Edited by xjack, 29 September 2005 - 10:10 PM.
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Jonathan Papelbon, this thread's for you
#1
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:09 PM
#2
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:11 PM
I'm sure it was talked about in the game thread, but tonight seemed like a defining moment for Papelbon. The guy was just exuding confidence, and you could tell that the guys on the field had a lot of confidence playing behind him.... I don't know what the future holds for this kid -- closer or starter -- but I suspect that we'll all remember this performance as the beginning of something great.
He's proven over the last few weeks that he's mentally tough, has great stuff, and is more than ready to pitch in big situations. I like the idea of using him in the pen for a year then looking to have him start in 2007. He's gonna be a very solid starter one day.
#3
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:13 PM
Great job!... Papi gets the praise but you are the one that gets the game ball in my book tonight....
#4
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:14 PM
#5
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:14 PM
He's proven over the last few weeks that he's mentally tough, has great stuff, and is more than ready to pitch in big situations. I like the idea of using him in the pen for a year then looking to have him start in 2007. He's gonna be a very solid starter one day.
Everything is coming together for him now. Even the split is a good pitch these days, and that fastball is just as good as sex.
He needed to be up here sooner, not pitching mop up for Pawtucket for those two weeks. Argh!
#6
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:14 PM
Edited by ragecage, 30 September 2005 - 10:06 AM.
#7
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:22 PM
The pure intensity on his face was something that I feel like I have not seen on any of of pen guy's faces since last postseason. I'm not sure what his role will be next year, but coming into this last stretch it is huge that Tito and the team can have confidence in him turning in the performance he did tonight.
He has to be in the rotation next year... Looking at the minors and what has come up, you have to be impressed with the young pitching in the organization. Papelbon, Hansen, Delcarmen, Lester, Sanchez and others I am forgetting... I haven't been this excited about the future in a LONG time. It will be wonderful not to have to rely on free agent acquisitions to build our staff for the future.
We are really starting to see the benefits of Theo's approach to building up the minors and it is fun to watch.
#8
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:28 PM
#9
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:28 PM
The pure intensity on his face was something that I feel like I have not seen on any of of pen guy's faces since last postseason. I'm not sure what his role will be next year, but coming into this last stretch it is huge that Tito and the team can have confidence in him turning in the performance he did tonight.
I don't know what he yelled after Mueller made the great play in the 9th, but he was juiced and enjoying every moment he was on the mound tonight. He will be an important part of this team for years to come. I just hope he stays healthy.
I'm sure Tito won't be afraid to use him in ANY situation moving forward. He's earned it!
#10
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:32 PM
I still don't believe we have the pitching to carry us through the postseason (if we even make it that far), but if he and Dinardo can pitch like they have for the past couple of days, these kids might prove me wrong. I have absolutely no problem with being proven wrong, by the way.
#11
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:33 PM
Not to get too fanboyish here, but he resembles the young Clemens in a lot of ways.
Not at all. I've been thinking this for a while now. He's got ice water in his veins, and fireballs issuing forth from his right arm. He's a fine, fine pitcher, and we should be giddy about the future.
"I like ya kid! Ya got spunk!"
#12
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:34 PM
#13
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:37 PM
"You got that right, baby."
Does this mean we can start calling Papelbon, Bruce Dickenson?
All kidding aside, great job by the kid tonight, hopefully we'll see him come in and dominate out of the pen a few more times this year.
#14
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:42 PM
#15
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:45 PM
Next year is next year, but I love his mound presence & his stuff and I think he'll grow into a very good starter with some patience (and the fans remembering performances like tonight's) when he struggles.
#16
Posted 29 September 2005 - 10:57 PM

This kid looked like a vet out there, as if 2 and 2/3rds of a one-run game was really no big deal and hell, he'd be ready for the 3rd if we needed him.
Of course we didn't need him after that, but any sign of stability in that bullpen gets a big thumbs up from me....and the fact that he displayed it in such a ballsy fashion makes it all the more exciting.
