Potential Trade Deadline Targets

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
He'd cost them about 400k at the deadline which they can probably find a way to make happen.

I don't think the prospect cost would be that prohibitive unless teams think he's the 2016 version. The relief market is also going to be flooded.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,680
Rogers Park
Pomeranz gave up two HR in the *first inning* of his start tonight at AAA. His results are less important than how his stuff looks, but it would be good to see him get people out before the deadline.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,677
Barraclough's lucky this year, but he's an interesting target. Very good fastball and an excellent change, which is a pitch no one in our bullpen really throws besides Joe Kelly (and his change-up isn't great).

As a team, our relievers have only thrown changeups 2.6% of the time (29th in MLB), and most of those were by Carson Smith and Bobby Poyner. It seems like he'd be too expensive to acquire, but his pitch mix would be a nice repertoire to add to the pen.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,677
Conley could be a really nice pickup. He was touching 97 last weekend, and has the same arsenal (fastball/change) as Barraclough, but much less hype.

It's his last pre-arb year so he'd be a solid payroll fit, and there may be shutdown-reliever upside there too. He's not a LOOGY.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,480
deep inside Guido territory
There's no way the Sox are looking at deGrom....right? There's no way they have what it takes to get him.


There were plenty of scouts on hand this past weekend for #Mets at #Marlins as reported, clubs were watching Miami relievers like Kyle Barraclough and others. Scouts, like from #RedSox and #Mariners also were there to get a look at Jacob deGrom, Jeurys Familia and others on NYM
 
Last edited:

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
I imagine it is due diligence though they could also be looking at Cabrera and/or all relievers from both teams.

It would probably take Devers+ or Benintendi. Wouldn't make much sense.
 

BornToRun

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 4, 2011
17,521
I imagine it is due diligence though they could also be looking at Cabrera and/or all relievers from both teams.

It would probably take Devers+ or Benintendi. Wouldn't make much sense.
I’d like us to take a good long look at Familia. I’ve seen a lot of him since I live in the Mets TV market. Solid strikeout guy, walk rate is middle of the road, and he keeps the ball in the yard. He loses the zone at times but he’s been a really good arm for a couple years now. He did miss a good chunk of time last year from a suspension and a blood clot in his shoulder.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,711
I imagine it is due diligence though they could also be looking at Cabrera and/or all relievers from both teams.

It would probably take Devers+ or Benintendi. Wouldn't make much sense.
The "plus" added to Devers would need to be a humongous plus. Jacob deGrom is unfreakingbelievable and has two more years of control left.

DeGrom and Todd Frazier for Devers and Eduardo Rodriguez might work. Frazier probably could hold the 3b fort for a couple more years until Chavis is ready (Frazier is only 32 and can at least provide some power). And DeGrom is a major step up from EdRo. A rotation of Sale, DeGrom, Porcello, and Price would be unreal. And then Sale and DeGrom leading the way in the postseason. Maybe the Mets would throw in Familia if the Sox included a prospect like Houck as well. That would solve a lot of issues for the 2018 Red Sox, even though losing Devers would hurt for many, many years to come.
 

Sandy Leon Trotsky

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2007
6,463
The "plus" added to Devers would need to be a humongous plus. Jacob deGrom is unfreakingbelievable and has two more years of control left.

DeGrom and Todd Frazier for Devers and Eduardo Rodriguez might work. Frazier probably could hold the 3b fort for a couple more years until Chavis is ready (Frazier is only 32 and can at least provide some power). And DeGrom is a major step up from EdRo. A rotation of Sale, DeGrom, Porcello, and Price would be unreal. And then Sale and DeGrom leading the way in the postseason. Maybe the Mets would throw in Familia if the Sox included a prospect like Houck as well. That would solve a lot of issues for the 2018 Red Sox, even though losing Devers would hurt for many, many years to come.
Tough one. I'm so bullish on Devers as being a GREAT hitter..... but yeah....
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,711
The Mets also get the added bonus of boning the Yankees with that trade. Still, it seems like the most unlikely of all the scenarios.
Anytime we talk trade possibilities in here, it's unlikely. This one too, of course. But I think it's a fair deal that makes sense for both teams given their needs. EdRo would be terrific in the NL and Devers is going to be a beast for a long time to come. Both very cost controlled. And if they get a solid relief prospect as well... that would be a nice haul. For the Mets, they're going to move Familia anyway, and Frazier is a spare part that's totally not needed for them, given where they're at. So it's basically DeGrom and half a Familia for Devers, EdRo, and Houck. For the Sox, yeah, losing Devers is huge, but again, Frazier can fill the gap adequately, Familia helps the bullpen, and DeGrom is an absolute stud.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,677
I'm probably in the minority here, but I'd trade Benintendi for deGrom. Benny's fallen back to earth pretty hard after that four-week hot stretch.

