2020 Gronk Watch: Gronkmania

Status
Not open for further replies.

kelpapa

Costanza's Hero
SoSH Member
Feb 15, 2010
4,652
That offense is going to be unreal. They got no production from TE last year, and had protection issues. This solves both problems.
I don't have time to go through every one he's ever made BUT has BB ever made a trade where it wasn't a player for picks or picks for a player? Has there ever been a player-for-player (picks included or not) trade? If not, I don't know why anyone expected one.

Also, their cap situation still blows and they probably can't bring Howard in without moving someone else first. Or maybe Bill just doesn't want him.

WWE is going to have to send a ref to every game if he doesn't drop the 24/7 Championship prior to training camp, because every tackle will be a pinning predicament and there could be several title changes over the course of one game.
Jonathan Cooper was in the Chandler Jones trade. So, sort of.

Edit: I meant to edit this from "no production" to minimal before posting, but for some reason that didn't go through.
 

Hector Salamanca

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
358
I don't have time to go through every one he's ever made BUT has BB ever made a trade where it wasn't a player for picks or picks for a player? Has there ever been a player-for-player (picks included or not) trade? If not, I don't know why anyone expected one.
Only one off the top of my head I can think of is Brissett for Dorsett. I'm sure there have been a couple others but it's definitely less common for BB.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,660
I’m with the crowd pushing for Gronk for the 45. I don’t think it’s crazy to expect that, given his talent, his “draw,” and what a game changer he STILL is. Then again, BB shrugged and offered Jimmy G for a 2nd that SF fell over themselves to say yes to in ten minutes, so maybe the “6th rounder/late round pick swap” guys are on target. Feels like in the early years BB used to do better, be more aggressive when it came to extracting VALUE out of trades. Ok fingers crossed hoping for a 2nd, and will be even more psyched to root for the Bucs unless they’re playing the Pats.
Tampa isn't trading 45 for Gronk, it makes no sense, he might not even get 45 if he hadn't been retired for a year.
The comparison is obviously Marshawn. They got a lot more for Gronk than SEA got for Marshawn, in fact more of a difference than I expected.

Who is also the best at his position ever.
But hasn't been the best at his position in several years, hasn't played a full season in forever, just skipped an entire season and weighs like 30 pounds less than his playing weight

So then why did Tampa offer a 4th rounder? Why not a 6th rounder?
Because their options are a 4th and OJ Howard or
a 7th, Gronk and the pick they get for OJ Howard (hint it's gonna be better than a 4th).

The Patriots only leverage was that Tampa wanted Gronk, that's why they got what they did. That isn't unlimited leverage though, at some point for Tampa it makes sense just to keep their picks. 4th for a 7th was the middleground they found.
 

Caspir

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
6,897
You think Gronk retiring was the reason Brady left? That feels like a stretch.
No, and I was scattered in how I said that. I think if he wanted to come back, Brady stays, but I think that’s an alternate universe given what’s happened in the past month. There’s clearly some sort of issue behind the scenes. Bound to happen after this long, but it just makes me even more curious about what went on the past three years where there was so much success to break it all up.
 

kelpapa

Costanza's Hero
SoSH Member
Feb 15, 2010
4,652
Cameron Brate is under contract for the next four years. He or Howard has to be traded.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,502
I don't have time to go through every one he's ever made BUT has BB ever made a trade where it wasn't a player for picks or picks for a player? Has there ever been a player-for-player (picks included or not) trade? If not, I don't know why anyone expected one.

Also, their cap situation still blows and they probably can't bring Howard in without moving someone else first. Or maybe Bill just doesn't want him.

WWE is going to have to send a ref to every game if he doesn't drop the 24/7 Championship prior to training camp, because every tackle will be a pinning predicament and there could be several title changes over the course of one game.
Player for player trades are pretty rare in the NFL in general. Like, to the point that the ones that first come to mind are deals like Clinton Portis for Champ Bailey, Santana Moss for Laveranues Coles and, more recently, Shady McCoy for Kiko Alonso...5 years ago.
 

kelpapa

Costanza's Hero
SoSH Member
Feb 15, 2010
4,652
No, and I was scattered in how I said that. I think if he wanted to come back, Brady stays, but I think that’s an alternate universe given what’s happened in the past month. There’s clearly some sort of issue behind the scenes. Bound to happen after this long, but it just makes me even more curious about what went on the past three years where there was so much success to break it all up.
I'm guessing the Lions trade for Gronk really pissed him off.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,653
You're right. Comparing 2020 Jim Brown to 2020 Gronk is a great analogy.

