The Nation's Tears: Volume II

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
Interesting. Brady and Belichick are two of the greatest of all time but yet they “cheat”. If you cheat how can you be considered great? Bonds and Clemens have lots of accomplishments and not in the hall of fame due to their cheating.

These writers need to pick a side and stick with it. Their either the best duo of all time or they’re the product of cheating and none of their accomplishments hold water. Pick a side and stick with it.

I may actually finally watch a game this season just to see the Titans get drilled 49-10.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
14,987
Silver Spring, MD

All of Brady’s postseason TDs, rushing and passing. Video is on NFL’s twitter account for app folks.

There’s a few in there that probably wouldn’t be a catch today, especially Patten in SB36.

Edit: Wrong thread. Can a mod move this to the “What Is” thread?
I had absolutely forgotten that the Jets made the playoffs in 2006 and Pats beat them before going to San Diego for that classic.
 

Hendu for Kutch

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 7, 2006
6,924
Nashua, NH
This guy, an old man, not only owns but wears a Fuck Brady shirt...to watch a game against a DIFFERENT team.
I popped by a Steelers board after the game to drink it in a bit and they happened to have a thread about which team the members hated most. Every single #1 answer was New England. All of them. It has reached the level of Boston's feelings toward the Yankees 15 years ago. It seems to color everything their fans (and even some players) say and do. 100% in their heads and I, for one, am glad they won't get the chance to 2004 us next week.
 

brandonchristensen

Loves Aaron Judge
SoSH Member
Feb 4, 2012
38,513
Yeah. Yanks lived in our head rent free for a long while there

Now they’re just pains in the FUCKING ASSES FUCKING STANTON ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME LURCH YOU GODDAMN PIECE OF SHIT I FUCKING HATE YOU
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,746

All of Brady’s postseason TDs, rushing and passing. Video is on NFL’s twitter account for app folks.

There’s a few in there that probably wouldn’t be a catch today, especially Patten in SB36.

Edit: Wrong thread. Can a mod move this to the “What Is” thread?
Not sure what would be wrong with Patten's catch. To me he catches and controls the ball in the air and very clearly (from other highlights) lands and is down in bounds (arm and butt), then slides out of bounds while still controlling the ball. Unless I'm missing a bobble I've never seen, that's still a catch.

But thank you for the link
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,149
Tuukka's refugee camp
If only Algee Crumpler has two mentions on that video. I also forgot how much I absolutely loved Jabar Gaffney for those couple of years.
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,166
Westwood MA
He's back.

Are you sure that's new footage as he's in the same get up as the last time we saw him, those pants are an abomination, the slippers too. Oh wait; the snacks are different this go round; should I assume that's his lucky outfit and it's been run through the wash since the Patriots game?
 

bosox188

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 11, 2008
3,017
Marlborough, MA
Are you sure that's new footage as he's in the same get up as the last time we saw him, those pants are an abomination, the slippers too. Oh wait; the snacks are different this go round; should I assume that's his lucky outfit and it's been run through the wash since the Patriots game?
You probably shouldn't assume it's been run through the wash
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,131
Lots of fun stats from this Ringer article, but this one was interesting: Brady is now the oldest starting quarterback to win a playoff game, passing Favre:
14,744: The number of days that Tom Brady—the football messiah/devil, depending on your allegiances—has been alive. Brady’s win on Saturday made him the oldest quarterback to ever win a playoff game, passing Brett Favre.
https://www.theringer.com/nfl-playoffs/2018/1/14/16889762/patriots-titans-afc-divisional-round-tom-brady

Another good one:
12: The number of AFC Championship games the Patriots have made since the 2001 season. There are many ways to put the Patriots’ unprecedented stretch into perspective—seven Super Bowl appearances, five Super Bowl wins, and 15 division titles in 17 years—but their continuous presence in the AFC championship game each year is as impressive as anything outside of their five rings. The Pats have made the conference title game a dozen times since the 2001 season, while 28 NFL teams haven’t made the playoffs that many times since 2001.
 

BuellMiller

New Member
Mar 25, 2015
451
Not sure what would be wrong with Patten's catch. To me he catches and controls the ball in the air and very clearly (from other highlights) lands and is down in bounds (arm and butt), then slides out of bounds while still controlling the ball. Unless I'm missing a bobble I've never seen, that's still a catch.