3/29 - 5/11: 136 PA, 99 wRC+, .290 BABIP, 21.1 Hard %
5/12 - 6/7: 109 PA, 221 wRC+, .365 BABIP, 31.3 Hard%
6/8 - 7/2: 102 PA, 93 wRC+, .275 BABIP, 29.8 Hard%

A passion for watching Benny develop has become one of this board's pieties, but I think the perception of his abilities outstrips reality both offensively and defensively. He's a good young player with a solid floor, but I don't see evidence he's the star in the making we think he is.
 
Last edited:

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
I'm probably in the minority here, but I'd trade Benintendi for deGrom. Benny's fallen back to earth pretty hard after that four-week hot stretch.

3/29 - 5/11: 136 PA, 99 wRC+, .290 BABIP, 21.1 Hard %
5/12 - 6/7: 109 PA, 221 wRC+, .365 BABIP, 31.3 Hard%
6/8 - 7/2: 102 PA, 93 wRC+, .275 BABIP, 29.8 Hard%

A passion for watching Benny develop has become one of this board's pieties, but I think the perception of his abilities outstrips reality both offensively and defensively. He's a good young player with a solid floor, but I don't see evidence he's the star in the making we think he is.
Seems a little premature for a 23 year old with a career OPS of .809.

What happens to his 2018 numbers when he gets hot again? If he's hitting close to average during his cold streaks instead of bad, that's a sign of big improvement.
 

21st Century Sox

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 19, 2006
766
Tough crowd. AB was 2nd last year in ROY voting. He is now 23, and is ranked 35th in MLB for WAR. Maybe I am off base, but I think he is far better than "a good young player with a solid floor", right now. (wRC+ of 131, ranking him 23rd best in MLB.) What do you want from this kid?
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,677
Seems a little premature for a 23 year old with a career OPS of .809.

What happens to his 2018 numbers when he gets hot again? If he's hitting close to average during his cold streaks instead of bad, that's a sign of big improvement.
If he had the exit velocity, I'd agree with you. Even during that hot stretch, his exit velocity was around 89.6 mph. It's since slid back down to 88.1 mph. (MLB average is 88.7).

He's obviously a good player and his plate discipline keeps him valuable, but I think a lot of people bought into that May stretch as a new baseline. He's hit .230/.320/.345 since.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
The Mets also get the added bonus of boning the Yankees with that trade. Still, it seems like the most unlikely of all the scenarios.
Ya if he or Syndergaard were on any other team (other than Baltimore) I would be petrified of what the Yankees could package for him. That said - they could still blow away any other offers, so the Mets ought to at least listen.

I'm probably in the minority here, but I'd trade Benintendi for deGrom. Benny's fallen back to earth pretty hard after that four-week hot stretch.
I think he is just finding his middle. His overall numbers are still All-Star like.

I would not trade Benintendi for deGrom. I bet he ends up top 10 in the trade value series. 4 1/2 more years of team control and on pace for a 5 WAR season at age 23. They will net 30 mill of value on him conservatively this year.

I threw his name out there because he is one of the few cost controlled assets they have, but that would be quite an overpay IMO.

I bet deGrom goes for several blue chippers because those are dice rolls.
 
Last edited:

williams_482

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 1, 2011
391
I'm probably in the minority here, but I'd trade Benintendi for deGrom. Benny's fallen back to earth pretty hard after that four-week hot stretch.

3/29 - 5/11: 136 PA, 99 wRC+, .290 BABIP, 21.1 Hard %
5/12 - 6/7: 109 PA, 221 wRC+, .365 BABIP, 31.3 Hard%
6/8 - 7/2: 102 PA, 93 wRC+, .275 BABIP, 29.8 Hard%

A passion for watching Benny develop has become one of this board's pieties, but I think the perception of his abilities outstrips reality both offensively and defensively. He's a good young player with a solid floor, but I don't see evidence he's the star in the making we think he is.
Adding to the other comments, Statcast loves him. He's running a .366 wOBA right now, but a .374 xwOBA. He's pretty fast, doesn't hit a ton of ground balls, and is rarely shifted (14.2% of PAs), so he's not likely to perennially underperform on batted balls.

