2019 NFL Week 11 Game Thread

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,016
Garrett made an unnecessary and hard take-down of Rudolph. That should have been a penalty/fine/whatever - and also should have been the end of it.
Rudolph took umbrage and began trying to yank off Garrett's helmet (for reasons known only to him), and then planted his cleats in Garrett's groin. At that point they were separated and it looked like things were over. Then Rudolph came after Garrett again and got a helmet to the head for his trouble. Then several Steelers took Garrett to the ground and began beating and kicking him.

I'm having a hard time finding the good guy in this story.
There's a distinct bad guy though.

The first 2 things happen on football fields every week. The last one doesn't.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,070
Newton
I will go with 6 games.

If he clubbed his girlfriend with a helmet, 2 games.
This.
Depends on whether there is video or not.
Ok, this too.

People don't understand - It's not just Garrett who is lucky, it's also the NFL. If Garrett happened to be holding the helmet upside down and Rudolph's skull is cracked open on national TV, you can only imagine the conversation this morning.

NFL is going to make an example of Garrett. As they say, bad facts make bad law, and using a helmet as a weapon is at bad facts can get.
I completely agree with the bolded -- where I'm less confident is in what the NFL is going to do. They have proven to administer justice based on the perceived PR hit -- and in light of some of the @ilol@u-type takes--which are clearly pretty common amongst the NFL fanbase based on what I'm seeing online--I'm not sure exactly what that will be.
 

kartvelo

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2003
10,478
At home
There's a distinct bad guy though.

The first 2 things happen on football fields every week. The last one doesn't.
I agree. It's the case, however, that Rudolph escalated the situation once and then reignited it when it was seemingly over. He doesn't deserve a helmet to the head for that, but absent those two actions this is a virtual non-event, and he needs to get himself under control there.
And I don't recall seeing a man on the ground being beaten and kicked in the head recently (even if one might think he deserved it), so there's that.

Please don't construe this as a defense of Garrett. Whatever he gets from the NFL, he deserves.
 

DanoooME

above replacement level
SoSH Member
Mar 16, 2008
19,877
Henderson, NV
People are fucked when it comes to sports. ANYONE who justifies that shit in any way is a complete shithead.
Hope he only gets 2 games. What he did is no different than other sports entertainment (MMA, NHL fights, Boxing). All the comments saying he could have killed him are laughable.

Give me more of these fights. Can't wait to see Browns/Steelers II in a few weeks.
And still lost in all of this is Ogunjubi's cheap shot on Rudolph after Garrett swung his helmet. That piece of shit can get a nice long suspension too. It's a good thing the Steelers' OL showed some restraint (other than Pouncey) because a lot of players would have escalated things even further after the cheap shot.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,731
AZ
Yeah, I would actually suspend Rudolph too. For the same reason that pulling a guy off a pile is a personal foul. You know where it leads. Which is not to say that Garrett didn’t escalate well beyond reason. But starting fights leads to escalation. This is a legal concept and a common sense one.

Pouncey also gets tagged. You don’t kick at a guy laying passively on the ground. He wasn’t trying to prevent any imminent injury. Maybe what he did makes him a locker room hero, and is understandable, but it’s unacceptable.

I would want all the evidence and to hear from the relevant participants. My current thinking is that Garrett should get something into next year and my punishment would be something like a 1/1.5/5 ratio Rudolph/Pouncey/Garrett. So, if you give Garrett 5, give Rudolph 1, Pouncey 1 or 2.

My resolution would actually be Garrett for 10, which puts Pouncey at 3 and Rudolph at 2, but maybe you reduce Rudolph to 1 since he’s the victim of the most vicious act.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,731
AZ
And still lost in all of this is Ogunjubi's cheap shot on Rudolph after Garrett swung his helmet. That piece of shit can get a nice long suspension too. It's a good thing the Steelers' OL showed some restraint (other than Pouncey) because a lot of players would have escalated things even further after the cheap shot.
One at most for me. I can’t say it’s worse than the Gronk play. They are comps. It’s the least significant to me.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,070
Newton
Lost in all this is what an absolute embarrassment that game was. The most tension that game produced was whether one of the players gets suspended for a year and criminal charges.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,728
Whatever he otherwise deserves for the actual incident will be multiplied by 1.5-2.0x because it’s his fourth fine of the year, right?

I think 3 games becomes 5 or 6 because of his priors.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,268
from the wilds of western ma
Hope he only gets 2 games. What he did is no different than other sports entertainment (MMA, NHL fights, Boxing). All the comments saying he could have killed him are laughable.

Give me more of these fights. Can't wait to see Browns/Steelers II in a few weeks.
I'm not sure if you're doing a little comedy skit here, if so, disregard, but if not, I'm amazed and impressed at the restraint other posters have shown in responding to this idiocy. As has been alluded to, the comp to this is the benches clearing in baseball, and somebody grabs a bat and hits another player over the head with it. And he absolutely could have maimed or killed Rudolph had the helmet landed a little differently on his head, for fucks sake. He's lucky the result wasn't worse, because criminal assault charges would be in order if it had. Garrett deserves at least the rest of this year, as big a fine as the CBA will allow, and his return next year should be contingent upon his showing real remorse, and taking demonstrable steps to convince the league it will never happen agin. There are others in this who didn't cover themselves in any glory either, and they should be dealt with accordingly. But Garrett is the main culprit, by a wide margin.
 