Gronk was still very good last time we saw him, and he's had a full year to heal up.
Jim Brown has had a ton of years to heal up. Gronk turns 31 in May -- they're not getting the 25 year-old version.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,217
Um, maybe they did offer a 6 and the Pats talked them up to 4. Pats didn't have a ton of leverage here.
Obviously the Pats talked them up to a 4th. I was responding to the logic that since Gronk wasn't going to play, the Pats should be happy with anything at all that was more than nothing.
 

ndpope

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
88
Dedham, MA
I don't have time to go through every one he's ever made BUT has BB ever made a trade where it wasn't a player for picks or picks for a player? Has there ever been a player-for-player (picks included or not) trade? If not, I don't know why anyone expected one.

Also, their cap situation still blows and they probably can't bring Howard in without moving someone else first. Or maybe Bill just doesn't want him.

WWE is going to have to send a ref to every game if he doesn't drop the 24/7 Championship prior to training camp, because every tackle will be a pinning predicament and there could be several title changes over the course of one game.
Jacoby Brissett for Phillip Dorsett
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,653
Obviously the Pats talked them up to a 4th. I was responding to the logic that since Gronk wasn't going to play, the Pats should be happy with anything at all that was more than nothing.
Gotcha. But moving up from the 7th to the 4th is far from nothing. They need a kicker and could turn a 7th into the best kicker in the draft (or at least one better than one they could get in the 7th).
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,150
Pittsburgh, PA
So is comparing Gronk 2020 to Gronk in his prime
When last we saw him in spandex, Gronk wasn't some shell of himself, he was catching the decisive pass in the super bowl.

Yeah he's lost 30 lbs of muscle since then, he's also got 6 months to put it back on now. I don't see why we should assume he's done, unless we're really motivated to not feel hurt.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,505
Oregon
Rooting for no sports this year just to gloat about trading Betts and Gronk and then not even playing.
Why screw things up for everyone else, just because you don't want to follow your teams this year?

Just don't follow them
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,505
Oregon
When last we saw him in spandex, Gronk wasn't some shell of himself, he was catching the decisive pass in the super bowl.
Definitive proof that he hasn't lost a step and/or injuries haven't taken a toll!!!
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,217
Gotcha. But moving up from the 7th to the 4th is far from nothing. They need a kicker and could turn a 7th into the best kicker in the draft.
Sure, it's not nothing. And they are in a far better position that I am to determine the best they could get. But if 1.5 years of Sanu was worth a 2nd round pick, I thought they could have at least gotten a 3rd for a year of Gronk.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,150
Pittsburgh, PA
I mean, I'm rooting against Gronk un-retiring for this, just because I love the guy but he has absolutely no regard for his own well-being and has taken way too many concussive hits over the last decade. Like Brady once felt about Welker, at some point if you care about the guy you hope he stays retired, and stops taking brutal hits.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,653
They have 2 other 7th rounders to pick a kicker.
I meant that the best kicker in the draft might not last until the 7th, but might last until the pick they get from Tampa. Just saying that you can look at this as moving up to get the best K in the draft (or whomever they feel is the best K).
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,150
Pittsburgh, PA
Sure, it's not nothing. And they are in a far better position that I am to determine the best they could get. But if 1.5 years of Sanu was worth a 2nd round pick, I thought they could have at least gotten a 3rd for a year of Gronk.
Sanu was willing to play for Atlanta.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,660
Gotcha. But moving up from the 7th to the 4th is far from nothing. They need a kicker and could turn a 7th into the best kicker in the draft (or at least one better than one they could get in the 7th).
They have multiple 7ths, but also....... you don't really have to draft a kicker, decent chance the best kicker to come out of this draft is undrafted, there are also a lot of FA kickers out there who can be had for vet min.

Edit- just saw your post. Under no circumstances should anyone ever draft a kicker in the 4th. MAYBE a "can't miss" guy you take late 6th, but even can't miss kickers often.... miss.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,653
Sure, it's not nothing. And they are in a far better position that I am to determine the best they could get. But if 1.5 years of Sanu was worth a 2nd round pick, I thought they could have at least gotten a 3rd for a year of Gronk.
Sanu was an in season trade and the Pats very possibly/likely had competitors for him. For Gronk, it's TB or nothing (presumably). IOW, Atlanta had much more leverage with Sanu than NE does with Gronk.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,453
deep inside Guido territory
I expect Gronk to come out and have a really good season. He had a whole year to heal up and gets to play in an offense with Mike Evans and Chris Godwin so he should have much better matchups than he had at the end with the Pats.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
63,942
Rotten Apple
Honestly I'm fine with how this played out. Good luck to the oldies Gronk and TB, I've already turned the page.
The Betts trade, on the other hand... still furious.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,660
Sure, it's not nothing. And they are in a far better position that I am to determine the best they could get. But if 1.5 years of Sanu was worth a 2nd round pick, I thought they could have at least gotten a 3rd for a year of Gronk.
Sanu was....
1. Not retired for a year
2. Playing every week for the team trading him (pretty well too) and willing to do so going forward,
3. A trade option for every other team in the league, with no real ability to stop a trade anywhere.
 