Even the more conservative ZiPS/Steamer projections give him a .350 wOBA the rest of the way, which makes him a ~3.5 win player over a full season. He's controlled for another 4.5 years.

DeGrom looks like a ~5.5 win pitcher if we are a little generous and give him 200 innings per year. He's got 2.5 years of control left.

Trading Benni for DeGrom wouldn't be a *crazy* decision, but it is a rather blatant win now decision, by a team with cap problems now and for the foreseeable future. I want no part of that.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,677
I would not trade Benintendi for deGrom. I bet he ends up top 10 in the trade value series. 5 1/2 more years of team control and on pace for a 5 WAR season at age 23. They will net 30 mill of value on him conservatively this year.

I threw his name out there because he is one of the few cost controlled assets they have, but there aren't many players in baseball I'd move him for.
I agree, he has a ton of value. I think it's just longstanding strategy for Red Sox front offices to trade for pitching, since we can more likely sign comparable hitters than pitchers in free agency.

If Benny brings back deGrom and we find a stopgap outfielder in 2018 (maybe Jose Bautista, who is murdering the ball), and we sign A.J. Pollock next year, I think we're a better team.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
If he had the exit velocity, I'd agree with you. Even during that hot stretch, his exit velocity was around 89.6 mph. It's since slid back down to 88.1 mph. (MLB average is 88.7).

He's obviously a good player and his plate discipline keeps him valuable, but I think a lot of people bought into that May stretch as a new baseline. He's hit .230/.320/.345 since.
Exit velocity is nice, but it is certainly not the end-all. Hell, Beni has a higher exit velocity than Jose Altuve and Kris Bryant this season. Guys like Jose Ramirez last year had lower exit velocity than Beni does this year...so therefore, his 2017 power surge was a fluke, right? Nope...Jose Ramirez increased his exit velocity substantially in 2018 and his power bumped up even more. Sub-25 year old hitters on the upswing are a dangerous breed to make assumptions about.

I love deGrom, but not sure I'd trade Beni for him...he's wrong side of 30 now.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,910
Maine
Anytime we talk trade possibilities in here, it's unlikely. This one too, of course. But I think it's a fair deal that makes sense for both teams given their needs. EdRo would be terrific in the NL and Devers is going to be a beast for a long time to come. Both very cost controlled. And if they get a solid relief prospect as well... that would be a nice haul. For the Mets, they're going to move Familia anyway, and Frazier is a spare part that's totally not needed for them, given where they're at. So it's basically DeGrom and half a Familia for Devers, EdRo, and Houck. For the Sox, yeah, losing Devers is huge, but again, Frazier can fill the gap adequately, Familia helps the bullpen, and DeGrom is an absolute stud.
Fair deal? In a vacuum, sure. In reality, I'm not so sure about that. Yes, it makes the team better on paper for the short term, but is it an improvement that is unquestionably necessary? I'm not sure starting pitcher is a need right now (even if DeGrom is a stud). Nor is 3B (where I think Devers -> Frazier is a downgrade). So the only need fulfilled is the addition of another quality bullpen arm but Familia doesn't exactly fit their true need, which is a LHRP. This is a move the pre-2004 Red Sox would have to make. I'm not sure it's something the 2018 Red Sox have to do.

They can't keep mortgaging the future to win now. Eventually it will catch up to them and the crash will be spectacular. A trade like this is 2000-2010ish Yankees Territory...selling off the future to keep winning now, even as their roster gets progressively older and significantly more expensive. The result for the Yankees was a lot of division titles, one World Series, and a shit-ton of luxury tax costs.
 

thepriceisright

New Member
Apr 8, 2018
70
MLB.com predicted the Sox to get Gennett for CJ Chatham and a “lower pitching prospect.” What do we think about that?
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,910
Maine
MLB.com predicted the Sox to get Gennett for CJ Chatham and a “lower pitching prospect.” What do we think about that?
Stupid. They've gotten this far with Brock Holt and the corpse of Eduardo Nunez holding down 2B, with Lin and Phillips in Pawtucket as backup, they can go the whole season without adding another. No sense in throwing more money and prospects at the problem unless a couple of those guys go the way of Pedroia and get injured.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
MLB.com predicted the Sox to get Gennett for CJ Chatham and a “lower pitching prospect.” What do we think about that?
Chatham is one of the few positional guys who is showing something this year in the minors. They will need good cheap infielders at some point. I wouldn't do that.