BigJimEd

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 4, 2002
4,438
I agree. It's the case, however, that Rudolph escalated the situation once and then reignited it when it was seemingly over. He doesn't deserve a helmet to the head for that, but absent those two actions this is a virtual non-event, and he needs to get himself under control there.
And I don't recall seeing a man on the ground being beaten and kicked in the head recently (even if one might think he deserved it), so there's that.

Please don't construe this as a defense of Garrett. Whatever he gets from the NFL, he deserves.
Someone up thread mentioned Bertuzzi and McSorley but I think this is where it is very different.
Rudolph was coming at Garrett. Not excusing Garrett either but I think it's different in that regard than those cases.

Watching in break room with co-worker, a casual Colts fan. They show the slow mo of helmet to head and he shudders. Then they show full video and he shrugs and says self defense.
Not exactly my view but there are those out there that put as much if not blame on Rudolph and they are not just Browns fans/ Steelers haters.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,268
from the wilds of western ma
Someone up thread mentioned Bertuzzi and McSorley but I think this is where it is very different.
Rudolph was coming at Garrett. Not excusing Garrett either but I think it's different in that regard than those cases.

Watching in break room with co-worker, a casual Colts fan. They show the slow mo of helmet to head and he shudders. Then they show full video and he shrugs and says self defense.
Not exactly my view but there are those out there that put as much if not blame on Rudolph and they are not just Browns fans/ Steelers haters.
A large number of NFL fans are fucking mouth breathing idiots. Virtually every former player and coach I've seen in various media platforms this morning is condemning it in the strongest terms. It's laughable to think Rudolph posed any real physical threat to Garrett. More likely, how dare this mouthy, pretty boy QB get in my face, was the trigger.
 
Last edited:

Bongorific

Thinks he’s clever
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,444
Balboa Towers
If Garrett gets the rest of the year, and it is possible, you have to give Rudolph one game for the kick to the nuts and for him trying to pull Garrett's helmet off.

It was pretty bad all around. The sack was bad. the kick and helmet twist by Rudolph was worse. And then the return volley with the helmet on a helmetless player was reprehensible. Just a horrendous situation that kept getting worse. But maybe Garrett might not get any games because that's just hard nosed AFC North football.
Agreed. The game was out of control. The headshots, particularly Randall, were really bad. Coupled with players complaining about flags and fans booing for clear targeted headshots, the game was out of control. Myles body slamming at the end of the game got the whole sequence going. The Browns have been an undisciplined mess all year.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,502
Someone up thread mentioned Bertuzzi and McSorley but I think this is where it is very different.
Rudolph was coming at Garrett. Not excusing Garrett either but I think it's different in that regard than those cases.

Watching in break room with co-worker, a casual Colts fan. They show the slow mo of helmet to head and he shudders. Then they show full video and he shrugs and says self defense.
Not exactly my view but there are those out there that put as much if not blame on Rudolph and they are not just Browns fans/ Steelers haters.
Self-defense does not automaticaly encompass every possible defensive response.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
I just hope the NFL breaks down the tape and sanctions what’s deserving of it. Which would mean, in my view, penalties for Garrett AND Rudolph, of differing dimension.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,221
CA
I agree with others that Rudolph should be suspended 1-2 games. Pouncey should get 3-5 (kicking a pinned down guy in the head regardless as to why is unacceptable), and Garrett should be somewhere in the 10-16 range (he committed battery and should probably be charged imo).
 

axx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,131
I agree with others that Rudolph should be suspended 1-2 games. Pouncey should get 3-5 (kicking a pinned down guy in the head regardless as to why is unacceptable), and Garrett should be somewhere in the 10-16 range (he committed battery and should probably be charged imo).
Rudolph's Agent is talking about possibly pressing charges, so this could get pretty spicy. The ESPN article compares it to Gurode, who did not when he got stomped on by Haynesworth. Haynesworth got 5 games.

Anything is possible for Garrett, but I would say 6-8 is most likely (The Browns have 6 games left). I would be surprised if either Steeler got more than 2 games.
 

Bongorific

Thinks he’s clever
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,444
Balboa Towers
Rudolph's Agent is talking about possibly pressing charges, so this could get pretty spicy. The ESPN article compares it to Gurode, who did not when he got stomped on by Haynesworth. Haynesworth got 5 games.

