Go on?The texts in the formal complaint aren’t very pleasant.
https://haaslawpllc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/1_Complaint.pdfGo on?
Really? Why not do it after he signed his extension with the Raiders? His contract with the Pats is modest compared to what he already earned from the Steelers and what he stood to earn from the Raiders.Why too convenient of a time to do the lawsuit to think it's legit and anything but a shakedown.
I mean, they should probably see if he’s guilty before releasing him no?Can he be released without any cap hit for this?
He has no equity built up here. And that could take a long time. I’d be looking for the most club friendly way to cut bait.I mean, they should probably see if he’s guilty before releasing him no?
Yeah, why would that be the case? Criminal conviction too hard to get, so you skip that and go for the civil suit?Looks to be a Civil suit, not a criminal trial. Important distinction.
Could be lots of reasons, but it's true that the burden of proof needed to win a civil case is much lower than that to win a criminal case.Yeah, why would that be the case? Criminal conviction too hard to get, so you skip that and go for the civil suit?
Waited until the season started for max visibility.Really? Why not do it after he signed his extension with the Raiders? His contract with the Pats is modest compared to what he already earned from the Steelers and what he stood to earn from the Raiders.
Totally. Nobody would have cared if she did this while he was on hard knocks.Waited until the season started for max visibility.
Also, you don't get paid monetary compensation for a criminal case.Yeah, why would that be the case? Criminal conviction too hard to get, so you skip that and go for the civil suit?
Eh. I still think it's more likely than not Demaryius Thomas is cooked.Demaryius Thomas for a 6th and four days of AB seems like a bad trade.
Well, now we know why he needs more than one phone.This is going to be a mess.
View: https://twitter.com/incarceratedbob/status/1170215266527141889?s=19
My friend who knows both said that she was trying to get a confidential settlement from him for about six months. Guess she gave up on that.That is seriously gross. It’s also pleaded with a great deal of particularity. Unless her counsel was going to ignore his Rule 11 obligations, which I seriously doubt, he would have to take steps to verify the key allegations. In this case, obviously it means reviewing the email chain and likely speaking with the chef she befriended and other material witnesses.
But all that said, why now? Why not when he hit the jackpot with his Raider deal?
Wait till Shank and BV get their hands on this situation.
Also it's possible the police/local DA already knew and did nothing.Also, you don't get paid monetary compensation for a criminal case.
No, your immediate reaction was this:I really, really, don’t want to be the guy who’s immediate reaction to these kinds of allegations is “lying bitch, cash grab” etc etc but does the wording on these emails, assholery aside, kind of give off the vibe that he’s giving her shit for trying to say that he did what he’s accused of/trying to extort him to anyone else or am I just reading them wrong?
See you, asshole.
That's the way I am reading it. His verbage is certainly "less than ideal".I really, really, don’t want to be the guy who’s immediate reaction to these kinds of allegations is “lying bitch, cash grab” etc etc but does the wording on these emails, assholery aside, kind of give off the vibe that he’s giving her shit for trying to say that he did what he’s accused of/trying to extort him to anyone else or am I just reading them wrong?
If he acknowledges the relationship and says everything that happened was consensual, harsh texts don’t make him a rapist.I really, really, don’t want to be the guy who’s immediate reaction to these kinds of allegations is “lying bitch, cash grab” etc etc but does the wording on these emails, assholery aside, kind of give off the vibe that he’s giving her shit for trying to say that he did what he’s accused of/trying to extort him to anyone else or am I just reading them wrong?
I agree that if it’s true she’s extorting him then the texts are read totally differently and him being a total asshole to her is somewhat justified. Gotta wait and see I guessI really, really, don’t want to be the guy who’s immediate reaction to these kinds of allegations is “lying bitch, cash grab” etc etc but does the wording on these emails, assholery aside, kind of give off the vibe that he’s giving her shit for trying to say that he did what he’s accused of/trying to extort him to anyone else or am I just reading them wrong?
The complaint is written to be a media document. It goes well beyond what is needed to get past notice pleading standards and contains lots of details that are intended to respond to potential weaknesses in her story. It even alleges she passed a polygraph, which is unusual for a complaint. It is intended for maximum exposure and to get the jump on the narrative in the public.That is seriously gross. It’s also pleaded with a great deal of particularity. Unless her counsel was going to ignore his Rule 11 obligations, which I seriously doubt, he would have to take steps to verify the key allegations. In this case, obviously it means reviewing the email chain and likely speaking with the chef she befriended and other material witnesses.
But all that said, why now? Why not when he hit the jackpot with his Raider deal?
Wait till Shank and BV get their hands on this situation.
I’d be surprised especially since this is a civil case.Any chance that AB gets put on the Comissioner’s Exempt list?
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=come upThat's the way I am reading it. His verbage is certainly "less than ideal".
Of course he is. I mean, this is a guy with no downside to acquiring, right? We could always just cut him if he were going to pose any problem whatsoever.More importantly, is TB12 still OK with him staying at the house?
I can’t past the three separate occasions part of it. This story is weird. Who gets raped by someone and then willingly spends time alone with the accused not once but two more times? Including going to his house and watching tv? Huh? Not to blame a victim but that’s hard to believe that someone would do that if they felt victimized.I really, really, don’t want to be the guy who’s immediate reaction to these kinds of allegations is “lying bitch, cash grab” etc etc but does the wording on these emails, assholery aside, kind of give off the vibe that he’s giving her shit for trying to say that he did what he’s accused of/trying to extort him to anyone else or am I just reading them wrong?
TB12 is just a tenant in that house. I think we’ll know tomorrow how this goes. Pats tend to act quickly on stuff like this. If he is around tomorrow, I don’t think they’re doing anything and will let it play out.More importantly, is TB12 still OK with him staying at the house?
Her lawyers are no joke. Significant high profile litigation experience, Supreme Court oral arguments, NYU - Best Oralist. In contrast, AB's attorney's website is down and his litigation experience consists of a small insurance defense firm in Florida.That is seriously gross. It’s also pleaded with a great deal of particularity. Unless her counsel was going to ignore his Rule 11 obligations, which I seriously doubt, he would have to take steps to verify the key allegations. In this case, obviously it means reviewing the email chain and likely speaking with the chef she befriended and other material witnesses.
But all that said, why now? Why not when he hit the jackpot with his Raider deal?
Wait till Shank and BV get their hands on this situation.