Not to mention Gennett is making almost 6 mill and will get a big increase the next two seasons with Pedey still under contract.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,680
Rogers Park
Chatham’s a tough guy to evaluate from the outside because of how little he’s played.

He could be Brandon Crawford, he could be nothing. But he’s getting older, and needs PA.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,677
MLB.com predicted the Sox to get Gennett for CJ Chatham and a “lower pitching prospect.” What do we think about that?
I can’t shake the notion that Gennett’s interchangeable with Holt, but he’s got a .382 OBA and 37 home runs since June 6 of last year (715 PA). I don’t think that trade will happen.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
Chatham’s a tough guy to evaluate from the outside because of how little he’s played.

He could be Brandon Crawford, he could be nothing. But he’s getting older, and needs PA.
Agreed, which is why I'd like to see what he can do here since he was a high draft pick and is starting to perform. If it were for a legit long term need, then sure. But not for Gennett.
 

PrometheusWakefield

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2009
10,447
Boston, MA
I'm probably in the minority here, but I'd trade Benintendi for deGrom. Benny's fallen back to earth pretty hard after that four-week hot stretch.

3/29 - 5/11: 136 PA, 99 wRC+, .290 BABIP, 21.1 Hard %
5/12 - 6/7: 109 PA, 221 wRC+, .365 BABIP, 31.3 Hard%
6/8 - 7/2: 102 PA, 93 wRC+, .275 BABIP, 29.8 Hard%

A passion for watching Benny develop has become one of this board's pieties, but I think the perception of his abilities outstrips reality both offensively and defensively. He's a good young player with a solid floor, but I don't see evidence he's the star in the making we think he is.
I agree that Benintendi is not "a star in the making". He's a star right now.

His 2.8 WAR so far this season is 15th in the AL, right around guys like Manny Machado (2.9) and above Carlos Correa and Giancarlo Stanton. And I'm convinced that playing in LF in Fenway hurts his numbers. Give him the center field job and his WAR would be more like 3.1, in a half season.

Four years of Benintendi for 2 of deGrom? No way.
 

PrometheusWakefield

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2009
10,447
Boston, MA
Chatham’s a tough guy to evaluate from the outside because of how little he’s played.

He could be Brandon Crawford, he could be nothing. But he’s getting older, and needs PA.
He's 23 and in single A. Are we going to give him MLB plate appearances by 2019? Probably not, right?

We need more depth in the minors, losing guys who really need starting jobs in the 2019-2020 time frame is no big deal. If he's the centerpiece for a Scooter Gennett deal, sure. But I would think Cinci could get more than that.
 

MikeM

Member
SoSH Member
May 27, 2010
3,121
Florida
MLB.com predicted the Sox to get Gennett for CJ Chatham and a “lower pitching prospect.” What do we think about that?
In an event the internal take on Pedroia atm has him being a lost cause for 2018, it definitely falls within DD's own recently stated trying the world series here criteria imo.

As Chawson already basically pointed out, I do question whether that offer actually gets it done though.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,711
Fair deal? In a vacuum, sure. In reality, I'm not so sure about that. Yes, it makes the team better on paper for the short term, but is it an improvement that is unquestionably necessary? I'm not sure starting pitcher is a need right now (even if DeGrom is a stud). Nor is 3B (where I think Devers -> Frazier is a downgrade). So the only need fulfilled is the addition of another quality bullpen arm but Familia doesn't exactly fit their true need, which is a LHRP. This is a move the pre-2004 Red Sox would have to make. I'm not sure it's something the 2018 Red Sox have to do.

They can't keep mortgaging the future to win now. Eventually it will catch up to them and the crash will be spectacular. A trade like this is 2000-2010ish Yankees Territory...selling off the future to keep winning now, even as their roster gets progressively older and significantly more expensive. The result for the Yankees was a lot of division titles, one World Series, and a shit-ton of luxury tax costs.
You speak of 3b as if I'm trying to fix it with Frazier. No. That's a sacrifice on the Red Sox' part in order to get deGrom. The Mets would be the ones improving dramatically at 3b.
 