But thank you for the link
Yeah, I think it was Patten's catch from Bledsoe in the AFCCG that could maybe have been disallowed (he doesn't seem to have control of the ball all the way through "surviving the ground"). But who knows what a catch is anymore, right?
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,973
Here
Yeah, I think it was Patten's catch from Bledsoe in the AFCCG that could maybe have been disallowed (he doesn't seem to have control of the ball all the way through "surviving the ground"). But who knows what a catch is anymore, right?
Definitely not a catch by today’s standards, but was a TD back then. That was the worst officiated game I remember the Pats being part of. Hochuli got probably ten calls wrong and half of them AFTER review. It was remarkable.
 

uk_sox_fan

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,273
London, England
Apologies if this has been mentioned here before - but I find the following to be probably the most incredible stat that defines the 21st Century Patriots.

In 2000 the Patriots were 5-11 in Belichick's 1st season as HC. They finished alone in 5th, meaning all four other AFC East teams had better records that year. Since then there hasn't been a single season when any AFC East team had a better record than the Patriots.

For 17 years in a row, the worst that has happened (twice) is that Pats had the same record as the division champ (tied with the Jets and Dolphins at 9-7 in 2002 and tied with the Dolphins at 11-5 in 2008 and in one year - 2001 - they tied the Dolphins at 11-5 and won the division by tie-breaker). In all other 14 years the Pats not only won the division, but did so outright - without the benefit of a tie-breaker: twice by 1 game, once by 2 games, twice by 3, 6 times by 4 games, twice by 5 and in 2007 by 9 games over the 2nd place Bills - that's an average of 3.2 games over the 2nd place team for 17 years.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,896
Unreal America
I popped by a Steelers board after the game to drink it in a bit and they happened to have a thread about which team the members hated most. Every single #1 answer was New England. All of them. It has reached the level of Boston's feelings toward the Yankees 15 years ago. It seems to color everything their fans (and even some players) say and do. 100% in their heads and I, for one, am glad they won't get the chance to 2004 us next week.
The obsession is so strange to me. It is not like pre-2004 Sox/Yankees. Since the Pats began their run in 2001 the Steelers have been in 3 Super Bowls and won 2. It’s not like the franchise has been unable to win the big one, always denied by the Pats. I get that the Steelers are 0-3 in the playoffs vs the Pats since ‘01, but at the same time the Pats are 0-2 vs the Giants and it’s not like fans are obsessed with them.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,216
The obsession is so strange to me. It is not like pre-2004 Sox/Yankees. Since the Pats began their run in 2001 the Steelers have been in 3 Super Bowls and won 2. It’s not like the franchise has been unable to win the big one, always denied by the Pats. I get that the Steelers are 0-3 in the playoffs vs the Pats since ‘01, but at the same time the Pats are 0-2 vs the Giants and it’s not like fans are obsessed with them.
Pats fans aren’t obsessed with the Giants but if 2014/2016 didn’t happen, I think the collective butthurt would still be quite strong.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
24,896
Unreal America
Pats fans aren’t obsessed with the Giants but if 2014/2016 didn’t happen, I think the collective butthurt would still be quite strong.
I guess, but the Steelers won a SB in 2008 after the AFCCG losses in 2001 and 2004. Why are they still so crazed?
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,661
Pats fans aren’t obsessed with the Giants but if 2014/2016 didn’t happen, I think the collective butthurt would still be quite strong.
Well that and the Pats don't play the Giants very often. They seem to play the Steelers every year, so it just keeps coming up.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,216
I guess, but the Steelers won a SB in 2008 after the AFCCG losses in 2001 and 2004. Why are they still so crazed?
Not a Steelers fan so can’t really speak to their mindset but my guess is the following:

1. They’ve always viewed themselves as the gold standard due to Count Da Ringz. But Brady’s ownership of that franchise is a huge blemish on that position.

2. They thought their 2001/2004 teams were vastly superior to the Patriots teams they lost to.

3. If it weren’t for the Pats, they probably would be the franchise that everyone fawns over. Pats probably stole at least 2 titles from them.
 

Mystic Merlin

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2007
46,892
Hartford, CT
I guess, but the Steelers won a SB in 2008 after the AFCCG losses in 2001 and 2004. Why are they still so crazed?
The Pats play them far more frequently than the Pats play the Giants (five times in eleven seasons), the Pats get the most media exposure/adulation and there's a sense of generational entitlement to the mantle of model AFC franchise that the Patriots have threatened.

