Jump to content


Yo! You're not logged in. Why am I seeing this ad?

Photo

Edes: Sox want Swisher if they can't get Hamilton


  • Please log in to reply
153 replies to this topic

#151 drbretto


  • High seas digital pirate


  • 3,715 posts

Posted 03 January 2013 - 08:09 PM

Or we can all just swear a pact to stop posting in it.

#152 Smiling Joe Hesketh


  • now batting steve sal hiney. the leftfielder, hiney


  • 23,325 posts

Posted 03 January 2013 - 08:13 PM

The park factors for Portland in 2012 (http://minorleaguece...com/parkfactors) show:

PF(runs) = 112 (highest in league)
PF(hits) = 106 (highest in league)
PF(doubles) = 119 (highest in league)
PF(home runs) = 105 (fifth highest in league)

And what do you consider cold weather?


I must say I had no idea park factors for the minor leagues were being kept. I thank you for the link.

Cold weather: all the damn Sea Dogs games I went to and froze my man boobs off at this past year.

#153 Edelpeddle

  • 273 posts

Posted 04 January 2013 - 02:32 AM

The park factors for Portland in 2012 (http://minorleaguece...com/parkfactors) show:

PF(runs) = 112 (highest in league)
PF(hits) = 106 (highest in league)
PF(doubles) = 119 (highest in league)
PF(home runs) = 105 (fifth highest in league)

And what do you consider cold weather?


Portland has traditionally been a pretty fair ballpark.

http://www.baseballt...rk_multipliers/

It appears the park factor you provided is for 2011 when Bogaerts was in Single-A.

http://www.baseballt...rk_multipliers/

Edited by Edelpeddle, 04 January 2013 - 02:32 AM.


#154 OttoC


  • Mr. Excel


  • 6,365 posts

Posted 04 January 2013 - 08:55 AM

...
It appears the park factor you provided is for 2011 when Bogaerts was in Single-A.
...


Yeah, I did a Google search for "2012 minor league park factors." That url was the first return and I missed seeing it was for 2011. Incidentally, your source uses runs created instead of runs and I have no idea how much difference that causes.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users