2021-2022 NBA Game Thread!

Sam Ray Not

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
8,871
NYC
The Dubs are way better than they were last year, but its hard to look at Kuminga and wonder what went wrong with Wiseman last year. Kuminga just dives to the rim and cleans up, I wonder what Wiseman would look like in that role this year?
It’s a good question. I think the key differences are some combo of:

1. Wiseman was thrown into the fray with only three games of college experience plus zero training camp due to covid, whereas JK had a full season with G-League ignite and a proper training camp; and was brought along slowly and carefully, with a couple of Santa Cruz stints to get him plenty of burn while he was still figuring things out. The Ws also added a couple of key members to their development staff this past off-season in anticipation of the need to develop Kuminga, Wiseman and Moody.

2. This edition of the Warriors has more players who get Kerrball principles, with high IQ vets like Andre, Otto, JTA, Bjelica, and GP2 replacing questionable fits like Oubre, Paschall, Mulder and Mannion — which makes it easier to mix in minutes for the young guys while keeping the system chugging along.

3. Kuminga actually does a lot more than just “drive to the rim and clean up” — he’s also a switchable 6-8 wing-forward who can guard 1-5, which makes him more immediately playable on D than a somewhat awkward (even if freakishly athletic) 7-1 center who still has not figured out when to switch and when to drop, how much to gap quick guys, how to avoid dumb fouls, etc.

Anyway, I still think Wiseman has a chance to be really good; it’s just gonna take time. Losing two training camps and most of his sophomore season to covid/meniscus surgery is rough for a guy that young. And yeah, @BSF, it’s tantalizing to ponder an alt universe Warriors with LaMelo (who apparently had a lot of supporters among the Warriors brass at the time of the draft) in place of Wiseman. LeMelo + Poole + Moody + Kuminga could have been a ridiculously good young core going forward. But I want to see Wiseman actually play for a stretch before kicking myself too hard…
 

cheech13

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2006
1,608
I know the stats don't remotely bear this out, but it seems like every time I see Anthony Davis I'm struck by the notion that he's a gigantic fraud. Lebron is 37 and clearly past his prime, Westbrook is 33 and is barely useful. Davis is 28, and the Warriors didn't even both having a big on the floor down the stretch. He should be carrying them right now, but he's absolutely not. By my count the Lakers are 16-20 when he plays, most of which were with Lebron. Maybe he's one of those guys who peaked young and injuries have aged him faster than you'd expect, but he's not getting nearly enough criticism for how the Lakers' season has gone.
I was legitimately surprised that he made the 75th Anniversary team. His resume isn’t bad, but I don’t really think of him as one of the elite players of this era, which should absolutely be a prerequisite to getting in that kind of company.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,713
I know the stats don't remotely bear this out, but it seems like every time I see Anthony Davis I'm struck by the notion that he's a gigantic fraud. Lebron is 37 and clearly past his prime, Westbrook is 33 and is barely useful. Davis is 28, and the Warriors didn't even both having a big on the floor down the stretch. He should be carrying them right now, but he's absolutely not. By my count the Lakers are 16-20 when he plays, most of which were with Lebron. Maybe he's one of those guys who peaked young and injuries have aged him faster than you'd expect, but he's not getting nearly enough criticism for how the Lakers' season has gone.
The advanced stats do bear it out (depending on your expectations of course).

But a few years into his career, I think a lot of people expected AD to be perennial MVP candidate. What is he currently in his age 28 season? Is he a top 10 player in the league?

He seemed to be on a trajectory to superstardom but fell off big-time. Maybe injury relayed, maybe he still has another leap left in his career. But it's possible he's just not that good.

Unfortunately for the Lakers, they need him to be MVP-level good for this team to have a chance.
 

Attachments

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,659
Raptors getting boatraced by the Pelicans, they look exhausted already, they need the ASB bad, playing everyone 38-40 minutes every single game since New Year's is wearing them out.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
Raptors getting boatraced by the Pelicans, they look exhausted already, they need the ASB bad, playing everyone 38-40 minutes every single game since New Year's is wearing them out.
They just won 8 straight including an OT and a 3OT, while winning two others in final seconds. We’re they exhausted and worn out then? C’mon now.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
They just won 8 straight including an OT and a 3OT, while winning two others in final seconds. We’re they exhausted and worn out then? C’mon now.
I'm sure they are, but no more so than any other team in the league. I'm guessing the vast majority of players are looking forward to the ASB/rest.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,659
They just won 8 straight including an OT and a 3OT, while winning two others in final seconds. We’re they exhausted and worn out then? C’mon now.
I mean... maybe that's why they're exhausted? That team looked gassed like 25 minutes in. That's how it works with overplay, you actually win short term because you get more minutes of your best guys against bench units... then you run out of steam or get injured.

