Kyrie is dirty rotten no good and we have schadenfreude…?

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
This is probably the worst column I've ever read. What a total moron...

Just cringeworthy:
"In one breath Kareem is claiming current NBA players don't grasp the seriousness of the situation, and in the next breath he's arguing that Irving has a duty to live up to the responsibilities of celebrity. Is Kareem serious? Is he a serious person? Kareem is allegedly a Muslim. Arguing for the responsibilities of celebrity is the promotion of idolatry. Islam strictly prohibits idolatry. It's called shirk. As a Muslim or a serious person, Kareem should realize Irving's only duty is to serve God, not celebrity, not the government, not the desires of a 74-year-old sellout..."

So, umm...Kyrie is now a serious person? Kareem now a man "driven by celebrity"? Jesus friggin Christ...:confused:
Stupid argument, bad writing, and outrage click bait...but idolatry? Really?

Guy should be fucking ashamed of himself.
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,156
Sally Jenkins pulling no punches.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/09/27/kyrie-irving-covid-19-vaccine/

Kyrie Irving is too smart for you. He’s so smart, he can outwit germs and governments. He’s so smart, you can’t understand a word he’s saying. That’s how smart he is. His genius is utterly indecipherable to you and me, and while you may wish for some insight into the exquisite, diamond-chip workings of his multifaceted mind, you are not entitled to them because he prefers to keep them “private.”
Irving is so smart that everything he says sounds like a mystery unless it’s a contradiction. “I’m a human being first,” he said in refusing to share whether he is vaccinated against the coronavirus or to comment on whether he is anti-vaccine, as has been reported, a stance that could imperil other human beings because the vaccines reduce the chance of spread.
“Please, just respect my privacy,” he repeated. “All the questions kind of leading into what’s happening, just please — everything will be released at a due date, and once we get this cleared up … I’m just excited to enjoy this day by day and the journey, man. However this comes, the ups, the downs, the good, the bad — I know that I’ll be there every day no matter what and just be present for my teammates as one of the leaders on the team.”
I’m sorry — you’ll be “there,” meaning where? And what exactly do you take people for?
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
I think the thing that annoys me most about Kyrie is that he wants to come off as some sort of modern-day philosopher but nothing he says actually means anything at all. His vaccination decision is bad u see any circumstances but I’d at least respect him a bit more if he took the Marshawn Lynch approach of “fuck you, I’m going to do whatever I want, I’m not talking to the media.”
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
I think the thing that annoys me most about Kyrie is that he wants to come off as some sort of modern-day philosopher but nothing he says actually means anything at all. His vaccination decision is bad u see any circumstances but I’d at least respect him a bit more if he took the Marshawn Lynch approach of “fuck you, I’m going to do whatever I want, I’m not talking to the media.”
The quote about him being a contrarian without a cause is perfect. If he's not a contrarian, he probably never bothered learning anything because he didn't have to.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
I think the thing that annoys me most about Kyrie is that he wants to come off as some sort of modern-day philosopher but nothing he says actually means anything at all. His vaccination decision is bad u see any circumstances but I’d at least respect him a bit more if he took the Marshawn Lynch approach of “fuck you, I’m going to do whatever I want, I’m not talking to the media.”
Well he is a Dukie even if for only like 11 games or so.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,807
The situation with Kyrie comes across as him just buying time in hopes that something will be worked out between the league and the city that will allow him to play home games without being vaccinated. I think he would be the kind of person to sit out games to make a statement because that gets him closer to his real goal which is to be the martyr.

Jenkins mentioned in the piece a good point: LaMarcus Aldridge had to retire mid-way through last season due to a heart condition, and has now came back and Irving could potentially put his teammate at extra risk by not being vaccinated. That should be something hammered home in every interview with Kyrie or anyone associated with the Nets.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
Silver is not going to back off this stance, and has no reason to compromise. Kyrie can try the courts, but the courts are going to give lots leeway to the state laws and to the league office.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,660
Honestly I doubt Kyrie cares, he's got a ton of money, and the Nike money is still coming in. What Kyrie wants more than anything is for people to tell him how smart he is, and what a great thinker he is. Basically he wants Whitlock articles all the time. He'd love the idea of saying "see I'm giving up money because I'm SOOOO principled."
 

