Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
2013 Bruins Opening Day Roster
#1
Posted 06 January 2013 - 08:20 AM
Who makes the team this year? How do the lines shake out?
I heard yesterday Caron has an injury and will be out a couple of weeks.
Hamilton was relatively unimpressive in the World Juniors.
So RMPS - what say ye?
#2
Posted 06 January 2013 - 08:35 AM
#3
Posted 06 January 2013 - 08:40 AM
Anywho,
Lucic - Krejci - Horton
Marchand - Bergeron - Seguin
XXX - Kelly - Peverley
Paille - Campbell - Thornton
Chara - Hamilton
Boychuk - Seidenberg
Ference - McQuaid
Rask
Khuodobin
Chris Bourque and Christian Hanson are probably the 2 leading candidates to battle it out for 3rd line LW. Spooner has been good for the Baby B's, but I feel like they'll want to keep him in Providence getting top minutes. Bourque probably has the inside track on the final forward spot. Leading scorer in Providence, NHL experience, Chiarelli spoke glowingly of him when we traded for him, and brings a bit more offense to the table than Hanson. Hanson is more of a grinder.
As for the defense, Dougie will be here. The 7th defenseman battle will be interesting. Aaron Johnson probably has the inside track, but they may bring up a guy like Warsofsky or Krug to battle it out in camp. Maybe Zach Trotman.
#4
Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:10 AM
#5
Posted 06 January 2013 - 09:55 AM
That Chara-Hamilton pairing is giving me a chub.
#6
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:06 AM
There's been a lot of toughness imported to the East this past off season, it might not hurt to have him up.
#7
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:33 AM
#8
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:37 AM
Hamilton getting first line minutes? He looked bad against teenagers this week. I can't imagine that even Chara will be able to hide his flaws over 20+ minutes a night against top pairs. That seems like rushing him.
I think they'll move him around, but he will get time with Chara. Not 20 minutes, but 15 or so with Seidenberg and Boychuk rotating in depending on situation. Late 3rd protecting a lead, defense zone draw, etc. he won't see the ice.
#9
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:40 AM
I think Chia's banking a bit too much on a guy like Jordan Caron being able to come through, and you never, ever give yourself just one young player as your option for a roster spot. Given my druthers I'd have had Pouliot AND Caron AND Bourque AND a veteran wing available and let the winner take all. The nature of the season is such that you're absolutely going to have situations where any or all of the above might be playing at the same time.
As for the D -- how has Torey Krug looked for those who've gotten a chance to see him? I can definitely see the FO using the McQuaid injury as a blessing in disguise to see what they have there. Krug looked good in limited time last year, and another guy who can skate and move the puck would be a nice addition to our D -- which isn't as bad as it used to be, but is still pretty stagnant offensively.
Edited by Outsider, 06 January 2013 - 10:42 AM.
#10
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:41 AM
Hamilton getting first line minutes? He looked bad against teenagers this week. I can't imagine that even Chara will be able to hide his flaws over 20+ minutes a night against top pairs. That seems like rushing him.
I think Hamilton would be fine as the #6 but to me the real question is if in this new CBA is it worth burning a year of his ELC for that? He's having another very good year in junior, so it's debatable if sending him back there would do anything positive for his development.
Caron was laying an egg with Providence so I don't really see any drawbacks to leaving him down there until he's fully healthy.
I believe there are still a good number of UFAs out there. I'm not sure who's signed in Europe (irrevocably) but guys like Rolston, Knuble, Sturm...you know, the mid- to upper-30s veterans who will take a 1-yr deal could easily be plugged into the 3rd line for low dollars. Same goes for the 6th D spot to compete with Aaron Johnson. Filling around the margins should be a straightforward thing.
#11
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:44 AM
I think they'll move him around, but he will get time with Chara. Not 20 minutes, but 15 or so with Seidenberg and Boychuk rotating in depending on situation. Late 3rd protecting a lead, defense zone draw, etc. he won't see the ice.
Chara plays with Boychuk or Seidenberg. You need that defensive rock playing 25 minutes a night if you want to win hockey games.
If someone draws Hamilton duty, it's probably going to be Seids, with Ference and Krug on the bottom pairing.
Chara-Boychuk
Seids-Hamilton
Ference-Krug
Kinda soft. And kinda small, especially that bottom pairing. Which is why you really, really, REALLY need that defensive rock of a top pairing.
But if that D is firing on all cylinders we'll see the transition game working better than we've seen it since the Bourque era ended.
Edited by Outsider, 06 January 2013 - 10:47 AM.
#12
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:53 AM
I think Hamilton would be fine as the #6 but to me the real question is if in this new CBA is it worth burning a year of his ELC for that? He's having another very good year in junior, so it's debatable if sending him back there would do anything positive for his development.
That last sentence is the whole of the decision for Hamilton. Seguin was the same way after 2010: sending him back to the OHL is a wasted year where bad habits can creep in. It's better to get him up to Boston to learn from professionals and refining his game.