Adrian's Dome

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2010
4,424
If he had the exit velocity, I'd agree with you. Even during that hot stretch, his exit velocity was around 89.6 mph. It's since slid back down to 88.1 mph. (MLB average is 88.7).

He's obviously a good player and his plate discipline keeps him valuable, but I think a lot of people bought into that May stretch as a new baseline. He's hit .230/.320/.345 since.
And a cold streak is more indicative of true talent level than a hot streak...why? Because you believe so?

Everybody knows he's going to settle between the two. Exit velocity is not the end-all.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,910
Maine
You speak of 3b as if I'm trying to fix it with Frazier. No. That's a sacrifice on the Red Sox' part in order to get deGrom. The Mets would be the ones improving dramatically at 3b.
That's not what I was getting at at all. I understand that you want to downgrade 3B to upgrade the rotation. My point was that the rotation isn't in a state where such a sacrifice is really necessary. Exchanging Devers for Frazier is the kind of move you make to add DeGrom to the 2015 version of the Red Sox rotation, not the 2018 version.

It's trading a brand new tire for a used one so you can add a gallon of gas to a nearly full tank.
 

strek1

Run, Forrest, run!
SoSH Member
Jun 13, 2006
31,931
Hartford area
If he had the exit velocity, I'd agree with you. Even during that hot stretch, his exit velocity was around 89.6 mph. It's since slid back down to 88.1 mph. (MLB average is 88.7).

He's obviously a good player and his plate discipline keeps him valuable, but I think a lot of people bought into that May stretch as a new baseline. He's hit .230/.320/.345 since.
His lack of plate discipline is one of the keys to his current cold streak. Once he gets it back he will be fine. And I don't get the over emphasis on exit velocity.
 

grimshaw

Member
SoSH Member
May 16, 2007
4,231
Portland
That's not what I was getting at at all. I understand that you want to downgrade 3B to upgrade the rotation. My point was that the rotation isn't in a state where such a sacrifice is really necessary. Exchanging Devers for Frazier is the kind of move you make to add DeGrom to the 2015 version of the Red Sox rotation, not the 2018 version.

It's trading a brand new tire for a used one so you can add a gallon of gas to a nearly full tank.
I'm 95% with you - including the 2004 vs. making the trade this season analogy.
But deGrom would replace Pomeranz next year and would extend the window another season.
Plus they'd get to QO him.

I still wouldn't do it because of Devers potential studliness and price tag, but it's a not a terrible proposal from a present talent perspective before taking $$ into account.

I would ask for more than Frazier as a secondary piece though. He hasn't been very good.
 
Last edited:

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,677
His lack of plate discipline is one of the keys to his current cold streak. Once he gets it back he will be fine. And I don't get the over emphasis on exit velocity.
Here’s a data set from 2015. (Benny’s at 88.2 mph on the season.)


Again, I’m cautious not to overemphasize and I’m not saying he’s not a good player, or that he couldn’t improve here. And some guys with elite exit velo struggle (like Sano) or flame out. I’m just saying it’s a clue.
 
Last edited:

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
20,022
St. Louis, MO
I'm 95% with you - including the 2004 vs. making the trade this season analogy.
But deGrom would replace Pomeranz next year and would extend the window another season.
Plus they'd get to QO him.

I still wouldn't do it because of Devers potential studliness and price tag, but it's a not a terrible proposal from a present talent perspective before taking $$ into account.

I would ask for more than Frazier as a secondary piece though. He hasn't been very good.
I’d imagine they would just hand 3rd to some combination of Phillips/Nunez before taking back Frazier. I don’t think Devers would get moved, but DD did go out and sign an emergency 3b option in Phillips. I’d have to think really hard on DeGrom.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,910
Maine
I'm 95% with you - including the 2004 vs. making the trade this season analogy.
But deGrom would replace Pomeranz next year and would extend the window another season.
Plus they'd get to QO him.

I still wouldn't do it because of Devers potential studliness and price tag, but it's a not a terrible proposal from a present talent perspective before taking $$ into account.

I would ask for more than Frazier as a secondary piece though. He hasn't been very good.
Please don't get me wrong. In a perfect world, I'd love for the Sox to have DeGrom for at least the next 18 months. But not at the price of Devers, and certainly not with the payroll situation being what it is. Yes, he replaces Pomeranz in 2019, but not at much savings plus they'd be paying more for a 3B too.
 

