playbook experience (but not hands-on coaching with the regular coaching staff, since they're segregated), but the problem is trying to find like 500-600 extra guys leaguewide as opposed to just grabbing the best guy available and plugging him in.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
Is this better than just grabbing street free agents and having them come in cold? Sure, in your scenario they can get some playbook experience (but not hands-on coaching with the regular coaching staff, since they're segregated), but the problem is trying to find like 500-600 extra guys leaguewide as opposed to just grabbing the best guy available and plugging him in.
Well yeah you get to keep them in your system and work with them. Hugely advantageous over grabbing people off the street. Plus, they're getting paid, which of course costs the NFL more money, and we know they're loathe to part with it, but if they want to have a season, and if they want the quality of football to not fall completely off a cliff, then this is a better solution than just grabbing guys off the street, IMO.

At the start of camp, every team already has the extra guys they'd need. Just let them start with 80 or 90 and cut it down to ~75. 50 stay with the team as active, and 25 stay inactive and separated from the team. Something like that can work.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
Well yeah you get to keep them in your system and work with them. Hugely advantageous over grabbing people off the street. Plus, they're getting paid, which of course costs the NFL more money, and we know they're loathe to part with it, but if they want to have a season, and if they want the quality of football to not fall completely off a cliff, then this is a better solution than just grabbing guys off the street, IMO.

At the start of camp, every team already has the extra guys they'd need. Just let them start with 80 or 90 and cut it down to ~75. 50 stay with the team as active, and 25 stay inactive and separated from the team. Something like that can work.
I'm thinking about a case like last year when the Pats picked up Marshall Newhouse off the street and plugged him in. He was better than the Dan Skippers and Cole Crostons they had in camp. But if teams have an extra 20-25 guys, Newhouse is probably on a roster somewhere, and the Pats are plugging in a preseason / practice squad caliber guy like Skipper or Croston (unless they were lucky enough to be the 1 team out of 32 to sign a guy like Newhouse).
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,132
Pittsburgh, PA
I'm staying on 16 - I think if they start, they'll plow ahead and finish - but I think they need that shadow roster / greatly expanded Practice Squad model above. The cost for that probably won't be prohibitive (it's $8k / week for a player on the PS, max $136k for the full 17-week season, so multiply that by an extra 20 or so and that's still a reasonable insurance policy). But if they show no signs of reaching agreement on a salary cap or mass payroll deduction, I think that could end up being the undoing of the season.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,223
CA
I went from 9-12 to 1-4. NFL owners will still try to save every penny they can, but there is no way a league with teams traveling will make it through this. MLB will be shutting its doors soon I would imagine. Football is just too big to bubble obviously and has the most compromised folks amongst its athletes. I think this season is toast.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
I'm staying on 16 - I think if they start, they'll plow ahead and finish - but I think they need that shadow roster / greatly expanded Practice Squad model above. The cost for that probably won't be prohibitive (it's $8k / week for a player on the PS, max $136k for the full 17-week season, so multiply that by an extra 20 or so and that's still a reasonable insurance policy). But if they show no signs of reaching agreement on a salary cap or mass payroll deduction, I think that could end up being the undoing of the season.
I think everyone saying fewer than 16 here vastly overestimates the owners giving a single shit about the health and wellbeing of their players and staff. IMO, the only way they don't get to 16 games is (a) if a critical mass of state governments outright forbid the playing of games in their states or (b) the players get so concerned about contracting the virus that they go on strike. Neither of those seems particularly likely to me, so I'm pretty confident they will play all 16 games and a full postseason - even if they are playing with basically all practice squad players by the end.
 
Going to be really interesting to see how they handle the 2021 draft if they can’t finish a season, particularly since you’ve got a potential franchise altering guy like Lawrence coming out. Not sure what the “fair” solution would be if they played, say, 6 games or something.
I think I posted a suggestion in another thread here whereby in the event of a cancelled season, you'd measure each team's performance over the last 10 (or 20, etc.) years by number of Super Bowl wins, playoff wins, playoff appearances and regular season wins in some form or fashion and use that to determine the draft order - so the worst franchises in recent memory would get the best picks. No ping pong balls needed, although you could take the worst X teams from this list and put them into a draft lottery to determine the top three spots in the first round like the NBA does.
 

Oppo

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2009
1,576
Would never happen due to $$ but a double elimination tournament would be a fun idea for 2020.
Go with the bubble or football island idea, once eliminated you go home. Cuts total games down from 256 + playoffs to 63 games and takes 7 weeks resulting in better chance to finish and less teams active as the tournament progresses.