Zedia

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
7,009
Pasadena, CA
They have multiple 7ths, but also....... you don't really have to draft a kicker, decent chance the best kicker to come out of this draft is undrafted, there are also a lot of FA kickers out there who can be had for vet min.
I think Kyed has had the Pats taking Rodrigo Blankenship in just about every mock he’s done (I’m not even sure it’s not a bit at this point). He seems to think it’s a foregone conclusion that they’d take a kicker mid-rounds.
 

Ferm Sheller

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 5, 2007
20,653
They have multiple 7ths, but also....... you don't really have to draft a kicker, decent chance the best kicker to come out of this draft is undrafted, there are also a lot of FA kickers out there who can be had for vet min.

Edit- just saw your post. Under no circumstances should anyone ever draft a kicker in the 4th. MAYBE a "can't miss" guy you take late 6th, but even can't miss kickers often.... miss.
Ghost was taken in the fourth. If there's a guy they like as much or nearly as much (and other teams feel the same way), they're more likely to get him in the 4th than the 7th. That's all I'm saying.
 

Average Reds

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 24, 2007
35,413
Southwestern CT
Why wouldn’t Tampa wait until he unretired amdeffectively force the Pats to release him? Who else would trade for his rights if he unretired, as there’s no indication that Gronk would play for any other team?
Why piss off the Pats and possibly trigger a tampering investigation when you can make everyone happy and get what you want for peanuts?
 

Oppo

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2009
1,576
Why screw things up for everyone else, just because you don't want to follow your teams this year?

Just don't follow them
Because I want to see de facto trades netting Verdugo/Downs/Wong/4th rd pick for Price/7th rd pick
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,978
Here
Gronk could have just come back and held out, so gotta just take the 4th and be happy. Not like Gronk was a monster his last season, either.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
I don’t know why anyone is upset with this. It’s basically a free mid round pick in a rebuild. Maybe they can get a 3rd for Jules somewhere before he’s a pain in the ass in training camp? As soon as Brady was gone Bill should get all the TB 12 out of the room.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
When last we saw him in spandex, Gronk wasn't some shell of himself, he was catching the decisive pass in the super bowl.

Yeah he's lost 30 lbs of muscle since then, he's also got 6 months to put it back on now. I don't see why we should assume he's done, unless we're really motivated to not feel hurt.
He came up big in the AFC Championship and Super Bowl, but he was really a shell of himself for the bulk of that season. Anyone expecting top vintage Gronk is likely to be disappointed.

The plus side for him and Tampa is that he won't have to be vintage Gronk. His presence alone will create matchup problems for opposing defenses.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,218
He came up big in the AFC Championship and Super Bowl, but he was really a shell of himself for the bulk of that season. Anyone expecting top vintage Gronk is likely to be disappointed.

The plus side for him and Tampa is that he won't have to be vintage Gronk. His presence alone will create matchup problems for opposing defenses.
I feel like he could be like 2010 Gronk from production standpoint. Limited targets and yardage but lots of TDs.
 

GoDa

New Member
Sep 25, 2017
962
One 4th round pick? Are you kidding me? Could've easily twisted TB arms for more. That's a joke.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,187
Imaginationland
He came up big in the AFC Championship and Super Bowl, but he was really a shell of himself for the bulk of that season. Anyone expecting top vintage Gronk is likely to be disappointed.

The plus side for him and Tampa is that he won't have to be vintage Gronk. His presence alone will create matchup problems for opposing defenses.
This is, of course, a relative term. Per FO he was the 6th best TE in 2018, despite only playing 13 games. In 2017 he missed two games (one due to suspension) and was far and away the best TE in the league:

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/nfl/te/2017
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,187
Imaginationland
One 4th round pick? Are you kidding me? Could've easily twisted TB arms for more. That's a joke.
Or Tampa could have said no and waited it out for the Pats to either cut him entirely (how long would they keep their HOF tight end hanging?) or give him up for a 6th or 7th round pick. If they held out for more it would have turned into an ugly staring contest that had no guarantee of turning out better than a 4th round pick.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
63,942
Rotten Apple
Nink on ESPN said he was lifting with Gronk while he was retired and Gronk hinted at a comeback. Nink also said he'd guess that Tom called Gronk and talked him into it.
 

GoDa

New Member
Sep 25, 2017
962
Or Tampa could have said no and waited it out for the Pats to either cut him entirely (how long would they keep their HOF tight end hanging?) or give him up for a 6th or 7th round pick. If they held out for more it would have turned into an ugly staring contest that had no guarantee of turning out better than a 4th round pick.
I'm sorry. Neither Gronk, nor TB had any leverage. Leak out that Gronk is looking to move to TB - but the Pats are looking for a better deal than swapping 4th and 7th round picks.. and ALL of the pressure if on TB. What - are they building for the future?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.