#17
Posted 29 September 2005 - 11:04 PM
#18
Posted 29 September 2005 - 11:07 PM
#19
Posted 29 September 2005 - 11:13 PM
#20
Posted 29 September 2005 - 11:21 PM
I think he's going to build the confidence and competitive drive in the bullpen. The rookie will provide the drive to juice the rest of the bullpen.
Post game interview Ortiz, w/out being led, said that Papelbon is a yong Roger.
#21
Posted 29 September 2005 - 11:37 PM
Does this mean we can start calling Papelbon, Bruce Dickenson?
All kidding aside, great job by the kid tonight, hopefully we'll see him come in and dominate out of the pen a few more times this year.
He puts on his pants one leg at a time. Except, once his pants are on, he gets outs.
#22
Posted 29 September 2005 - 11:47 PM
Please, sir, I want more.
#23
Posted 30 September 2005 - 12:03 AM
He puts on his pants one leg at a time. Except, once his pants are on, he gets outs.
And by the time he's done we'll all be wearing gold plated diapers.
#24
Posted 30 September 2005 - 12:04 AM
STARTING ROTATION IN 2006.
much
much
too valuable
for relief
#25
Posted 30 September 2005 - 12:24 AM
Edited by LahoudOrBillyC, 30 September 2005 - 12:38 AM.
#26
Posted 30 September 2005 - 12:46 AM
Although I certainly believe that starting pitchers are more valuable than relief pitchers, there is an argument to be made that it would be best for his development to let him be a spot starter and long man next year. This is what the Twins did with Johan Santana, which they got a lot of grief about in analyst circles. On the one hand, he sure did seem like the best pitcher on the team for at least a year before he cracked the rotation, which seemed like a waste. On the other hand, it worked out well in the end.
Sure, the Santana plan worked out well for the Twins, but what about that experience leads anyone to believe that it would not have worked out even better had he just been given the ball every 5 days, with a 100 pitch leash to make sure his arm did not get too much stress? I hope Papelbon is in the rotation next year, but I also pray that management is looking out for his future in terms of pitch or inning limits.
#27
Guest_Corsi Combover_*
Posted 30 September 2005 - 01:20 AM
#28
Posted 30 September 2005 - 01:37 AM
It was in a similiar performance against Toronto IN Toronto that I went "all-in" with Jonathan Papelbon. Tonight was a bery similiar performance (3 IP v. 2 2/3IP), but the demeanor, the command, the control oozing out of him was wonderful to see tonight. It was like the first TOR win was "yeah, I can do this" and tonight was "there's no way I'm not doing this".
Next year is next year, but I love his mound presence & his stuff and I think he'll grow into a very good starter with some patience (and the fans remembering performances like tonight's) when he struggles.
Yes. I felt the same way. 121 I read everything you say, either here or at that other place you frequent, and you always steel my thunder. I couldn't agree with you more. I was so highly motivated and truly dedicated tonight.
Romp'in, Stomp'in.
#29
Posted 30 September 2005 - 03:34 AM
#30
Posted 30 September 2005 - 04:05 AM
Put me in the "let him start in 2006" camp. While he's been very good in the pen, his velocity fluctuates a lot, some nights he's throwing 95 and others he's throwing 91. In the rotation he'll be in a better rhtyhm and his stuff will be more consistent.
Edited by jtn46, 30 September 2005 - 04:06 AM.
#31
Posted 30 September 2005 - 05:55 AM
Not to get too fanboyish here, but he resembles the young Clemens in a lot of ways.
I was thinking the same thing last night.
#32
Posted 30 September 2005 - 06:37 AM
#33
Posted 30 September 2005 - 07:40 AM
#34
Posted 30 September 2005 - 07:55 AM
Then buyout his arby years and some of his free agent ones.
#35
Posted 30 September 2005 - 07:58 AM
#36
Posted 30 September 2005 - 08:04 AM
You guys must be living in a dream world. Francona doesn't trust young players. Sox need to dump him if they're ever going to give the young players a chance.
My thoughts exactly; Papelbon is living proof that Tito certainly trusts young players, just not all of them. The kid is ready and he shows it; he's gonna be a good one. Hell, he is a good one right now. Huge performance again last night.