There is a reason teams that play their starters way too much always seem to falter and collapse.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
I mean... maybe that's why they're exhausted? That team looked gassed like 25 minutes in. That's how it works with overplay, you actually win short term because you get more minutes of your best guys against bench units... then you run out of steam or get injured.

There is a reason teams that play their starters way too much always seem to falter and collapse.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2022_per_game.html#per_game_stats::mp_per_g

Doesn't really need any commentary. Just posting to back up the claim that the Toronto starters are playing big minutes.

edit: Top 3 in mpg, 4 of the top 8, 5 of the top 15.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
I mean... maybe that's why they're exhausted? That team looked gassed like 25 minutes in. That's how it works with overplay, you actually win short term because you get more minutes of your best guys against bench units... then you run out of steam or get injured.

There is a reason teams that play their starters way too much always seem to falter and collapse.
It’s not overplaying when you are forced to play multiple OT games and other games that go to the wire……that’s when the usage plays itself. I’m sure the cost of one scheduling loss was worth the price of all those clutch wins with no evidence that 3 fewer min per game affects tonight at all while very possibly/likely it costs than a couple of those wins. Be careful…..Herman Edwards is lurking! ;)


https://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2022_per_game.html#per_game_stats::mp_per_g

Doesn't really need any commentary. Just posting to back up the claim that the Toronto starters are playing big minutes.
Nobody is arguing otherwise. They are also winning a shit ton of close games in doing so which is the purpose. There is a time and place to lessen workloads, although limiting practice time with true days off is the most effective way, but when you’re hovering around ,500 that is more of a desperation time when you really need wins.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
for reference, the C's have one in the top 5 and 2 in the top 30 (5th and 27th). 3 in the top 50 (45th), and 5 in the top 10 (82nd and 91st)
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Nobody is arguing otherwise. They are also winning a shit ton of close games in doing so which is the purpose. There is a time and place to lessen workloads, although limiting practice time with true days off is the most effective way, but when you’re hovering around ,500 that is more of a desperation time when you really need wins.
I know, I just didn't realize they had the top 3 in mpg and 4 in the top 8. No other team comes close. They've also been playing big minutes all year. Their top 5 was already at the top of the league in minutes played well before the streak. Though they did get a big bump in minutes in January. The streak didn't start until January 29th and 6 of the 8 wins came in February, where their minutes loads are in line with November, October and December.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
I know, I just didn't realize they had the top 3 in mpg and 4 in the top 8. No other team comes close. They've also been playing big minutes all year. Their top 5 was already at the top of the league in minutes played well before the streak. Though they did get a big bump in minutes in January. The streak didn't start until January 29th and 6 of the 8 wins came in February, where their minutes loads are in line with November, October and December.
Yes they’ve been playing big minutes…..when they play. Like I said earlier, these guys aren’t worn down bc they have all had breaks throughout the season. Heading into tonight’s game everyone in their starting lineup has missed anywhere from 6 to 15 games. VanVleet is their minutes leader….over the last two months he’s had a 2 week break and another 12 days where he only played 1 game. He’s fresh despite avg 38 mpg when he does play. Siakam is coming off a 5-game stretch where he’s shot 63-90 (70%!!) 30ppg & 10rpg…….and I keep reading how he’s worn down. These aren’t fragile 38-yr old bigs……we saw the same with the Knicks last year when they were “worn down” yet finished the season as one of the hottest teams in the game. Most guys can handle and even thrive with big minutes.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
Anthony Davis just badly rolled his ankle. Could be worse. Time to quit on the season, LeBron.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,807
Damn, Spurs and Wizards combine for 310 points, Spurs come out on top 157-153 in Double OT.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
Lakers/Clippers going on 7 minutes of an officials review with :24 to go. Wtf NBA???

Edit: 7 min, 34 sec later a decision is made……at which point Tyronn Lue calls a timeout and we are off to another commercial. We are going to end up with nearly 10 full minutes of no action in a game that has :24 remaining. Good lord.