Murderer's Crow

Dragon Wangler 216
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
23,570
Garden City
Please don't get me wrong. In a perfect world, I'd love for the Sox to have DeGrom for at least the next 18 months. But not at the price of Devers, and certainly not with the payroll situation being what it is. Yes, he replaces Pomeranz in 2019, but not at much savings plus they'd be paying more for a 3B too.
It's very similar to the Moncada & Kopech for Sale trade except I think Moncada was the second coming of babe ruth as a prospect.

I think the question for DD and Sox fans here isn't whether Devers potential is great or not, it's whether Devers helps win a WS this and next year more than <fill in your trade candidates>, which is where your best and most open window actually is. I'm not pushing back against the idea of cost-controlled stars 3 years out, but the Sox would have a lot more payroll flexibility in 2-4 years than they do now. Devers can have all the potential in the world but the 2nd spot in your rotation is probably more important to fill than the 7th spot in your lineup, considering the beastly lineup you guys have.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,711
That's not what I was getting at at all. I understand that you want to downgrade 3B to upgrade the rotation. My point was that the rotation isn't in a state where such a sacrifice is really necessary. Exchanging Devers for Frazier is the kind of move you make to add DeGrom to the 2015 version of the Red Sox rotation, not the 2018 version.

It's trading a brand new tire for a used one so you can add a gallon of gas to a nearly full tank.
Given that the starting pitching has completely crapped its collective pants in the playoffs two years in a row, and deGrom has done well in the playoffs, and is a total stud otherwise, I don't see him as just adding a few gallons of gas to the tank. I consider that to be a substantial and game changing upgrade and not just for one year but for several.


Of course, it doesn't matter because there is barely a non-zero chance that it will happen, as is the case with every trade discussed in this forum. But it is interesting to get peoples' perspectives.
 
Last edited:

Pitt the Elder

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 7, 2013
4,441
Here’s a data set from 2015. (Benny’s at 88.2 mph on the season.)


Again, I’m cautious not to overemphasize and I’m not saying he’s not a good player, or that he couldn’t improve here. And some guys with elite exit velo struggle (like Sano) or flame out. I’m just saying it’s a clue.
this isn't really on-topic, but, given this data, isn't the distribution of a player's batted ball exit velocity more important than the average exit velocity? averages can be deceiving. though, for what it's worth, beni is 105th in barrels per batted ball event, which is pretty middling.

we've had statcast for a handful of years, now. does anyone know how exit velocity changes as a function of age?
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,910
Maine
Given that the starting pitching has completely crapped its collective pants in the playoffs two years in a row, and deGrom has done well in the playoffs, and is a total stud otherwise, I don't see him as just adding a few gallons of gas to the tank. I consider that to be a substantial and game changing upgrade and not just for one year but for several.


Of course, it doesn't matter because there is barely a non-zero chance that it will happen, as is the case with every trade discussed in this forum. But it is interesting to get peoples' perspectives.
DeGrom has all of four post-season starts...three good, one not so great. 25 total innings. Hardly the sample size that guarantees he will be a significantly better bet in the Red Sox October rotation than what they already have. Of course he's an asset that can help them if money is no object, but that's not the reality of the situation. Acquiring him and creating a hole at 3B at the same time adds significant future salary to an already bloated payroll. The additional cost of the deal might wind up being losing Chris Sale...someone younger, more accomplished, and arguably better than deGrom.
 

jtn46

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 10, 2004
9,771
Norwalk, CT
I don’t see why the Mets would want a package centered around Devers (or Andujar). If they think they can compete in the next 2 seasons, they should keep DeGrom and if they are wrong, they can trade him for a great package next year or in 2020. If they don’t think they can compete they should prefer a package centered around a player that will contribute in a few years. If DeGrom is available practically every contender should have interest, surely one of them can trade the Mets a package that fits their needs perfectly and if they don’t they should just keep him.
 

Green Monster

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
2,277
CT
Are there rumors about the Sox/Mets trade being discussed or is this SoSH speculation? ....I mentioned it to my Yankee fan friend and he is hyperventilating.
 

tonyarmasjr

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2010
1,120
Are there rumors about the Sox/Mets trade being discussed or is this SoSH speculation? ....I mentioned it to my Yankee fan friend and he is hyperventilating.
Through the mouth, shallow, and as if he's overly exerted himself? Don't worry yourself. That's just how mfy fans breathe...