BREAKING: Chip Kelly is close to a deal to become the
Nice hire for the Browns
Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:03 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:11 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:11 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:15 PM
I don't get why anyone would leave a cushy college job for the pros unless they are facing sanctions.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:15 PM
I don't get why anyone would leave a cushy college job for the pros unless they are facing sanctions.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:19 PM
I don't get why anyone would leave a cushy college job for the pros unless they are facing sanctions.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:20 PM
There are millions of reasons why...................all with dead presidents on them.
Edited by E5 Yaz, 04 January 2013 - 06:22 PM.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:25 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:26 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:34 PM
I like the hire. I think Chip's style is a bit of a gamble (assuming he doesn't turn into a turtle in the NFL), which is what the Browns need after all the boring, shitty football their fans have been forced to watch. Could be a colossal bust or a gamechanger.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 06:37 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:04 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:08 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:10 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:10 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:15 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:42 PM
I don't get why anyone would leave a cushy college job for the pros unless they are facing sanctions.
http://deadspin.com/5970235/oregon-football-boosters-are-mad-that-chip-kelly-doesnt-hang-out-with-them
A number of substantial Oregon football boosters, many of whom requested anonymity, expressed a widespread annoyance with Kelly.
"Some of the college boosters have gone as far as to say, ‘I hope he does leave so we can get somebody who appreciates the fans,'" says Jack Roberts, a former Oregon labor commissioner and Oregon alumnus.
Dan Dutton, a booster and former walk-on player at Oregon under Rich Brooks, says: "Fundraising and socializing are not his favorite activities."
Posted 04 January 2013 - 07:48 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:01 PM
Yeah, I can see the boosters being upset with Kelly based on the amount of success and national recognition the school has gotten since Kelly took over.
Nike, BCS Bowls, TV contracts in non traditional markets. The nerve of the guy to be unappreciative by not being overly social.
Wow, Kelly's job is to build and maintain a successful team, not be ringleader for the socialites.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:20 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:26 PM
I hear the whine [sic] from Willamette Valley is pretty good
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:44 PM
They have never had it so good and a huge reason for the success is chastised for spending time with his family rather than the people whose job he makes easy.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:54 PM
I don't get why anyone would leave a cushy college job for the pros unless they are facing sanctions.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 09:07 PM
I'm excited to see what he does in the NFL.
As for the why, if for some reason he fails in the NFL, he'll have his pick of jobs back in NCAA. May as well see if he can hack it now.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 09:14 PM
Don't mind seeing him leave the Pac-12, that's for sure. And while I don't think it'll be as stark as Caroll running from a sinking ship, I think it's inevitable that the Duck program sees some sanctions. There have long been whispers...
Posted 04 January 2013 - 09:20 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 09:46 PM
All the same people who are people claiming his system will never work in the pros are the same old school NFL types who continue to assert "defense wins championships" or "you need a balanced offensive attack." looking forward to what he brings to the nfl
Edited by Darnell's Son, 04 January 2013 - 09:47 PM.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:02 PM
Who's claiming this? From what I've heard, most have been claiming that he's been influencing the NFL and other college offenses for years. Almost anytime the hurry up spread offense comes into a conversation, Chip Kelly is mentioned.
If I'm Kelly, I'm picking a QB, even reaching for him, that can make my offense work. He's got Cribbs and Richardson to completment his offense. If I was an owner in the NFL, I would grab this guy as an Offensive Coordinator first, but the Browns can't be picky. I'm more worried that this shit franchise can't support an expiriment than I am that Chip Kelly can't coach.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:06 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:10 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:17 PM
Edited by Jnai, 04 January 2013 - 10:31 PM.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:18 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:24 PM
If true, have to figure Weeden is gone or Kelly instituting a completely new system. Doesn't seem to be a fit, currently, McCoy a better fit, mobility/rushing-wise, until they can find a true franchise QB with skills more similar to RGIII or Wilson that would be better suited to Kelly's system.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 10:42 PM
If true, have to figure Weeden is gone or Kelly instituting a completely new system.
Posted 04 January 2013 - 11:24 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 11:35 PM
Posted 04 January 2013 - 11:46 PM
Yeah, but you need your QB to be a rushing threat in the spread n shred. Weeden's not going to be that. Weeden was more in the Tom Brady 2007 mold.Well, I would imagine it could be tweaked some, but Weeden did run a spread offense in college that had him in the shotgun most (all?) of the time.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 12:05 AM
I think Mike Sherman is an Algonquin alum but I can't think of many others.I find it interesting that three of the most high profile NCAA coaches are from the Boston area (both Kellys, Chip and Brian and Bill O'Brien). An area that isn't known for football like Texas, Florida or Ohio. Pretty soon all three could be in the NFL at the same time. I can't remember any high profile football coaches from the area other than Wayne Fontes, Steve Spags and Dick Jauron.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 12:30 AM
Not so fast!
Kelly met wih the Bills tonight and is meeting with the Eagles tomorrow per Mort.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 12:43 AM
Posted 05 January 2013 - 01:06 AM
Cleveland would seriously consider drafting Geno Smith I would think.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 03:43 AM
Edited by Papelbon's Poutine, 05 January 2013 - 03:51 AM.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 05:48 AM
There are millions of reasons why...................all with dead presidents on them.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 09:13 AM
Posted 05 January 2013 - 09:45 AM
Tebow!!!Oh, and I think the NFL is in for a show. It may take a few years to find the talent, but if he actually commits to running a spread option, it could be something special.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 09:52 AM
Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton were not US presidents. But they are in fact dead, so nice work there.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 10:51 AM
Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton were not US presidents. But they are in fact dead, so nice work there.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 10:56 AM
Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton were not US presidents. But they are in fact dead, so nice work there.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 11:21 AM
Smith isn't that very athletic and isn't a running QB. CBS predicts Barkley to run a faster 40.
I could see Kelly going after Tajh Boyd or EJ Manuel. Possible Collin Klein.
Said Orr, 77, "Once a reporter called me asking about Johnny (Unitas) taking too many risks with the football. Collin didn't kiss his wife until they were at the altar… Now that's a risk."
Often called the "Tim Tebow of the Midwest," Klein would like to avoid comparisons to the New York Jets quarterback, though he understands the connection.
Edited by DrewDawg, 05 January 2013 - 11:21 AM.
Posted 05 January 2013 - 12:09 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users