Edit: Inbounds play the Lakers get whistled for a foul just before the 8-count for backcourt violation…….and we go to another review. Can’t make this up.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,181
Imaginationland
That was about right for two teams that are a combined 5 games under .500 and missing 3/4 best players. Multiple bonehead mistakes in the final minute on both sides (remarkable that the entire world had to know LeBron was going to try a fadeaway from the corner on that final play, and they give him a relatively clean look), but a fitting end.
 

jmcc5400

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
5,335
That was about right for two teams that are a combined 5 games under .500 and missing 3/4 best players. Multiple bonehead mistakes in the final minute on both sides (remarkable that the entire world had to know LeBron was going to try a fadeaway from the corner on that final play, and they give him a relatively clean look), but a fitting end.
What a comedy of errors. Jackson getting bailed out on the 8 second call followed by LA inexplicably throwing it backwards and Jackson trying to *dribble* to half court in a second. Then Carmelo’s pathetic attempt at a game winner - great movement Lakers. Then the Clips losing LeBron and giving him a clean look at a tie…
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
What a comedy of errors. Jackson getting bailed out on the 8 second call followed by LA inexplicably throwing it backwards and Jackson trying to *dribble* to half court in a second. Then Carmelo’s pathetic attempt at a game winner - great movement Lakers. Then the Clips losing LeBron and giving him a clean look at a tie…
I don’t think there was anything inexplicable about Batum inbounding in the backcourt against a 5-count. Everyone in the frontcourt was fronted and if Jackson doesn’t have to juke to get past Reeves(?) he makes it over in time. Obv not the best option but it was comical how the announcers were downplaying that unless the Lakers had a complete breakdown it would be next to impossible to inbound into the frontcourt.
 

jmcc5400

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
5,335
I don’t think there was anything inexplicable about Batum inbounding in the backcourt against a 5-count. Everyone in the frontcourt was fronted and if Jackson doesn’t have to juke to get past Reeves(?) he makes it over in time. Obv not the best option but it was comical how the announcers were downplaying that unless the Lakers had a complete breakdown it would be next to impossible to inbound into the frontcourt.
Agree that Jefferson was egregiously off on how difficult it would be to inbound the ball to the front court. Inbounding in the back court was understandable, but throwing it backwards from the foul line extended made it pretty much impossible.
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,074
The final 30 seconds of that game took about 20 minutes in real time. Great advertisement for the NBA!

At least it ended happily for us, with the Lakers losing.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
Lakers/Clippers going on 7 minutes of an officials review with :24 to go. Wtf NBA???

Edit: 7 min, 34 sec later a decision is made……at which point Tyronn Lue calls a timeout and we are off to another commercial. We are going to end up with nearly 10 full minutes of no action in a game that has :24 remaining. Good lord.

Edit: Inbounds play the Lakers get whistled for a foul just before the 8-count for backcourt violation…….and we go to another review. Can’t make this up.
The NFL for a period of time set a hard limit of 2 minutes for replay reviews. May still be in place.

If you cannot determine the outcome after watching replay for 2 minutes, then the call on the court should stand. Perfection is so often the enemy of the good.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
Agree that Jefferson was egregiously off on how difficult it would be to inbound the ball to the front court. Inbounding in the back court was understandable, but throwing it backwards from the foul line extended made it pretty much impossible.
The count was right around 4 and Jackson had to break free to accept any pass. The defense simply was not allowing any other option and Batum could only inbound to him where he made himself available. “Maybe” Jackson could have cut to the half court line but again the defense wasn’t allowing it.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
The NFL for a period of time set a hard limit of 2 minutes for replay reviews. May still be in place.

If you cannot determine the outcome after watching replay for 2 minutes, then the call on the court should stand. Perfection is so often the enemy of the good.
The other question that LeBron was adamant about on the floor following the review is that the Clippers were specifically challenging who the ball went out of bounds off and not whether LeBron’s foot landed on the line while he still had the ball. Just a weird sequence that the officials have to expedite.
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,074
The count was right around 4 and Jackson had to break free to accept any pass. The defense simply was not allowing any other option and Batum could only inbound to him where he made himself available. “Maybe” Jackson could have cut to the half court line but again the defense wasn’t allowing it.
Once Jackson caught the ball in the backcourt, his teammate at the opposite foul line could/should have flashed toward midcourt to receive a pass. That was open and wouldn't have resulted in the violation.
 

ElUno20

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
6,122
I love that awful 20 minutes of waiting just led to a lakers loss. This clippers team is mainly grit and "promise" but short on any top tier talent, lebron should be ashamed of himself losing to these guys.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,659
Toronto getting absolutely waxed again.

Elsewhere some potential for a really good night for the Celtics...WAS leads CLE, MIA and SA are tied, MEM up big on CHI
 

128

Member
SoSH Member
May 4, 2019
10,074
Memphis goes into Chicago and wins on a night when Desmond Bane goes 4 for 18 from the floor. Impressive.