#13
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:55 AM
#14
Posted 06 January 2013 - 10:57 AM
I think Hamilton would be fine as the #6 but to me the real question is if in this new CBA is it worth burning a year of his ELC for that? He's having another very good year in junior, so it's debatable if sending him back there would do anything positive for his development.
Caron was laying an egg with Providence so I don't really see any drawbacks to leaving him down there until he's fully healthy.
I believe there are still a good number of UFAs out there. I'm not sure who's signed in Europe (irrevocably) but guys like Rolston, Knuble, Sturm...you know, the mid- to upper-30s veterans who will take a 1-yr deal could easily be plugged into the 3rd line for low dollars. Same goes for the 6th D spot to compete with Aaron Johnson. Filling around the margins should be a straightforward thing.
They don't really have any other palatable options to fill out the d-corps. Hamilton has nothing else to prove and little to gain in juniors other than saving a year of his ELC. I don't think it's really a legitimate choice to keep him down in junior. They will need him with McQuaid out, plus the experience for him will be more valuable than stashing him in juniors.
Caron has been really bad, and the injury is just another excuse to keep him down there. I think the options are really just Bourque and Spooner and I don't think they would hesitate to put Spooner out there initially.
But, really, we are only talking about one open defensive spot with McQuaid out and the open 3rd line LW spot. I have to think those spots are Hamilton's and Bourque's given the short training camp.
#15
Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:00 AM
With McQuaid out, there's really 2 spots open unless you're already considering Johnson or Krug to be in the lineup. But they only have 4 D ready to play from last year; Chara, Seids, Boychuk, Ference.But, really, we are only talking about one open defensive spot with McQuaid out and the open 3rd line LW spot. I have to think those spots are Hamilton's and Bourque's given the short training camp.
#16
Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:09 AM
With McQuaid out, there's really 2 spots open unless you're already considering Johnson or Krug to be in the lineup. But they only have 4 D ready to play from last year; Chara, Seids, Boychuk, Ference.
True. I'm too elated to focus on details.
That being said, anybody for Tommy Cross? From what I understand he's been their best defenseman over the past few weeks after struggling and being sent to the ECHL earlier in the year.
#17
Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:12 AM
With McQuaid out, there's really 2 spots open unless you're already considering Johnson or Krug to be in the lineup. But they only have 4 D ready to play from last year; Chara, Seids, Boychuk, Ference.
That is a pretty thin back-end. Really can't afford any injuries to that core 4, at least until McQuaid is back.
It will be interesting to see if Claude changes from his typical rookie approach and uses Dougie on the PP. That might be the only area that Dougie can really help the team this year but Claude typically doesn't give rookies PP time until they prove they can handle themselves in both ends of the rink.
#18
Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:28 AM
#19
Posted 06 January 2013 - 11:59 AM
Holy fuck am I excited that we're even having this discussion
#20
Posted 06 January 2013 - 12:24 PM
Bringing in Exelby to replace McQuaid would be like bringing in Colton Orr to replace Shawn Thornton. It works superficially, and that only if you analyze core function, but the player you're replacing is good at a lot more than toughness.They also have Exelby down in Providence if they want to replace the toughness and size aspect of McQuaid.
Besides being an excellent fighter, Adam McQuaid is a very, very solid stay at homer who could earn his daily bread in the NHL easily if he never dropped the gloves again. A bit flighty under pressure which makes him prone to bad decisions when he tries to hurry up a play, otherwise, just as a defensive defenseman McQuaid's solid as-is with significant room to improve.
With his size, strength, positional savvy, and mean streak, I could see McQuaid anchoring a middle pairing at some point in his career, and maybe even serving as a #1B.
Edited by Outsider, 06 January 2013 - 12:27 PM.
#21
Posted 06 January 2013 - 12:34 PM
Well no shit. But when the options are poop, crap and some other stuff that may be shit but may turn out to be gold, you're not exactly choosing from a position of strength. Just basically throwing every option against the wall and I honestly have no idea which one will stick.Bringing in Exelby to replace McQuaid would be like bringing in Colton Orr to replace Shawn Thornton. It works superficially, and that only if you analyze core function, but the player you're replacing is good at a lot more than toughness.
Besides being an excellent fighter, Adam McQuaid is a very, very solid stay at homer who could earn his daily bread in the NHL easily if he never dropped the gloves again.
Edited by kenneycb, 06 January 2013 - 12:34 PM.
#22
Posted 06 January 2013 - 01:07 PM
I would prefer Shane Hnidy to Exelby in particular.
#23
Posted 06 January 2013 - 01:10 PM
#24
Posted 06 January 2013 - 01:14 PM
You know, PK Subban still doesn't have a contract. Just sayin'...
I'd sign him in a cocaine heartbeat.
#25
Posted 06 January 2013 - 01:30 PM
Can you imagine him playing with Chara?
Edited by Outsider, 06 January 2013 - 01:30 PM.
#26
Posted 06 January 2013 - 03:18 PM
#27
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:06 PM
@TSNBobMcKenzie: As of now, subject to usual "could change mind later" qualifiers, TIm Thomas is not interested in ending his self-imposed hockey exile.