#37
Posted 30 September 2005 - 09:35 AM
Hey, don't forget about his calm eyes. His gait does lack elegance, though--he needs to work on that.The pure intensity on his face was something that I feel like I have not seen on any of of pen guy's faces since last postseason.
Change his number to 21 for the weekend and tell him to start off guys high and tight.
#38
Posted 30 September 2005 - 09:48 AM
And did anyone see him after Damon crossed the plate with the winning run? He was the first one out there, waving a towel and giving his team-mates the "this race ain't over yet" look.
He owns the mound when he's out there. Fun stuff.
#39
Posted 30 September 2005 - 11:23 AM
Vanilla Papi
Just like his darker counterpart, ice cold in the clutch.
#40
Posted 30 September 2005 - 11:29 AM
#41
Posted 30 September 2005 - 11:35 AM
I'm a Papist!
#42
Posted 30 September 2005 - 11:52 AM
Note the lack of qualifying phrases like: "will be" or "highest upside" or "best stuff". Right now, ask yourself: is Paps better than Wake? [i think so] than Timlin? [yes] than Wells? [yes] and don't even get me started on Arroyo or Clement [hells yes].
I'm stunned that there are people who want Papelbon coming out of the bullpen next year. As far as I'm concerned, if this comes down to a one game playoff in New York, I want the ball going to Jonathan Papelbon. In the FIRST inning.
#43
Posted 30 September 2005 - 12:46 PM
Regarding nicknames, I like Bruce Dickinson - gives us the chance to bellow "Bruce!" when he takes the mound and it'd be great to hear a montage of all the Dickinson quotes - "Cock of the walk, baby!," etc. - as he's warming up.
#44
Posted 30 September 2005 - 12:48 PM
Regarding nicknames, I like Bruce Dickinson - gives us the chance to bellow "Bruce!" when he takes the mound and it'd be great to hear a montage of all the Dickinson quotes - "Cock of the walk, baby!," etc. - as he's warming up.
Are we sure Papelbon (or really anyone but 5 people here that are in on the joke) would ever know what you are talking about? I guess you could go tell his mom over on soxprospects.com or something?
#45
Posted 30 September 2005 - 01:02 PM
Very loosely translated, Papelbon means The Good Pope.
I, myself, think of him as the Great White Hope.
#46
Posted 30 September 2005 - 01:19 PM
Looking at the minors and what has come up, you have to be impressed with the young pitching in the organization. Papelbon, Hansen, Delcarmen, Lester, Sanchez and others I am forgetting...
I just hope that in order to fix some of our other holes over the offseason, we don't screw around with this. My fear is that some of our holes are going to take some major talent to fix, and we can't expect to get it on the cheap.
Pape and Papi, I like the sound of that duet.
#47
Posted 30 September 2005 - 01:45 PM
So we've now got Good Pappy to go along with Big Papi.Very loosely translated, Papelbon means The Good Pope.
Or maybe we should just call him Pope Jon -- after all, Pope John XXIII was "The Good Pope."
#48
Posted 30 September 2005 - 01:56 PM
Tofu, more likely.I guess tonight we'll see what Wang's made of. Swiss cheese, hopefully.
My question about Papelbon is how quickly he can bounce back. I can imagine some high leverage innings Saturday afternoon, when he could come in with the cheese after the wanks have seen 6 or 7 innings of knuckleballs. With RJ going, there might not be much room for error. Or I could see him needed Sunday, when Tito will have to have G38 on a short leash if the series is 1-1 at the time.
#49
Posted 30 September 2005 - 02:01 PM
What's between the ears can't make up for a nothing fastball and a curve that doesn't, but it means a lot when you have good stuff -- which he does. Papelbon simply seems to know how to pitch and can't be intimidated. Not that either is a 100% guarantee to success, but I wouldn't be afraid to use him in key situations, even this early in his career. He may get beat, but it wouldn't be because he couldn't handle the situation mentally. To me, that's what he brings to the table that can't be taught.
#50
Posted 30 September 2005 - 02:46 PM
I like "The Pope" or "Pope John".Is it too late to suggest a nickname? I submit....
Vanilla Papi
Just like his darker counterpart, ice cold in the clutch.