In sum, we're constantly a barrier to a Super Bowl berth and they're not used to looking up to another football team in the conference.
 

staz

Intangible
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2004
20,757
The cradle of the game.
It's the threat to the whole "We got 6 ringz!! Do you?" thing.
This is absolutely the case. I know plenty of Steeler fans who play the “Sixburgh” card the moment someone criticizes the team, however slight. And this past weekend brought them 2 steps closer to their Football Armageddon: losing sole possession of the “Greatest Franchise” mantle - all on their watch.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,328
Hingham, MA
This is absolutely the case. I know plenty of Steeler fans who play the “Sixburgh” card the moment someone criticizes the team, however slight. And this past weekend brought them 2 steps closer to their Football Armageddon: losing sole possession of the “Greatest Franchise” mantle - all on their watch.
I believe if the Pats win it all they will also tie for all time playoff wins.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
They thought their 2001/2004 teams were vastly superior to the Patriots teams they lost to.
Wait, is this a thing? Definitely 2001, and even Pats fans will acknowledge that fact. But they can't seriously believe that about 2004. The Pats were road favorites in that AFC title game. I could see an arguement that the Steelers were actually better, as they finished with a better regular season record and had beaten the Pats earlier in the season. They'd be wrong, but the argument could me made, I guess. But anyone who thinks that 2004 Steelers team was "vastly superior" to the 2004 Pats is on drugs.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,328
Hingham, MA
Wait, is this a thing? Definitely 2001, and even Pats fans will acknowledge that fact. But they can't seriously believe that about 2004. The Pats were road favorites in that AFC title game. I could see an arguement that the Steelers were actually better, as they finished with a better regular season record and had beaten the Pats earlier in the season. They'd be wrong, but the argument could me made, I guess. But anyone who thinks that 2004 Steelers team was "vastly superior" to the 2004 Pats is on drugs.
I wouldn't acknowledge 2001. Talk about a paper tiger team. Their QB was Kordell Stewart.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,055
Yeah, I think it was Patten's catch from Bledsoe in the AFCCG that could maybe have been disallowed (he doesn't seem to have control of the ball all the way through "surviving the ground"). But who knows what a catch is anymore, right?
There is one touchdown there that definitely wouldn't be under today's rules. May have been one of Givens, but the receiver catches it in the back of the end zone, and the two refs come together, and they rule he was pushed out of bounds, so it's a TD. Under current rules, if you are pushed out of bounds and don't get both feet down, it is not a catch.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
I wouldn't acknowledge 2001. Talk about a paper tiger team. Their QB was Kordell Stewart.
Eh, it's not like that Pats team was loaded either. It took two return TDs to beat that Kordell Stewart-led team. I think if those teams play 10 times, Pats win maybe 2-3 of them, 4 tops. They were big underdogs for a reason. Steelers were better all year, Pats just made more big plays in that game. Of course, who knows how it goes if Brady doesn't get hurt. Bledsoe threw the TD and had a big 3rd down conversion, but otherwise was pretty mediocre.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,328
Hingham, MA
I hear what you are saying, but in retrospect, the Pats actually scored more points than the Steelers that year, and which defense would you take? We didn’t know Vrabel and Bruschi and Seymour were stars in 2001 but they turned out to be.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,216
Wait, is this a thing? Definitely 2001, and even Pats fans will acknowledge that fact. But they can't seriously believe that about 2004. The Pats were road favorites in that AFC title game. I could see an arguement that the Steelers were actually better, as they finished with a better regular season record and had beaten the Pats earlier in the season. They'd be wrong, but the argument could me made, I guess. But anyone who thinks that 2004 Steelers team was "vastly superior" to the 2004 Pats is on drugs.
I think that’s always a thing with Steelers fans, at least in the interactions I’ve had. Definitely in 2001 but less so in 2004. The Steelers went 15-1 that year and beat the Patriots pretty good in their matchup. It’s tapered off in recent years after Brady snatched the GOAT label from Montana so now the Patriots are basically just cheaters to them.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Both are reaching a bit. It’s still the same franchise in both cases. The Colts still get their 71 title. And if the Boston Patriots had won a title, I doubt we’d be arguing it shouldn’t count.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
14,987
Silver Spring, MD
Who do Pats fans hate the most? Jets, Dolphins, Bills, Steelers, Ravens, Colts, Broncos, Giants is a representative list. None of them won a playoff game this season.
 

crossdog

New Member
Jul 5, 2015
78
Who do Pats fans hate the most? Jets, Dolphins, Bills, Steelers, Ravens, Colts, Broncos, Giants is a representative list. None of them won a playoff game this season.
Ravens. Do not like the Steelers because they are to chippy but not a real threat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.