Anything is possible for Garrett, but I would say 6-8 is most likely (The Browns have 6 games left). I would be surprised if either Steeler got more than 2 games.
It’s not up to Rudolph or his agent whether charges are “pressed.”
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,419
Oregon
I love how the ESPN story says that Rudolph "appeared to attempt to dislodge" Garrett's helmet
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,762
Wasn’t Garrett leading the league in roughing the passer calls? Guy has built a reputation for himself in taking cheap shots; I’m not surprised Rudolph lost his cool when he hit him again.
 

ilol@u

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 2, 2009
4,239
Foxboro
I'm not sure if you're doing a little comedy skit here, if so, disregard, but if not, I'm amazed and impressed at the restraint other posters have shown in responding to this idiocy. As has been alluded to, the comp to this is the benches clearing in baseball, and somebody grabs a bat and hits another player over the head with it. And he absolutely could have maimed or killed Rudolph had the helmet landed a little differently on his head, for fucks sake. He's lucky the result wasn't worse, because criminal assault charges would be in order if it had. Garrett deserves at least the rest of this year, as big a fine as the CBA will allow, and his return next year should be contingent upon his showing real remorse, and taking demonstrable steps to convince the league it will never happen agin. There are others in this who didn't cover themselves in any glory either, and they should be dealt with accordingly. But Garrett is the main culprit, by a wide margin.
Save your holier than thou speech.

You watch a sport where 300lb men are being paid to hit and hurt each other. Players get CTE playing this game and have killed themselves and others. Sports entertainment includes MMA, WWE, and boxing where guys actually get hurt and could kill each other. Yet people watch them. These sports are violent. They're entetaining. The chances of Rudolph dying there was exactly 0.00%.

Your outrage awards you zero internet points.
 

axx

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,131
Save your holier than thou speech.

You watch a sport where 300lb men are being paid to hit and hurt each other. Players get CTE playing this game and have killed themselves and others. Sports entertainment includes MMA, WWE, and boxing where guys actually get hurt and could kill each other. Yet people watch them. These sports are violent. They're entetaining. The chances of Rudolph dying there was exactly 0.00%.
Garrett swung pretty hard, Rudolph is lucky it was the bottom of the helmet and not the top.
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,268
from the wilds of western ma
Save your holier than thou speech.

You watch a sport where 300lb men are being paid to hit and hurt each other. Players get CTE playing this game and have killed themselves and others. Sports entertainment includes MMA, WWE, and boxing where guys actually get hurt and could kill each other. Yet people watch them. These sports are violent. They're entetaining. The chances of Rudolph dying there was exactly 0.00%.

Your outrage awards you zero internet points.
Wow, that's an impressive field of straw men you've constructed there, Bra. I'll leave you to enjoy your man-cave.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
The final decision of course isn't Rudolph's but I imagine it carries a lot of weight.
As a practical matter, it’s dispositive. Good luck prosecuting a battery case with a reluctant witness.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,419
Oregon
Copying this here from the news thread:

Garrett: Suspended indefinitely and must meet with RG. Fined as well.
Pouncey: Suspended 3 games and fined
Ogunjobi: 1 game suspension and fine

Other suspensions will be forthcoming in the regular channels.
Steelers and Browns organizations fined $250,000
Rudolph ... not punished
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
Copying this here from the news thread:



Rudolph ... not punished
He’d better be and fit into the “regular channels”. Otherwise, it comes off as another example of Rooney/Mara justice.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,731
AZ
"Indefinitely" is right out of the RG playbook. He's such a wuss.

"I'm doing something immediately but giving myself the opportunity to see how the wind is blowing before I commit."
 

cornwalls@6

Less observant than others
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,268
from the wilds of western ma

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,682
As a practical matter, it’s dispositive. Good luck prosecuting a battery case with a reluctant witness.
I think he means that affirmatively requesting prosecution isn't dispositive but does carry some weight - which you would agree with - rather than the inverse, where a victim that declines prosecution is often dispositive of not having prosecution going forward.
 

KiltedFool

has a terminal case of creeping sharia
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
2,400
Disgusted with my team, disgusted with the game, disgusted with the league as a whole at this point.

One thing that may play a role in Rudolph's reaction is his recent concussion October 6th. And just calling that hit a concussion feels kind of like minimizing it. Not to make excuses but an overreaction by Rudolph wouldn't be surprising.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,070
Newton
Copying this here from the news thread:



Rudolph ... not punished
Garrett: Suspended indefinitely and must meet with RG. Fined as well.
Pouncey: Suspended 3 games and fined
Ogunjobi: 1 game suspension and fine

Other suspensions will be forthcoming in the regular channels.
Steelers and Browns organizations fined $250,000
I have to say: this actually feels about right. Which is not something I A) anticipated or B) have ever said about a Roger Goodell/related punishment. I’m also shocked/impressed (I can’t believe I’m saying this) that they managed to hand this down in, like, 12 hours. For all the reasons that they should have done it, I can think of about 100 more, knowing the NFL, that they wouldn’t have. But they did.

There is still time to fuck it up though.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,387
What the fuck did Mikes Garret do that FOX is trying to convince me is understandable even if it was wrong?

Like, WTF is this? And why won’t they stop?

It’s become unnerving. And now I need to know.

Thanks in advance.