11/5 - @ Canadiens. Money, get away

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,536
What a shitshow of a league. How do you have a rule that doesn’t even pass the absolute minimum requirement of “does this rule serve a purpose?”

Can’t review when the puck hits the net out of play though. Or obvious penalties that lead to goals. God forbid we do that.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,536
LOL obvious interference on one end then Tuukka gets run on the other end. Forget about a favorable call tonight.
 

catomatic

thinks gen turgidson is super mean!!!
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
3,419
Park Slope, Brooklyn
The non-call on Senyshyn is the limit. Millimeters of inconclusivity negates a good goal and 25' of textbook interference is ignored. Livid.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,872
This Canadiens crowd is looking for a penalty every time one of their players dives or gets touched... I guess they're used to it, but man they suck.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,242
306, row 14
Goddamn Felger for the Rask in Montreal thing. He’s 6-1-1 with like a .953 in his last 8 in the Bell Centre. He’s having a bad night, it is not a Montreal thing.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,872
Even the replay they keep showing the puck is in the zone.. if they used the film from nbc the puck passes into the zone between frames almost so how could they possibly have seen which entered the zone first?