ElUno20

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
6,122
Honestly I doubt Kyrie cares, he's got a ton of money, and the Nike money is still coming in. What Kyrie wants more than anything is for people to tell him how smart he is, and what a great thinker he is. Basically he wants Whitlock articles all the time. He'd love the idea of saying "see I'm giving up money because I'm SOOOO principled."
That's great. But if he does go that route and he loses checks, it may scare the not so rich idiot players to get vaccinated. So it's a win win.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,660
That's great. But if he does go that route and he loses checks, it may scare the not so rich idiot players to get vaccinated. So it's a win win.
Maybe, but how many are there? Knicks are all vaccinated, I THINK that Kyrie and Wiggins are the only guys who would miss checks as of today. All the rest play places without local rules and unlikely to have them at this point.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
That's great. But if he does go that route and he loses checks, it may scare the not so rich idiot players to get vaccinated. So it's a win win.
I'm sure most of them already got vaccinated because most of them are easily replaceable and wouldn't be worth the trouble.

Like, I'm guessing if Bruno wasn't vaxxed, he wouldn't be here. I could be wrong.
 

Phil Plantier

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 7, 2002
3,420
The problem is the CBA doesn't really allow them to mandate it, they need an agreement with the union and given that a couple of the anti-vaxxers are prominent union members and/or close friends with prominent members, the Union won't even consider it. The NBA doesn't want to put a mandate in place that gets challenged in court and risk a ruling that might weaken them on other issues
I recommend Bomani Jones' podcast from Monday on this. His take: it may not be that anti-vaxxers are prominent union people (besides Kyrie), it's that in the particular case of the NBA players union, mandating players to put something in their bodies is a very big deal.

And the NBA mandating without union agreement is a non-starter.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,851
Honestly I doubt Kyrie cares, he's got a ton of money, and the Nike money is still coming in. What Kyrie wants more than anything is for people to tell him how smart he is, and what a great thinker he is. Basically he wants Whitlock articles all the time. He'd love the idea of saying "see I'm giving up money because I'm SOOOO principled."
Great success!

44700
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
I recommend Bomani Jones' podcast from Monday on this. His take: it may not be that anti-vaxxers are prominent union people (besides Kyrie), it's that in the particular case of the NBA players union, mandating players to put something in their bodies is a very big deal.

And the NBA mandating without union agreement is a non-starter.
Except in the case of Kyrie and Brooklyn, the NBA is not mandating anything. It's the state of New York that's instituted a mandate, and Silver has said that the league will abide by the state's mandate, as well as the city of San Francisco's local mandate.

I can see the Players Association fighting it, but the NBA is on pretty solid legal ground here by saying they will abide by government regulations. The PA could try suing the state of New York, but so far the courts have not ruled in favor of those fighting mask or vaccine mandates in other venues.
 

Bleedred

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 21, 2001
10,018
Boston, MA
But will he then in the next breath tell them to shut up and dribble? Or is it because what they're saying fits your stupid narratives about COVID?
I look forward to Ted Cruz's follow up tweet standing up for women's reproductive rights and choice. You know, "your body, your choice" and all.
 

EddieYost

is not associated in any way with GHoff
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
10,751
NH
Michael Porter Jr. is one of the biggest stars in the NBA?
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,186
Imaginationland
This is no surprise (I remember something from the spring about MPJ on the subject) and as ridiculous as the statement is, unless someone new emerges he's instantly the second biggest star to not be vaccinated, right?
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,807
This is no surprise (I remember something from the spring about MPJ on the subject) and as ridiculous as the statement is, unless someone new emerges he's instantly the second biggest star to not be vaccinated, right?
Beal.