#28
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:09 PM
Well hopefully this helps shed some light on the goalie situation.
Yup, it sheds light on the fact that he's still a douchebag. Oh well.
#29
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:09 PM
It is so fucked that he can do this and we are strapped with his cap number.
Edited by SoxScout, 06 January 2013 - 04:10 PM.
#30
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:13 PM
If he doesn't come back / doesn't want to come back are we going to have to amnesty him next summer? (ie his $ is still tied up until he plays another season?)
It is so fucked that he can do this and we are strapped with his cap number.
I thought it was this season where we had to deal with his cap money.
#31
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:19 PM
If he doesn't come back / doesn't want to come back are we going to have to amnesty him next summer? (ie his $ is still tied up until he plays another season?)
It is so fucked that he can do this and we are strapped with his cap number.
No. Contract expires after the season, we just have to deal with him this year.
#32
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:20 PM
#33
Posted 06 January 2013 - 04:23 PM
#34
Posted 07 January 2013 - 08:49 AM
Edited by Outsider, 07 January 2013 - 09:02 AM.
#35
Posted 07 January 2013 - 09:04 AM
#36
Posted 07 January 2013 - 09:04 AM
#37
Posted 07 January 2013 - 09:33 AM
#38
Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:10 PM
#39
Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:39 PM
How set is Khudobin as the #2? Could Svedberg or someone else from Providence steal the job?
I doubt Svedberg is going to be removed from the #1 spot in Providence. He has been sensational down there, and with Khudobin being on a one-way deal this year (iirc), it's a lock Svedberg will stay down there barring injury. Khudobin is a better fit as a backup, considering they will want to continue to develop Svedberg as a potential #1.
#40
Posted 07 January 2013 - 12:49 PM
How set is Khudobin as the #2? Could Svedberg or someone else from Providence steal the job?
Everything I've seen from the two tells me Kudo is better than Svedberg.
That said, it'll be nice having a guy doing as well as Svedberg is doing in the A, to come up when Rask gets hurt. Again.
Edited by Outsider, 07 January 2013 - 12:50 PM.
#41
Posted 09 January 2013 - 12:37 PM
#42
Posted 09 January 2013 - 10:01 PM
#43
Posted 09 January 2013 - 10:04 PM
#44
Posted 09 January 2013 - 10:15 PM
#45
Posted 09 January 2013 - 11:46 PM
#46
Posted 10 January 2013 - 12:19 PM
Spooner needs to put on 10+ pounds. He'd be exposed as a 3rd line winger. He's much better off getting 1st line minutes as a center in the AHL (especially since Bourque will probably get the initial nod making Spooner a healthy scratch). I don't think he projects the same way as Seguin, who can slide over to wing because he has a superior shot. I think Spooner can be a core player in the NHL, but not yet.Ryan spooner definitely deserves a spot. I know Caron is injured but even if he was healthy he still isn't better than spooner.Caron has around 5 points in 30 games this year in the ahl. Compared to Ryan spooners 20 points in 26 games
I'd love to see Warsofsky take McQuaid's spot. He'd add some speed to the back line. Problem is what pairing he'd need to be on. Pairing him and Ference makes for a small pairing.
#47
Posted 10 January 2013 - 12:21 PM
I'd love to see Warsofsky take McQuaid's spot. He'd add some speed to the back line. Problem is what pairing he'd need to be on. Pairing him and Ference makes for a small pairing.
Which side does Warsofsky favor, left or right? It really makes a difference here because it affects whether you might want to play him with Boychuk, or if your only realistic option is Seidenberg.
Edited by Outsider, 10 January 2013 - 12:23 PM.
#48
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:03 PM
Spooner needs to put on 10+ pounds. He'd be exposed as a 3rd line winger. He's much better off getting 1st line minutes as a center in the AHL (especially since Bourque will probably get the initial nod making Spooner a healthy scratch). I don't think he projects the same way as Seguin, who can slide over to wing because he has a superior shot. I think Spooner can be a core player in the NHL, but not yet.
I think Spooner definitely has a shot. He's the closest 'big' prospect not named "Dougie" to landing a full time NHL job. He's got tremendous speed and quickness, but his physical game is certainly lacking. However, given his current competition is Chris Bourque, who is small himself, I think he's got a reasonable chance if he can show a defensive awareness that he hasn't shown previously. His +/- figures in Providence have gotten a lot better lately from what I understand, and feel his game is improving, so I think he's got a solid shot.
Still, you have to think Bourque will get the first shot at that LW spot on the 3rd line given the limited training camp.
#49
Posted 10 January 2013 - 01:49 PM
I only recall seeing him on the left side. Boychuk would be the pairing I think I'd favor.Which side does Warsofsky favor, left or right? It really makes a difference here because it affects whether you might want to play him with Boychuk, or if your only realistic option is Seidenberg.
#50
Posted 10 January 2013 - 02:35 PM
kluedeke29: For those wondering about why no Sauve, Krug, Knight, etc. at BOS camp- told it's more about injuries & getting them healthy than anything
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