I'm also skeptical that LeBron is vaccinated. Maybe he got it but IIRC during the playoffs he kind of denied it.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,660
Beal kinda walked back his statements too, basically said he isn't sure if he'll get it, but was told by doctors to wait either way because he isn't far enough from his symptomatic COVID bout. (I think it's 90 days you're supposed to wait?) He said he thinks it's a personal decision, but he wasn't advocating that people not get it, just that it's up to the individual and he'll decide when the time comes (or something like that, I'm paraphrasing).
 

ElUno20

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
6,122
Beal, lebron, all of these boil down to the "do your own research" type of canned answers. Like i truly, truly hate people.

I hope when Beal goes down with the 5008383838th injury of his career, he tells the team doctor to F off and does his own research.

And lebron, really? After almost 2 years into this, the rest of us idiots shouldn't have been keeping up with things and trusting the science. Nope. We should've just waited until our jobs backed us into a corner.

I just can't with these morons. I cant believe im saying this but i wish David Stern was the commissioner to deal with this.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,770
Any of these anti-vaccine idiots who profess to care about Black people are certainly not helping the Black community in the US, where Blacks are dying at 1.4 times the rate than whites. With vaccinate rates for Blacks trailing other ethnic groups, pro athletes could have taken a better role as influencers. Instead, we have morons like Kyrie attempting to dissuade people from getting vaccinated.

I wonder how his title chasing teammates like James Harden are going to feel about Kyrie not being able to play in half the games.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,705
I look forward to Ted Cruz's follow up tweet standing up for women's reproductive rights and choice. You know, "your body, your choice" and all.
Look at what covid19 has done, it’s turned Democrats into fanatical pro-lifers and Republicans into avid pro-choices.
 

The Social Chair

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 17, 2010
6,106
Any of these anti-vaccine idiots who profess to care about Black people are certainly not helping the Black community in the US, where Blacks are dying at 1.4 times the rate than whites. With vaccinate rates for Blacks trailing other ethnic groups, pro athletes could have taken a better role as influencers. Instead, we have morons like Kyrie attempting to dissuade people from getting vaccinated.
The entire Kareem post linked below is worth reading but especially this.

The dark reality is that those who promote hesitancy and “more research” have blood on their hands. Worse, the kind of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience pundits spread is the kind of selective “science” that white people used to justify enslaving Black people. Drapetomania was a malady coined by a doctor in 1851: slaves ran away because of their smaller brains and blood vessels combined with their natural tendencies toward indolence and barbarism. This theory lasted for a hundred years. Many other “scientific” ideas about Black inferiority have been spread throughout America’s history and are still popular today. Racism, misogyny, xenophobia, anti-LGBTQ+ all thrive in the addled minds of flat-Earth thinking. For Black athletes or entertainers to give this same anti-vax pseudo-science any oxygen is to allow the other crackpot theories to co-exist that justify marginalizing others.
https://kareem.substack.com/p/why-athletes-need-to-lead-the-drive
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,556
Beal, lebron, all of these boil down to the "do your own research" type of canned answers. Like i truly, truly hate people.

I hope when Beal goes down with the 5008383838th injury of his career, he tells the team doctor to F off and does his own research.

And lebron, really? After almost 2 years into this, the rest of us idiots shouldn't have been keeping up with things and trusting the science. Nope. We should've just waited until our jobs backed us into a corner.

I just can't with these morons. I cant believe im saying this but i wish David Stern was the commissioner to deal with this.
They readily trust that the slacker serving the 350$ steak actually did wash his hands after taking a dump 10 minutes ago, but they "have to do more research" on something that scientists have been studying for 20 years and that neither they nor I would understand if it was explained by the best explainers around.

Or the "personal trainer" who says "drink this, it's got neuropolemicblomoplasmicgrojhimby yarsters in it to help your triglionic fibers jonquifferate."
 
Last edited:

Batman Likes The Sox

Not postscient
Gold Supporter
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2003
2,463
Madison, CT
When does Nike drop Kyrie? Now? After he misses all of his home games and some others, maybe for multiple years? If most of the country is tired of those who won't get vaccinated, does that even leave enough people who want to buy Kyrie gear?
 

BringBackMo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
1,329
Calling out jimbodandy with this post isn’t it, I think you wanted to prove a point by being extremely negative but most of your post is just wrong and not fit for an NBA board.
The game hasn’t collapsed and the products not bad. Not sure what you’re going for here honestly.
Agree the ending of games are bad with the length of replays. Officiating in every sport sucks and Im not sure that the nba is markedly worse than any other major sports league
I agree with nearly all of your post. Well said. But I disagree about the officiating. I do believe that the NBA is on a different level of bad, with the refs much more likely than in other sports to call games differently for home teams and, especially, for star players. I personally believe that this affects game outcomes, including in the playoffs. Do many MLB umps suck? Yes. But for the most part I don’t feel that they are influenced by the screaming of the crowd and therefore call pitches differently in order to benefit the home team. Nor do I believe that balls and strikes are called differently for specific hitters or pitchers. I believe that the basketball equivalent of those things happens in the NBA. In fact, I believe that the league—which has since at least the 80s been at the forefront of marketing its superstars above its teams—encourages this kind of preferential treatment. It’s the one thing about the NBA that I can’t stand.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,745
In fact, I believe that the league—which has since at least the 80s been at the forefront of marketing its superstars above its teams—encourages this kind of preferential treatment. It’s the one thing about the NBA that I can’t stand.
I have no idea whether the NBA actually protects its stars (is there really any data on this?) but let's assume that's true.

The NBA is an entertainment business. People pay to go see the stars play not sit on the bench with foul trouble. IMO, the NBA would be fine to give its stars some extra leeway. The issue is just to make it consistent so everyone understands, and since we're having this discussion, maybe the NBA has done a good job of getting everyone to understand (assuming it's true)?

I think the NBA is the toughest sport to ref. Charging/block is as hard as a call to make in sports and instead of having two or three close instances, the NBA has dozens per game. Also, trying to figure out, just a couple of examples, whether guys kick out their legs or the defender is stepping into air space or trying to figure out if 260 pound athletes are taking an extra step (etc.) all while also trying to see what guys are doing with their hands or feet in super tight quarters - there's a ton to look for on every trip down the court. I couldn't do it.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,660
When does Nike drop Kyrie? Now? After he misses all of his home games and some others, maybe for multiple years? If most of the country is tired of those who won't get vaccinated, does that even leave enough people who want to buy Kyrie gear?
When his shoes stop being one of the most popular things they sell.... which is probably never.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,309
Santa Monica
I think the NBA is the toughest sport to ref. Charging/block is as hard as a call to make in sports and instead of having two or three close instances, the NBA has dozens per game. Also, trying to figure out, just a couple of examples, whether guys kick out their legs or the defender is stepping into air space or trying to figure out if 260 pound athletes are taking an extra step (etc.) all while also trying to see what guys are doing with their hands or feet in super tight quarters - there's a ton to look for on every trip down the court. I couldn't do it.
Yep. Basketball/Football is so tough to ref because it's very subjective, unlike the baseball strike zone which is measured. All MLB has to do is add what tennis adopted over a decade ago, camera technology/"robots", to call balls/strikes.

At some point Umpires will realize that moving their 60-yr old, fat slob from behind the plate into the booth to make quicker instant replay calls will help the MLB product. The NBA/NFL officiating/replay system is a much tougher nut to crack.
 
Last edited:

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,660
NFL is honestly probably the toughest to ref if you go by the rulebook since it's 5 guys for 22 spread over a bigger field, but NBA is the hardest in reality.
NFL because if they actually tried to call holding or illegal contact, completely by the book you'd have flags on literally every play.
NBA is the hardest overall because you are judging degrees of contact, sub-second windows of foot placement, who initiated arm contacts, etc.

I think people also overrate the "star" effect. Stars get more calls because they are involved in way more plays, and they are usually superior talents to the guys who foul them. Like Harden drives people nuts, but the thing is.... he really does get fouled a ton, and he exploits the rules by putting himself in positions to be fouled knowing that his opponents don't have the skill to avoid it most of the time. People used to complain about LeBron just driving into traffic and getting calls, but 90% of the time he used his superior speed/strength to beat guys to the spot. So a guy like HArden probably gets fouled 15 times a game easy and gets 9-11 calls, but a guy who gets the ball less gets fouled 3 times a game and gets 1 call. Refs missed more calls on Harden, but people's reaction is "oh Harden got all the calls, look at my bench guy he had 2 blown calls"... STAR treatment. When really... refs just miss some calls, and the more calls you create the less impact the missed calls have.

Also, people are very bad at judging refs, you just need to go on any place people talk about basketball to see that every fanbase thinks their stars don't get calls they deserve and other people's stars get "star treatment", the NBA viewership is Tommy Heinsohns all the way down.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
NFL is honestly probably the toughest to ref if you go by the rulebook since it's 5 guys for 22 spread over a bigger field, but NBA is the hardest in reality.
NFL because if they actually tried to call holding or illegal contact, completely by the book you'd have flags on literally every play.
NBA is the hardest overall because you are judging degrees of contact, sub-second windows of foot placement, who initiated arm contacts, etc.
Seven, but I don't disagree with your conclusion
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,278
NFL is honestly probably the toughest to ref if you go by the rulebook since it's 5 guys for 22 spread over a bigger field, but NBA is the hardest in reality.
NFL because if they actually tried to call holding or illegal contact, completely by the book you'd have flags on literally every play.
NBA is the hardest overall because you are judging degrees of contact, sub-second windows of foot placement, who initiated arm contacts, etc.

I think people also overrate the "star" effect. Stars get more calls because they are involved in way more plays, and they are usually superior talents to the guys who foul them. Like Harden drives people nuts, but the thing is.... he really does get fouled a ton, and he exploits the rules by putting himself in positions to be fouled knowing that his opponents don't have the skill to avoid it most of the time. People used to complain about LeBron just driving into traffic and getting calls, but 90% of the time he used his superior speed/strength to beat guys to the spot. So a guy like HArden probably gets fouled 15 times a game easy and gets 9-11 calls, but a guy who gets the ball less gets fouled 3 times a game and gets 1 call. Refs missed more calls on Harden, but people's reaction is "oh Harden got all the calls, look at my bench guy he had 2 blown calls"... STAR treatment. When really... refs just miss some calls, and the more calls you create the less impact the missed calls have.

Also, people are very bad at judging refs, you just need to go on any place people talk about basketball to see that every fanbase thinks their stars don't get calls they deserve and other people's stars get "star treatment", the NBA viewership is Tommy Heinsohns all the way down.
I’ve been preaching all of this for decades…..nearly word for word. Especially the “star treatment” complaint. LeBron, Harden, etc excel in creating angles while utilizing their skill to put them in position to draw fouls. There is a reason why inferior players don’t get nearly as many calls…..bc they aren’t capable of controlling the play while putting themselves in these same positions.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,188
There are a couple of areas where the stars may have an advantage from the refs:

The first is the classic case where the defender makes no contact with the star player, but jumps and knocks the ball out of the offensive player's hands. The video replay shows that the defender clearly had no contact with the player, but instead got all ball. But the defender is still called for the foul. Anecdotally, these calls seem to favor the stars, but that could be selection bias at work on my end. And, there is the saying "luck is the residue of design".

The other is traveling; there's no real reason for the officials to allow the player 3-4 steps toward the basket without the ball anywhere near touching the floor. But maybe there is some selection bias at work there as well.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,705
I believe that the basketball equivalent of those things happens in the NBA. In fact, I believe that the league—which has since at least the 80s been at the forefront of marketing its superstars above its teams—encourages this kind of preferential treatment. It’s the one thing about the NBA that I can’t stand.
Marcus Smart Superstah...

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=difg1ERWZfU


(Posting the full video because it's the best 18 seconds of The Demon Kyzuzu Era)